Home Barbarians and brothers-in-arms
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Barbarians and brothers-in-arms

Byzantines on barbarian soldiers in the sixth century
  • David Alan Parnell EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: February 4, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The modern explanation of the Byzantine distinction between Roman and barbarian has focused on a dichotomy based on political allegiance to the emperor. In this interpretation, while individuals could change identity by changing loyalty, the categories themselves did not change. This essay argues that sixth-century Byzantine military elites had more complex opinions about identity and loyalty. In particular, they could accept that many who served the emperor loyally were in fact non-Romans and even barbarians, even if they liked them and refrained from using that term pejoratively. In fact, Byzantines could exhibit approval and fondness of non-Romans in loyal service to the emperor. The application of the pejorative label “barbarian” to non-Romans serving in the Byzantine military was limited to occasions when criticism was deemed appropriate (such as the misbehavior of the non-Roman) and those situations in which a reference to traditional barbarian tropes served a literary purpose.

Online erschienen: 2016-2-4
Erschienen im Druck: 2015-12-1

© 2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bz-2015-0025/html
Scroll to top button