Diagramming discursive intentionality—A cognitive-pragmatic model of intentional verbs

References

Allen, Colin & Marc Bekoff. 1999. Species of mind: The philosophy and biology of cognitive ethology. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Allen, Colin & Marc Bekoff (eds.). 2002. The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspecitves on animal cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Anscombe, G. Elizabeth M. 1981. The intentionality of sensation: A grammatical feature. In G. Elizabeth M. Anscombe (ed.), The collected philosophical papers of G. E. M. Anscombe, volume 2: Metaphysics and the philosophy of mind, 3–20. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Babb, Matthew. 2016. The essential indexicality of intentional action. The Philosophical Quarterly 66(264). 439–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqw023.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Jonathan. 1976. Linguistic behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benoist, Jocelyn. 2005. Seeking and finding: Intentionality as an internal and an external relation. Synthesis Philosophica 40(2). 327–338.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 1994. Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 2001. Articulating reasons: An introduction to inferentialism. Cambridge and London: Cambridge University Press.10.4159/9780674028739Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 2002. Pragmatics and pragmatisms. In James Conant & Urszula M. Zeglen (eds.), Hilary Putnam: Pragmatism and realism, 40–58. London and New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 2008. Between saying and doing: Towards an analytic pragmatism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199542871.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 2009. Reason in philosophy: Animating ideas. Cambridge and London. Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674053618Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 2011. Perspectives on pragmatism: Classical, recent, and contemporary. Cambrdige and London: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1nzfgwdSearch in Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 2014. Intentionality and language. In Nick J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman & Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic anthropology, 347–363. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139342872.017Search in Google Scholar

Brandom, Robert B. 2014a. From empiricism to expressivism: Brandom reads Sellars. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674735569Search in Google Scholar

Brandt, Per Aage. 2004. The semantics of diagrams. In Per Aage Brandt (ed.), Spaces, domains, and meaning: Essays in cognitive semiotics, 87–102. Bern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Castañeda, Hector-Neri. 1967. Indicators and quasi-indicators. American philosophical journal 4. 85–100.Search in Google Scholar

Ciecierski, Tadeusz. 2016. Linguistic criteria of intentionality. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 46(59). 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2016-0032.Search in Google Scholar

Danón, Laura. 2019. Neo-pragmatism, primitive intentionality, and animal minds. Philosophia 47(1). 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-9963-z.Search in Google Scholar

Deacon, Terrence W. 1997. The symbolic species: The co-evolution of language and the brain. New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2007. Intentionality and semiotics: A story of mutual fecundation. Scranton and London: University of Scranton Press.Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2009. Purely objective reality. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781934078099Search in Google Scholar

Deely, John. 2015. From semiosis to semioethics. In Peter P. Trifonas (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 772–789. Dortrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-017-9404-6_36Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel C. 1971. Intentional systems. Journal of philosophy 68. 87–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/2025382.Search in Google Scholar

Dennett, Daniel C. 1987. The intentional stance. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Descombes, Vincent. 2001. The mind’s provisions: A critique of cognitivism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400832484Search in Google Scholar

Descombes, Vincent. 2014. The institutions of meaning: A defense of anthropological holism. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674419971Search in Google Scholar

Donald, Merlin. 1991. Origins of the modern minds: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fodor, Jerry A. 2008. LOT 2: The language of thought revisited. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199548774.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter. 2000. Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2076.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Gärdenfors, Peter. 2014. Geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9629.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Geach, Peter. 1957. Mental acts: Their content and their objects. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gruber, Helmut & Gisela Redeker (eds.). 2014. The pragmatics of discourse coherence: Theories and applications. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.254Search in Google Scholar

Grüne, Stefanie. 2011. Brandom über Kants Konzeption der Intentionalität. In Christian Barth & Holger Sturm (eds.), Robert Brandoms expressive Vernunft: Historische und systematische Untersuchungen, 91–115. Paderborn: Mentis.10.30965/9783957439451_006Search in Google Scholar

Harendarski, Ulf. 2014. Zum Zeichenbegriff in Brandom’s Expressiver Vernunft. Zeitschrift für Semiotik 36(3–4). 15–48.10.14464/zsem.v36i3-4.403Search in Google Scholar

Haugeland, Jhn. 1990. The intentionality all-stars. Philosophical Perspectives 4. 383–427. https://doi.org/10.2307/2214199.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmeyer, Jesper. 2012. The natural history of intentionality: A biosemiotc approach. In Theresa Schilhab, Frederik Stjernfelt & Terrence Deacon (eds.), The symbolic species evolved, 97–116. Dortrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2336-8_6Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, Daniel D. & Glenda L. Satne. 2015. The natural origins of content. Philosophia 43(3). 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9644-0.Search in Google Scholar

Hutto, Daniel D. & Erik Myin. 2017. Evolving enactivism: Basic minds meet content. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262036115.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jacob, Pierre. 1997. What minds can do: Intentionality in a non-intentional world. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511583315Search in Google Scholar

Jankovic, Mariia & Kirk Ludwig (eds.). 2017. The Routledge handbook of collective intentionality. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315768571Search in Google Scholar

Keeler, Mary. 2004. Using Brandom’s framework to do Peirce’s normative science: Pragmatism as the game of harmonizing assertions? In Karl E. Wolff, Heather D. Pfeiffer & Harry S. Delugach (eds.), Conceptual structures at work, 242–260. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-27769-9_16Search in Google Scholar

Knell, Sebastian. 2004. Propositionaler Gehalt und diskursive Kontoführung: Eine Untersuchung zur Begründung der Sprachabhängigkeit intentionaler Zustände bei Brandom. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Knell, Sebastian. 2005. A deflationist theory of intentionality? Brandom’s analysis of de re specifying attitude-ascriptions. In Pirmin Stekeler-Weithofer (ed.), The pragmatics of making it explicit, 65–81. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.15.06kneSearch in Google Scholar

Krämer, Sybille and Christina Ljungberg (eds.). 2016. Thinking with diagrams: The semiotic basis of human cognition. Boston and Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9781501503757Search in Google Scholar

Johansen, Jørgen D. & Svend E. Larsen. 2005. Signs in use: An introduction to semiotics. London and New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203994146Search in Google Scholar

Lauer, David. 2009. Genuine normativity, expressive bootstrapping, and normative phenomenology. Ethics and Politics XI(1). 321–350.Search in Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean-François. 1988. The differend: Phrases in dispute. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Moltmann, Friederike. 2008. Intensional verbs and their intentional objects. Natural Language Semantics 16(3). 239–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-008-9031-5.Search in Google Scholar

Moltmann, Friederike. 2015. Quantification with intentional verbs and with intensional verbs. In Alessandro Torza (ed.), Quantifiers, quantifiers, and quantifiers: Themes in logic, metaphysics, and language, 141–168. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-18362-6_8Search in Google Scholar

Okrent, Mark. 2007. Rational animals: The teleologial roots of intentionality. Athens: Ohio University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pape, Helmut. 2002. Pragmatism and the normativity of assertion. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society 28(4). 521–542.Search in Google Scholar

Parker, Kelly A. 1998. The continuity of Peirce’s thought: From the sixties to the Greensboro Massacre. Nashville: Vanderbuilt University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Peregrin, Jaroslav. 2001. Meaning and structure: Structuralism of (post)analytic philosophers. Aldershot: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Peregrin, Jaroslav. 2014. Inferentialism: Why rules matter. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan.10.1057/9781137452962Search in Google Scholar

Perry, John. 1979. The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs 24(5). 723–734.10.1075/aicr.30.10perSearch in Google Scholar

Plümacher, Martina. 2004. Dealing with the diversity of sign systems in human culture. In Marcel Bax, Barend van Heusden & Wolfgang Wildgen (eds.), Semiotic evolution and the dynamics of culture, 89–101. Vern: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Prien, Bernd & David P. Schweikard (eds.). 2008. Robert Brandom: Analytic pragmatist. Frankfurt: Ontos.10.1515/9783110326246Search in Google Scholar

Rowlands, Marc. 2015. Hard problems of intentionaliy. Philosophia 43(3). 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-015-9626-2.Search in Google Scholar

Russell, Bertrand. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14(56). 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/xiv.4.479.Search in Google Scholar

Schiffer, Stephen R. 1972. Meaning. Oxford: Claredon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John R. 1983. Intentionality: An essay in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173452Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid. 2007. Some reflections on languagen games. In Kevin Scharp & Robert B. Brandom (eds.), In the space of reason: Selected essays of Wilfrid Sellars, 28–56. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Short, Thomas L. 1981. Semeiosis and intentionality. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 17(3). 197–223.Search in Google Scholar

Short, Thomas L. 2007. Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498350Search in Google Scholar

Smith, David W. 1999. Intentionality naturalized?. In Jean Petitot, Francisco J. Varela, Bernard Pachoud & Jean-Michel Roy (eds.), Naturalizing phenomenology: Issues in contemporary phenomenology and cognitive science, 83–110. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165327.010Search in Google Scholar

Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5/6). 701–721.10.1023/A:1020867916902Search in Google Scholar

Stekeler-Weithofer, Pirmin (ed.). 2008. The pragmatics of making it explicit. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/bct.15Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5652-9Search in Google Scholar

Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2014. Natural propositions: The actuality of peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Boston: Docent Press.10.1007/s11229-014-0406-5Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of human communication. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7551.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael. 2014. A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674726369Search in Google Scholar

Tomasello, Michael & Josep Call (eds.). 1997. Primate cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195106237.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486500Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, Bernhard & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.). 2010. Reading Brandom: On making it explicit. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203851784Search in Google Scholar

West, Donna E. 2013. Deictic imaginings: Semiosis at work and at play. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-39443-0Search in Google Scholar

West, Donna E. 2015. The primacy of index in naming paradigms, part II. Respectus philologicus 28(33). 11–21. https://doi.org/10.15388/respectus.2015.28.33.1.Search in Google Scholar

West, Donna E. 2018. Deely’s extension of Peirce’s thirdness: Pregenerativity. The American Journal of Semiotics 34(1–2). 39–64. https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs201841835.Search in Google Scholar

Zlavev, Jordan. 2016. Turning back to experience in cognitive linguistics via phenomenology. Cognitive linguistcs 27(4). 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0057.Search in Google Scholar