Home Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) in fecal samples: validation of the extraction methodology and stability in short-term storage conditions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) in fecal samples: validation of the extraction methodology and stability in short-term storage conditions

  • Sandra F. Gomes ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Francisco Jorge Melo , Rita Silva , Mafalda Santiago , Maria Manuela Estevinho , Sandra Dias , Cláudia Camila Dias and Fernando Magro
Published/Copyright: April 25, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

This study assesses the clinical relevance of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) membrane exopeptidase as a biomarker of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A spike-and-recovery approach of DPP4 in fecal samples was used to compare two different methods for protein extraction, followed by a stability assessment.

Methods

Fecal samples of healthy volunteers spiked with known concentrations of recombinant DPP4 were processed using a standard manual extraction protocol and the CALEX® protocol. The two methods were compared by quantification of fecal DPP4 by ELISA, followed by Bland-Altman analysis. For the stability assays DPP4 was extracted from fecal samples and stored under different conditions of temperature and time after collection.

Results

In general, the levels of spiked DPP4 in stool samples were lower with the manual protocol than in those obtained with the CALEX® method; this trend was corroborated by Bland-Altman analysis. Nonetheless, variability was within the acceptable limits for both protocols. In the stability assessment, no statistically significant differences were found between the results obtained under the different storage conditions.

Conclusions

Both manual and CALEX® protocols provided equal extraction ability of DPP4 from stool samples. In addition, DPP4 provided flexibility in terms of sample storage enabling the accurate assessment of samples delivered up to a week before analysis.


Corresponding author: Sandra F. Gomes, Department of Biomedicine, Unit of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; and Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines (MedInUP), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal, Phone: +351 915963501, E-mail:
Sandra F. Gomes and Francisco Jorge Melo contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Paula Pinto, PharmD, PhD (PMA – Pharmaceutical Medicine Academy) for providing medical writing and editorial assistance.

  1. Research funding: This work was supported by the Portuguese Study Group of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (GEDII). Sandra F. Gomes is supported by funding from the Portuguese FCT under the grant UI/BD/150826/2021 (“The modulation of cytokines, toll-like receptors and adipose-derived cell secretome on intestinal epithelial cells and adipocytes upon dipeptidyl peptidase-4”). Francisco Jorge Melo is supported by funding from the Portuguese FCT under the grant 2021.06912.BD (“Looking 4WARD: The role of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as a novel biomarker for predicting disease activity and monitoring response to therapy in IBD patients”). The funding organizations played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Fernando Magro served as a speaker and received honoraria from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Abbvie, Vifor, Falk, Laboratórios Vitória, Ferring, Hospira, and Biogen; the other authors have no conflict of interests to disclose.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013), and has been approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Board (Ethics Committee of University Hospital Center of São João, Porto, Portugal; approval number 492/2020).

References

1. Hoffmann, T, Faust, J, Neubert, K, Ansorge, S. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD 26) and aminopeptidase N (CD 13) catalyzed hydrolysis of cytokines and peptides with N-terminal cytokine sequences. FEBS Lett 1993;336:61–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-5793(93)81609-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Klemann, C, Wagner, L, Stephan, M, von Hörsten, S. Cut to the chase: a review of CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase-4’s (DPP4) entanglement in the immune system. Clin Exp Immunol 2016;185:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12781.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Nargis, T, Kumar, K, Ghosh, AR, Sharma, A, Rudra, D, Sen, D, et al.. KLK5 induces shedding of DPP4 from circulatory Th17 cells in type 2 diabetes. Mol Metabol 2017;6:1529–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2017.09.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Röhrborn, D, Eckel, J, Sell, H. Shedding of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is mediated by metalloproteases and up-regulated by hypoxia in human adipocytes and smooth muscle cells. FEBS Lett 2014;588:3870–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.08.029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Enz, N, Vliegen, G, De Meester, I, Jungraithmayr, W. CD26/DPP4 – a potential biomarker and target for cancer therapy. Pharmacol Ther 2019;198:135–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.02.015.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Cuchacovich, M, Gatica, H, Pizzo, SV, Gonzalez-Gronow, M. Characterization of human serum dipeptidyl peptidase IV (CD26) and analysis of its autoantibodies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2001;19:673–80.Search in Google Scholar

7. Bank, U, Tadje, J, Helmuth, M, Stefin, S, Täger, M, Wolke, C, et al.. Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (DPIV) and alanyl-aminopeptidases (AAPs) as a new target complex for treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases-proof of concept in a mouse model of colitis. Adv Exp Med Biol 2006;575:143–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32824-6_15.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Pinto-Lopes, P, Afonso, J, Pinto-Lopes, R, Rocha, C, Lago, P, Gonçalves, R, et al.. Serum dipeptidyl peptidase 4: a predictor of disease activity and prognosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2020;26:1707–19. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izz319.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Melo, FJ, Pinto-Lopes, P, Estevinho, MM, Magro, F. The role of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 as a therapeutic target and serum biomarker in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2021;27:1153–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izaa324.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Torres, J, Mehandru, S, Colombel, JF, Peyrin-Biroulet, L. Crohn’s disease. Lancet 2017;389:1741–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31711-1.Search in Google Scholar

11. Ordás, I, Eckmann, L, Talamini, M, Baumgart, DC, Sandborn, WJ. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet 2012;380:1606–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60150-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Khaki-Khatibi, F, Qujeq, D, Kashifard, M, Moein, S, Maniati, M, Vaghari-Tabari, M. Calprotectin in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Chim Acta 2020;510:556–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.08.025.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Pinto-Lopes, P, Melo, F, Afonso, J, Pinto-Lopes, R, Rocha, C, Melo, D, et al.. Fecal dipeptidyl peptidase-4: an emergent biomarker in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2021;12:e00320. https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000320.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Juricic, G, Brencic, T, Tesija-Kuna, A, Njegovan, M, Honovic, L. Faecal calprotectin determination: impact of preanalytical sample treatment and stool consistency on within- and between-method variability. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2019;29:010707. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2019.010707.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Kaur, S, Ford, C, Gama, R. BÜHLMANN Calex® Cap for the faecal extraction of calprotectin – fit for purpose? Ann Clin Biochem 2020;57:332–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563220927056.Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0139).


Received: 2023-02-06
Accepted: 2023-03-23
Published Online: 2023-04-25
Published in Print: 2023-08-28

© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Developments in reference measurement systems for C-reactive protein and the importance of maintaining currently used clinical decision-making criteria
  4. Review
  5. Why C-reactive protein is one of the most requested tests in clinical laboratories?
  6. Mini Reviews
  7. C-reactive protein and clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients: the importance of harmonized measurements
  8. Current performance of C-reactive protein determination and derivation of quality specifications for its measurement uncertainty
  9. Opinion Papers
  10. Implementing metrological traceability of C-reactive protein measurements: consensus summary from the Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine Workshop
  11. Analytical performance specifications for the measurement uncertainty of 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D examinations
  12. A new door to a different world: opportunities from the metaverse and the raise of meta-medical laboratories
  13. Guidelines and Recommendations
  14. Point-of-care testing performed by healthcare professionals outside the hospital setting: consensus based recommendations from the IFCC Committee on Point-of-Care Testing (IFCC C-POCT)
  15. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  16. Effects of storage conditions on the stability of blood-based markers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease
  17. Long-term stability of thyroid peroxidase antibody (anti-TPO) in serum in the Danish General Suburban Population Study
  18. Exploration of suitable external quality assessment materials for serum C-peptide measurement
  19. Description and validation of an equilibrium dialysis ID-LC-MS/MS candidate reference measurement procedure for free thyroxine in human serum
  20. Evaluation of testosterone, estradiol and progesterone immunoassay calibrators by liquid chromatography mass spectrometry
  21. Lack of comparability of immunoassays for rheumatoid factor isotypes
  22. Validation of ELISA assays for the calculation of FLC indices for the diagnosis of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis
  23. First-trimester screening for Down syndrome using quadruple maternal biochemical markers
  24. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) in fecal samples: validation of the extraction methodology and stability in short-term storage conditions
  25. Cardiovascular Diseases
  26. Interlaboratory variation for NT-proBNP among Swedish laboratories in an external quality program 2011–2021
  27. Infectious Diseases
  28. SARS-CoV-2 specific T-cell humoral response assessment after COVID-19 vaccination using a rapid direct real-time PCR amplification
  29. Efficiency evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic strategy combining high throughput quantitative antigen immunoassay and real time PCR
  30. Peri-infection titers of neutralizing and binding antibodies as a predictor of COVID-19 breakthrough infections in vaccinated healthcare professionals: importance of the timing
  31. Letters to the Editor
  32. Pooled analysis of laboratory-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen immunoassays
  33. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different COVID-19 screening strategies based on rapid or laboratory-based SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing
  34. Early kinetics of cellular immunity in recipients of bivalent BNT162b2 vaccine: a proof-of-concept study
  35. Impact of switching total bilirubin assays on the classification of neonates at high risk for hyperbilirubinemia
  36. Discrepancies in PSA values among laboratories: the case of a traveling patient
  37. Measurement of amyloid-β 1–42 in cerebrospinal fluid: a comparison of the second generation Elecsys and INNOTEST
Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2023-0139/html
Scroll to top button