Home IUPAC/CITAC Guide: Evaluation of risks of false decisions in conformity assessment of a multicomponent material or object due to measurement uncertainty (IUPAC Technical Report)
Article Publicly Available

IUPAC/CITAC Guide: Evaluation of risks of false decisions in conformity assessment of a multicomponent material or object due to measurement uncertainty (IUPAC Technical Report)

Published/Copyright: January 22, 2021
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Ilya Kuselman, Francesca R. Pennecchi, Ricardo J. N. B. da Silva and David Brynn Hibbert

Pure and Applied Chemistry, 2020

Published online ahead of print 29 Oct 2020

https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2019-0906

In this Guide, modelling and evaluating the total risks in the conformity assessment of a multicomponent material or object caused by measurement uncertainties are discussed in detail.

 A map of the risks of false decisions on the conformity of a multicomponent material or object. See full text for details.

A map of the risks of false decisions on the conformity of a multicomponent material or object. See full text for details.

Risks of a false decision on conformity of the chemical composition of a multicomponent material or object due to measurement uncertainty are defined using the Bayesian approach. Even if the conformity assessment for each particular component of a material is successful, the total probability of a false decision (total consumer’s risk or producer’s risk) concerning the material as a whole might still be significant. This is related to the specific batch, lot, sample, environmental compartment, or other item of material or object (specific consumer’s and producer’s risks), or to a population of these items (global consumer’s and producer’s risks). A model of the total probability of such false decisions for cases of independent actual (‘true’) concentrations or contents of the components and the corresponding measurement results is formulated based on the law of total probability. It is shown that the total risk can be evaluated as a combination of the particular risks in the conformity assessment of components of the item. For a more complicated task, i.e. for a larger number of components under control, the total risk is greater. When the actual values of the components’ concentrations or contents, as well as the measurement results, are correlated, they are modelled by multivariate distributions. Then, a total global risk of a false decision on the material conformity is evaluated by the calculation of integrals of corresponding joint probability density function. A total specific risk can be evaluated as the joint posterior cumulative function of actual property values of a specific item lying outside the multivariate specification (tolerance) domain when the vector of measured values obtained for the item is inside this domain. The effect of correlation on the risk is not easily predictable. Examples of the evaluation of risks are provided for conformity assessment of denatured alcohols, total suspended particulate matter in ambient air, a cold/flu medication, and a PtRh alloy.

https://iupac.org/project/2018-004-1-500

Online erschienen: 2021-01-22
Erschienen im Druck: 2021-01-01

©2021 IUPAC & De Gruyter. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For more information, please visit: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead - Full issue pdf
  2. President's Column
  3. Resilience in Pandemic Time
  4. Features
  5. Challenges for Evaluation of the Safety of Engineered Nanomaterials
  6. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
  7. Feeding the World in a Time of Climate Change
  8. Early Industrial Roots of Green Chemistry
  9. IUPAC Wire
  10. Election of IUPAC Officers and Bureau Members—Call for Nominations
  11. IUPAC Congress 2027
  12. PAC60 Celebrations
  13. IYPT 2019—Global Report
  14. UNESCO-Russia Mendeleev International Prize in the Basic Sciences
  15. IUPAC Blockchain Technology White Paper—Call for input
  16. CPCDS Shorts
  17. Feed for Thought
  18. In Memoriam—Alexander Lawson: Visionary Pioneer in Cheminformatics
  19. Project Place
  20. Provisional Report on Discussions on Group 3 of The Periodic Table
  21. Development of a Machine Accessible Kinetic Databank for Radical Polymerizations
  22. Assessment of Absolute Isotope Ratios for the International Isotope Delta Measurement Standards
  23. Development of a Metadata Schema for Critically Evaluated Solubility Measurement Data
  24. Making an imPACt
  25. Glossary of methods and terms used in surface chemical analysis (IUPAC Recommendations 2020)
  26. Global occurrence, chemical properties, and ecological impacts of e-wastes (IUPAC Technical Report)
  27. Variation of lead isotopic composition and atomic weight in terrestrial materials (IUPAC Technical Report)
  28. Definitions and notations relating to tactic polymers (IUPAC Recommendations 2020)
  29. Terminology of polymers in advanced lithography (IUPAC Recommendations 2020)
  30. IUPAC/CITAC Guide: Evaluation of risks of false decisions in conformity assessment of a multicomponent material or object due to measurement uncertainty (IUPAC Technical Report)
  31. Dielectric dispersion in solutions of flexible polymers
  32. Bookworm
  33. Glossary of Terms Used in Molecular Toxicology
  34. Up for Discussion
  35. The Hudlicky case—A reflection on the current state of affairs
  36. Conference Call
  37. Frontiers in Chemical Technology
  38. OPCW Convenes International Experts to Develop Strategy for Greener, Safer, and More Sustainable Chemistry
  39. Green Chemistry Postgraduate Summer School Online
  40. Foreword
Downloaded on 15.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ci-2021-0124/html
Scroll to top button