Home Development and control of a home-based training device for hand rehabilitation with a spring and cable driven mechanism
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Development and control of a home-based training device for hand rehabilitation with a spring and cable driven mechanism

  • Kasim Serbest ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Mustafa Kutlu , Osman Eldogan and Ibrahim Tekeoglu
Published/Copyright: February 9, 2021

Abstract

Rehabilitation at home is rapidly increasing. Although successful results are achieved with treatment methods applied in rehabilitation clinics, there are also some disadvantages in this process, such as dependence on an expert and high costs. Developments in mechatronic technologies have accelerated the development of assistive devices which are designed for use at home. One of the rehabilitation applications is on a hemiplegic hand. In previous studies, some useful devices have been developed for hand rehabilitation. In this study, we suggest a new, low-cost and wearable robotic glove for hand rehabilitation. The specific component of this device is the spring and cable driven system proposed for transmission of motion and force. The device was tested on both unimpaired participants and patients with the hemiplegic hand, and it was proven to be beneficial for hand rehabilitation. As a result of trials with unimpaired participants, the muscle activation of the extensor digitorum and the flexor carpi radialis were increased by 184.1 and 197.8% respectively. The weight of the device was less than 400 g, thanks to 3D printed parts.


Corresponding author: Kasim Serbest, Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Sakarya University of Applied Sciences, 54187Sakarya, Turkey, E-mail:

Funding source: The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)

Award Identifier / Grant number: 115M622

Acknowledgments

A special thanks is extended to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Arno H. A. Stienen of Northwestern University for his contribution to spring mechanism design.

  1. Research funding: This study was supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) with project No. 115M622.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

References

1. Feigin, VL, Forouzanfar, MH, Krishnamurthi, R, Mensah, GA, Connor, M, Bennett, DA, et al.. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet 2014;383:245–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61953-4.Search in Google Scholar

2. Turkish Ministry of Health. Health statistics yearbook; 2019. Available from: https://sbu.saglik.gov.tr/Ekutuphane/kitaplar/sa%C4%9Fl%C4%B1k%20istatistik%20y%C4%B1ll%C4%B1%C4%9F%C4%B1%202013.pdf [Accessed 2 September 2019].Search in Google Scholar

3. Henssge, U, Hoffman, A, Kavanagh, S, Roughton, M, Rudd, A, Cloud, G. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National sentinel stroke audit 2010. London UK: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

4. Desrosiers, J, Malouin, F, Richards, C, Bourbonnais, D, Rochette, A, Bravo, G. Comparison of changes in upper and lower extremity impairments and disabilities after stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 2003;26:109–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004356-200306000-00005.Search in Google Scholar

5. Ingram, NJ, Kording, KP, Howard, IS, Wolpert, DM. The statistics of natural hand movements. Exp Brain Res 2008;188:223–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1355-3.Search in Google Scholar

6. World Health Organization. World report on disability. Switzerland: WHO Press; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kwakkel, G, Wagenaar, RC, Koelman, TW, Lankhorst, GJ, Koetsier, JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: a research synthesis. Stroke 1997;28:1550–6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.8.1550.Search in Google Scholar

8. Amirabdollahian, F, Ates, S, Basteris, A, Cesario, A, Buurke, J, Hermens, H, et al.. Design, development and deployment of a hand/wrist exoskeleton for home-based rehabilitation after stroke-script project. Robotica 2014;32:1331–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0263574714002288.Search in Google Scholar

9. Winstein, CJ, Stewart, JC. Conditions of task practice for individuals with neurologic impairments. Textb Neural Repair Rehabil 2006;2:89–102.10.1017/CBO9780511545078.009Search in Google Scholar

10. Shea, CH, Lai, Q, Black, C, Park, JH. Spacing practice sessions across days benefits the learning of motor skills. Hum Mov Sci 2000;19:737–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9457(00)00021-x.Search in Google Scholar

11. Heo, P, Gu, GM, Lee, S, Rhee, K, Kim, J. Current hand exoskeleton technologies for rehabilitation and assistive engineering. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 2012;13:807–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-012-0107-2.Search in Google Scholar

12. Jo, I, Lee, J, Park, Y, Bae, J. Design of a wearable hand exoskeleton for exercising flexion/extension of the fingers. In: International conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), 15th IEEE international conference; 2017:1465–70 pp.10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009479Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Worsnopp, TT, Peshkin, MA, Colgate, JE, Kamper, DG. An actuated finger exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation following stroke. In: International conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), 10th IEEE international conference; 2007:896–901 pp.10.1109/ICORR.2007.4428530Search in Google Scholar

14. Guo, S, Zhang, W, Guo, J, Gao, J, Hu, Y. Design and kinematic simulation of a novel exoskeleton rehabilitation hand robot. In: International conference on mechatronics and automation (ICMA), IEEE international conference; 2016:1125–30 pp.10.1109/ICMA.2016.7558720Search in Google Scholar

15. Prange-Lasonder, GB, Radder, B, Kottink, AIR, Melendez-Calderon, A, Buurke, JH, Rietman, JS. Applying a soft-robotic glove as assistive device and training tool with games to support hand function after stroke: preliminary results on feasibility and potential clinical impact. In: International conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), 15th IEEE international conference; 2017:1401–6 pp.10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009444Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Polygerinos, P, Wang, Z, Galloway, KC, Wood, RJ, Walsh, CJ. Soft robotic glove for combined assistance and at-home rehabilitation. Robot Autonom Syst 2015;73:135–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2014.08.014.Search in Google Scholar

17. Yap, HK, Lim, JH, Nasrallah, F, Goh, JCH, Yeow, C. Characterisation and evaluation of soft elastomeric actuators for hand assistive and rehabilitation applications. J Med Eng Technol 2016;40:199–209. https://doi.org/10.3109/03091902.2016.1161853.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Polygerinos, P, Correll, N, Morin, SA, Mosadegh, B, Onal, CD, Petersen, K, et al.. Soft robotics: review of fluid-driven intrinsically soft devices; manufacturing, sensing, control, and applications in human-robot interaction. Adv Eng Mater 2017;19:1700016. https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201700016.Search in Google Scholar

19. Baier, J, Kuchinke, LM, Neumann, M, Bender, B. Form and function – exemplary analysis of the significance for the design of rehabilitation devices. In: International conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), 15th IEEE international conference; 2017:740–5 pp.10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009336Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Pahl, G, Beitz, W, Feldhusen, J, Grote, KH. Engineering design: a systematic approach, 3rd ed. London: Springer; 2007.10.1007/978-1-84628-319-2Search in Google Scholar

21. Andrew, I, Batavia, JD, Guy, SH. Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. J Rehabil Res Dev 1990;27:425–36.10.1682/JRRD.1990.10.0425Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Nordin, M, Frankel, VH. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system, 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

23. Duan, Q, Vashista, V, Agrawal, SK. Effect on wrench-feasible workspace of cable-driven parallel robots by adding springs. Mech Mach Theor 2015;86:201–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2014.12.009.Search in Google Scholar

24. Mao, Y, Jin, X, Dutta, GG, Scholz, JP, Agrawal, SK. Human movement training with a cable driven arm exoskeleton (carex). IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2015;23:84–92. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2014.2329018.Search in Google Scholar

25. Borille, A, Gomes, J, Meyer, R, Grote, K. Applying decision methods to select rapid prototyping technologies. Rapid Prototyp J 2010;16:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541011011712.Search in Google Scholar

26. Buchholz, B, Armstrong, TJ. A kinematic model of the human hand to evaluate its prehensile capabilities. J Biomech 1992;25:149–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(92)90272-3.Search in Google Scholar

27. Tong, KY, Ho, SK, Pang, PMK, Hu, XL, Tam, WK, Fung, KL, et al.. An intention driven hand functions task training robotic system. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2010 Annual international conference of the IEEE; 2010:3406–9 pp.10.1109/IEMBS.2010.5627930Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Zhang, F, Hua, L, Fu, Y, Chen, H, Wang, S. Design and development of a hand exoskeleton for rehabilitation of hand injuries. Mech Mach Theory 2014;73:103–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2013.10.015.Search in Google Scholar

29. Serbest, K, Cilli, M, Yildiz, MZ, Eldogan, O. Development of a human hand model for estimating joint torque using MatLab tools. In: Biomedical robotics and biomechatronics (BioRob), 6th IEEE international conference; 2016:793–7 pp.10.1109/BIOROB.2016.7523724Search in Google Scholar

30. Basmajian, JV. Biofeedback: principles and practice for clinicians, 2nd ed. London: Williams & Wilkins; 1984.Search in Google Scholar

31. Cempini, M, De Rossi, SMM, Lenzi, T, Cortese, M, Giovacchini, F, Vitiello, N, Carrozza, MC. Kinematics and design of a portable and wearable exoskeleton for hand rehabilitation. In: International conference on rehabilitation robotics (ICORR), 13th IEEE international conference; 2013:1–6 pp.10.1109/ICORR.2013.6650414Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-10-12
Accepted: 2021-01-19
Published Online: 2021-02-09
Published in Print: 2021-08-26

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 23.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2019-0267/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button