Startseite Medizin Plasma glucose measurement in diabetes: impact and implications of variations in sample collection procedures with a focus on the first hour after sample collection
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Plasma glucose measurement in diabetes: impact and implications of variations in sample collection procedures with a focus on the first hour after sample collection

  • Huan Chan , Helen Lunt EMAIL logo , Harmony Thompson , Helen F. Heenan , Christopher M.A. Frampton und Christopher M. Florkowski
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 29. März 2014
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Background: Previous studies of participants with plasma glucose concentrations at or near the glucose reference range demonstrate glucose loss following delayed separation and extraction of plasma from the cellular components of blood, of ≤7% per hour. We aimed to assess pre-analytical glucose loss in diabetic subjects, focusing on the first hour after sample collection.

Methods: Venous blood was collected from diabetes clinic attendees, into a series of lithium heparin PST™ (plasma separator tube) and fluoride oxalate Vacutainers™. Baseline (reference) plasma glucose measurements were undertaken on samples prepared under refrigerated conditions. The remaining samples underwent a series of controlled pre-analytical delays in sample preparation, at room temperature. Plasma glucose was measured using the hexokinase method.

Results: Median baseline glucose (mmol/L) for the 62 participants was 10.6 (range 3.4–31.1). Using lithium heparin PST™ tubes, mean glucose loss (95% CI) was 0.16 (0.09–0.23) after 30 min delay in plasma preparation and 0.28 (0.21–0.34) after 60 min delay. Glucose loss was independent of both baseline glucose and also individual cellular count. Fluoride failed to inhibit glucose loss within the first hour after sample collection. Immediate plasma centrifugation of PST™ tubes, followed by delayed plasma extraction (median delay 92 min), produced a mean glucose loss of 0.02 mmol/L (–0.05–0.09).

Conclusions: Samples collected into lithium heparin PST™ tubes show pre-analytical glucose loss at 1 h that is independent of baseline glucose and cellular count. Furthermore, immediate plasma separation using these tubes attenuates glucose loss across a wide range of glucose concentrations.


Corresponding author: Helen Lunt, Diabetes Centre Christchurch, 550 Hagley Avenue, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand, Phone: +643 3640860, Fax: +643 3640171, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We thank Florence Logan for her expert technical assistance with sample collection and Dr. Brett Shand for his comments on study design. HT was supported by a University of Otago, Christchurch Summer Studentship.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. Research support played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Author contribution: HC co-wrote the manuscript and conducted the statistical analyses. HL led the write-up of the manuscript and had primary responsibility for study design and final content. HL is also the guarantor of this study. HT contributed to study design, collected samples and contributed to preparation of Figures. HFH contributed to study design and sample collection and edited the manuscript. CMF advised on laboratory aspects and co-wrote the manuscript. CMAF oversaw statistical analysis and edited the manuscript.

Ethical statement: The study had Health and Disability Ethics Committee (New Zealand) approval; HDEC number 12/STH/22/AM01.

References

1. Bruns DE, Knowler WC. Stabilization of glucose in blood samples: why it matters. Clin Chem 2009;55:850–2.10.1373/clinchem.2009.126037Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, Bruns DE, Horvath AR, Kirkman MS, et al. Executive summary: guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 2011;57:793–8.10.1373/clinchem.2011.163634Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Gambino R, Bruns DE. Stabilization of glucose in blood samples: out with the old, in with the new. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1883–5.10.1515/cclm-2013-0341Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Del Pino IG, Constanso I, Mourín LV, Safont CB, Vázquez PR. Citric/citrate buffer: an effective antiglycolytic agent. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;51:1943–9.10.1515/cclm-2012-0735Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Peake MJ, Bruns DE, Sacks DB, Horvath AR. It’s time for a better blood collection tube to improve the reliability of glucose results. Diabetes Care 2013;36:e2.10.2337/dc12-1312Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Festa R, Carta M, Ceriello A, Testa R. Time is glucose, can’t miss gestational diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2012;14: 444–6.10.1089/dia.2011.0225Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Turchiano M, Nguyen C, Fierman A, Lifshitz M. Impact of blood sample collection and processing methods on glucose levels in community outreach studies. J Environ Public Health 2013. Article ID 256151, 4 pages.10.1155/2013/256151Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Tonyushkina K, Nichols JH. Glucose meters: a review of technical challenges to obtaining accurate results. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2009;3:971–80.10.1177/193229680900300446Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Hawkins RC. Laboratory turnaround time. Clin Biochem Rev 2007;28:179–94.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Chan AY, Swaminathan R, Cockram CS. Effectiveness of sodium fluoride as a preservative of glucose in blood. Clin Chem 1989;35:315–7.10.1093/clinchem/35.2.315Suche in Google Scholar

11. Gambino R, Piscitelli J, Ackattupathil TA, Theriault JL, Andrin RD, Sanfilippo ML, et al. Acidification of blood is superior to sodium fluoride alone as an inhibitor of glycolysis. Clin Chem 2009;55:1019–21.10.1373/clinchem.2008.121707Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Steele AM, Wensley KJ, Brewer E, Shields BM, Hattersley AT, McDonald TJ. Pre analytical sample handling of venous blood: how to ensure your glucose measurement is accurate and reliable. Pract Diab Int 2013;30:128–31.10.1002/pdi.1758Suche in Google Scholar

13. Behan KJ, Dumas M, Johnston M. Sedimentation by gravity stabilizes plasma glucose for up to 60 minutes. Clin Lab Sci 2013;26:158–61.10.29074/ascls.26.3.158Suche in Google Scholar

14. Khan II, Usmani HA, Mughal FH. To re-emphasize the need for fluoride in blood samples for glucose-level testing. J Pak Med Assoc 1998;48:113–5.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Dalal BL, Brigden ML. Factitious biochemical measurements resulting from haematological conditions. Am J Clin Pathol 2009;131:195–204.10.1309/AJCPY9RP5QYTYFWCSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Sidebottom RA, Williams PR, Kanarek KS. Glucose determinations in plasma and serum: potential error related to increased haematocrit. Clin Chem 1982;28:190–2.10.1093/clinchem/28.1.190Suche in Google Scholar

17. Canivet B, Elbaze P, Dujardin P. Pseudohypoglycemia in a patient with leukemia [letter]. Biomedicine 1981;35:203–4.Suche in Google Scholar

18. Gambino R. Sodium fluoride: an ineffective inhibitor of glycolysis. Ann Clin Biochem 2013;50:3–5.10.1258/acb.2012.012135Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, Ginsberg BH. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1143–8.10.2337/diacare.23.8.1143Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Brahm J. Kinetics of glucose transport in human erythrocytes. J Physiol 1983;339:339–54.10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014720Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Florkowski C, Budgen C, Kendall D, Lunt H, Moore MP. Comparison of blood glucose meters in a New Zealand diabetes centre. Ann Clin Biochem 2009;46:302–5.10.1258/acb.2009.008193Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Lippi G, Salvagno GL, Montagnana M, Brocco G, Guidi GC. Influence of hemolysis on routine clinical chemistry testing. Clin Chem Lab Med 2006;44:311–6.10.1515/CCLM.2006.054Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Fernandez L, Jee P, Klein MJ, Fischer P, Perkins SL, Brooks SP. A comparison of glucose concentration in paired specimens collected in serum separator and fluoride/potassium oxalate blood collection tubes under survey ‘field’ conditions. Clin Biochem 2013;46:285–8.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2012.11.027Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Daves M, Cemin R, Fattor B, Cosio G, Salvagno GL, Rizza F, et al. Evaluation of hematocrit bias on blood glucose measurement with six different portable glucose meters. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2011;21:306–11.10.11613/BM.2011.041Suche in Google Scholar

25. Perera NJ, Molyneaux L, Constatino MI, McGill M, Yue DK, Twigg SM, et al. Suboptimal performance of blood glucose meters in an antenatal diabetes clinic. Diabetes Care 2011;34:335–7.10.2337/dc10-1457Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Parwaiz M, Lunt H, Florkowski CM, Logan FJ, Irons L, Perwick C, et al. Assessment of glucose meter performance at the antenatal diabetes clinic: exploration of patient-related and pre-analytical factors. Ann Clin Biochem 2014;51:47–53.10.1177/0004563213487893Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Guarner V, Alvarez-Buylla R. Erthrocytes and glucose homeostasis in rats. Diabetes 1989;38:410–5.10.2337/diab.38.4.410Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2013-12-8
Accepted: 2014-2-21
Published Online: 2014-3-29
Published in Print: 2014-7-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: reiterated responsibilities for the clinical laboratory
  4. Review
  5. The association between plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) levels, PAI-1 4G/5G polymorphism, and myocardial infarction: a Mendelian randomization meta-analysis
  6. Opinion Papers
  7. Harmonization of quality indicators in laboratory medicine. A preliminary consensus
  8. Cardiac biomarkers and risk assessment in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery: time to revise the guidelines?
  9. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  10. A statistical basis for harmonization of thyroid stimulating hormone immunoassays using a robust factor analysis model
  11. Sigma metrics used to assess analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: importance of the allowable total error (TEa) target
  12. Combined light chain immunofixation to detect monoclonal gammopathy: a comparison to standard electrophoresis in serum and urine
  13. Automated indirect immunofluorescence microscopy enables the implementation of a quantitative internal quality control system for anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) analysis
  14. Peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with bipolar disorder demonstrate apoptosis and differential regulation of advanced glycation end products and S100B
  15. Coefficient of energy balance, a new parameter for basic investigation of the cerebrospinal fluid
  16. Interconversion of stone composition profiles from two recurrent stone episodes in stone formers
  17. Reference Values
  18. Complete blood count reference intervals and age- and sex-related trends of North China Han population
  19. Cancer Diagnostics
  20. The quantification of HER2 and MYC gene fragments in cell-free plasma as putative biomarkers for gastric cancer diagnosis
  21. Cardiovascular Diseases
  22. Novel sensitive cardiac troponin I immunoassay free from troponin I-specific autoantibody interference
  23. Interleukin-6 receptor Asp358Ala gene polymorphism is associated with plasma C-reactive protein levels and severity of aortic valve stenosis
  24. Diabetes
  25. Stability of glucose in plasma with different anticoagulants
  26. Plasma glucose measurement in diabetes: impact and implications of variations in sample collection procedures with a focus on the first hour after sample collection
  27. Changing from glucose to HbA1c for diabetes diagnosis: predictive values of one test and importance of analytical bias and imprecision
  28. System accuracy evaluation of systems for point-of-care testing of blood glucose: a comparison of a patient-use system with six professional-use systems
  29. Letter to the Editors
  30. Reply to the article entitled “Identification of an 18 bp deletion in the TWIST1 gene by CO-amplification at lower denaturation temperature-PCR (COLD-PCR) for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis: first case report” by Galbiati et al., Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52(4):505–9
  31. Further considerations concerning non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of craniosynostosis based on the identification of an 18 bp deletion in the TWIST1 gene by COLD-PCR
  32. Sensible use of laboratory testing requires active laboratory involvement
  33. Digoxin overdose – an accurate method for determining free digoxin concentrations on general chemistry analysers post DigiFab treatment
  34. Method-specific differences in β-isomerised carboxy-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen and procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide using two fully automated immunoassays
  35. Evaluation of mutation profiling by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry in fine needle aspirations from papillary thyroid cancer
  36. Evaluation of Calfast® immunochromatographic quantitative assay for the measurement of calprotectin in faeces
  37. Measurement error in estimated average glucose: a novel approach
  38. Feasibility of an EQAS for HbA1c in Italy using fresh blood samples
  39. Congress Abstracts
  40. 5th Annual International Symposium on Kallikreins and Kallikrein-Related Peptidases
Heruntergeladen am 7.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2013-1059/pdf
Button zum nach oben scrollen