Home Hands and faces: The expression of modality in ZEI, Iranian Sign Language
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Hands and faces: The expression of modality in ZEI, Iranian Sign Language

  • Sara Siyavoshi EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 3, 2019

Abstract

This paper presents a study of modality in Iranian Sign Language (ZEI) from a cognitive perspective, aimed at analyzing two linguistic channels: facial and manual. While facial markers and their grammatical functions have been studied in some sign languages, we have few detailed analyses of the facial channel in comparison with the manual channel in conveying modal concepts. This study focuses on the interaction between manual and facial markers. A description of manual modal signs is offered. Three facial markers and their modality values are also examined: squinted eyes, brow furrow, and downward movement of lip corners (horseshoe mouth). In addition to offering this first descriptive analysis of modality in ZEI, this paper also applies the Cognitive Grammar model of modality, the Control Cycle, and the Reality Model, classifying modals into two kinds, effective and epistemic. It is suggested that effective control, including effective modality, tends to be expressed on the hands, while facial markers play an important role in marking epistemic assessment, one manifestation of which is epistemic modality. ZEI, like some other sign languages, exhibits an asymmetry between the number of manual signs and facial markers expressing epistemic modality: while the face can be active in the expression of effective modality, it is commonly the only means of expressing epistemic modality. By positing an epistemic core in effective modality, Cognitive Grammar provides a theoretical basis for these findings.

Acknowledgements

I wish to offer special thanks to Dr. Sherman Wilcox for his support and for his insightful comments on this study. I also gratefully thank Dr. Laura Hirrel for reviewing the first draft of this paper and the deaf signers for participating in this study: Ali Faridi, Ardavan Guity, Mehdi Khorasani, and Tuba Pourzard.

References

Bitti, Pio E., Luisa Bonfiglioli Ricci, Paolo Melani, Roberto Caterina & Pierluigi Garotti. 2014. Expression and communication of doubt/uncertainty through facial expression. Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education 9(1). 159–177.Search in Google Scholar

Borodulina, Darija. 2012. Means of expressing the possibility and necessity in Russian Sign Language. Bulletin of Tomsk State Pedagogical University 1. 92–95.Search in Google Scholar

Brisard, Frank. 2006. Logic, subjectivity, and the semantics/pragmatics distinction. In Angeliki Athanasiadou, Costas Canakis & Bert Cornillie (eds.), Subjectification: Various paths to subjectivity, 41–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Cabeza-Pereiro, Carmen. 2013. Modality and linguistic change in Spanish Sign Language (LSE). Obligation and epistemic necessity from the Fernández Villabrille dictionary (1851) to the DNLSE (2008). CogniTextes. Revue de l’Association française de linguistique cognitive 10. https://cognitextes.revues.org/642.Search in Google Scholar

Chovil, Nicole. 1989. Communicative functions of facial displays in conversation. British Columbia: University of Victoria Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Chovil, Nicole. 1991. Discourse-oriented facial displays in conversation. Research on Language & Social Interaction 25(1–4). 163–194.10.1080/08351819109389361Search in Google Scholar

Debras, Camille. 2017. The shrug, forms and meanings of a compound enactment. Gesture 16(1). 1–34.10.1075/gest.16.1.01debSearch in Google Scholar

Ekman, Paul. 1985. Telling lies. New York: Berkley Books.Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira Brito, Lucinda. 1990. Epistemic, alethic, and deontic modalities in a Brazilian Sign Language. Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research 1. 229–260.Search in Google Scholar

Gianfreda, Gabriele, Virginia Volterra & Andrzej Zuczkowski. 2014. L’espressione dell’incertezza nella Lingua dei Segni Italiana (LIS). Ricerche di Pedagogia e Didattica. Journal of Theories and Research in Education 9(1). 199–234.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael & Alexander Kirkwood. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: Edward Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Herrero-Blanco, Ángel & Ventura Salazar-García. 2010. The expression of modality in Spanish Sign Language. Web Papers in Functional Discourse Grammar (WP-FDG) 83. 19–42.Search in Google Scholar

Herrmann, Anika. 2007. The expression of modal meaning in German Sign Language and Irish Sign Language. Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 188. 245.10.1515/9783110198850.245Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Ding Hau, Wen Ko Chiou, Bi Hui Chen & Yi-Lang Chen. 2017. The design features of pictorial face design for facilitating exertion perception. In Kelly S. Hale & Kay M. Stanney (eds.), Advances in neuroergonomics and cognitive engineering, 405–412. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-41691-5_34Search in Google Scholar

Iglesias Lago, Silvia. 2006. Uso del componente facial para la expresión de la modalidad en Lengua de Signos Española. Vigo: University of Vigo PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Janzen, Terry & Barbara Shaffer. 2002. Gesture as the substrate in the process of ASL grammaticization. Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages. 199–223.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486777.010Search in Google Scholar

Janzen, Terry, Barbara Shaffer & Sherman Wilcox. 2000. Signed language pragmatics. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of pragmatics, 1–20. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Johnston, Trevor A. & Adam Schembri. 2007. Australian sign language (Auslan): An introduction to sign language linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511607479Search in Google Scholar

Kratzer, Angelika. 1978. Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie, Modalwörter, Konditionalsätze. Königstein, Germany: Scriptor.Search in Google Scholar

Kyle, James G. & Bencie Woll. 1985. Sign language: The study of deaf people and their language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lackner, Andrea. 2017. Functions of head and body movements in Austrian Sign Language, 171–196. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781501507779-195Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12. 143–188.10.1515/cogl.12.2.143Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2013. Modals: Striving for control. English modality: Core, periphery and evidentiality. 3–55. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110286328.3Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2016. Baseline and elaboration. Cognitive Linguistics 27(3). 405–439.10.1163/9789004347472_007Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2017. Evidentiality in cognitive grammar. Evidentiality Revisited: Cognitive Grammar, Functional and Discourse-pragmatic Perspectives 271. 13.10.1075/pbns.271.02lanSearch in Google Scholar

McKee, Rachel Locker & Sophia Wallingford. 2011. ‘So, well, whatever’: Discourse functions of palm-up in New Zealand Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 14(2). 213–247.10.1075/sll.14.2.01mckSearch in Google Scholar

Meir, Irit & Wendy Sandler. 2008. A language in space: The story of Israeli Sign Language. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Oster, Harriet. 1982. Pouts and horseshoe-mouth faces: Their determinants, affective meaning and signal value in infants. Paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Austin, TX, April.Search in Google Scholar

Oster, Harriet. 2005. The repertoire of infant facial expressions: An ontogenetic perspective. Emotional development. 261–292. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528845.003.0010Search in Google Scholar

Oster, Harriet & Paul Ekman. 1978. Facial behavior in child development. Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology 11. 231–276.Search in Google Scholar

Oster, Harriet, Douglas Hegley & Linda Nagel. 1992. Adult judgments and fine-grained analysis of infant facial expressions: Testing the validity of a priori coding formulas. Developmental Psychology 28(6). 1115.10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1115Search in Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland & Josep F. Quer Villanueva. 2007. On the syntax of negation and modals in German Sign Language (DGS) and Catalan Sign Language (LSC). Trends in linguistics, studies and monographs. 129–162. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110198850.129Search in Google Scholar

Rejeski, Walter J. & Charles A. Lowe. 1980. Nonverbal expression of effort as causally relevant information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6(3). 436–440.10.1177/014616728063017Search in Google Scholar

Sandler, Wendy, Irit Meir, Svetlana Dachkovsky, Carol Padden & Mark Aronoff. 2011. The emergence of complexity in prosody and syntax. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue Internationale De Linguistique Generale 121(13). 2014.10.1016/j.lingua.2011.05.007Search in Google Scholar

Shaffer, Barbara. 2002. CAN’T: The negation of modal notions in ASL. Sign Language Studies 3. 34–53.10.1353/sls.2002.0026Search in Google Scholar

Shaffer, Barbara. 2004. Information ordering and speaker subjectivity: Modality in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15. 175–195.10.1515/cogl.2004.007Search in Google Scholar

Shaffer, Barbara & Terry Janzen. 2016. Modality and mood in American Sign Language. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of mood and modality, 448–469. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.17Search in Google Scholar

Shaffer, Barbara, Maria-Josep Jarque & Sherman Wilcox. 2011. The expression of modality: Conversational data from two signed languages. In M. T. Nogueira & M. F. V. Lopes (eds.), Modo e modalidade: Gramática, discurso e interação, 11–39. Fortaleza: Edições UFC.Search in Google Scholar

Siyavoshi, Sara. 2019. The expression of modality in Iranian Sign Language (ZEI). University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM (Dissertation).10.1515/cog-2018-0130Search in Google Scholar

Talmy, Leonard. 1988. Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12. 49–100.10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2Search in Google Scholar

Van der Auwera, Johan. 1996. Modality: The three-layered scalar square. Journal of Semantics 13(3). 181–195.10.1093/jos/13.3.181Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman. 2014. Moving beyond structuralism: Usage-based signed language linguistics. Lingua de Señas e Interpretación. 5–97.Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Barbara Shaffer. 2006. Modality in American sign language. In W. Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, 207–237. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110197570.207Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Barbara Shaffer. 2018. Evidentiality and information source in signed languages. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidentiality, 741–754. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.36Search in Google Scholar

Wilcox, Sherman & Phyllis Wilcox. 1995. The gestural expression of modality in American Sign Language. In J. Bybee & S. Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 135–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.32.07wilSearch in Google Scholar

Xavier, André Nogueira & Sherman Wilcox. 2014. Necessity and possibility modals in Brazilian Sign Language (Libras). Linguistic Typology 18. 449–488.10.1515/lingty-2014-0019Search in Google Scholar

Zeshan, Ulrike. 2004. Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80. 7–39. Linguistic Society of America, JSTOR.10.1353/lan.2004.0050Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-10-24
Revised: 2019-02-25
Accepted: 2019-03-25
Published Online: 2019-09-03
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cog-2018-0130/html
Scroll to top button