Home Uncertainty in measurement and the renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Uncertainty in measurement and the renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate

  • Ian Farrance ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Robert Frenkel and Kay Weng Choy
Published/Copyright: July 19, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

The ratio of tubular maximum reabsorption of phosphate to glomerular filtration rate (TmP/GFR) is used to evaluate renal phosphate transport. TmP/GFR is most probably calculated using the formula described by Kenny and Glen or obtained from the nomogram described by Walton and Bijvoet. Even though the calculation itself is well described, no attention has been given to its measurement uncertainty (MU). The aim of this study is to provide a procedure for evaluating the MU of the Kenny and Glen formula; a procedure which is based on the Evaluation of measurement data – Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM).

Methods

TmP/GFR is a quantity value calculated from the input of measured values for serum (plasma) phosphate and creatinine, plus measured values of urine phosphate and creatinine. Given the measurement uncertainty associated with these input quantities, the GUM describes the mathematical procedures required to determine the uncertainty of the calculated TmP/GFR. From a medical laboratory perspective, these input uncertainties are the standard deviations of the respective internal quality control estimates for serum and urine phosphate, plus serum and urine creatinine.

Results

Based on representative measurements for the input quantities and their associated standard uncertainties, the expanded relative uncertainty for a calculated TmP/GFR is approximately 3.0–4.5 %.

Conclusions

With the continued relevance of the TmP/GFR procedure and the use of creatinine clearance as an estimate of GFR, the addition of an uncertainty estimate is important as an adjunct to this diagnostic procedure.


Corresponding author: Ian Farrance, Discipline of Laboratory Medicine, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC, 3083, Australia, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the design and development of the study. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version for publication. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Bijvoet, OLM. Relation of plasma phosphate concentration to renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate. Clin Sci 1969;37:23–36.Search in Google Scholar

2. Bijvoet, OLM. The assessment of phosphate reabsorption. Clin Chim Acta 1969;26:15–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(69)90280-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Bijvoet, OLM, Van der Sluys Veer, J. The interpretation of laboratory tests in bone disease. Clin Endocrinol Metabol 1972;1:217–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-595x(72)80058-6.Search in Google Scholar

4. Kenny, AP, Glen, ACA. Tests of phosphate reabsorption. Lancet 1973;21:158. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(73)93112-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Walton, RJ, Bijvoet, OLM. Nomogram for derivation of renal threshold phosphate concentration. Lancet 1975;16:309–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(75)92736-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Anderson, J. A method for estimating Tm for phosphate in man. J Physiol 1955;130:268–77. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1955.sp005409.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Barth, JH, Jones, RG, Payne, RB. Calculation of renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate: the algorithm performs better than the nomogram. Ann Clin Biochem 2000;37:79–81. https://doi.org/10.1258/0004563001901371.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Rigo-Bonnin, R, Canalias, F. Measurement uncertainty estimation for derived biological quantities [letter]. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;59:e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-1003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Manghat, P, Sodi, R, Swaminathan. Phosphate homeostasis and disorders. Ann Clin Biochem 2014;51:631–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563214521399.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Bureau International des Pois et Mesures. Evaluation of measurement data – guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM). Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology 100; 2008. http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/guides/gum.html [Accessed May 2023].Search in Google Scholar

11. International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories – practical guidance for the estimation of measurement uncertainty. ISO/TS 20914; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

12. Farrance, I, Frenkel, R, Badrick, T. ISO/TS 20914:2019 – a critical commentary. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:1182–90. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-1209.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Farrance, I, Badrick, T, Frenkel, R. Uncertainty in measurement: a review of the procedures for determining uncertainty in measurement and its use in deriving the biological variation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate. Pract Lab Med 2018;12:e00097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2018.e00097.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Farrance, I, Frenkel, R. Uncertainty of measurement: a review of the rules for calculating uncertainty components through functional relationships. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;33:49–75.Search in Google Scholar

15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Expression of measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine; approved guideline. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2012. Document EP29-A, CLSI.Search in Google Scholar

16. Frenkel, RB, Farrance, I. Uncertainty in measurement: procedures for determining uncertainty with application to clinical laboratory calculations. Adv Clin Chem 2018;85:149–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acc.2018.02.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Farrance, I, Frenkel, R. Uncertainty in measurement: a review of Monte Carlo simulation using Microsoft Excel for the calculation of uncertainties through functional relationships, including uncertainties in empirically derived constants. Clin Biochem Rev 2014;35:37–61.Search in Google Scholar

18. Coskun, A, Oosterhuis, WP. Statistical distributions commonly used in measurement uncertainty in laboratory medicine. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2020;30:010101. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2020.010101.Search in Google Scholar

19. Farrance, I, Frenkel, R. Measurement uncertainty and the importance of correlation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2021;59:7–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-1205.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Payne, RB. Renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate (TmP/GFR): indications and interpretation. Ann Clin Biochem 1998;35:201–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/000456329803500203.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Phelps, KR, Mason, DL. Parameters of phosphate homeostasis at normal and reduced GFR: theoretical considerations. Clin Nephrol 2015;83:167–76. https://doi.org/10.5414/cn108367.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Phelps, KR, Mason, DL, Stote, KS. Parameters of phosphate homeostasis at normal and reduced GFR: empiric observations. Clin Nephrol 2015;83:208–17. https://doi.org/10.5414/CN108380.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Phelps, KR, Mason, DL. Evidence that TmP/GFR can be estimated with the Walton-Bijvoet nomogram in chronic kidney disease. Clin Nephrol 2017;88:19–26. https://doi.org/10.5414/cn109069.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Stark, H, Eisenstein, B, Tieder, M, Rachmel, A, Alpert, G. Direct measurement of TmP/GFR; A simple and reliable parameter of renal phosphate handling. Nephron 1986;44:125–8. https://doi.org/10.1159/000184216.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Brodehl, J, Krause, A, Hoyer, PF. Assessment of maximal tubular phosphate reabsorption: comparison of direct measurement with the nomogram of Bijvoet. Pediatr Nephrol 1988;2:183–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00862587.Search in Google Scholar

26. Alon, U, Hellerstein, S. Assessment and interpretation of tubular threshold for phosphate in infants and children. Pediatr Nephrol 1994;8:250–1. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00865491.Search in Google Scholar

27. Dubourg, LD, Aurelle, M, Chardon, L, Flammier, S, Lemoine, S, Baddhetta, J. Tubular phosphate handling: references from child to adulthood in the era of standardized creatinine. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022;37:2150–6.10.1093/ndt/gfab331Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Chinoy, A, Padidela, R. Commentary on severe hypophosphatemia: the hidden truth. Clin Chem 2023;69:453–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvad025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. McKenna, MJ, Crowley, RK, Twomey, PJ, Kilbane, MT. Renal phosphate handling: independent effects of circulating FGF23, PTH, and calcium. JBMR Plus 2021;5:e10437. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm4.10437.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. von Londen, M, Aarts, BM, Sanders, JSF, Hillebrands, JL, Bakker, SJL, Navis, G, et al.. Tubular maximum phosphate reabsorption capacity in living kidney donors is independently associated with one-year recipient GFR. Am J Physiol Ren Physiol 2018;314:F196–202. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajprenal.00287.2017.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Emmens, JE, de Borst, MH, Boorsma, EM, Damman, K, Navis, G, van Veldhuisrn, DJ, et al.. Assessment of proximal tubular function by tubular maximum phosphate reabsorption capacity in heart failure. CJASN 2022;17:228–39. https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.03720321.Search in Google Scholar

32. Mohamed, F, Raal, FJ. Clinical case study. Severe hypophosphatemia: the hidden truth. Clin Chem 2023;69:450–5. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvad028.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

33. Sumner, JB. A method for the colorimetric determination of phosphorus. Science 1944;100:413–24. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.100.2601.413.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

34. Heyrovsky, A. A new method for the determination of inulin in plasma and urine. Clin Chim Acta 1956;1:470–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-8981(56)90020-1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2023-05-06
Accepted: 2023-06-29
Published Online: 2023-07-19
Published in Print: 2023-11-27

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Adherence to recommendations and clinical practice guidelines: not an easy task
  4. Reviews
  5. Comparison of interferon-gamma production between TB1 and TB2 tubes of QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus: a meta-analysis
  6. Review on adherence of the literature to official recommendations on albuminuria harmonization and standardization
  7. Opinion Paper
  8. The total testing process harmonization: the case study of SARS-CoV-2 serological tests
  9. IFCC Paper
  10. Quality standards and internal quality control practices in medical laboratories: an IFCC global survey of member societies
  11. Guidelines and Recommendations
  12. Toolkit for emerging technologies in laboratory medicine
  13. Recommendations for the study of monoclonal gammopathies in the clinical laboratory. A consensus of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine and the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy. Part I: Update on laboratory tests for the study of monoclonal gammopathies
  14. Recommendations for the study of monoclonal gammopathies in the clinical laboratory. A consensus of the Spanish Society of Laboratory Medicine and the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy. Part II: Methodological and clinical recommendations for the diagnosis and follow-up of monoclonal gammopathies
  15. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  16. The MBL2 genotype relates to COVID-19 severity and may help to select the optimal therapy
  17. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  18. The stability of C-peptide and insulin in plasma and serum samples under different storage conditions
  19. Self-sampling of blood using a topper and pediatric tubes; a prospective feasibility study for PSA analysis using 120 prostate cancer patients
  20. Albumin determined by bromocresol green leads to erroneous results in routine evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease
  21. Uncertainty in measurement and the renal tubular reabsorption of phosphate
  22. Urine transfer devices may impact urinary particle results: a pre-analytical study
  23. Analytical and clinical validation of a blood progranulin ELISA in frontotemporal dementias
  24. Early changes in S100B maternal blood levels can predict fetal intrauterine growth restriction
  25. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  26. Interpreting two TSH results from the same patient
  27. Cancer Diagnostics
  28. Integrated plasma and exosome long noncoding RNA profiling is promising for diagnosing non-small cell lung cancer
  29. Diagnostic accuracy of extended HPV DNA genotyping and its application for risk-based cervical cancer screening strategy
  30. Infectious Diseases
  31. Performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection in the post-pandemic era: multi-laboratory assessment
  32. Serum sPD-L1 levels are elevated in patients with viral diseases, bacterial sepsis or in patients with impaired renal function compared to healthy blood donors
  33. Letters to the Editor
  34. Results of the first survey of the EFLM Task Force Preparation of Labs for Emergencies (TF-PLE)
  35. Thrombocytopenia and hyperinflammation are induced by extracellular histones circulating in blood
  36. Bilirubin color interference on prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time tests assessed in patients with liver disease
  37. Laboratory response to paradigm change in hemophilia treatment
  38. MALDI-ISD mass spectrometry analysis as a simple and reliable tool to detect post-translational modifications of hemoglobin variants: the case of Hb Raleigh
  39. Method validation for a greener approach to the quantification of 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 in patient serum using supported liquid extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
  40. Interest of minigene splicing reporter assay in familial hypobetalipoproteinemia genetic diagnosis: the example of the missense mutation APOB c.1468C>T
  41. Laboratory medicine unveiling an unusual cause of D-lactic acidosis as the trigger of decompensation of a rare inborn error of metabolism
Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0451/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button