Article
Publicly Available
Frontmatter
Published/Copyright:
November 29, 2018
Published Online: 2018-11-29
Published in Print: 2018-12-19
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- The Post-Analytical Phase
- Terminology, units and reporting – how harmonized do we need to be?
- A pragmatic bottom-up approach to harmonize the units of clinical chemistry tests among Belgian clinical laboratories, focusing on immunoassays
- Indirect methods for reference interval determination – review and recommendations
- Verification of reference intervals in routine clinical laboratories: practical challenges and recommendations
- An update report on the harmonization of adult reference intervals in Australasia
- NUMBER: standardized reference intervals in the Netherlands using a ‘big data’ approach
- Pediatric and adult reference interval harmonization in Canada: an update
- Report formatting in laboratory medicine – a call for harmony
- Harmonization of interpretative comments in laboratory hematology reporting: the recommendations of the Working Group on Diagnostic Hematology of the Italian Society of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (WGDH-SIBioC)
- Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey
- An evidence- and risk-based approach to a harmonized laboratory alert list in Australia and New Zealand
- Harmonization of units and reference intervals of plasma proteins: state of the art from an External Quality Assessment Scheme
- Harmonization activities of Noklus – a quality improvement organization for point-of-care laboratory examinations
- Towards harmonization of external quality assessment/proficiency testing in hemostasis
- The Post-Post-Analytical Phase
- Extra-analytical quality indicators – where to now?
- Role of laboratory medicine in collaborative healthcare
- Acknowledgment
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- The Post-Analytical Phase
- Terminology, units and reporting – how harmonized do we need to be?
- A pragmatic bottom-up approach to harmonize the units of clinical chemistry tests among Belgian clinical laboratories, focusing on immunoassays
- Indirect methods for reference interval determination – review and recommendations
- Verification of reference intervals in routine clinical laboratories: practical challenges and recommendations
- An update report on the harmonization of adult reference intervals in Australasia
- NUMBER: standardized reference intervals in the Netherlands using a ‘big data’ approach
- Pediatric and adult reference interval harmonization in Canada: an update
- Report formatting in laboratory medicine – a call for harmony
- Harmonization of interpretative comments in laboratory hematology reporting: the recommendations of the Working Group on Diagnostic Hematology of the Italian Society of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Molecular Biology (WGDH-SIBioC)
- Toward harmonization of clinical molecular diagnostic reports: findings of an international survey
- An evidence- and risk-based approach to a harmonized laboratory alert list in Australia and New Zealand
- Harmonization of units and reference intervals of plasma proteins: state of the art from an External Quality Assessment Scheme
- Harmonization activities of Noklus – a quality improvement organization for point-of-care laboratory examinations
- Towards harmonization of external quality assessment/proficiency testing in hemostasis
- The Post-Post-Analytical Phase
- Extra-analytical quality indicators – where to now?
- Role of laboratory medicine in collaborative healthcare
- Acknowledgment