Article
Publicly Available
Frontmatter
Published/Copyright:
November 3, 2016
Published Online: 2016-11-3
Published in Print: 2016-11-2
© 2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- “Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward”
- Working toward a synthesis
- Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins
- What corpus-based Cognitive Linguistics can and cannot expect from neurolinguistics
- Towards cognitively plausible data science in language research
- The sociosemiotic commitment
- Why Cognitive Linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously
- Turning back to experience in Cognitive Linguistics via phenomenology
- Does historical linguistics need the Cognitive Commitment? Prosodic change in East Slavic
- Typology and the future of Cognitive Linguistics
- Cognitive Linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- “Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward”
- Working toward a synthesis
- Cognitive Linguistics’ seven deadly sins
- What corpus-based Cognitive Linguistics can and cannot expect from neurolinguistics
- Towards cognitively plausible data science in language research
- The sociosemiotic commitment
- Why Cognitive Linguistics must embrace the social and pragmatic dimensions of language and how it could do so more seriously
- Turning back to experience in Cognitive Linguistics via phenomenology
- Does historical linguistics need the Cognitive Commitment? Prosodic change in East Slavic
- Typology and the future of Cognitive Linguistics
- Cognitive Linguistics, gesture studies, and multimodal communication