Abstract
In recent years, there has been a growing consensus that speakers store large numbers of preconstructed phrases and low-level patterns, even when these can be derived from more abstract constructions, and that ordinary language use relies heavily on such relatively concrete, lexically specific units rather than abstract rules or schemas that apply “across the board”. One of the advantages of such an approach is that it provides a straightforward explanation of how grammar can be learned from the input; and in fact, previous work (e.g. Dąbrowska and Lieven 2005) has demonstrated that the utterances children produce can be derived by superimposing and juxtaposing lexically specific units derived directly from utterances that they had previously experienced. This paper argues that such a “recycling” account can also explain adults' ability to produce complex fluent speech in real time, and explores the implications of such a view for theories of language representation and processing.
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Munich/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Cooking from cold to hot: goal-directedness in simulation and language
- Extending the dominion of effective control – Its applicability to mood choice in Spanish and Portuguese
- Recycling utterances: A speaker's guide to sentence processing
- What's in a dialogic construction? A constructional approach to polysemy and the grammar of challenge
- Manners of human gait: a crosslinguistic event-naming study
- Book Review
- Book Review
- Book Review
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Cooking from cold to hot: goal-directedness in simulation and language
- Extending the dominion of effective control – Its applicability to mood choice in Spanish and Portuguese
- Recycling utterances: A speaker's guide to sentence processing
- What's in a dialogic construction? A constructional approach to polysemy and the grammar of challenge
- Manners of human gait: a crosslinguistic event-naming study
- Book Review
- Book Review
- Book Review