Abstract
We establish several useful estimates for a non-conforming 2-norm posed on piecewise linear surface triangulations with boundary, with the main result being a Poincaré inequality.
We also obtain equivalence of the non-conforming 2-norm posed on the true surface with the norm posed on a piecewise linear approximation.
Moreover, we allow for free boundary conditions.
The true surface is assumed to be
A Differential Geometry
In this appendix, we review the differential geometry tools needed for working on manifolds [38, 25, 24, 16, 37]. Specifically, we review the basic notation of covariant, contravariant, and other differential geometry concepts.
A.1 Intrinsic
For the sake of generality, consider a 𝑑-dimensional Riemannian manifold
A.1.1 Tensor Index Notation
We use lower-case Greek indices (
Moreover, covariant and contravariant components of general tensor quantities use lower and upper Greek indices, respectively, e.g.
Furthermore, we use the letters 𝔞–𝔥 (with a different font for emphasis) as a non-numerical label to indicate a covariant, contravariant, or mixed tensor.
For example,
A.1.2 Main Concepts
The given metric
The Christoffel symbols
where
The metric satisfies (see [25])
A.2 Extrinsic
Suppose that the manifold Γ is embedded in
A.2.1 Tensor Index Notation
We use lower-case Latin letters starting with 𝑖 (i.e.
A.2.2 Differential Geometry in the Ambient Space
The tangent space
In this case, the metric tensor
Given a vector
thus, we say
Next, we introduce extrinsic differential operators via their intrinsic counterpart, starting with the surface gradient
The (covariant) surface Hessian (a symmetric tensor) is given by
A.2.3 Special Case of a Surface
Suppose
where
where
and note that (in local coordinates)
References
[1] R. A. Adams and J. J. F. Fournier, Sobolev Spaces, 2nd ed., Pure Appl. Math. 140, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003. Search in Google Scholar
[2] S. Agmon, Lectures on Elliptic Boundary Value Problems, Van Nostrand Math. Stud. 2, Van Nostrand, New York, 1965. Search in Google Scholar
[3] D. N. Arnold and F. Brezzi, Mixed and nonconforming finite element methods: Implementation, postprocessing and error estimates, ESAIM: M2AN 19 (1985), 7–32. 10.1051/m2an/1985190100071Search in Google Scholar
[4] D. N. Arnold and S. W. Walker, The Hellan–Herrmann–johnson method with curved elements, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 58 (2020), 2829–2855. 10.1137/19M1288723Search in Google Scholar
[5] I. Babuška, J. Osborn and J. Pitkäranta, Analysis of mixed methods using mesh dependent norms, Math. Comp. 35 (1980), 1039–1062. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1980-0583486-7Search in Google Scholar
[6] E. Bänsch, P. Morin and R. H. Nochetto, A finite element method for surface diffusion: The parametric case, J. Comput. Phys. 203 (2005), 321–343. 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.08.022Search in Google Scholar
[7] J. W. Barrett, H. Garcke and R. Nürnberg, On stable parametric finite element methods for the stefan problem and the Mullins–Sekerka problem with applications to dendritic growth, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010), 6270–6299. 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.04.039Search in Google Scholar
[8] J. W. Barrett, H. Garcke and R. Nürnberg, A stable parametric finite element discretization of two-phase Navier–Stokes flow, J. Sci. Comput. 63 (2015), 78–117. 10.1007/s10915-014-9885-2Search in Google Scholar
[9] J. W. Barrett, H. Garcke and R. Nürnberg, A stable numerical method for the dynamics of fluidic membranes, Numer. Math. 134 (2016), 783–822. 10.1007/s00211-015-0787-5Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[10] H. Blum and R. Rannacher, On mixed finite element methods in plate bending analysis. Part 1: The first Herrmann scheme, Comput. Mech. 6 (1990), 221–236. 10.1007/BF00350239Search in Google Scholar
[11] A. Bonito, R. H. Nochetto and M. Sebastian Pauletti, Parametric fem for geometric biomembranes, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010), 3171–3188. 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.12.036Search in Google Scholar
[12] A. Bonito, R. H. Nochetto and M. Sebastian Pauletti, Dynamics of biomembranes: Effect of the bulk fluid, Math. Model. Nat. Phenom. 6 (2011), 25–43. 10.1051/mmnp/20116502Search in Google Scholar
[13] S. C. Brenner and L. R. Scott, The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, 3rd ed., Texts Appl. Math. 15, Springer, New York, 2008. 10.1007/978-0-387-75934-0Search in Google Scholar
[14] F. Brezzi and P. A. Raviart, Mixed finite element methods for 4th order elliptic equations, Topics In Numerical Analysis III: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy Conference on Numerical Analysis, Academic Press, New York (1976), 33–56. Search in Google Scholar
[15] E. Burman, P. Hansbo, M. G. Larson, K. Larsson and A. Massing, Finite element approximation of the Laplace–Beltrami operator on a surface with boundary, Numer. Math. 141 (2019), 141–172. 10.1007/s00211-018-0990-2Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[16] P. G. Ciarlet, Linear and Nonlinear Functional Analysis with Applications, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2013. 10.1137/1.9781611972597Search in Google Scholar
[17] M. I. Comodi, The Hellan–Herrmann–Johnson method: Some new error estimates and postprocessing, Math. Comput. 52 (1989), 17–29. 10.1090/S0025-5718-1989-0946601-7Search in Google Scholar
[18] C. B. Davis and S. W. Walker, A mixed formulation of the Stefan problem with surface tension, Interfaces Free Bound. 17 (2015), 427–464. 10.4171/IFB/349Search in Google Scholar
[19] C. B. Davis and S. W. Walker, Semi-discrete error estimates and implementation of a mixed method for the Stefan problem, ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 51 (2017), 2093–2126. 10.1051/m2an/2017022Search in Google Scholar
[20] K. Deckelnick, G. Dziuk and C. M. Elliott, Computation of geometric partial differential equations and mean curvature flow, Acta Numer. 14 (2005), 139–232. 10.1017/S0962492904000224Search in Google Scholar
[21] M. C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries: Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization, 2nd ed., Adv. Des. Control 4, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2011. 10.1137/1.9780898719826Search in Google Scholar
[22] A. Demlow, Higher-order finite element methods and pointwise error estimates for elliptic problems on surfaces, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47 (2009), 805–827. 10.1137/070708135Search in Google Scholar
[23] A. Demlow and G. Dziuk, An adaptive finite element method for the Laplace–Beltrami operator on implicitly defined surfaces, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 45 (2007), 421–442. 10.1137/050642873Search in Google Scholar
[24] M. P. do Carmo, Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1976. Search in Google Scholar
[25] M. P. do Carmo, Riemannian Geometry, 2nd ed., Math. Theory Appl., Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992. 10.1007/978-1-4757-2201-7Search in Google Scholar
[26] Q. Du, C. Liu, R. Ryham and X. Wang, A phase field formulation of the Willmore problem, Nonlinearity 18 (2005), Article ID 1249. 10.1088/0951-7715/18/3/016Search in Google Scholar
[27] Q. Du, C. Liu and X. Wang, A phase field approach in the numerical study of the elastic bending energy for vesicle membranes, J. Comput. Phys. 198 (2004), Paper No. 450. 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.01.029Search in Google Scholar
[28] G. Dziuk, Finite elements for the Beltrami operator on arbitrary surfaces, Partial Differential Equations and Calculus of Variations, Lecture Notes in Math. 1357, Springer, Berlin (1988), 142–155. 10.1007/BFb0082865Search in Google Scholar
[29] G. Dziuk, Computational parametric Willmore flow, Numer. Math. 111 (2008), 55–80. 10.1007/s00211-008-0179-1Search in Google Scholar
[30] G. Dziuk and C. M. Elliott, Finite element methods for surface PDEs, Acta Numer. 22 (2013), 289–396. 10.1017/S0962492913000056Search in Google Scholar
[31] L. P. Eisenhart, Riemannian Geometry, Princeton University, Princeton, 1926. 10.1090/coll/008Search in Google Scholar
[32] C. M. Elliott and T. Ranner, Evolving surface finite element method for the Cahn–Hilliard equation, Numer. Math. 129 (2015), 483–534. 10.1007/s00211-014-0644-ySearch in Google Scholar
[33] C. M. Elliott and B. Stinner, Modeling and computation of two phase geometric biomembranes using surface finite elements, J. Comput. Phys. 229 (2010), 6585–6612. 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.05.014Search in Google Scholar
[34] C. M. Elliott, B. Stinner and C. Venkataraman, Modelling cell motility and chemotaxis with evolving surface finite elements, J. Roy. Soc. Interface 9 (2012), 3027–3044. 10.1098/rsif.2012.0276Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[35] J.-F. Gerbeau and T. Lelièvre, Generalized Navier boundary condition and geometric conservation law for surface tension, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 198 (2009), 644–656. 10.1016/j.cma.2008.09.011Search in Google Scholar
[36] M. Gromov, Sign and geometric meaning of curvature, Rend. Semin. Mat. Fis. Milano 61 (1991), 9–123. 10.1007/BF02925201Search in Google Scholar
[37] E. Hebey, Sobolev Spaces on Riemannian Manifolds, Lecture Notes in Math., Springer, Berlin, 1996. 10.1007/BFb0092907Search in Google Scholar
[38] E. Kreyszig, Differential Geometry, Dover, New York, 1991. Search in Google Scholar
[39] K. Larsson and M. G. Larson, A continuous/discontinuous Galerkin method and a priori error estimates for the biharmonic problem on surfaces, Mathe. Comput. 86 (2017), 2613–2649. 10.1090/mcom/3179Search in Google Scholar
[40] M. Lenoir, Optimal isoparametric finite elements and error estimates for domains involving curved boundaries, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 23 (1986), 562–580. 10.1137/0723036Search in Google Scholar
[41] P. Petersen, Riemannian Geometry, 2nd ed., Grad. Texts in Math., Springer, New York, 2006. Search in Google Scholar
[42] P. Smereka, Semi-implicit level set methods for curvature and surface diffusion motion, J. Sci. Comput. 19 (2003), 439–456. 10.1023/A:1025324613450Search in Google Scholar
[43] S. W. Walker, The Shapes of Things: A Practical Guide to Differential Geometry and the Shape Derivative, Adv. Des. Control 28, SIAM, Philadelpha, 2015. 10.1137/1.9781611973969Search in Google Scholar
[44] S. W. Walker, The Kirchhoff plate equation on surfaces: The surface Hellan–Herrmann–Johnson method, to appear. 10.1093/imanum/drab062Search in Google Scholar
[45] S. W. Walker, B. Shapiro and R.-H. Nochetto, Electrowetting with contact line pinning: Computational modeling and comparisons with experiments, Phys. Fluids 21 (2009), Article ID 102103. 10.1063/1.3254022Search in Google Scholar
[46] O.-Y. Zhong-Can and W. Helfrich, Bending energy of vesicle membranes: General expressions for the first, second, and third variation of the shape energy and applications to spheres and cylinders, Phys. Rev. A 39 (1989), 5280–5288. 10.1103/PhysRevA.39.5280Search in Google Scholar PubMed
© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Robust Iterative Solvers for Gao Type Nonlinear Beam Models in Elasticity
- Using Complete Monotonicity to Deduce Local Error Estimates for Discretisations of a Multi-Term Time-Fractional Diffusion Equation
- Accurate Full-Vectorial Finite Element Method Combined with Exact Non-Reflecting Boundary Condition for Computing Guided Waves in Optical Fibers
- Robust Hybrid High-Order Method on Polytopal Meshes with Small Faces
- A Totally Relaxed, Self-Adaptive Subgradient Extragradient Method for Variational Inequality and Fixed Point Problems in a Banach Space
- Robust Discretization and Solvers for Elliptic Optimal Control Problems with Energy Regularization
- Dual System Least-Squares Finite Element Method for a Hyperbolic Problem
- Artificial Compressibility Methods for the Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations Using Lowest-Order Face-Based Schemes on Polytopal Meshes
- Numerical Analysis of a Finite Element Approximation to a Level Set Model for Free-Surface Flows
- Inexact Inverse Subspace Iteration with Preconditioning Applied to Quadratic Matrix Polynomials
- Convergence Theory for IETI-DP Solvers for Discontinuous Galerkin Isogeometric Analysis that is Explicit in ℎ and 𝑝
- Poincaré Inequality for a Mesh-Dependent 2-Norm on Piecewise Linear Surfaces with Boundary
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Robust Iterative Solvers for Gao Type Nonlinear Beam Models in Elasticity
- Using Complete Monotonicity to Deduce Local Error Estimates for Discretisations of a Multi-Term Time-Fractional Diffusion Equation
- Accurate Full-Vectorial Finite Element Method Combined with Exact Non-Reflecting Boundary Condition for Computing Guided Waves in Optical Fibers
- Robust Hybrid High-Order Method on Polytopal Meshes with Small Faces
- A Totally Relaxed, Self-Adaptive Subgradient Extragradient Method for Variational Inequality and Fixed Point Problems in a Banach Space
- Robust Discretization and Solvers for Elliptic Optimal Control Problems with Energy Regularization
- Dual System Least-Squares Finite Element Method for a Hyperbolic Problem
- Artificial Compressibility Methods for the Incompressible Navier–Stokes Equations Using Lowest-Order Face-Based Schemes on Polytopal Meshes
- Numerical Analysis of a Finite Element Approximation to a Level Set Model for Free-Surface Flows
- Inexact Inverse Subspace Iteration with Preconditioning Applied to Quadratic Matrix Polynomials
- Convergence Theory for IETI-DP Solvers for Discontinuous Galerkin Isogeometric Analysis that is Explicit in ℎ and 𝑝
- Poincaré Inequality for a Mesh-Dependent 2-Norm on Piecewise Linear Surfaces with Boundary