Home Frequency decomposition and phase synchronization of the visual evoked potential using the empirical mode decomposition
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Frequency decomposition and phase synchronization of the visual evoked potential using the empirical mode decomposition

  • Byuckjin Lee , Byeongnam Kim and Sun K. Yoo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 28, 2020

Abstract

Objectives

The phase characteristics of the representative frequency components of the Electroencephalogram (EEG) can be a means of understanding the brain functions of human senses and perception. In this paper, we found out that visual evoked potential (VEP) is composed of the dominant multi-band component signals of the EEG through the experiment.

Methods

We analyzed the characteristics of VEP based on the theory that brain evoked potentials can be decomposed into phase synchronized signals. In order to decompose the EEG signal into across each frequency component signals, we extracted the signals in the time-frequency domain with high resolution using the empirical mode decomposition method. We applied the Hilbert transform (HT) to extract the signal and synthesized it into a frequency band signal representing VEP components. VEP could be decomposed into phase synchronized δ, θ, α, and β frequency signals. We investigated the features of visual brain function by analyzing the amplitude and latency of the decomposed signals in phase synchronized with the VEP and the phase-locking value (PLV) between brain regions.

Results

In response to visual stimulation, PLV values were higher in the posterior lobe region than in the anterior lobe. In the occipital region, the PLV value of theta band was observed high.

Conclusions

The VEP signals decomposed into constituent frequency components through phase analysis can be used as a method of analyzing the relationship between activated signals and brain function related to visual stimuli.


Corresponding author: Sun K. Yoo, Department of Medical Engineering, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1,Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea, E-mail:

Funding source: This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT.

Award Identifier / Grant number: (NRF-2018M3A9H6081483)

Acknowledgment

We thank all participants and anonymous reviewers for invaluable assistance with this article. This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation(NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2018M3A9H6081483).

  1. Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Başar E. EEG-brain dynamics: relation between EEG and brain evoked potentials. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North-Holland Biomedical Press; 1980.Search in Google Scholar

2. Varela, F., Lachaux, J., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J. Phase synchronization and large-scale integration. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001;2:229–39. https://doi.org/10.1038/35067550.https://doi.org/10.1038/35067550Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Light GA, Williams LE, Minow F, Sprock J, Rissling A, Sharp R, et al. Electroencephalography (EEG) and event‐related potentials (ERPs) with human participants. Curr Protoc Neurosci 2010;6:25. 1-6. 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142301.ns0625s52.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Misulis KE, Fakhoury T. Spehlmann's evoked potential primer. United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2001.Search in Google Scholar

5. Key APF, Dove GO, Maguire MJ. Linking brainwaves to the brain: an ERP primer. Dev Neuropsychol 2005;27:183–215. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2702_1.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Arbib MA. The handbook of brain theory and neural networks. Cambridge: MIT press; 2003.10.7551/mitpress/3413.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

7. Williams N, Nasuto SJ, Saddy JD. Evaluation of empirical mode decomposition for event-related potential analysis. EURASIP J Adv Sig Pr 2011;2011:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/965237.Search in Google Scholar

8. Lee GB, Cho BJ. EMD based cardiac arrhythmia classification using multi-class SVM. J Korea Inst Inf Commun Eng 2010;14:16–22. https://doi.org/10.6109/jkiice.2010.14.1.016.Search in Google Scholar

9. Pachori RB, Bajaj V. Analysis of normal and epileptic seizure EEG signals using empirical mode decomposition. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2011;104:373–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2011.03.009.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu MC, Shih HH, Zheng Q, et al., editors. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. In: Proceedings of the royal society of London a: mathematical physical engineering sciences. The Royal Society, London; 1998.10.1098/rspa.1998.0193Search in Google Scholar

11. Sweeney-Reed CM, Nasuto SJ. A novel approach to the detection of synchronisation in EEG based on empirical mode decomposition. J Comput Neurosci 2007;23:79–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10827-007-0020-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Rilling G, Flandrin P, Goncalves P, editors. On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms. In: IEEE-EURASIP workshop on nonlinear signal and image processing. IEEER, Grado, Italy; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

13. Torres ME, Colominas MA, Schlotthauer G, Flandrin P, editors. A complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise. In: 2011 IEEE International conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). IEEE, Prague, Czech Republic; 2011.10.1109/ICASSP.2011.5947265Search in Google Scholar

14. Labate D, Foresta FL, Occhiuto G, Morabito FC, Lay-Ekuakille A, Vergallo P. Empirical mode decomposition vs. wavelet decomposition for the extraction of respiratory signal from single-channel ECG: a comparison. IEEE Sens J 2013;13:2666–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2013.2257742.Search in Google Scholar

15. Kim WS, Han SK. Phase analysis of single-trial EEGs: phase resetting of alpha and theta rhythms. Neurocomputing 2006;69:1337–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2005.12.103.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ray WJ, Cole HW. EEG alpha activity reflects attentional demands, and beta activity reflects emotional and cognitive processes. Science 1985;228:750. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3992243.Search in Google Scholar

17. Vogel EK, Luck SJ. The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 2000;37:190–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3720190.Search in Google Scholar

18. Freunberger R, Klimesch W, Doppelmayr M, Höller Y. Visual P2 component is related to theta phase-locking. Neurosci Lett 2007;426:181–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2007.08.062.Search in Google Scholar

19. Burkitt GR, Silberstein RB, Cadusch PJ, Wood AW. Steady-state visual evoked potentials and travelling waves. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:246–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00194-7.Search in Google Scholar

20. Ito J, Nikolaev AR, Van Leeuwen C. Spatial and temporal structure of phase synchronization of spontaneous alpha EEG activity. Biol Cybern 2005;92:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-004-0533-z.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2019-07-29
Accepted: 2020-01-22
Published Online: 2020-05-28
Published in Print: 2020-10-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2019-0195/html
Scroll to top button