Home Stresses and deformations of an osteosynthesis plate in a lateral tibia plateau fracture
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Stresses and deformations of an osteosynthesis plate in a lateral tibia plateau fracture

  • Matthias Münch EMAIL logo , Tobias Barth , Annika Studt , Julius Dehoust , Klaus Seide , Maximilian Hartel and Karl-Heinz Frosch
Published/Copyright: January 10, 2022

Abstract

This study has the aim to investigate the strain and stress in an anterolateral locking plate applied for the fixation of a lateral split fracture. To simulate a complex fracture situation, three segments were separated. With a FEM analysis, representative places for strain and stress measurement were determined. A locked osteosynthesis plate was instrumented with strain gauges and tested on a fractured and a non-fractured Saw Bone model. To simulate different loading situations, four different points of force application, from the center of the condyles to a 15 mm posterior position, were used with a medial-lateral load distribution of 60:40. The simulations as well as the biomechanical tests demonstrated that two deformations dominate the load on the plate: a bending into posterior direction and a bulging of the plate head. Shifting the point of application to the posterior direction resulted in increasing maximum stress, from 1.16 to 6.32 MPa (FEM analysis) and from 3.04 to 7.00 MPa (biomechanical study), respectively. Furthermore, the comparison of the non-fractured and fractured models showed an increase in maximum stress by the factor 2.06–2.2 (biomechanical investigation) and 1.5–3.3 (FEM analysis), respectively.


Corresponding author: Matthias Münch, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Sports Traumatology, BG Hospital Hamburg, Bergedorfer Straße 10, 21033 Hamburg, Germany, E-mail:

Funding source: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347

Award Identifier / Grant number: 13GW0199B

  1. Research funding: This work was funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under the Grant Number 13GW0199B.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: not applicable.

References

1. Mcnamara, IR, Smith, TO, Shepherd, KL, Clark, AB, Nielsen, DM, Donell, S, et al.. Surgical fixation methods for tibial plateau fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009679.pub2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Davis, JT, Rudloff, MI. Posttraumatic arthritis after intra-articular distal femur and proximal tibia fractures. Orthop Clin N Am 2019;50:445–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2019.06.002.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Lowe, DT, Milone, MT, Gonzalez, LJ, Egol, KA. Repair of tibial plateau fracture (Schatzker II). JBJS Essent Surg Tech 2019;9:e25. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.st.18.00105.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Prat-Fabregat, S, Camacho-Carrasco, P. Treatment strategy for tibial plateau fractures: an update. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:225–32. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.1.000031.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Holmenschlager, F, Beck, OT, Halm, P, Winckler, S. Nachuntersuchung operativ versorgter Tibiakopffrakturen. Acta Chir Austriaca 2000;32(Suppl. 161):39–42.10.1007/BF02949857Search in Google Scholar

6. Hua, K, Jiang, X, Zha, Y, Chen, C, Zhang, B, Mao, Y. Retrospective analysis of 514 cases of tibial plateau fractures based on morphology and injury mechanism. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1321-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Lee, JA, Papadakis, SA, Moon, C, Zalavras, CG. Tibial plateau fractures treated with the less invasive stabilisation system. Int Orthop 2007;31:415–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0176-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Dehoust, J, Münch, M, Seide, K, Barth, T, Frosch, KH. Biomechanical aspects of the posteromedial split in bicondylar tibial plateau fractures—a finite-element investigation. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2020;46:1257–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01538-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Luo, C, Hwa, S, Lin, S, Chen, C, Tseng, C. Placement-induced effects on high tibial osteotomized construct - biomechanical tests and finite-element analyses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0630-2.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Koh, Y-G, Lee, J-A, Lee, H-Y, Chun, H-J, Kim, H-J, Kang, K-T. Design optimization of high tibial osteotomy plates using finite element analysis for improved biomechanical effect. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1269-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Chen, YN, Chang, CW, Li, CT, Chen, CH, Chung, CR, Chang, CH, et al.. Biomechanical investigation of the type and configuration of screws used in high tibial osteotomy with titanium locking plate and screw fixation. J Orthop Surg Res 2019;14:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1062-8.Search in Google Scholar

12. Goldstein, SA, Wilson, DL, Sonstegard, DA, Matthews, LS. The mechanical properties of human tibial trabecular bone as a function of metaphyseal location. J Biomech 1983;16:965–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(83)90097-0.Search in Google Scholar

13. Zeighami, A, Aissaoui, R, Dumas, R. Knee medial and lateral contact forces in a musculoskeletal model with subject-specific contact point trajectories. J Biomech 2018;69:138–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.021.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Freeman, MAR, Pinskerova, V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 2005;38:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.006.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Sawbones. Biomechanical materials for precise, repeatable testing.Available from: https://www.sawbones.com/biomechanical-product-info.Search in Google Scholar

16. Samsami, S, Pätzold, R, Winkler, M, Herrmann, S, Augat, P. The effect of coronal splits on the structural stability of bi-condylar tibial plateau fractures: a biomechanical investigation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2020;140:1719–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03412-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

17. Lasanianos, NG, Garnavos, C, Magnisalis, E, Kourkoulis, S, Babis, GC. A comparative biomechanical study for complex tibial plateau fractures: nailing and compression bolts versus modern and traditional plating. Injury2013;44:1333–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.03.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Fouad, H. Assessment of function-graded materials as fracture fixation bone-plates under combined loading conditions using finite element modelling. Med Eng Phys 2011;33:456–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.11.013.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Seide, K, Aljudaibi, M, Weinrich, N, Kowald, B, Jürgens, C, Müller, J, et al.. Telemetric assessment of bone healing with an instrumented internal fixator. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94-B:398–404. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.94b3.27550.Search in Google Scholar

20. Metalcore. Datenblatt Ti-grade. Available from: http://www.metalcor.de/datenblatt/121/.Search in Google Scholar

21. Browner, B, Jupiter, J, Krettek, C, Anderson, P. Tibial plateau fractures. In: Skeletal Trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction, 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

22. Schorler, H, Capanni, F, Gaashan, M, Wendlandt, R, Jürgens, C, Schulz, A-P. Bone plates for osteosynthesis – a systematic review of test methods and parameters for biomechanical testing. Biomed Eng Biomed Tech 2017;62:235–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2015-0219.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Schorler, H, Wendlandt, R, Jürgens, C, Schulz, AP, Kaddick, C, Capanni, F. Bone plate-screw constructs for osteosynthesis - recommendations for standardized mechanical torsion and bending tests. Biomed Tech 2018;63:691–7. https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2017-0126.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2021-05-27
Accepted: 2021-11-26
Published Online: 2022-01-10
Published in Print: 2022-02-23

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2021-0166/html
Scroll to top button