Home Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to detect cannabinoids in whole blood and breath
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to detect cannabinoids in whole blood and breath

  • Jacqueline A. Hubbard ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Breland E. Smith , Philip M. Sobolesky , Sollip Kim , Melissa A. Hoffman , Judith Stone , Marilyn A. Huestis , David J. Grelotti , Igor Grant , Thomas D. Marcotte and Robert L. Fitzgerald
Published/Copyright: September 17, 2019

Abstract

Background

The widespread availability of cannabis raises concerns regarding its effect on driving performance and operation of complex equipment. Currently, there are no established safe driving limits regarding ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentrations in blood or breath. Daily cannabis users build up a large body burden of THC with residual excretion for days or weeks after the start of abstinence. Therefore, it is critical to have a sensitive and specific analytical assay that quantifies THC, the main psychoactive component of cannabis, and multiple metabolites to improve interpretation of cannabinoids in blood; some analytes may indicate recent use.

Methods

A liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed to quantify THC, cannabinol (CBN), cannabidiol (CBD), 11-hydroxy-THC (11-OH-THC), (±)-11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-THC (THCCOOH), (+)-11-nor-Δ9-THC-9-carboxylic acid glucuronide (THCCOOH-gluc), cannabigerol (CBG), and tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) in whole blood (WB). WB samples were prepared by solid-phase extraction (SPE) and quantified by LC-MS/MS. A rapid and simple method involving methanol elution of THC in breath collected in SensAbues® devices was optimized.

Results

Lower limits of quantification ranged from 0.5 to 2 μg/L in WB. An LLOQ of 80 pg/pad was achieved for THC concentrations in breath. Calibration curves were linear (R2>0.995) with calibrator concentrations within ±15% of their target and quality control (QC) bias and imprecision ≤15%. No major matrix effects or drug interferences were observed.

Conclusions

The methods were robust and adequately quantified cannabinoids in biological blood and breath samples. These methods will be used to identify cannabinoid concentrations in an upcoming study of the effects of cannabis on driving.


Corresponding author: Jacqueline A. Hubbard, PhD, Department of Pathology, University of California, 10300 Campus Point Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Waters Corporation for their support, training, and technical assistance throughout this project.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: This work was supported by the State of California via the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act (Assembly Bill 266). Additional support was provided by the Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research at the University of California, San Diego, which receives support from the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (California Proposition 64) and philanthropic gifts from the Wholistic Research and Education Foundation.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. The National Academies Collection: Reports funded by National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

2. Ebbert JO, Scharf EL, Hurt RT. Medical cannabis. Mayo Clin Proc 2018;93:1842–7.10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.09.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Spindle TR, Bonn-Miller MO, Vandrey R. Changing landscape of cannabis: novel products, formulations, and methods of administration. Curr Opin Psychol 2019;30:98–102.10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.04.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Kelley-Baker T, Berning A, Ramirez A, Lacey JH, Carr K, Waehrer G, et al. 2013–2014 National Roadside Study of alcohol and drug use by drivers: drug results (Report No. DOT HS 812 411). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

5. Broyd SJ, van Hell HH, Beale C, Yucel M, Solowij N. Acute and chronic effects of cannabinoids on human cognition – a systematic review. Biol Psychiatry 2016;79:557–67.10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.12.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Compton R. Marijuana-impaired driving – a report to congress (DOT HS 812 440). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

7. Ramaekers JG, Berghaus G, van Laar M, Drummer OH. Dose related risk of motor vehicle crashes after cannabis use. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004;73:109–19.10.1007/978-3-7643-9923-8_29Search in Google Scholar

8. Biecheler M-B, Peytavin J-F, the SAMG, Facy F, Martineau H. SAM survey on “drugs and fatal accidents”: search of substances consumed and comparison between dInvolved under the influence of alcohol or cannabis. Traffic Injury Prev 2008;9:11–21.10.1080/15389580701737561Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Logan B, Kacinko SL, Beirness DJ. An evaluation of data from drivers arrested for driving under the influence in relation to per se limits for cannabis. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, 2016. https://aaafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ EvaluationOfDriversInRelationToPerSeReport.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

10. Hartman RL, Brown TL, Milavetz G, Spurgin A, Gorelick DA, Gaffney GR, et al. Effect of blood collection time on measured delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations: implications for driving interpretation and drug policy. Clin Chem 2016;62:367–77.10.1373/clinchem.2015.248492Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Schwope DM, Bosker WM, Ramaekers JG, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA. Psychomotor performance, subjective and physiological effects and whole blood Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations in heavy, chronic cannabis smokers following acute smoked cannabis. J Anal Toxicol 2012;36:405–12.10.1093/jat/bks044Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Hartman RL, Huestis MA. Cannabis effects on driving skills. Clin Chem 2013;59:478–92.10.1373/clinchem.2012.194381Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

13. Bergamaschi MM, Karschner EL, Goodwin RS, Scheidweiler KB, Hirvonen J, Queiroz RH, et al. Impact of prolonged cannabinoid excretion in chronic daily cannabis smokers’ blood on per se drugged driving laws. Clin Chem 2013;59:519–26.10.1373/clinchem.2012.195503Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Newmeyer MN, Swortwood MJ, Barnes AJ, Abulseoud OA, Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA. Free and glucuronide whole blood cannabinoids’ pharmacokinetics after controlled smoked, vaporized, and oral cannabis administration in frequent and occasional cannabis users: identification of recent cannabis intake. Clin Chem 2016;62:1579–92.10.1373/clinchem.2016.263475Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Scheidweiler KB, Schwope DM, Karschner EL, Desrosiers NA, Gorelick DA, Huestis MA. In vitro stability of free and glucuronidated cannabinoids in blood and plasma following controlled smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 2013;59:1108–17.10.1373/clinchem.2012.201467Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

16. Himes SK, Scheidweiler KB, Beck O, Gorelick DA, Desrosiers NA, Huestis MA. Cannabinoids in exhaled breath following controlled administration of smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 2013;59:1780–9.10.1373/clinchem.2013.207407Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Sobolesky PM, Smith BE, Hubbard JA, Stone J, Marcotte TD, Grelotti DJ, et al. Validation of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for analyzing cannabinoids in oral fluid. Clin Chim Acta 2019;491:30–8.10.1016/j.cca.2019.01.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Rudzki PJ, Gniazdowska E, Bus-Kwasnik K. Quantitative evaluation of the matrix effect in bioanalytical methods based on LC-MS: a comparison of two approaches. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2018;155:314–9.10.1016/j.jpba.2018.03.052Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Hadener M, Weinmann W, Schurch S, Konig S. Development of a rapid column-switching LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of THCCOOH and THCCOOH-glucuronide in whole blood for assessing cannabis consumption frequency. Anal Bioanal Chem 2016;408:1953–62.10.1007/s00216-016-9311-8Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Konig S, Aebi B, Lanz S, Gasser M, Weinmann W. On-line SPE LC-MS/MS for the quantification of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and its two major metabolites in human peripheral blood by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2011;400:9–16.10.1007/s00216-011-4708-xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Palazzoli F, Citti C, Licata M, Vilella A, Manca L, Zoli M, et al. Development of a simple and sensitive liquid chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for the determination of cannabidiol (CBD), Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and its metabolites in rat whole blood after oral administration of a single high dose of CBD. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2018;150:25–32.10.1016/j.jpba.2017.11.054Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Schwope DM, Scheidweiler KB, Huestis MA. Direct quantification of cannabinoids and cannabinoid glucuronides in whole blood by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 2011;401:1273–83.10.1007/s00216-011-5197-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Teixeira H, Verstraete A, Proenca P, Corte-Real F, Monsanto P, Vieira DN. Validated method for the simultaneous determination of Delta9-THC and Delta9-THC-COOH in oral fluid, urine and whole blood using solid-phase extraction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization. Forensic Sci Int 2007;170:14–55.10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.03.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Tiscione NB, Miller R, Shan X, Sprague J, Yeatman DT. An efficient, robust method for the determination of cannabinoids in whole blood by LC-MS-MS. J Anal Toxicol 2016;40:639–48.10.1093/jat/bkw063Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Fell JC, Scherer M. Estimation of the potential effectiveness of lowering the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limit for driving from 0.08 to 0.05 grams per deciliter in the United States. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2017;41:2128–39.10.1111/acer.13501Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Lynch KL, Luo YR, Hooshfar S, Yun C. Correlation of breath and blood Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations and release kinetics following controlled administration of smoked cannabis. Clin Chem 2019. pii: clinchem.2019.304501. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2019.304501 [Epub ahead of print].10.1373/clinchem.2019.304501Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Coucke L, Massarini E, Ostijn Z, Beck O, Verstraete AG. Delta(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations in exhaled breath and physiological effects following cannabis intake – a pilot study using illicit cannabis. Clin Biochem 2016;49:1072–7.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2016.06.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Beck O, Sandqvist S, Dubbelboer I, Franck J. Detection of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol in exhaled breath collected from cannabis users. J Anal Toxicol 2011;35:541–4.10.1093/anatox/35.8.541Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Luo YR, Yun C, Lynch KL. Quantitation of cannabinoids in breath samples using a novel derivatization LC-MS/MS assay with ultra-high sensitivity. J Anal Toxicol 2019;43:331–9.10.1093/jat/bkz023Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Garzinsky AM, Walpurgis K, Krug O, Thevis M. Does oral fluid contribute to exhaled breath samples collected by means of an electret membrane? Drug Test Anal 2019. doi: 10.1002/dta.2597. [Epub ahead of print].10.1002/dta.2597Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Sorensen LK, Hasselstrom JB. Sensitive determination of cannabinoids in whole blood by LC-MS-MS after rapid removal of phospholipids by filtration. J Anal Toxicol 2017;41:382–91.10.1093/jat/bkx030Search in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Scheidweiler KB, Newmeyer MN, Barnes AJ, Huestis MA. Quantification of cannabinoids and their free and glucuronide metabolites in whole blood by disposable pipette extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2016;1453:34–42.10.1016/j.chroma.2016.05.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Hanisch S, Paulke A, Toennes SW. 11-nor-9-carboxy-Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol glucuronide exhibits acyl-migration isomers. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2017;146:261–5.10.1016/j.jpba.2017.08.044Search in Google Scholar PubMed


Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0600).


Received: 2019-06-13
Accepted: 2019-08-21
Published Online: 2019-09-17
Published in Print: 2020-04-28

©2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Advancements in mass spectrometry as a tool for clinical analysis: Part I
  4. Drug adherence, testing and therapeutic monitoring
  5. Hyphenated mass spectrometry techniques for assessing medication adherence: advantages, challenges, clinical applications and future perspectives
  6. Method development for quantitative determination of seven statins including four active metabolites by means of high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry applicable for adherence testing and therapeutic drug monitoring
  7. Validation of a liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method to detect cannabinoids in whole blood and breath
  8. THC and CBD concentrations in blood, oral fluid and urine following a single and repeated administration of “light cannabis”
  9. Identification of metabolites of peptide-derived drugs using an isotope-labeled reporter ion screening strategy
  10. Validation according to European and American regulatory agencies guidelines of an LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of free and total ropivacaine in human plasma
  11. Enhanced specificity due to method specific limits for relative ion intensities in a high-performance liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectrometry method for iohexol in human serum
  12. Small molecule biomarkers
  13. Applying mass spectrometry-based assays to explore gut microbial metabolism and associations with disease
  14. Trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) determined by LC-MS/MS: distribution and correlates in the population-based PopGen cohort
  15. Development of a total serum testosterone, androstenedione, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, 11β-hydroxyandrostenedione and 11-ketotestosterone LC-MS/MS assay and its application to evaluate pre-analytical sample stability
  16. Short-term stability of free metanephrines in plasma and whole blood
  17. Validation of a rapid, comprehensive and clinically relevant amino acid profile by underivatised liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
  18. UPLC-MS/MS method for determination of retinol and α-tocopherol in serum using a simple sample pretreatment and UniSpray as ionization technique to reduce matrix effects
  19. Independent association of plasma xanthine oxidoreductase activity with serum uric acid level based on stable isotope-labeled xanthine and liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry: MedCity21 health examination registry
  20. Serum bile acids profiling by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and its application on pediatric liver and intestinal diseases
  21. LC-MS/MS analysis of plasma glucosylsphingosine as a biomarker for diagnosis and follow-up monitoring in Gaucher disease in the Spanish population
  22. Dried blood spots and alternative sample mediums
  23. Investigating the suitability of high-resolution mass spectrometry for newborn screening: identification of hemoglobinopathies and β-thalassemias in dried blood spots
  24. Candidate reference method for determination of vitamin D from dried blood spot samples
  25. Therapeutic drug monitoring of anti-epileptic drugs – a clinical verification of volumetric absorptive micro sampling
  26. Simultaneous quantitation of five triazole anti-fungal agents by paper spray-mass spectrometry
  27. Obtaining information from the brain in a non-invasive way: determination of iron in nasal exudate to differentiate hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes
Downloaded on 2.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2019-0600/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button