Evaluation of reference intervals of haematological and biochemical markers in an Austrian adolescent study cohort
-
Barbara Bogner
, Karin Schwenoha
Abstract
Background
Reference intervals are a prerequisite for the interpretation of laboratory data related to diagnostic issues and treatment strategies. In adolescents, biomarker concentrations change with age, necessitating a continuous age-related definition of the reference intervals. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the reference intervals for a healthy population of adolescents in Salzburg and compare these, when possible, with age- and gender-matched published data.
Methods
Anthropometrical parameters and blood samples were collected from adolescents (male and female; 14–17 years) in a school setting. Haematological samples were measured using Sysmex XS-1000i, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism markers as well as enzymes and hormones were determined by Cobas c311, Vitros ECiQ® or ELISA. The reference intervals were calculated according to the CLSI guidelines C28-A3c.
Results
Samples of 102 participants were included. Compared to age- and gender-matched reference intervals, the BMI levels were in the lower normal rage. Most haematological parameters and biomedical makers reveal similar ranges to values published in other studies.
Conclusions
This data analysis allowed for a partial comparison of reference values with published data and enabled a new determination of paediatric reference intervals for an Austrian cohort.
Introduction
Reference intervals of specific biomarkers are used to distinguish between healthy and diseased people. This enables an accurate interpretation of biomedical laboratory tests, which is a prerequisite for the proper treatment of patients. Reference intervals and target values are not only used for diagnosis, but also to monitor therapeutic treatments and to screen for risks of disease. Therefore, the continuous evaluation and fine-tuning of reference intervals, based on age-, gender- and ethnic-specific variations as well as on different methods, are essential. Physiological changes in biomedical parameters occur with age and are especially pronounced during childhood and adolescence due to constant growth, development as well as maturation, thereby causing alterations in metabolic processes [1], [2], [3]. Thus, the establishment and validation of paediatric reference values is of high relevance. Studies like the Children’s Health Improvement through Laboratory Diagnostics program, the Lifestyle of Our Kids (LOOK) program, the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Children and Adolescents (KiGGS), the Canadian Laboratory Initiative on Paediatric Reference Intervals (CALIPER) project (reviewed in [2]) as well as the Identification and prevention of Dietary- and lifestyle-induced health Effects in Children and infants (IDEFICs) project [4] contribute to meet this demand and close gaps in paediatric laboratory medicine. Although these studies all have a similar aim, the study protocols differ from each other. Nevertheless, the common denominator is the evaluation of reference intervals of different biomedical markers for age groups between 0 and 18 years. Recently, the MoYo (Motivating Young people to maintain a healthy life-style) project was performed. This was a school-based pilot study with an interventional design performed in Salzburg (Austria) from 2014 to 2015 [5]. It has provided baseline data from healthy adolescents at the age of 14–17 years and facilitated an “a priori” approach for the evaluation of reference values. The purpose of this paper is, to evaluate the reference intervals of haematological and biochemical laboratory parameters for local, Caucasian adolescents in Salzburg, and to compare these with available paediatric reference data.
Materials and methods
The anthropometric and biomedical data were obtained from the baseline data of the MoYo-pilot project, which was performed in schools and therefore in a non-clinical setting. In total, 110 per se healthy adolescents of Caucasian origin in the age group of 14–17 years participated. All but one indicated at the beginning of the study that their health status was good and that they did not have any known diseases. For 102 adolescents (63 males, 39 females) haematological parameters as well as carbohydrate and lipid metabolism markers, hormones, vitamins and micronutrients were determined. A full list with all the analysed parameters can be found in Table 1. All participants and their legal guardians gave informed consent to participate in this study. This informed consent could be withdrawn at any point of the study and beyond and included the deletion of all available data when required. The study design was approved by the local Ethics Committee (county of Salzburg, Austria) and meets the Declaration of Helsinki.
Measurement of laboratory parameters.
Measurement device | Reagents (Inc.) | Sample | Parameter |
---|---|---|---|
XS-1000i (Sysmex GmbH, Vienna, Austria) | Sysmex | EDTA | Erythrocytes, haemoglobin, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, platelets, leucocytes, segmented neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils, basophils |
Cobas c311 (Roche, Mannheim Germany) | Roche | Serum | Glucose, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein (a), hs-CRP, GOT (ASAT), GPT (ALAT), GGT, creatinine, cystatin-C, albumin, uric acid, urea, zinc, ferritin |
Roche | EDTA | HbA1c | |
Vitros ECiQ® (Assista, Vienna, Austria) | Ortho Clinical Diagnostics | Serum | TSH, fT3, fT4, vitamin B12, folic acid, vitamin D, testosterone, oestrogene, FSH, LH, prolactin |
Plate reader infinite 200-pro (Tecan, Grödig, Austria) | IBL | Serum | Insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide, SHBG |
Biovendor | Serum | Adiponectin |
Standard equipment was used in combination with the corresponding test kits for clinical-chemical analysis.
Venipuncture and anthropometric measurements were carried out between 07:30 and 08:30 AM. The participants were instructed not to eat or drink anything except for water at least 10 h before the day of the blood sample collection. Blood samples were drawn using a 21G Safety blood collection set (Ref. 450081, Greiner bio-one GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria) in combination with Vacuette tubes for serum (Ref. 455092, Greiner bio-one GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria), EDTA- (Ref. 454086, Greiner bio-one GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria) and Li-Heparin-plasma (Ref. 454083, Greiner bio-one GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria) and handled according to pre-analytical guidelines [6]. Serum samples were stored at room temperature in an upright position for 30 min to allow the sample to fully clot before further processing. Serum and plasma samples were centrifuged at 1500×g for 10 min at 22°C.
Haematological parameters were measured using EDTA-samples on the XS-1000i instrument (Sysmex GmbH, Vienna, Austria). Clinical chemistry parameters, such as carbohydrate and lipid metabolism markers, hormones, vitamins and micronutrients were determined from serum using either the Cobas c311 (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland), the Vitros ECiQ® (Assista, Vienna, Austria) or diagnostically approved ELISAs (IBL International GmbH [Hamburg, Germany] and Biovendor GesmbH [Vienna, Austria]). Assessment of the optical density of these assays was performed on the Infinite 200 pro plate reader (Tecan, Grödig, Austria) (Table 1).
Anthropometric measurements for evaluating body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) were performed with a portable calibrated stadiometer, a measuring tape and a segmental body composition analyser (Tanita BC-418, Tanita Corporation of America, Inc., IL, USA) commonly used in clinical research.
For biometric data acquisition, Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corporation, WA, USA) was used. The BMI was calculated as the ratio of the body weight to the square of body height (kg/m2). The WHR was calculated by dividing waist circumference by hip circumference and WHtR by dividing waist circumference by body height. Laboratory data were managed and validated by the laboratory software GLIMS (MIPS Diagnostics Intelligence Europe, Gent, Belgium).
For statistical analyses, the data were imported to IBM SPSS Statistics version 25 (IBM Corporation, NY, USA) and descriptive und inference statistical analyses were performed. The reference intervals were calculated according to the CLSI guidelines C28-A3c [7] after the data were normalized and outliers were identified and excluded using the Grubbs test. Before the 2.5 and the 97.5 percentiles were calculated, the data were weighted with respect to gender proportion (number of cases 120). In addition, the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for the upper and lower limit of the reference interval ±1.64×SD/√n. Differences between males and females were analysed conducting a multivariate analysis of variance.
Results
The analysis of the biometrical data showed that the BMI is distributed according to the age- and gender-matched reference range. In males, the median BMI was 20.37 (25 percentile 18.73 and 75 percentile 22.67), in females the median BMI was 20.52 (25 percentile 18.14 and 75 percentile 22.74). The WHR was normally distributed in males (mean WHR±SD=0.85±0.05), but not in females (median WHR=0.77 (25 percentile 0.74 and 75 percentile 0.80). The evaluated median WHtR for male was 0.42 (25 percentile 0.40 and 75 percentile 0.44) and for female 0.41 (25 percentile 0.39 and 75 percentile 0.44).
The calculated reference intervals, including the 90% CI of the lower and upper limit from investigated laboratory parameters, are listed in Table 2. According to the Grubbs outlier test, 17 individuals (11 boys and 6 girls) with a higher score than the critical Grubbs cut-off in at least one parameter were excluded. In addition, it should be mentioned that one male diabetes patient in the age of 15 years participated in the study, who was also excluded from the calculation of reference ranges. To compare these with reference intervals of similar study populations (age, gender and ethnicity), a survey for published reference intervals was performed. The results for the reference intervals for the Austrian adolescents as determined in the presented study and those published of matched age ranges [3], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12] are shown in Table 3.
Calculation of reference intervals (2.5–97.5 percentile [P2.5%–P97.5%]) from the baseline data of the MoYo-study based on the CLSI guidelines C28-A3c.
Parameter | All | Male | Female | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P2.5% | CI lower P2.5% | CI upper P2.5% | P97.5% | CI lower P97.5% | CI upper P97.5% | P2.5% | CI lower P2.5% | CI upper P2.5% | P97.5% | CI lower P97.5% | CI upper P97.5% | P2.5% | CI lower P2.5% | CI upper P2.5% | P97.5% | CI lower P97.5% | CI upper P97.5% | |
Erythrocytes, ×106/μL* | 3.99 | 3.93 | 4.05 | 5.97 | 5.91 | 6.03 | 4.62 | 4.57 | 4.66 | 6.04 | 5.99 | 6.08 | 3.83 | 3.78 | 3.88 | 5.14 | 5.09 | 5.19 |
Haemoglobin, g/dL* | 11.74 | 11.54 | 11.94 | 16.48 | 16.28 | 16.68 | 13.22 | 13.08 | 13.36 | 16.70 | 16.56 | 16.84 | 9.00 | 8.84 | 9.16 | 14.60 | 14.44 | 14.76 |
HCT, %* | 36.08 | 35.60 | 36.56 | 48.06 | 47.58 | 48.54 | 39.04 | 38.66 | 39.43 | 48.88 | 48.49 | 49.26 | 29.20 | 28.81 | 29.59 | 42.70 | 42.31 | 43.09 |
MCV, fL* | 76.18 | 75.53 | 76.84 | 93.42 | 92.76 | 94.07 | 76.39 | 75.89 | 76.89 | 88.92 | 88.42 | 89.42 | 66.70 | 65.90 | 67.50 | 95.30 | 94.50 | 96.10 |
MCH, pg* | 25.44 | 25.20 | 25.68 | 31.18 | 30.94 | 31.42 | 25.90 | 25.72 | 26.08 | 31.26 | 31.07 | 31.44 | 20.50 | 20.20 | 20.80 | 31.10 | 30.80 | 31.40 |
MCHC, g/dL* | 31.64 | 31.50 | 31.78 | 35.76 | 35.62 | 35.90 | 33.22 | 33.11 | 33.32 | 35.83 | 35.72 | 35.93 | 30.80 | 30.65 | 30.95 | 35.40 | 35.25 | 35.55 |
Platelets, ×103/μL | 157.21 | 150.69 | 163.73 | 354.40 | 347.87 | 360.92 | 152.04 | 145.34 | 158.75 | 352.85 | 346.14 | 359.55 | 175.00 | 168.89 | 181.11 | 366.00 | 359.89 | 372.11 |
Leucocytes, ×103/μL | 3.52 | 3.25 | 3.78 | 11.44 | 11.17 | 11.70 | 3.90 | 3.63 | 4.16 | 11.24 | 10.98 | 11.51 | 3.48 | 3.22 | 3.74 | 12.00 | 11.74 | 12.26 |
Segmented neutrophils, % | 37.24 | 35.83 | 38.66 | 76.30 | 74.88 | 77.72 | 38.81 | 37.42 | 40.20 | 75.18 | 73.79 | 76.57 | 36.60 | 35.24 | 37.96 | 76.80 | 75.44 | 78.16 |
Segmented neutrophils, ×103/μL* | 1.70 | 1.46 | 1.94 | 8.26 | 8.02 | 8.49 | 1.79 | 1.56 | 2.03 | 8.03 | 7.80 | 8.27 | 1.67 | 1.44 | 1.91 | 9.22 | 8.98 | 9.45 |
Lymphocytes, % | 16.04 | 14.84 | 17.24 | 51.00 | 49.80 | 52.20 | 17.56 | 16.37 | 18.76 | 50.60 | 49.40 | 51.79 | 15.90 | 14.74 | 17.06 | 51.20 | 50.04 | 52.36 |
Lymphocytes, ×103/μL | 1.27 | 1.20 | 1.34 | 3.15 | 3.08 | 3.22 | 1.38 | 1.32 | 1.45 | 3.26 | 3.19 | 3.33 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 1.01 | 2.94 | 2.87 | 3.01 |
Monocytes, % | 4.32 | 4.13 | 4.51 | 9.28 | 9.09 | 9.47 | 4.50 | 4.31 | 4.69 | 9.64 | 9.45 | 9.83 | 4.10 | 3.91 | 4.29 | 9.10 | 8.91 | 9.29 |
Monocytes, ×103/μL | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.83 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.26 | 0.86 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.22 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.67 |
Eosinophils, %* | 0.70 | 0.23 | 1.17 | 14.28 | 13.81 | 14.75 | 0.76 | 0.24 | 1.28 | 14.41 | 13.89 | 14.93 | 0.70 | 0.36 | 1.04 | 9.40 | 9.06 | 9.74 |
Eosinophils, ×103/μL* | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 1.04 | 1.01 | 1.07 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 1.10 | 1.07 | 1.14 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.61 |
Basophils, % | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 1.38 | 1.33 | 1.43 | 0.17 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 1.36 | 1.31 | 1.41 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 1.40 | 1.36 | 1.44 |
Basophils (×103/μL)* | 0.009 | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.088 | 0.085 | 0.090 | 0.010 | 0.007 | 0.013 | 0.088 | 0.085 | 0.091 | 0.008 | 0.006 | 0.011 | 0.062 | 0.060 | 0.065 |
Glucose, mg/dL* | 68.20 | 67.30 | 69.10 | 93.80 | 92.90 | 94.70 | 68.00 | 67.07 | 68.93 | 95.13 | 94.20 | 96.07 | 69.00 | 68.26 | 69.74 | 88.00 | 87.26 | 88.74 |
HbA1c, % | 4.70 | 4.67 | 4.73 | 5.60 | 5.57 | 5.63 | 4.87 | 4.84 | 4.90 | 5.60 | 5.57 | 5.63 | 4.60 | 4.57 | 4.63 | 5.60 | 5.57 | 5.63 |
Insulin, μIU/mL | 6.96 | 6.39 | 7.53 | 22.45 | 21.87 | 23.02 | 7.24 | 6.68 | 7.80 | 21.47 | 20.92 | 22.03 | 6.93 | 6.33 | 7.53 | 24.87 | 24.27 | 25.47 |
Proinsulin, pmol/L | 0.62 | 0.37 | 0.86 | 8.34 | 8.09 | 8.58 | 0.55 | 0.30 | 0.80 | 8.89 | 8.64 | 9.13 | 0.84 | 0.61 | 1.07 | 7.80 | 7.57 | 8.03 |
Triglycerides, mg/dL | 28.81 | 24.15 | 33.47 | 150.80 | 146.14 | 155.46 | 30.87 | 26.15 | 35.59 | 140.96 | 136.24 | 145.68 | 26.00 | 21.50 | 30.50 | 158.00 | 153.50 | 162.50 |
Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 110.01 | 105.88 | 114.15 | 232.98 | 228.84 | 237.11 | 120.00 | 116.79 | 123.21 | 214.28 | 211.07 | 217.50 | 104.00 | 98.73 | 109.27 | 255.00 | 249.73 | 260.27 |
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL | 51.62 | 47.76 | 55.48 | 156.21 | 152.36 | 160.07 | 56.69 | 53.47 | 59.91 | 146.94 | 143.72 | 150.16 | 44.00 | 39.33 | 48.67 | 170.20 | 165.53 | 174.87 |
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL* | 35.20 | 33.45 | 36.95 | 82.19 | 80.44 | 83.95 | 34.43 | 32.72 | 36.15 | 81.26 | 79.55 | 82.98 | 36.00 | 34.26 | 37.74 | 83.00 | 81.26 | 84.74 |
Lipoprotein (a), mg/dL | 0.00 | −6.42 | 6.42 | 171.39 | 164.97 | 177.81 | 0.00 | −5.89 | 5.89 | 151.37 | 145.48 | 157.26 | 0.00 | −7.13 | 7.13 | 181.00 | 173.87 | 188.13 |
ApoA1, mg/dL* | 115.65 | 112.36 | 118.94 | 208.34 | 205.05 | 211.63 | 121.55 | 118.70 | 124.39 | 207.67 | 204.82 | 210.51 | 114.00 | 110.27 | 117.73 | 222.00 | 218.27 | 225.73 |
ApoB, mg/dL | 42.80 | 40.24 | 45.37 | 115.84 | 113.27 | 118.41 | 47.55 | 45.25 | 49.84 | 115.43 | 113.13 | 117.73 | 41.40 | 38.46 | 44.34 | 125.40 | 122.46 | 128.34 |
Adiponectin, μg/mL | 5.34 | 4.83 | 5.85 | 18.80 | 18.29 | 19.31 | 5.36 | 4.87 | 5.84 | 17.46 | 16.98 | 17.95 | 4.87 | 4.34 | 5.40 | 19.09 | 18.56 | 19.62 |
hs-CRP, mg/L | 0.01 | −0.15 | 0.17 | 4.32 | 4.16 | 4.48 | 0.00 | −0.12 | 0.12 | 3.23 | 3.11 | 3.35 | 0.06 | −0.14 | 0.26 | 6.79 | 6.59 | 6.99 |
TSH, mIU/L | 0.89 | 0.77 | 1.02 | 4.13 | 4.00 | 4.25 | 1.02 | 0.89 | 1.14 | 4.51 | 4.39 | 4.64 | 0.51 | 0.39 | 0.63 | 4.15 | 4.03 | 4.27 |
FT3, pg/mL* | 3.07 | 2.98 | 3.16 | 5.72 | 5.62 | 5.81 | 3.76 | 3.69 | 3.84 | 5.95 | 5.87 | 6.02 | 2.87 | 2.78 | 2.96 | 5.30 | 5.21 | 5.39 |
FT4, ng/dL | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.38 | 1.35 | 1.41 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.36 | 1.34 | 1.39 | 0.70 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 1.40 | 1.37 | 1.43 |
Albumin, g/L* | 42.32 | 41.79 | 42.85 | 57.98 | 57.45 | 58.51 | 44.20 | 43.70 | 44.70 | 58.68 | 58.18 | 59.18 | 40.30 | 39.77 | 40.83 | 54.80 | 54.27 | 55.33 |
Creatinine, mg/dL* | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 1.02 | 1.00 | 1.03 | 0.61 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 1.04 | 1.02 | 1.05 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.00 |
Urea (BUN), mg/dL* | 12.54 | 11.76 | 13.32 | 34.18 | 33.40 | 34.96 | 16.87 | 16.15 | 17.60 | 34.30 | 33.57 | 35.03 | 12.40 | 11.67 | 13.13 | 30.30 | 29.57 | 31.03 |
Cystatin C, mg/L* | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 1.08 | 1.06 | 1.10 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 0.70 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 1.01 |
Uric acid, mg/dL* | 3.22 | 3.04 | 3.40 | 7.94 | 7.76 | 8.12 | 4.04 | 3.90 | 4.19 | 8.00 | 7.85 | 8.15 | 2.80 | 2.69 | 2.91 | 5.80 | 5.69 | 5.91 |
AST, IU/L* | 15.00 | 14.04 | 15.96 | 44.60 | 43.63 | 45.56 | 17.72 | 16.73 | 18.71 | 45.57 | 44.57 | 46.56 | 14.00 | 13.23 | 14.77 | 37.00 | 36.23 | 37.77 |
ALT, IU/L* | 10.00 | 9.12 | 10.88 | 35.80 | 34.92 | 36.68 | 9.72 | 8.79 | 10.64 | 36.85 | 35.92 | 37.77 | 10.00 | 9.34 | 10.66 | 32.00 | 31.34 | 32.66 |
GGT, IU/L* | 5.20 | 4.49 | 5.91 | 26.80 | 26.09 | 27.51 | 5.72 | 5.03 | 6.40 | 26.57 | 25.88 | 27.25 | 5.00 | 4.43 | 5.57 | 27.00 | 26.43 | 27.57 |
Vitamin B12, pmol/L | 228.53 | 209.49 | 247.57 | 704.23 | 685.19 | 723.27 | 224.21 | 205.35 | 243.08 | 724.18 | 705.31 | 743.04 | 263.00 | 244.00 | 282.00 | 707.00 | 688.00 | 726.00 |
Folic acid, nmol/L | 2.66 | 2.32 | 3.01 | 11.47 | 11.12 | 11.82 | 3.01 | 2.68 | 3.34 | 11.32 | 10.99 | 11.65 | 2.44 | 2.07 | 2.81 | 14.60 | 14.23 | 14.97 |
Vitamin D, ng/mL | 17.12 | 15.95 | 18.29 | 43.88 | 42.70 | 45.05 | 17.35 | 16.17 | 18.52 | 44.20 | 43.02 | 45.38 | 17.00 | 15.87 | 18.13 | 44.40 | 43.27 | 45.53 |
Zinc, μg/dL* | 9.20 | 4.38 | 14.03 | 117.59 | 112.76 | 122.42 | 8.59 | 3.72 | 13.45 | 119.00 | 114.13 | 123.87 | 9.00 | 4.52 | 13.48 | 101.00 | 96.52 | 105.48 |
Ferritin, ng/mL* | 5.50 | 3.22 | 7.77 | 69.80 | 67.52 | 72.07 | 11.60 | 9.43 | 13.77 | 73.06 | 70.89 | 75.22 | 3.28 | 1.19 | 5.37 | 51.70 | 49.61 | 53.79 |
Testosterone, nmol/L* | 0.45 | −0.78 | 1.68 | 28.30 | 27.07 | 29.53 | 0.82 | −0.21 | 1.86 | 29.74 | 28.71 | 30.78 | 0.44 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 2.81 | 2.73 | 2.89 |
Oestradiol, pmol/L* | 25.20 | 13.34 | 37.07 | 380.28 | 368.42 | 392.15 | 25.44 | 21.14 | 29.74 | 141.36 | 137.07 | 145.66 | 24.89 | 10.06 | 39.72 | 392.42 | 377.59 | 407.25 |
FSH, IU/L* | 1.06 | 0.71 | 1.41 | 9.61 | 9.26 | 9.95 | 1.23 | 0.89 | 1.57 | 9.83 | 9.50 | 10.17 | 0.66 | 0.35 | 0.97 | 9.11 | 8.80 | 9.42 |
LH, IU/L* | 0.41 | −0.13 | 0.95 | 15.86 | 15.32 | 16.39 | 0.59 | 0.39 | 0.79 | 5.83 | 5.63 | 6.03 | 0.22 | −0.49 | 0.93 | 21.50 | 20.79 | 22.21 |
Prolactin, ng/mL* | 147.26 | 133.86 | 160.65 | 561.57 | 548.18 | 574.96 | 143.57 | 130.40 | 156.73 | 517.29 | 504.12 | 530.45 | 165.60 | 152.63 | 178.57 | 578.60 | 565.63 | 591.57 |
SHBG, nmol/L* | 12.11 | 6.36 | 17.86 | 149.09 | 143.33 | 154.84 | 10.78 | 7.35 | 14.21 | 116.87 | 113.44 | 120.30 | 20.29 | 13.05 | 27.53 | 271.31 | 264.07 | 278.55 |
HCT, haematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c (glycated haemoglobin); LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein; Apo, apolipoprotein; hs-CRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; FT, free thyroxine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; vitamin D (total 25-OH vitamin D [D3+D2]); FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinising hormone; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin. The age range is 14–17 years. Significant gender differences for the calculated reference intervals are indicated with asterisk (*) in the first column.
Reference intervals derived from the MoYo-study compared to published, age- and gender-matched paediatric reference values.
Analyte | Male | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bogner et al.a | Soldin et al. [3] | CALIPER or other studies | SI units | ||||
Reference values | Age, years | Reference values | Age, years | Reference values | Age, years | (CF US to SI) | |
Erythrocytes, ×106/μL* | 4.62–6.04 | 14–17 | 3.74–4.93 | 12 to <18 | 4.3–5.8 [8] | 16 | ×1012/L (×1) |
Haemoglobin, g/dL* | 13.22–16.70 | 14–17 | 11.0–14.3 | 12 to <18 | 12.3–17.0 [8] | 16 | g/L (×10) |
HCT, %* | 39.04–48.88 | 14–17 | 31.4–41.0 | 12 to <18 | 36.3–50.2 [8] | 16 | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
MCV, fL* | 76.39–88.92 | 14–17 | 80.8–86.56 | 12 to <18 | 76–95 [8] | 16 | % |
MCH, pg* | 25.90–31.26 | 14–17 | 28.2–30.5 | 12 to <18 | 26–31 [8] | 16 | fL |
MCHC, g/dL* | 33.22–35.83 | 14–17 | 34.2–35.6 | 12 to <18 | 31–36 [8] | 16 | g/L (×10) |
Platelets, ×103/μL | 157.21–354.40 | 14–17 | 180–299 | 12 to <18 | 153–344.7 [8] | 16 | ×109/L (×1) |
Leucocytes, ×103/μL | 3.52–11.44 | 14–17 | 5.24–9.74 | 12 to <18 | 4.2–12.2 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Segmented neutrophils, % | 37.24–76.30 | 14–17 | 43.2–76.7 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Segmented neutrophils, ×103/μL* | 1.79–8.03 | 14–17 | 2.73–6.68 | 12 to <18 | 1.6–6.1 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Lymphocytes, % | 16.04–51.00 | 14–17 | 8–41 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Lymphocytes, ×103/μL | 1.27–3.15 | 14–17 | 1.03–2.18 | 12 to <18 | 1.4–3.3 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Monocytes, % | 4.32–9.28 | 14–17 | 4–8 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Monocytes, ×103/μL | 0.22–0.83 | 14–17 | 0.18–0.78 | 12 to <18 | 0.27–0.87 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Eosinophils, %* | 0.76–14.41 | 14–17 | 2–4 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Eosinophils, ×103/μL* | 0.07–1.10 | 14–17 | 0.04–0.20 | 12 to <18 | 0.05–0.61 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Basophils, % | 0.10–1.38 | 14–17 | 0–1 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Basophils, ×103/μL* | 0.010–0.088 | 14–17 | 0.01–0.05 | 12 to <18 | 0.01–0.18 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Glucose, mg/dL* | 68.00–95.13 | 14–17 | 54–117 | >7 days | n.a.b | adol. | mmol/L (×0.0555) |
HbA1c, % | 4.70–5.60 | 14–17 | 4–7 | All | n.a.b | adol. | Proportion of total haemoglobin (×0.01) |
Insulin, μIU/mL | 6.96–22.45 | 14–17 | 7.1–66.1 | 15–18 | 2.2–49.6b | 6 to <19 | pmol/L (×6.945) |
Proinsulin, pmol/L | 0.62–8.34 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | n.a.b | adol. | pmol/L |
Triglycerides, mg/dL | 28.81–150.80 | 14–17 | 38–243 | ≥1 to ≤20 | 44–197 [10] | 1 to <19 | mmol/L (×0.0113) |
Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 110.01–232.98 | 14–17 | 95–208 | >15 to ≤20 | 112–208 [10] | 1 to <19 | mmol/L (×0.0259) |
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL | 51.62–156.21 | 14–17 | 50–154 | ≥1 to ≤20 | n.a.b | adol. | mmol/L (×0.0259) |
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL* | 34.43–81.26 | 14–17 | 25–68 | >15 to ≤20 | 32–6 [10] | 13 to <19 | mmol/L (×0.0259) |
Lipoprotein (a), mg/dL | <171.39 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | n.a.b | adol. | μmol/L (×0.0357) |
ApoA1, mg/dL* | 121.55–207.67 | 14–17 | 88–164 | >15 to ≤20 | 72–154 [10] | 14 to <19 | g/L (×0.01) |
ApoB, mg/dL | 42.80–115.84 | 14–17 | 38–105 | ≥1 to ≤20 | 31–84 [10] | 6 to <19 | g/L (×0.01) |
Adiponectin, μg/mL | 5.34–18.80 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | n.a.b | adol. | μg/mL |
hs-CRP, mg/L | 0.01–4.32 | 14–17 | 0.4–7.9 | 15–18 | 0.1–1.7 [10] | 15 to <19 | nmol/L (×9.524) |
TSH, mIU/L | 0.89–4.13 | 14–17 | 0.5–4.5 | 0.5–18 | 0.47–3.41 [11] | 14 to <19 | mIU/L |
FT3, pg/mL* | 3.76–5.95 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | 2.25–3.85 [11] | 15 to <19 | pmol/L (×1.54) |
FT4, ng/dL | 0.70–1.38 | 14–17 | 0.8–2.0 | 31 days–18 | 0.89–1.37 [11] | 1 to <19 | pmol/L (×12.87) |
Albumin, g/L* | 44.20–58.68 | 14–17 | 37–56 | 10–19 | 38–50 [10] | 15 to <19 | g/L |
Creatinine, mg/dL* | 0.61–1.04 | 14–17 | 0.6–1.0 | 15–20 | 0.45–1.08 [10] | 12 to <19 | μmol/L (×88.4) |
Urea (BUN), mg/dL* | 16.87–34.30 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | 7.3–21 [10] | 10 to <19 | mmol/L (×0.3571) |
Cystatin C, mg/L* | 0.70–1.10 | 14–17 | 0.5–1.3 | >3–16 | 2.6–7.6 [10] | 12 to <19 | mg/L |
Uric acid, mg/dL* | 4.04–8.00 | 14–17 | 2.4–8.6 | 14–19 | 2.6–7.6 [10] | 12 to <19 | μmol/L (×59.485) |
AST, IU/L* | 17.72–45.57 | 14–17 | <39 | 13–18 | 14–35 [10] | 12 to <19 | μkat/L (×0.0167) |
ALT, IU/L* | 9.72–36.85 | 14–17 | 5–30 | 10–18 | 9–24 [10] | 13 to <19 | μkat/L (×0.0167) |
GGT, IU/L* | 5.72–26.57 | 14–17 | 2–42 | 13–18 | 7–21 [10] | 11 to <19 | μkat/L (×0.0167) |
Vitamin B12, pmol/L | 228.53–704.23 | 14–17 | 158–638 | 13–18 | 180–655 [11] | 14 to <17 | pmol/L |
Folic acid, nmol/L | 2.66–11.47 | 14–17 | 2.7–19.9 | 13–18 | n.a.b | adol. | nmol/L |
Vitamin D, ng/mL | 17.12–43.88 | 14–17 | 6–39 | 13–18 | 4.8–42.32 [11] | 14 to <19 | nmol/L (×2.496) |
Zinc, μg/dL* | 8.59–119.00 | 14–17 | 46–130 | 14 to <18 | n.a.b | adol. | μmol/L (×0.153) |
Ferritin, ng/mL* | 11.60–73.06 | 14–17 | 10–300 | 10–18 | 11.1–171.9 [11] | 16 to <19 | pmol/L (×2.247) |
Testosterone, nmol/L* | 0.82–29.74 | 14–17 | <0.069–35.075 | >10 to ≤20 | 1.25–27.55 [12] | 14 to <19 | nmol/L |
Oestradiol, pmol/L* | 25.44–141.36 | 14–17 | 37–184 | 13–17 | ≤141 [12] | 15 to <19 | pmol/L |
FSH, IU/L* | 1.23–9.83 | 14–17 | 0.0–10.0 | 13–18 | 0.78–5.1 [12] | 13 to <19 | IU/L |
LH, IU/L* | 0.59–5.83 | 14–17 | 1.3–5.7 | 13–17 | 0.79–4.76 [12] | 15 to <17 | IU/L |
Prolactin, ng/mL* | 143.57–517.29 | 14–17 | 1.8–13.3 | 11–20 | 4.2–23.04 [12] | 1 to <19 | pmol/L (×43.478) |
SHBG, nmol/L* | 10.78–116.87 | 14–17 | 10.6–62.6 | 13–18 | 9.7–49.6 [12] | 15 to <19 | nmol/L (×8.896) |
Analyte | Female | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bogner et al.a | Soldin et al. [3] | CALIPER or other studies | SI units | ||||
Reference values | Age, years | Reference values | Age, years | Reference values | Age, years | (CF US to SI) | |
HCT, %* | 29.20–42.70 | 14–17 | 32.1–38.7 | 12 to <18 | 35.2–45.6 [8] | 16 | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
MCV, fL* | 66.70–95.30 | 14–17 | 82.1–87.7 | 12 to <18 | 80–96 [8] | 16 | % |
MCH, pg* | 20.50–31.10 | 14–17 | 28.4–30.7 | 12 to <18 | 26–32 [8] | 16 | fL |
MCHC, g/dL* | 30.80–35.40 | 14–17 | 33.9–35.4 | 12 to <18 | 31–35 [8] | 16 | g/L (×10) |
Platelets, ×103/μL | 157.21–354.40 | 14–17 | 192–307 | 12 to <18 | 126–390 [8] | 16 | ×109/L (×1) |
Leucocytes, ×103/μL | 3.52–11.44 | 14–17 | 5.52–9.29 | 12 to <18 | 4.6–10.7 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Segmented neutrophils, % | 37.24–76.30 | 14–17 | 46.4–75.6 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Segmented neutrophils, ×103/μL* | 1.67–9.22 | 14–17 | 3.04–6.06 | 12 to <18 | 2.1–7.2 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Lymphocytes, % | 16.04–51.00 | 14–17 | 8–39 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Lymphocytes, ×103/μL | 1.27–3.15 | 14–17 | 1.17–2.30 | 12 to <18 | 1.4–3.3 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Monocytes, % | 4.32–9.28 | 14–17 | 4–7 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Monocytes, ×103/μL | 0.22–0.83 | 14–17 | 0.19–0.72 | 12 to <18 | 0.37–1.06 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Eosinophils, %* | 0.70–9.40 | 14–17 | 1–3 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Eosinophils, ×103/μL* | 0.03–0.59 | 14–17 | 0.05–0.17 | 12 to <18 | 0.05–0.61 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Basophils, % | 0.10–1.38 | 14–17 | 0–1 | 12 to <18 | n.a. | adol. | Portion of 1 (×0.01) |
Basophils, ×103/μL* | 0.008–0.062 | 14–17 | 0.01–0.05 | 12 to <18 | 0.01–0.18 [9] | 14–19 | ×109/L (×0.001) |
Glucose, mg/dL* | 69.00–88.00 | 14–17 | 54–117 | >7 days | n.a.b | adol. | mmol/L (×0.0555) |
HbA1c, % | 4.70–5.60 | 14–17 | 4–7 | All | n.a.b | adol. | Proportion of total haemoglobin (×0.01) |
Insulin, μIU/mL | 6.96–22.45 | 14–17 | 7.4–51.3 | 15–18 | 2.2–49.6b | 6 to <19 | pmol/L (×6.945) |
Proinsulin, pmol/L | 0.62–8.34 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | n.a.b | adol. | pmol/L |
Triglycerides, mg/dL | 28.81–150.80 | 14–17 | 38–243 | ≥1 to ≤20 | 44–197 [10] | 1 to <19 | mmol/L (×0.0113) |
Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 110.01–232.98 | 14–17 | 93–233 | >15 to ≤20 | 112–208 [10] | 1 to <19 | mmol/L (×0.0259) |
LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL | 51.62–156.21 | 14–17 | 50–154 | ≥1 to ≤20 | n.a.b | adol. | mmol/L (×0.0259) |
HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL* | 36.00–83.00 | 14–17 | 25–89 | >15 to ≤20 | 32–72 [10] | 13 to <19 | mmol/L (×0.0259) |
Lipoprotein (a), mg/dL | <171.39 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | n.a.b | adol. | μmol/L (×0.0357) |
ApoA1, mg/dL* | 114.00–222.00 | 14–17 | 89–203 | >15 to ≤20 | 72–154 [10] | 14 to <19 | g/L (×0.01) |
ApoB, mg/dL | 42.80–115.84 | 14–17 | 38–105 | ≥1 to ≤20 | 31–84 [10] | 6 to <19 | g/L (×0.01) |
Adiponectin, μg/mL | 5.34–18.80 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | n.a.b | adol. | μg/mL |
hs-CRP, mg/L | 0.01–4.32 | 14–17 | 0.6–7.9 | 15–18 | 0.1–1.7 [10] | 15 to <19 | nmol/L (×9.524) |
TSH, mIU/L | 0.89–4.13 | 14–17 | 0.5–4.5 | 0.5–18 | 0.47–3.41 [11] | 14 to <19 | mIU/L |
FT3, pg/mL* | 2.87–5.30 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | 2.31–3.71 [11] | 15 to <19 | pmol/L (×1.54) |
FT4, ng/dL | 0.70–1.38 | 14–17 | 0.8–2.0 | 31 days-18 | 0.89–1.37 [11] | 1 to <19 | pmol/L (×12.87) |
Albumin, g/L* | 40.30–54.80 | 14–17 | 37–56 | 10–19 | 35–49 [10] | 15 to <19 | g/L |
Creatinine, mg/dL* | 0.58–0.99 | 14–17 | 0.6–0.9 | 15–20 | 0.45–0.84 [10] | 12 to <19 | μmol/L (×88.4) |
Urea (BUN), mg/dL* | 12.40–30.30 | 14–17 | n.a. | adol. | 7.3–19 [10] | 10 to <19 | mmol/L (×0.3571) |
Cystatin C, mg/L* | 0.70–1.00 | 14–17 | 0.5–1.3 | >3–16 | 2.6–5.9 [10] | 12 to <19 | mg/L |
Uric acid, mg/dL* | 2.80–5.80 | 14–17 | 3.0–5.9 | 14–19 | 2.6–5.9 [10] | 12 to <19 | μmol/L (×59.485) |
AST, IU/L* | 14.00–37.00 | 14–17 | <32 | 13–18 | 13–26 [10] | 12 to <19 | μkat/L (×0.0167) |
ALT, IU/L* | 10.00–32.00 | 14–17 | 5–20 | 10–18 | 8–22 [10] | 13 to <19 | μkat/L (×0.0167) |
GGT, IU/L* | 5.00–27.00 | 14–17 | 4–24 | 13–18 | 6–21 [10] | 11 to <19 | μkat/L (×0.0167) |
Vitamin B12, pmol/L | 228.53–704.23 | 14–17 | 134–605 | 13–18 | 180–655 [11] | 14 to <17 | pmol/L |
Folic acid, nmol/L | 2.66–11.47 | 14–17 | 2.7–16.3 | 13–18 | n.a.b | adol. | nmol/L |
Vitamin D, ng/mL | 17.12–43.88 | 14–17 | 6–28 | 13–18 | 4.8–42.32 [11] | 14 to <19 | nmol/L (×2.496) |
Zinc, μg/dL* | 9.00–101.00 | 14–17 | 46–130 | 14 to <18 | n.a.b | adol. | μmol/L (×0.153) |
Ferritin, ng/mL* | 3.28–51.70 | 14–17 | 10–70 | 10–18 | 5.46–67.42 [11] | 14 to <19 | pmol/L (×2.247) |
Testosterone, nmol/L* | 0.44–2.81 | 14–17 | <0.069–2.715 | >10 to ≤20 | 0.36–1.7 [12] | 13 to <19 | nmol/L |
Oestradiol, pmol/L* | 24.89–392.42 | 14–17 | 37–1100 | 13–17 | ≤936 [12] | 14 to <19 | pmol/L |
FSH, IU/L* | 0.66–9.11 | 14–17 | 0.0–15.0 | 13–18 | 0.26–7.77 [12] | 11 to <19 | IU/L |
LH, IU/L* | 0.22–21.50 | 14–17 | 1.3–10.2 | 11–20 | 0.37–13.08 [12] | 13 to <17 | IU/L |
Prolactin, ng/mL* | 165.60–578.60 | 14–17 | 1.4–14.3 | 11–20 | 4.2–23.04 [12] | 1 to <19 | pmol/L (×43.478) |
SHBG, nmol/L* | 20.29–271.31 | 14–17 | 9.3–76.5 | 13–18 | 9.83–154.6 [12] | 15 to <19 | nmol/L (×8.896) |
CF, conversion factor; HCT, haematocrit; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular haemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration; HbA1c, haemoglobin A1c (glycated haemoglobin); LDL, low density lipoprotein; HDL, high density lipoprotein; Apo, apolipoprotein; hs-CRP, high sensitive C-reactive protein; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; FT, free thyroxine; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; GGT, γ-glutamyltransferase; vitamin D (total 25-OH vitamin D [D3+D2]); FSH, follicle stimulating hormone; LH, luteinising hormone; SHBG, sex hormone binding globulin. aThis study, n.a., not available; adol., adolescents; bCALIPER database (https://app3.ccb.sickkids.ca/caliper/caliperlogin). Significant gender differences (indicated with asterisk [*] in the first column) of reference intervals of the MoYo-study were calculated by multivariate analysis of variance. For parameters that did not show significant gender differences, the P2.5% and P97.5% are deviated from the mixed cohort.
Discussion
The MoYo-project was performed as a feasibility study for health screening in a non-clinical setting and health promotion in schools, including an interventional study design. The implementation of sampling for anthropometrical and biomedical measurements in the school setting was successfully established and samples of healthy adolescents were analysed for haematological and biochemical parameters (Table 1). Even though the number of cases was comparatively low for the analysis in terms of gender-matched groups, the data set provides a good basis for the calculation of paediatric reference intervals according to the CLSI guidelines [7].
Over the last 15 years, different studies assessing paediatric reference intervals have been published. These evolved from projects like KiGGS (Germany; 1–18 years), CALIPER (Canada; 0–18 years), NHANES (US; all age groups), LOOK (Australia; 8, 10 and 12 years), AACB (Australia and New Zealand; all age groups), COPENHAGEN (Denmark; 5–20 years) (reviewed in [2]) and IDEFICS (Italy, Spain, Germany, Belgium, Sweden, Hungary and Estonia; 2–11 years) [4].
The age- and gender-based evaluation of the BMI of the Austrian adolescents investigated shows that in comparison to German [13] and Greek [14] adolescents the Austrian cohort had a slightly lower BMI. This highlights that the study cohort is within the healthy range of BMI. The current WHO BMI tables are based on age- and gender-specific percentiles and z-scores (http://www.who.int/growthref/who2007_bmi_for_age/en/). These were derived by pooling the data sets of the Health Examination Survey, and the Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [15]. However, an age-, gender- and percentile-based BMI value calculation requires a different study set-up and was beyond the scope of the present study. The values for WHR and WHtR are provided as well, as these are described as discriminators for cardiovascular risk factors and metabolic syndrome diagnosis [16].
The present biomedical data analysis represents a synopsis of reference values for haematological and clinical biochemical parameters of adolescents in Europe and the Anglo-American region. Both the MoYo data set as well as the CALIPER data set [10], [11], [12] were derived from healthy and normal-weight adolescents and were analysed “a priori”. As ethnical, environmental and lifestyle circumstances can influence the evaluation and establishment of reference intervals and the data of the CALIPER study are based on different ethnic groups [10], the MoYo data add value in regard of validation of reference intervals for Caucasian adolescents in the age of 14–17 years.
In terms of haematological data, Zierk et al. [8], [17] used a two-fold different approach: first, Zierk et al. used an indirect approach by retrospectively evaluating haematological parameters from the laboratory database of the University Children’s Hospital Erlangen containing healthy and pathologic samples for data analysis; and secondly, they calculated continuous reference intervals to meet the demands of variations in age and sex. In the first study [8], they compared the reference intervals for erythrocytes, haemoglobin, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration and platelets to the 2.5th and 97.5th percentile (95% CI) of the data retrieved from the KiGGS study, which investigated, among others, haematological parameters in a cohort representative for healthy 1–18 year old German children “a priori” [18] (Table 3). The analysis of the haematological parameters in the different studies was performed either using a Sysmex haematological analyser [5], [8] or a Coulter STKS haematological flow cytometer [9], and the results are in the same range. However, although the continuous reference interval approach is appropriate for specific parameters that are changing continuously with age (e.g. creatinine or uric acid [10], [19]), currently, the prevalent application for reference intervals is still the age-grouped reference range. One reason for that is that currently most laboratory IT systems are not designated for data interpretation using continuous reference intervals.
The CALIPER database (https://app3.ccb.sickkids.ca/caliper/caliperlogin) comprises data of healthy children between 0 and 18 years derived from a nation-wide, multi-centre study performed in hospitals across Canada. It contains validated reference intervals for over 100 biomedical blood tests for common biochemical, endocrine, metabolic disease and tumour biomarkers as well as vitamins [2], [10], [11], [12], [20], [21], [22]. The correlation with selected biomedical parameters also determined in the MoYo-study reveals a high correlation of the values for both genders, even though the laboratory analysis was performed with different devices (Cobas c311, Vitros ECiQ® and diagnostically approved ELISAs in the MoYo-study vs. Abbott Architect ci4100, c8000 or i2000 in the CALIPER project) and the study population was different in terms of regional aspects. Ideally, measurement values and therefore reference ranges should not differ depending on the technique or equipment used. However, it is known from the literature as well as from reference guides that there are significant alterations of the reference values depending on the used methodology [3], [7], [23]. Therefore, every clinical laboratory needs to validate the reference intervals for the parameters that are measured and released for diagnostic and therapeutic use [7], and it is of main importance to clearly indicate the methods and equipment used for clinical parameters tested. The availability of carefully established and validated databases for laboratory reference intervals and medical decision levels can serve not only as general reference work, but also as a standard for other laboratories.
The parameters proinsulin, lipoprotein (a) and adiponectin were neither analysed by Soldin et al. [3] nor by the CALIPER study. The cut-off for lipoprotein (a) is reported to be 30 mg/dL for 9.1–18-year-old persons [24]. The upper limit of the MoYo-study population was much higher (171.39 mg/dL). The adiponectin concentration in the serum varies significantly with age, but generally the range of the adiponectin values of the Austrian cohort match with the year-of-age specified reference intervals of Lausten-Thomsen et al. [25]. To the best of our knowledge, currently no reference intervals for proinsulin at fasting for 14–17-year-old patients exist. The analysis of the MoYo cohort revealed no significant gender differences and indicates a range of 0.62–8.34 pmol/L.
As already described, the MoYo study was performed as a pilot study and it should be mentioned that the small sample size is a limitation of this work. However, it is challenging to gain data of a per se healthy study cohort of people within this age range and the analysis of the data set in terms of reference limits gives valuable insights in both non-gender-matched and gender-matched reference intervals. Therefore, the data set provides a good basis for the calculation of paediatric reference intervals according to the CLSI recommendations [7].
To conclude, the results of this “a priori” study add value to the evaluation of paediatric reference intervals of Caucasian adolescents in terms of an increase of the spectrum and a broader validation of the available biomarkers.
Acknowledgments
We greatly acknowledge the coordination of the MoYo-project at the partner school by Edith Oberkofler and the competent assistance during sampling by Justine Gmachl-Baugartner, Renate Wiltsche and Liselotte Helminger.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: This work was supported by the County of Salzburg (grant number 2014-7081-004) and an Institutional Grant of the Salzburg University of Applied Sciences.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
References
1. Jung B, Adeli K. Clinical laboratory reference intervals in pediatrics: the CALIPER initiative. Clin Biochem 2009;42:1589–95.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.06.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed
2. Tahmasebi H, Higgins V, Fung AW, Truong D, White-Al Habeeb NM, Adeli K. Pediatric reference intervals for biochemical markers: gaps and challenges, recent national initiatives and future perspectives. EJIFCC 2017;28:43–63.Search in Google Scholar
3. Soldin SJ, Wong EC, Brugnara C, Soldin OP. Pediatric reference intervals, 7th ed. Washington, DC: AACC Press, 2011:304.Search in Google Scholar
4. Ahrens W, Bammann K, Siani A, Buchecker K, De Henauw S, Iacoviello L, et al. The IDEFICS cohort: design, characteristics and participation in the baseline survey. Int J Obes (Lond) 2011;35(Suppl. 1):S3–15.10.1038/ijo.2011.30Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Bogner B, Schwenoha K, Gmeinhart K, Tiefengrabner M, Stütz T, Ardelt-Gattinger E, et al. The MoYo-Project – study design and feasibility testing. Appetite 2015;89:321.10.1016/j.appet.2014.12.069Search in Google Scholar
6. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on drawing blood: best practices in phlebotomy. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press, 2010:125.Search in Google Scholar
7. CLSI. Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; Approved guideline – third edition, in CLSI document C28-A3c. Wayne, PA: Institute CaLS 2008.Search in Google Scholar
8. Zierk J, Arzideh F, Haeckel R, Rascher W, Rauh M, Metzler M. Indirect determination of pediatric blood count reference intervals. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:863–72.10.1515/cclm-2012-0684Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Taylor MR, Holland CV, Spencer R, Jackson JF, O’Connor GI, O’Donnell JR. Haematological reference ranges for schoolchildren. Clin Lab Haematol 1997;19:1–15.10.1046/j.1365-2257.1997.00204.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
10. Colantonio DA, Kyriakopoulou L, Chan MK, Daly CH, Brinc D, Venner AA, et al. Closing the gaps in pediatric laboratory reference intervals: a CALIPER database of 40 biochemical markers in a healthy and multiethnic population of children. Clin Chem 2012;58:854–68.10.1373/clinchem.2011.177741Search in Google Scholar PubMed
11. Bailey D, Colantonio D, Kyriakopoulou L, Cohen AH, Chan MK, Armbruster D, et al. Marked biological variance in endocrine and biochemical markers in childhood: establishment of pediatric reference intervals using healthy community children from the CALIPER cohort. Clin Chem 2013;59:1393–405.10.1373/clinchem.2013.204222Search in Google Scholar PubMed
12. Konforte D, Shea JL, Kyriakopoulou L, Colantonio D, Cohen AH, Shaw J, et al. Complex biological pattern of fertility hormones in children and adolescents: a study of healthy children from the CALIPER cohort and establishment of pediatric reference intervals. Clin Chem 2013;59:1215–27.10.1373/clinchem.2013.204123Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Rosario AS, Kurth BM, Stolzenberg H, Ellert U, Neuhauser H. Body mass index percentiles for children and adolescents in Germany based on a nationally representative sample (KiGGS 2003–2006). Eur J Clin Nutr 2010;64:341–9.10.1038/ejcn.2010.8Search in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Bacopoulou F, Efthymiou V, Landis G, Rentoumis A, Chrousos GP. Waist circumference, waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio reference percentiles for abdominal obesity among Greek adolescents. BMC Pediatr 2015;15:50.10.1186/s12887-015-0366-zSearch in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
15. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Borghi E, Siyam A, Nishida C, Siekmann J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull World Health Organ 2007;85:660–7.10.2471/BLT.07.043497Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
16. Lee CM, Huxley RR, Wildman RP, Woodward M. Indices of abdominal obesity are better discriminators of cardiovascular risk factors than BMI: a meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:646–53.10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.08.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Zierk J, Arzideh F, Rechenauer T, Haeckel R, Rascher W, Metzler M, et al. Age- and sex-specific dynamics in 22 hematologic and biochemical analytes from birth to adolescence. Clin Chem 2015;61:964–73.10.1373/clinchem.2015.239731Search in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Dortschy R, Schaffrath-Rosario A, Scheidt-Nave C, Thierfelder W, Thamm M, Gutsche J, et al. Bevölkerungsbezogene Verteilungswerte ausgewählter Laborparameter aus der Studie zur Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen in Deutschland (KiGGS), in Beiträge zur Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes, Koch-Institut R, Editor 2009, Robert Koch-Institut: Germany. 132.Search in Google Scholar
19. Ceriotti F, Boyd JC, Klein G, Henny J, Queralto J, Kairisto V, et al. Reference intervals for serum creatinine concentrations: assessment of available data for global application. Clin Chem 2008;54:559–66.10.1373/clinchem.2007.099648Search in Google Scholar PubMed
20. Bailey D, Bevilacqua V, Colantonio DA, Pasic MD, Perumal N, Chan MK, et al. Pediatric within-day biological variation and quality specifications for 38 biochemical markers in the CALIPER cohort. Clin Chem 2014;60:518–29.10.1373/clinchem.2013.214312Search in Google Scholar PubMed
21. Bevilacqua V, Chan MK, Chen Y, Armbruster D, Schodin B, Adeli K. Pediatric population reference value distributions for cancer biomarkers and covariate-stratified reference intervals in the CALIPER cohort. Clin Chem 2014;60:1532–42.10.1373/clinchem.2014.229799Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. Teodoro-Morrison T, Kyriakopoulou L, Chen YK, Raizman JE, Bevilacqua V, Chan MK, et al. Dynamic biological changes in metabolic disease biomarkers in childhood and adolescence: a CALIPER study of healthy community children. Clin Biochem 2015;48:828–36.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.05.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed
23. CLSI. Method procedure comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline – Third edition, in CLSI document EP09-A3. Wayne, PA: Institute CaLS. 2013.Search in Google Scholar
24. Langer C, Tambyrayah B, Thedieck S, Nowak-Gottl U. Testing for lipoprotein(a) concentration and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes: method standardization and pediatric reference values. Semin Thromb Hemost 2011;37:810–3.10.1055/s-0031-1297172Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. Lausten-Thomsen U, Christiansen M, Fonvig CE, Trier C, Pedersen O, Hansen T, et al. Reference values for serum total adiponectin in healthy non-obese children and adolescents. Clin Chim Acta 2015;450:11–4.10.1016/j.cca.2015.07.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed
©2019 Barbara Bogner et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Obituary
- Professor Howard A. Morris
- Editorial
- The silk road to total quality in Laboratory Medicine
- Reviews
- Moving average quality control: principles, practical application and future perspectives
- Serum α-fetoprotein in pediatric oncology: not a children’s tale
- Mini Review
- Value-based healthcare: the role of laboratory medicine
- Opinion Paper
- Advantages and limitations of total laboratory automation: a personal overview
- General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Analysis and evaluation of the external quality assessment results of quality indicators in laboratory medicine all over China from 2015 to 2018
- A pilot study for establishing quality indicators in molecular diagnostics according to the IFCC WG-LEPS initiative: preliminary findings in China
- Quality assessment of interpretative commenting and competency comparison of comment providers in China
- Lower creatinine concentration values and lower inter-laboratory variation among Swedish hospital laboratories in 2014 compared to 1996: results from the Equalis external quality assessment program
- Development of the Point-of-Care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET): a checklist for multi-dimensional evidence generation in point-of-care tests
- Analytical and clinical performance evaluation of two POC tests for therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab
- Hematology and Coagulation
- Provisional standardization of hepcidin assays: creating a traceability chain with a primary reference material, candidate reference method and a commutable secondary reference material
- Danger of false negative (exclusion) or false positive (diagnosis) for ‘congenital thrombophilia’ in the age of anticoagulants
- Point-of-care haemostasis monitoring during liver transplantation is cost effective
- Reference Values and Biological Variations
- Evaluation of reference intervals of haematological and biochemical markers in an Austrian adolescent study cohort
- Cancer Diagnostics
- A novel machine learning-derived decision tree including uPA/PAI-1 for breast cancer care
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Evaluation of analytical performances using standardized analytical protocols and comparison of clinical results of the new ADVIA BNP and NT-proBNP immunoassays for the Centaur XPT platform
- Infectious Diseases
- Improvement in detecting sepsis using leukocyte cell population data (CPD)
- Letters to the Editor
- The biological variation of plasma proenkephalin: data from a stable heart failure cohort
- Hemoglobin variants found in relation to HbA1c testing: high occurrence of Hb Athens-Georgia in the Northern Jutland, Denmark
- Eltrombopag interferes with the measurement of plasma total bilirubin in pediatric patients in an automated colorimetric method
- A challenging case: highly variable TSH in a mother and her two children
- Suppressing all test results in grossly hemolyzed samples: is this approach appropriate in every case?
- Prozone effect observed for heavy chain α in the serum immunofixation electrophoresis of a patient with monoclonal IgA-λ gammopathy
- Significant allelic dropout phenomenon of Oncomine BRCA Research Assay on Ion Torrent S5
- Evaluation of immature platelet fraction in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Association with poor prognosis factors
- Influence of temperature of transport of whole blood on plasma Cu, I, Mn, Se and Zn and Mg concentrations in erythrocytes
- Absorbent materials to collect urine can affect proteomics and metabolomic biomarker concentrations
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Obituary
- Professor Howard A. Morris
- Editorial
- The silk road to total quality in Laboratory Medicine
- Reviews
- Moving average quality control: principles, practical application and future perspectives
- Serum α-fetoprotein in pediatric oncology: not a children’s tale
- Mini Review
- Value-based healthcare: the role of laboratory medicine
- Opinion Paper
- Advantages and limitations of total laboratory automation: a personal overview
- General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
- Analysis and evaluation of the external quality assessment results of quality indicators in laboratory medicine all over China from 2015 to 2018
- A pilot study for establishing quality indicators in molecular diagnostics according to the IFCC WG-LEPS initiative: preliminary findings in China
- Quality assessment of interpretative commenting and competency comparison of comment providers in China
- Lower creatinine concentration values and lower inter-laboratory variation among Swedish hospital laboratories in 2014 compared to 1996: results from the Equalis external quality assessment program
- Development of the Point-of-Care Key Evidence Tool (POCKET): a checklist for multi-dimensional evidence generation in point-of-care tests
- Analytical and clinical performance evaluation of two POC tests for therapeutic drug monitoring of infliximab
- Hematology and Coagulation
- Provisional standardization of hepcidin assays: creating a traceability chain with a primary reference material, candidate reference method and a commutable secondary reference material
- Danger of false negative (exclusion) or false positive (diagnosis) for ‘congenital thrombophilia’ in the age of anticoagulants
- Point-of-care haemostasis monitoring during liver transplantation is cost effective
- Reference Values and Biological Variations
- Evaluation of reference intervals of haematological and biochemical markers in an Austrian adolescent study cohort
- Cancer Diagnostics
- A novel machine learning-derived decision tree including uPA/PAI-1 for breast cancer care
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Evaluation of analytical performances using standardized analytical protocols and comparison of clinical results of the new ADVIA BNP and NT-proBNP immunoassays for the Centaur XPT platform
- Infectious Diseases
- Improvement in detecting sepsis using leukocyte cell population data (CPD)
- Letters to the Editor
- The biological variation of plasma proenkephalin: data from a stable heart failure cohort
- Hemoglobin variants found in relation to HbA1c testing: high occurrence of Hb Athens-Georgia in the Northern Jutland, Denmark
- Eltrombopag interferes with the measurement of plasma total bilirubin in pediatric patients in an automated colorimetric method
- A challenging case: highly variable TSH in a mother and her two children
- Suppressing all test results in grossly hemolyzed samples: is this approach appropriate in every case?
- Prozone effect observed for heavy chain α in the serum immunofixation electrophoresis of a patient with monoclonal IgA-λ gammopathy
- Significant allelic dropout phenomenon of Oncomine BRCA Research Assay on Ion Torrent S5
- Evaluation of immature platelet fraction in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Association with poor prognosis factors
- Influence of temperature of transport of whole blood on plasma Cu, I, Mn, Se and Zn and Mg concentrations in erythrocytes
- Absorbent materials to collect urine can affect proteomics and metabolomic biomarker concentrations