The three grand cultural spheres of the Holocene Eurasian Continent
-
Jianye Han
Abstract
Based on the typology of ceramic wares and analysis of the spatial distribution, origin, and dispersal of other categories of archaeological remains, it can be determined that three grand cultural spheres existed on the Holocene Eurasian Continent prior to the rise of the Silk Road. These were the Early Eastern Cultural Sphere, centered around the Yellow River valley and the Yangtze River valley; the Early Western Cultural Sphere, centered around the Tigris-Euphrates River valley (Mesopotamia); the Early Northern Cultural Sphere, located to the north of the Eastern and Western Cultural Spheres. Due to cultural interactions, collisions, and exchanges, there were large intersection zones between the three grand cultural spheres.
Postscript
The original article 全新世亚欧大陆的三大文化圈 was published in Kaogu 考古(Archaeology) 2021.11:64–75 with one figure and 80 notes. The English version, translated by Siping Qiu 邱四平, has removed the notes.
Further readings
Bar-Yosef, Ofer, and Richard H. Meadow. “The origins of agriculture in the Near East.” In Last Hunters, First Farmers: New Perspectives on the Prehistoric Transition to Agriculture, 39–94. Santa Fe, N. M.: School of American Research Press, 1995.Search in Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter. Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1997.10.1515/9780824874681Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Kwang-chih. “The Chinese interaction sphere and the foundation of civilization.” In The Archaeology of Ancient China, 234–294. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Chernykh, E. N. Ancient Metallurgy in the USSR: The Early Metal Age. Translated by Sarah Wright. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Search in Google Scholar
Christian, David. “Inner Eurasia as a unit of world history.” Journal of World History 5, no. 2 (1994): 173–211.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, K. M., S. C. Finney, P. L. Gibbard, and J.-X. Fan. “The ICS International Chronostratigraphic Chart.” Episodes 36 (2013; updated): 199–204.10.18814/epiiugs/2013/v36i3/002Search in Google Scholar
Kohl, Philip. “The ancient economy, transferable technologies and the Bronze Age world system: A view from the northeastern frontier of the ancient Near East.” In Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World, 13–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.Search in Google Scholar
Wu, Xiaohong, Chi Zhang, Paul Goldberg, David Cohen, Yan Pan, Trina Arpin, and Ofer Bar-Yosef. “Early pottery at 20,000 years ago in Xianrendong Cave, China.” Science 336, no. 6089 (2012): 1696–1700.10.1126/science.1218643Search in Google Scholar
Yang, Xiaoyan, Zhiwei Wan, Linda Perry, Houyuan Lu, Qiang Wang, Chaohong Zhao, Jun Li, et al. “Early millet use in northern China.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109, no. 10 (2012): 3726–3730.10.1073/pnas.1115430109Search in Google Scholar
Zhao, Zhijun. “The middle Yangtze region in China is one place where rice was domesticated: Phytolith evidence from the Diaotonghuan Cave, northern Jiangxi.” Antiquity 72, no. 278 (1998): 885–897.10.1017/S0003598X00087524Search in Google Scholar
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- New archaeological discoveries
- Paleolithic site of Xuetang Liangzi in Shiyan, Hubei
- Sitai Neolithic site in Shangyi, Hebei
- Neolithic site of Nanzuo in Qingyang, Gansu
- Shang royal mausoleum area and its surroundings at Yinxu in Anyang, Henan
- Bronze Age site at Hebosuo in Kunming, Yunnan
- Xixia Suyukou porcelain kiln site in Helan, Ningxia
- Reports
- Dawenkou culture cemetery at the southern Gangshang site in Tengzhou, Shandong
- The excavation of the Tang tombs of Dai Zhou and his wife in Chang’an District, Xi’an
- Research
- The three grand cultural spheres of the Holocene Eurasian Continent
- Preliminary discussions on painted pottery in Neolithic China
- A comparative study on the jade drilling technology of ancient Mesoamerican civilizations and prehistoric China
- Seima-Turbino-type bronze spearheads from Xiawanggang in Xichuan and the implications for north-south cultural exchange
- “Export” of ninth- to tenth-century Chinese bronze mirrors: Shipwreck findings from the Java Sea
- Biological evolutionary insights into the origins of agriculture: Evidence from the origin of rice agriculture
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- New archaeological discoveries
- Paleolithic site of Xuetang Liangzi in Shiyan, Hubei
- Sitai Neolithic site in Shangyi, Hebei
- Neolithic site of Nanzuo in Qingyang, Gansu
- Shang royal mausoleum area and its surroundings at Yinxu in Anyang, Henan
- Bronze Age site at Hebosuo in Kunming, Yunnan
- Xixia Suyukou porcelain kiln site in Helan, Ningxia
- Reports
- Dawenkou culture cemetery at the southern Gangshang site in Tengzhou, Shandong
- The excavation of the Tang tombs of Dai Zhou and his wife in Chang’an District, Xi’an
- Research
- The three grand cultural spheres of the Holocene Eurasian Continent
- Preliminary discussions on painted pottery in Neolithic China
- A comparative study on the jade drilling technology of ancient Mesoamerican civilizations and prehistoric China
- Seima-Turbino-type bronze spearheads from Xiawanggang in Xichuan and the implications for north-south cultural exchange
- “Export” of ninth- to tenth-century Chinese bronze mirrors: Shipwreck findings from the Java Sea
- Biological evolutionary insights into the origins of agriculture: Evidence from the origin of rice agriculture
