Home Faecal leukocyte esterase activity is an alternative biomarker in inflammatory bowel disease
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Faecal leukocyte esterase activity is an alternative biomarker in inflammatory bowel disease

  • Els N. Dumoulin , Stephanie Van Biervliet , Martine De Vos , Jonas Himpe , Marijn M. Speeckaert and Joris R. Delanghe EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: April 17, 2015

Abstract

Background: Leukocyte cytosolic proteins (e.g., calprotectin) are emerging biomarkers for inflammatory bowel disease. Leukocyte aryl esterase activity has been commonly used for sensitive detection of leukocytes in human body fluids such as urine. Urine test strip results are generally reported in categories. As automated strip readers allow quantitative data to be reported, sensitive quantitative detection of leukocytes in body fluids has become possible. Here, we explored the use of leukocyte esterase as a potential alternative faecal biomarker for inflammatory bowel disease.

Methods: We evaluated leukocyte esterase activity in faecal extracts and compared Cobas u 411 (Roche) quantitative reflectance data with calprotectin concentration for 107 routine samples. Stability of leukocyte esterase for trypsin digestion was carried out by adding trypsin to the extract. Incubation occurred at 37 °C for 24 h or 48 h.

Results: Reproducibility of the reflectance signal was good (within-run imprecision: 6.1%; between-run imprecision: 6.2%). Results were linear in the range 103–106 WBC/100 mg faeces. The lower limit of detection was 4 WBC/μL and the lower limit of quantification was 5 WBC/μL. Stability of LE activity in stool and faecal matrix was good. An adequate correlation was obtained between leukocyte esterase activity and the faecal calprotectin concentration: log(y)=4.28+0.29log(x). In vitro experiments monitored the digestion of leukocyte esterase and faecal calprotectin. Leukocyte esterase activity was significantly less affected by trypsin activity than calprotectin immunoreactivity.

Conclusions: Quantitative leukocyte esterase activity of faecal extracts provides information about the leukocyte count in the gut lumen. Leukocyte esterase is a promising and affordable alternative biomarker for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease.


Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Joris R. Delanghe, Laboratory of Clinical Biology, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan, 185 (2P8), 9000 Ghent, Belgium, Phone: +32 9 332 29 56, Fax: +32 9 332 49 85, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Mrs. Elke Lecocq for her technical support.

Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Financial support: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Mazlam MZ, Hodgson HJ. Peripheral blood monocyte cytokine production and acute phase response in inflammatory bowel disease. Gut 1992;33:773–8.10.1136/gut.33.6.773Search in Google Scholar

2. Niederau C, Backmerhoff F, Schumacher B, Niederau C. Inflammatory mediators and acute phase proteins in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Hepatogastroenterology 1997;44:90–107.Search in Google Scholar

3. Pepys MB, Druguet M, Klass HJ, Dash AC, Mirjah DD, Petrie A. Immunological studies in inflammatory bowel disease. Ciba Found Symp 1977;46:283–304.Search in Google Scholar

4. Tibble J, Teahon K, Thjodleifsson B, Roseth A, Sigthorsson G, Bridger S, et al. A simple method for assessing intestinal inflammation in Crohn’s disease. Gut 2000;47:506–13.10.1136/gut.47.4.506Search in Google Scholar

5. Bennike T, Birkelund S, Stensballe A, Andersen V. Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel diseases: current status and proteomics identification strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20: 3231–44.10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3231Search in Google Scholar

6. Leddin DJ, Paterson WG, DaCosta LR, Dinda PK, Depew WT, Markotich J, et al. Indium-111-labeled autologous leukocyte imaging and fecal excretion. Comparison with conventional methods of assessment of inflammatory bowel disease. Dig Dis Sci 1987;32:377–87.10.1007/BF01296291Search in Google Scholar

7. Saverymuttu SH, Camilleri M, Rees H, Lavender JP, Hodgson HJ, Chadwick VS. Indium 111-granulocyte scanning in the assessment of disease extent and disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease. A comparison with colonoscopy, histology, and fecal indium 111-granulocyte excretion. Gastroenterology 1986;90:1121–8.10.1016/0016-5085(86)90376-8Search in Google Scholar

8. Angriman I, Scarpa M, D’Inca R, Basso D, Ruffolo C, Polese L, et al. Enzymes in feces: useful markers of chronic inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Chim Acta 2007;381:63–8.10.1016/j.cca.2007.02.025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Basso D, Zambon CF, Plebani M. Inflammatory bowel diseases: from pathogenesis to laboratory testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:471–81.10.1515/cclm-2013-0588Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Poullis A, Foster R, Mendall MA, Fagerhol MK. Emerging role of calprotectin in gastroenterology. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;18:756–62.10.1046/j.1440-1746.2003.03014.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

11. van Rheenen PF, Van de Vijver E, Fidler V. Faecal calprotectin for screening of patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease: diagnostic meta-analysis. Br Med J 2010;341:c3369.10.1136/bmj.c3369Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Kane SV, Sandborn WJ, Rufo PA, Zholudev A, Boone J, Lyerly D, et al. Fecal lactoferrin is a sensitive and specific marker in identifying intestinal inflammation. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1309–14.10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07458.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Konikoff MR, Denson LA. Role of fecal calprotectin as a biomarker of intestinal inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2006;12:524–34.10.1097/00054725-200606000-00013Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Moloney WC, McPherson K, Fliegelman L. Esterase activity in leukocytes demonstrated by the use of naphthol AS-D chloroacetate substrate. J Histochem Cytochem 1960;8:200–7.10.1177/8.3.200Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Brouwer J. Semiquantitative determination of fecal leukocyte esterase by a dip-and-read assay. Clin Chem 1993;39:2531–2.10.1093/clinchem/39.12.2531Search in Google Scholar

16. Penders J, Fiers T, Delanghe JR. Quantitative evaluation of urinalysis test strips. Clin Chem 2002;48:2236–41.10.1093/clinchem/48.12.2236Search in Google Scholar

17. Layer P, Keller J. Pancreatic enzymes: secretion and luminal nutrient digestion in health and disease. J Clin Gastroenterol 1999;28:3–10.10.1097/00004836-199901000-00002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Layer P, Go VL, DiMagno EP. Fate of pancreatic enzymes during small intestinal aboral transit in humans. Am J Physiol 1986;251:G475–80.10.1152/ajpgi.1986.251.4.G475Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Dumoulin EN, Van Biervliet S, Langlois MR, Delanghe JR. Proteolysis is a confounding factor in the interpretation of faecal calprotectin. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;53:65–71.Search in Google Scholar

20. Oyaert M, Trouve C, Baert F, De Smet D, Langlois M, Vanpoucke H. Comparison of two immunoassays for measurement of faecal calprotectin in detection of inflammatory bowel disease: (pre)-analytical and diagnostic performance characteristics. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:391–7.10.1515/cclm-2013-0699Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Smith JS, Ediss I, Mullinger MA, Bogoch A. Fecal chymotrypsin and trypsin determinations. Can Med Assoc J 1971;104:691–4.Search in Google Scholar

22. Modde H, Rodriguez S. Urin mikrobiologie. In: Colombo JP, editor. Klinisch-chemische urindiagnostik. Rotkreuz, Switzerland: Labolife Verlagsgemeinschaf, 1994:310.Search in Google Scholar

23. Nagel DW, Seiler DJ. Urinalysis with the new fully automated analyzer Supertron. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1995;33: 147–52.Search in Google Scholar

24. Froom P, Bieganiec B, Ehrenrich Z, Barak M. Stability of common analytes in urine refrigerated for 24 h before automated analysis by test strips. Clin Chem 2000;46:1384–6.10.1093/clinchem/46.9.1384Search in Google Scholar

25. Kaiser T, Langhorst J, Wittkowski H, Becker K, Friedrich AW, Ruefferet A, et al. Faecal S100A12 as a non-invasive marker distinguishing inflammatory bowel disease from irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 2007;56:1706–13.10.1136/gut.2006.113431Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Sipponen T, Karkkainen P, Savilahti E, Kolho KL, Nuutinen H, Turunen U, et al. Correlation of faecal calprotectin and lactoferrin with an endoscopic score for Crohn’s disease and histological findings. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008;28:1221–9.10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03835.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Sipponen T, Haapamäki J, Savilahti E, Alfthan H, Hämäläinen E, Rautiainen H, et al. Fecal calprotectin and S100A12 have low utility in prediction of small bowel Crohn’s disease detected by wireless capsule endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012;47:778–84.10.3109/00365521.2012.677953Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Lee JM, Leach ST, Katz T, Day AS, Jaffe A, Ooi CY. Update of faecal markers of inflammation in children with cystic fibrosis. Mediators Inflamm 2012;2012:948367.10.1155/2012/948367Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2015-1-13
Accepted: 2015-3-26
Published Online: 2015-4-17
Published in Print: 2015-11-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Biomarkers of inflammatory bowel disease: ready for prime time?
  4. Review
  5. Discriminant indices for distinguishing thalassemia and iron deficiency in patients with microcytic anemia: a meta-analysis
  6. Mini Reviews
  7. Cell-free DNA for diagnosing myocardial infarction: not ready for prime time
  8. The Laboratory Medicine and the care of patients infected by the Ebola virus. Experience in a reference hospital of Madrid, Spain
  9. Opinion Papers
  10. Theranos phenomenon − part 2
  11. Considerations in parathyroid hormone testing
  12. Quantity quotient reporting. Comparison of various models
  13. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  14. Assessing quality and functionality of DNA isolated from FFPE tissues through external quality assessment in tissue banks
  15. Influence of storage conditions and extraction methods on the quantity and quality of circulating cell-free DNA (ccfDNA): the SPIDIA-DNAplas External Quality Assessment experience
  16. Non-invasive fetal ABO genotyping in maternal plasma using real-time PCR
  17. Screening non-deletion α-thalassaemia mutations in the HBA1 and HBA2 genes by high-resolution melting analysis
  18. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  19. European views on patients directly obtaining their laboratory test results
  20. Diagnostic performances of clinical laboratory tests using Triton X-100 to reduce the biohazard associated with routine testing of Ebola virus-infected patients
  21. Thrombin generation, D-dimer and protein S in uncomplicated pregnancy
  22. Multi-analyte analysis of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in human plasma using tandem mass spectrometry
  23. Second generation analysis of antinuclear antibody (ANA) by combination of screening and confirmatory testing
  24. Faecal leukocyte esterase activity is an alternative biomarker in inflammatory bowel disease
  25. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  26. Total folate and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in the cerebrospinal fluid of children: correlation and reference values
  27. Effect of age and gender on reference intervals of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and mean red cell volume (MCV)
  28. Infectious Diseases
  29. Inosine triphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase activity: more accurate predictor for ribavirin-induced anemia in hepatitis C infected patients than ITPA genotype
  30. The ratio of calprotectin to total protein as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites
  31. Letter to the Editors
  32. Misleading high-sensitivity troponin algorithm for NSTEMI in the ESC guidelines
  33. Adjustment of serum potassium for age and platelet count. A simple step forward towards personalized medicine
  34. The impact of Tween 20 on repeatability of amyloid β and tau measurements in cerebrospinal fluid
  35. Effect of storage time and temperature on the generation of reactive oxygen species in peripheral blood leukocytes
  36. Iohexol interference in the α2-globulin fraction of the serum protein capillary electrophoresis
  37. A functional variant in the γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT)1 gene is associated with airflow obstruction in smokers
  38. Comparison of measured venous carbon dioxide and calculated arterial bicarbonates according to the PaCO2 and PaO2 cut-off values of obesity hypoventilation syndrome
  39. Creatinine, Jaffe, and glucose: another inconvenient truth
  40. Analytical evaluation of a new liquid immunoturbidimetric assay for the determination of ferritin in serum
  41. Analytical assessment of the novel homocysteine liquid enzymatic assay on Beckman Coulter AU5800
  42. Immunoglobulin IgA, IgD, IgG, IgM and IgG subclass reference values in adults
Downloaded on 8.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2015-0040/html
Scroll to top button