Home Uniform L2-estimates for flat nontrivial line bundles on compact complex manifolds
Article Open Access

Uniform L2-estimates for flat nontrivial line bundles on compact complex manifolds

  • Yoshinori Hashimoto EMAIL logo , Takayuki Koike and Shin-ichi Matsumura
Published/Copyright: March 14, 2025

Abstract

In this study, we extend the uniform L 2 -estimate of ¯ -equations for flat nontrivial line bundles, proved for compact Kähler manifolds by Hashimoto and Koike, to compact complex manifolds. In the proof, by tracing the Dolbeault isomorphism in detail, we derive the desired L 2 -estimate directly from Ueda’s lemma.

MSC 2010: 32W05; 53C07

1 Introduction

This work studies the uniform estimate of the L 2 -norm u of the solution of the ¯ -equation ¯ u = v for flat nontrivial line bundles. We begin by recalling the uniform L 2 -estimate on compact Kähler manifolds proved by the first two authors in [3]. Let X be a compact complex manifold, and let P ( X ) be the set of all unitarily flat (holomorphic) line bundles on X , which can be regarded as an abelian group under the tensor product and is compact with respect to a group-invariant distance d as defined in, e.g., [3, Lemma 2.6] and [8, §4.5] (refer to also [5, §A.3]). It is well-known that P ( X ) is a direct sum of copies of the Picard variety Pic 0 ( X ) (e.g., [3, Lemma 2.2]). We write I X for the trivial line bundle on X , which is the identity in P ( X ) . Then, we have

Theorem 1.1

[3, Theorem 1.1] Let ( X , g ) be a compact Kähler manifold. Then, there exists a constant K > 0 such that, for any element F P ( X ) \ { I X } and any smooth ¯ -closed ( 0 , 1 ) -form v with values in F whose Dolbeault cohomology class [ v ] H 0 , 1 ( X , F ) is trivial, there exists a unique smooth section u of F such that ¯ u = v and

X u h 2 d V g K d ( I X , F ) X v h , g 2 d V g

hold for a flat Hermitian metric h on F.

This result can be regarded as an L 2 -version of Ueda’s lemma. Ueda’s lemma (discussed below) is a foundational result in complex dynamics and complex analysis.

Theorem 1.2

(Ueda’s lemma, [8, Lemma 4]) Let X be a compact complex manifold and U { U j } be a finite open covering of X such that each U j is a Stein open set and U j trivializes any F P ( X ) . Then, there exists a constant K U > 0 such that, for any F P ( X ) \ { I X } and any Čech 0-cochain f { ( U j , f j ) } C ˇ 0 ( U , O X ( F ) ) , the inequality

max j sup U j f j h K U d ( I X , F ) max j , k sup U j k f j k h

holds for a flat Hermitian metric h on F, where { ( U j k , f j k ) } δ f C ˇ 1 ( U , O X ( F ) ) is the Čech coboundary of f .

This can be partially generalized to higher degree cohomology classes, leading to a cohomology vanishing result [3, Theorem 1.2], which seems to be related to the generic vanishing theorem (e.g., [6, §4.4]).

As written in [3, §2.3], Theorem 1.1 implies Theorem 1.2 when X is a compact Kähler manifold. It is natural to speculate that Theorem 1.1 may hold for a compact complex manifold that is not necessarily Kähler. We affirmatively answer this question, as follows.

Theorem 1.3

Theorem 1.1holds for a compact complex manifold ( X , g ) with a Hermitian metric g.

An important distinction from Theorem 1.1 is that the proof of the above theorem crucially depends on Ueda’s lemma (Theorem 1.2). Indeed, Theorem 1.3 is directly derived from Ueda’s lemma. One of the motivations behind Theorem 1.1 was to find a new proof of Ueda’s lemma in such a way that it is more geometric compared to the original argument in [8], which was rather technical. Here we establish a direction that is somewhat contrary to the one discussed in [3], with the merit of being able to extend [3, Theorem 1.1] to general compact complex manifolds.

2 Proof of Theorem 1.3

This section is devoted to the proof of Theorem 1.3. In what follows, we adhere to the notation used in Theorem 1.3 and [3].

Proof of Theorem 1.3

The strategy of the proof is to chase the Dolbeault isomorphism between ¯ -cohomology and Čech cohomology, using the Hörmander’s L 2 -method, which allows us to apply Ueda’s lemma for the δ -equation.

We work with a fixed Hermitian metric g on X , with all norms and volume forms defined with respect to g . We now recall a foundational result by Hörmander (e.g., [2, Chapter VIII, Theorem 6.9], [1, Théorème 4.1], or [4, Theorem 4.4.2]), which guarantees the following: Let U x * be a Stein open neighborhood of a given point x X , and let h = e φ be a singular Hermitian metric on the trivial line bundle with φ psh. Then, for any smooth ( 0 , 1 ) -form v x on U x * such that ¯ v x = 0 and v x L 2 ( U x * ) , h < , there exists a smooth function u x on U x * such that

¯ u x = v x on U x *

with the L 2 estimate

u x L 2 ( U x * ) , h C x , g v x L 2 ( U x * ) , h ,

where the constant C x , g > 0 depends only on U x * and g . Note that the solution of u x can be chosen to be smooth if h = e φ and v x are smooth.

We may assume, without loss of generality and by shrinking each U x * , that U x * trivializes any flat line bundle on X [3, Lemma 2.7]. For each x X , we pick a relatively compact open subset U x * * U x * . We then cover X with the open sets { U x * * } x X , and by the compactness of X , we may select a finite subcover { U x j * * } j I . By setting U j U x j * * and U j U x j * for each j I , we obtain two finite covers { U j } j I and { U j } j I of X . By construction, we can observe that U j are Stein, U j U j , and U j (and thus U j as well) trivializes any flat line bundle on X .

Let F be a flat line bundle endowed with a flat Hermitian metric h , which is unique up to a multiplicative constant (e.g., [3, Lemma 2.4]). Let v be a smooth ¯ -closed ( 0 , 1 ) -form with values in F , whose Dolbeault cohomology class [ v ] H 0 , 1 ( X , F ) is trivial. In what follows, all norms are with respect to the fixed flat Hermitian metric h on F and the fixed Hermitian metric g on X . By applying Hörmander’s estimates and trivializing F equipped with the metric h , we find that for each j I , there exists a smooth function u j on U j such that

(1) ¯ u j = v U j and u j L 2 ( U j ) , h C j , g ( 1 ) v L 2 ( U j ) , h

for a constant C j , g ( 1 ) > 0 , which depends only on U j and g . The key point of this estimate is that it holds uniformly for all flat line bundles ( F , h ) and for all v representing a trivial Dolbeault class in H 0 , 1 ( X , F ) .

We then find that { u i u j } i , j I defines a holomorphic section of F on U i j U i U j . The isomorphism between Čech cohomology and Dolbeault cohomology implies that { u i u j } i , j I represents the Čech cohomology class corresponding to [ v ] . Since [ v ] is trivial, we find that { u i u j } i , j I is a Čech 1-coboundary (after replacing U x * with a smaller polydisk if necessary), meaning that there exist local holomorphic sections { f j } j I of F such that

f i f j = u i u j

on U i j for all i , j I . We take a partition of unity { ρ j } j I subordinate to { U j } j I . The equation f i f j = u i u j on U i j for all i , j I then implies

j I ρ j ( u i u j ) = j I ρ j ( f i f j )

on U i . Taking the ¯ -operator of both sides, we have

¯ u i ¯ j I ρ j u j = ¯ j I ρ j f j

on U i , as j I ρ j 1 . Since ¯ u i = v U i , we obtain

v U i = ¯ j I ρ j ( u j f j ) U i .

Noting that j I ρ j ( u j f j ) is defined globally on X , we have

v = ¯ j I ρ j ( u j f j ) ,

and hence, u j I ρ j ( u j f j ) gives the solution to the equation ¯ u = v , which is necessarily unique since F is flat and nontrivial (a well-known result, refer to, e.g., [3, Lemma 2.3] for the proof).

The argument above (except for the uniqueness of solutions) is valid for any ( 0 , q ) -forms v with values in F ( h ) , where h is a singular Hermitian metric on F with positive curvature current (refer to [7, Subsection 5.3] for details). In the following discussion, we essentially use the flatness property.

We apply Ueda’s lemma (Theorem 1.2) to the Čech 0-cochain f { ( U j , f j U j ) } corresponding to the smaller cover U { U j } j I , to obtain

(2) max j I sup U j f j h K U d ( I X , F ) max j , k I sup U j k f j k h

uniformly for all F P ( X ) \ { I X } , for some constant K U > 0 . Note that we have

(3) f j L 2 ( U j ) Vol ( U j ) 1 2 max j I sup U j f j h

for each j I , and

max j , k I sup U j k f j k h = max j , k I sup U j k f j f k h = max j , k I sup U j k u j u k h ,

since u j u k = f j f k . Consider a weight φ j of h on U j such that h = e φ j . Since φ j is pluriharmonic, there exists a holomorphic function w j on U j such that φ j is the real part of w j , which implies that h = e φ j = e w j . Given that ( u j u k ) e w j is holomorphic on U j k (which contains U j k ), we have

sup U j k u j u k h C j , g ( 2 ) u j u k L 2 ( U j k ) , h 2 C j , g ( 2 ) u j L 2 ( U j k ) , h

for some constant C j , g ( 2 ) > 0 , depending only on U j , U j , and g , by the mean value inequality and the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Hence,

(4) max j , k I sup U j k f j k h = max j , k I sup U j k u j u k h 2 max j , k I C j , g ( 2 ) u j L 2 ( U j k ) , h 2 max j I C j , g ( 2 ) u j L 2 ( U j ) , h 2 max j I C j , g ( 2 ) C j , g ( 1 ) v L 2 ( U j ) , h C g ( 3 ) v L 2 ( X ) , h

by the Hörmander estimate (1) on U j , where we set C g ( 3 ) 2 max j C j , g ( 2 ) C j , g ( 1 ) > 0 . With (2) and (3), the estimate (4) gives

(5) f j L 2 ( U j ) , h k I f k L 2 ( U k ) , h K U C g ( 3 ) d ( I X , F ) k I Vol ( U k ) 1 2 v L 2 ( X ) , h

for any j I .

We now recall u = j I ρ j ( u j f j ) and evaluate

u L 2 ( X ) , h C g ( 4 ) j I ( u j L 2 ( U j ) , h + f j L 2 ( U j ) , h ) C g ( 4 ) j I ( C j , g ( 1 ) v L 2 ( X ) , h + f j L 2 ( U j ) , h )

again by the Hörmander estimate (1) on U j , where C g ( 4 ) > 0 is a constant, which depends only on g . Combined with (5), we thus obtain

u L 2 ( X ) , h C g ( 4 ) d ( I X , F ) j I C j , g ( 1 ) d ( I X , F ) + K U C g ( 3 ) k I Vol ( U k ) 1 2 v L 2 ( X ) , h .

Noting that sup F P ( X ) d ( I X , F ) is finite and I is a finite set, we obtain the required estimate.□



Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the organizers of the 7th workshop “Complex Geometry and Lie Groups,” which served as an impetus for this collaboration. Yoshinori Hashimoto thanks Osamu Fujino, Hisashi Kasuya, and Shinnosuke Okawa for helpful discussions.

  1. Funding information: Yoshinori Hashimoto is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 23K03120 and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 24K00524. Takayuki Koike is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) 23K03119. Shin-ichi Matsumura is supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 21H00976 and JST FOREST Program, JPMJFR2368.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and consented to its submission to the journal, reviewed all the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors contributed equally to this work.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

[1] J.-P. Demailly, Estimations L2 pour laopérateur ∂¯ daun fibré vectoriel holomorphe semi-positif au-dessus daune variété kählérienne complète, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 15 (1982), no. 3, 457–511, DOI: https://doi.org/10.24033/asens.1434. 10.24033/asens.1434Search in Google Scholar

[2] J.-P. Demailly, Complex Analytic and Differential Geometry, 2012. Accessed: March 5, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/∼demailly/manuscripts/agbook.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Y. Hashimoto and T. Koike, Ueda’s lemma via uniform Hörmander estimates for flat line bundles, Kyoto J. Math. (2022). https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.01360.Search in Google Scholar

[4] L. Hörmander, An introduction to complex analysis in several variables, 3rd ed., North-Holland Mathematical Library, vol. 7, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1990. Search in Google Scholar

[5] T. Koike and T. Uehara, A gluing construction of projective K3 surfaces, Épijournal Géom. Algébrique. 6 (2022), Art. 12, 15 pp. https://doi.org/10.46298/epiga.2022.volume6.8504.10.46298/epiga.2022.volume6.8504Search in Google Scholar

[6] R. Lazarsfeld, Positivity in algebraic geometry. I, Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], vol. 48, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004, Classical setting: line bundles and linear series. Search in Google Scholar

[7] S. Matsumura, An injectivity theorem with multiplier ideal sheaves of singular metrics with transcendental singularities, J. Algebraic Geom. 27 (2018), no. 2, 305–337, DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1308.2033.10.1090/jag/687Search in Google Scholar

[8] T. Ueda, On the neighborhood of a compact complex curve with topologically trivial normal bundle, J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 22 (1982/83), no. 4, 583–607, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/kjm/1250521670. 10.1215/kjm/1250521670Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2024-09-11
Accepted: 2025-01-29
Published Online: 2025-03-14

© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 26.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/coma-2024-0009/html
Scroll to top button