Lifespan change in grammaticalisation as frequency-sensitive automation: William Faulkner and the let alone construction

References

Alexander, Marc & Mark Davies. 2015–. Hansard corpus 1803–2005. Available online at<http://www.hansard-corpus.org>.Search in Google Scholar

Altmann, Eduardo G., Janet B. Pierrehumbert & Adilson E. Motter. 2009. Beyond word frequency: Bursts, lulls, and scaling in the temporal distributions of words. PloS One 4(11). e7678. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007678.Search in Google Scholar

Andersen, Henning. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language 49(4). 765–793.10.2307/412063Search in Google Scholar

Anthonissen, Lynn. this volume. Cognition in construction grammar: Connecting individual and community grammars. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2).10.1515/cog-2019-0023Search in Google Scholar

Anthonissen, Lynn & Peter Petré. 2019. Grammaticalization and the linguistic individual: New avenues in lifespan research. Linguistics Vanguard 5(2). 1–12.10.1515/lingvan-2018-0037Search in Google Scholar

Anthony, Laurence. 2014. AntConc. version 3.4.3. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University.<http://www.laurenceanthony.net/>.Search in Google Scholar

Arppe, Antti, Gaëtanelle Gilquin, Dylan Glynn, Martin Hilpert & Arne Zeschel. 2010. Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5(1). 1–27.10.3366/cor.2010.0001Search in Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael. 2013. Individual differences and usage-based grammar. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4). 443–478.10.1075/ijcl.18.4.01barSearch in Google Scholar

Barlow, Michael & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CLSI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Blumenthal-Dramé, Alice. 2012. Entrenchment in usage-based theories: What corpus data do and do not reveal about the mind. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110294002Search in Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2015. Exploring linguistic malleability across the life span: Age-specific patterns in quotative use. Language in Society 44(3). 457–496.10.1017/S0047404515000391Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2003a. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, vol. 2. 145–167. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2003b. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756393.ch19Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511750526Search in Google Scholar

Cappelle, Bert, Edwige Dugas & Vera Tobin. 2015. An afterthought on let alone. Journal of Pragmatics 80. 70–85.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2008. The effects of frequency and neighbourhood density on adult speakers’ productivity with Polish case inflections: An empirical test of usage-based approaches to morphology. Journal of Memory and Language 58. 931–951.10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.005Search in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2015. Individual differences in grammatical knowledge. In Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics, 650–668. Boston: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110292022-033Search in Google Scholar

Davies, Mark. 2010–. The corpus of historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009. Available online at<http://corpus.byu.edu/coha/>.Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. 2016. How gradual change progresses: The interaction between convention and innovation. Language Variation and Change 28. 83–102.10.1017/S0954394515000186Search in Google Scholar

De Smet, Hendrik. this volume. What predicts productivity? Theory meets individuals. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2).10.1515/cog-2019-0026Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2012. Language change and language acquisition. In Alexander Bergs & Laurel Brinton (eds.), Historical linguistics of English: An international handbook, vol. 2. 1599–1613. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110251609.1599Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2017. Usage-based linguistics. In Mark Aronoff (ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics, New York: Oxford University Press. http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-363?rskey=ivWwgv&result=2 (accessed 12 December 2017).10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.363Search in Google Scholar

Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Text Creation Partnership. Available online at<https://www.textcreationpartnership.org/tcp-ecco/>.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity on grammatical constructions: The case of. Let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.10.2307/414531Search in Google Scholar

Gerstenberg, Annette & Anja Voeste (eds.). 2015. Language development: The lifespan perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/impact.37Search in Google Scholar

Givón, Talmy. 1989. Mind, code and context: Essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Gries, Stefan Th. 2008. Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4). 403–437.10.1075/ijcl.13.4.02griSearch in Google Scholar

Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization, 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.109.07haiSearch in Google Scholar

Harder, Peter & Kaspar Boye. 2011. Grammaticalization and corpus linguistics. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 56–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0005Search in Google Scholar

Harmon, Zara & Vsevolod Kapatsinski. 2017. Putting old tools to novel uses: The role of form accessibility in semantic extension. Cognitive Psychology 98. 22–44.10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37(6). 1043–1068.10.1515/ling.37.6.1043Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 49), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.49.08heiSearch in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin. 2017. Frequencies in diachronic corpora and knowledge of language. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 49–68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316091746.003Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin & David Correia Saavedra. 2017. Why are grammatical elements more evenly dispersed than lexical elements? Assessing the roles of frequency and semantic generality. Corpora 12(3). 369–392.10.3366/cor.2017.0125Search in Google Scholar

Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds.), What makes Grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components (Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 158). 21–42. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197440Search in Google Scholar

Hinrichs, Erhard W., Marie Hinrichs & Thomas Zastrow. 2010. Weblicht: Web-based LRT services for German. In Proceedings of the ACL 2010 System Demonstrations, Uppsala, 13 July 2010, 25–29. Association for Computational Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2004. Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? On the limits of corpus data – and the importance of intuition. In Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 171–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.13.09hofSearch in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. 1. 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hopSearch in Google Scholar

Huber, Magnus, Magnus Nissel & Karin Puga. 2016. Old Bailey Corpus 2.0. hdl:11858/00-246C-0000-0023-8CFB-2.Search in Google Scholar

Ibbotson, Paul. 2013. The scope of usage-based theory. Frontiers in Psychology 4. 1–15.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00255Search in Google Scholar

Krug, Manfred G. 2000. Emerging English modals: A corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110820980Search in Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change, vol. I: Internal factors. Blackwell: Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Lambert, Wallace E. & Leon A. Jakobovits. 1960. Verbal satiation and changes in the intensity of meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 60(6). 376–383.10.1037/h0045624Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 2017. Grammaticalization and automation. In Martin Eberl, Sara Ingrosso, Enkhmaa Narmandakh, Sebastian Ortner, Katharina Scholtz & Aleksander Wiatr (eds.), Grammatikalisierung in interdisziplinärer Perspektive, (JournaLIPP 5). 33–48. München: LIPP.<https://lipp.ub.uni-muenchen.de/lipp/article/view/4853>.Search in Google Scholar

let, v.1. OED Online. Oxford University Press.<http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/107496?rskey=OkBqr5&result=4&isAdvanced=false>. (December 2018).Search in Google Scholar

Mair, Christian. 2011. Grammaticalization and corpus linguistics. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 239–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0019Search in Google Scholar

Moors, Agnes. 2016. Automaticity: Componential, causal, and mechanistic explanations. Annual Review of Psychology 67. 263–287.10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033550Search in Google Scholar

Neels, Jakob. 2015. The history of the quasi-auxiliary use(d) to: A usage-based account. Journal of Historical Linguistics 5(2). 177–234.10.1075/jhl.5.2.01neeSearch in Google Scholar

Neels, Jakob. 2020. Refining frequency-effect explanations of grammaticalisation. Leipzig: Leipzig University dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg & Mannila Heikki. 2011. The diffusion of language change in real time: Progressive and conservative individuals and the time depth of change. Language Variation and Change 23. 1–43.10.1017/S0954394510000207Search in Google Scholar

Perek, Florent. 2015. Argument structure in usage-based construction grammar: Experimental and corpus-based perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.17Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter. 2016. Unidirectionality as a cycle of convention and innovation: Micro-changes in the grammaticalization of [be going to INF]. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30(1). 115–146.10.1075/bjl.30.06petSearch in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter. 2017. The extravagant progressive: An experimental corpus study on the history of emphatic [be Ving]. English Language and Linguistics 21(2). 227–250.10.1017/S1360674317000107Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter & Lynn Anthonissen. this volume. Individuality in complex systems: A constructionist approach. Cognitive Linguistics 31(2).10.1515/cog-2019-0033Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter, Lynn Anthonissen, Sara Budts, Enrique Manjavacas, Emma-Louise Silva, William Standing & Odile A. O. Strik. 2019. Early modern multiloquent authors (EMMA): Designing a large-scale corpus of individuals’ languages. ICAME Journal 43(1). 83–122.10.2478/icame-2019-0004Search in Google Scholar

Petré, Peter & Freek Van de Velde. 2018. The real-time dynamics of the individual and the community in grammaticalization. Language 94(4). 867–901.10.1353/lan.2018.0056Search in Google Scholar

Pfänder, Stefan & Heike Behrens. 2016. Experience counts: An introduction to frequency effects in language. In Heike Behrens & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Experience counts: frequency effects in language acquisition, language change, and language processing, 2–20. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110346916-002Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, Martin J. & Simon C. Garrod. 2017. Priming and language change. In Marianne Hundt, Sandra Mollin & Simone Pfenninger (eds.), The changing English language: Psycholinguistic perspectives, 173–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316091746.008Search in Google Scholar

Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 2012. Burstiness of verbs and derived nouns. In Diana Santos, Krister Lindén & Wanjiku Ng’ang’a (eds.), Shall we play the festschrift game? Essays on the occasion of Lauri Carlson’s 60th birthday, 99–116. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-30773-7_8Search in Google Scholar

Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena & Arja Nurmi. 2011. Grammaticalization and language change in the individual. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 251–262. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0020Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: a minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486326Search in Google Scholar

Sawada, Osamu. 2003. Rethinking the let alone construction: What are its construction-specific characteristics? Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 7(1). 135–151.Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2010. Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? In Dylan Glynn & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Quantitative methods in cognitive semantics, 101–134. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110226423.101Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2015. A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. In Peter Uhrig & Thomas Herbst (eds.), Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 3, 1–27. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/gcla-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Hans-Jörg & Annette Mantlik. 2015. Entrenchment in historical corpora? Reconstructing dead authors’ minds from their usage profiles. Anglia 133(4). 583–623.10.1515/ang-2015-0056Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Walter & Jason M. Chein. 2003. Controlled and automatic processing: Behavior, theory, and biological mechanisms. Cognitive Science 27. 525–559.10.1207/s15516709cog2703_8Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, Walter & Richard M. Shiffrin. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing I: Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 84. 1–66.10.1037/0033-295X.84.1.1Search in Google Scholar

Spevack, Marvin. 1968–80. A complete and systematic concordance to the works of Shakespeare. vol. 9. Hildesheim: Olms.Search in Google Scholar

Toosarvandani, Maziar. 2009. The relevance of focus: The case of let alone reopened. In María Biezma & Jesse Harri (eds.), UMOP 39: Papers in pragmatics, 105–123. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Verveckken, Katrien. 2012. Towards a constructional account of high and low frequency binominal quantifiers in Spanish. Cognitive Linguistics 23. 421–478.10.1515/cog-2012-0013Search in Google Scholar

Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zipf, George K. 1949. Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.Search in Google Scholar