Startseite Lebenswissenschaften The impact of the permanent grass cover or conventional tillage on hydraulic properties of Haplic Cambisol developed on paragneiss substrate
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The impact of the permanent grass cover or conventional tillage on hydraulic properties of Haplic Cambisol developed on paragneiss substrate

  • Miroslav Fér EMAIL logo , Radka Kodešová , Antonín Nikodem , Veronika Jirků , Ondřej Jakšík und Karel Němeček
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 23. November 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Biologia
Aus der Zeitschrift Biologia Band 71 Heft 10

Abstract

This study is focused on the comparison of soil structure and soil hydraulic properties of a Haplic Cambisol on paragneiss under two different land managements. Soil samples were taken from all diagnostic horizons (A, Bw and C) of the soil profile under the permanent grass cover (grassland) and under the conventional tillage (arable land). Basic soil properties were measured. Aggregate stability was assessed using the WSA index. Soil composition was evaluated using micromorphological images. Tension disk infiltrometers with two diameters of 2.22 and 10.25 cm (and applied pressure head of −2 cm) and Guelph permeameter were used to measure unsaturated and saturated hydraulic conductivities, respectively. Soil hydraulic properties were measured in the laboratory using the multistep outflow experiment, which was performed on the undisturbed 100 cm3 soil samples. Results showed that the unsaturated and saturated hydraulic conductivities measured in all horizons were lower at the arable land than conductivities at the grassland. The shapes of the soil water retention curves for A and Bw horizons were also different, indicating that soil below the grass contained larger fraction of the large capillary pores, which also corresponded to measured hydraulic conductivities and soil structure characteristics. Differences between both locations were caused by a negative impact of tillage (inflicting soil degradation) and positive influence of grass (increasing organic matter content and improving soil aggregation).

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the financial support of the Czech Science Foundation grants no. 526/08/0434 and 13-12477S, and Dr. Žigová for taking micro-morphological images.

References

Bachmair S., Weiler M. & Nűtzmann G. 2010. Benchmarking of two dual-permeability models under different land use and land cover. Vadose Zone J. 9 226–237.10.2136/vzj2009.0089Suche in Google Scholar

Bachmann J., Krüger J., Göbel M.-O. & Heinze S. 2016. Occurrence and spatial pattern of water repellency in a beech forest subsoil. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 64 100–110.10.1515/johh-2016-0005Suche in Google Scholar

Bartlová J., Badalíková B., Pospíšilová L., Pokorný E. & Šarapatka B. 2015. Water stability of soil aggregates in different systems of tillage. Soil Water Res. 10 147–15410.17221/132/2014-SWRSuche in Google Scholar

Bormann H. & Klassen K. 2008. Seasonal and land use dependent variability of soil hydraulic and soil hydrological properties of two Northern German soils. Geoderma 145 295–302.10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.03.017Suche in Google Scholar

Dohnal M., Dusek J. & Vogel T. 2010. Improving hydraulic conductivity estimates from Minidisk Infiltrometer measurements for soils with wide pore-size distributions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74: 804–811.10.2136/sssaj2009.0099Suche in Google Scholar

Elrick D. E., Reynolds W.D. &Tan K. A. 1989. Hydraulic conductivity measurements in the unsaturated zone using improved well analyses. Ground Water Monit. Rew. 9 184–193.10.1111/j.1745-6592.1989.tb01162.xSuche in Google Scholar

Flint A.L. & Flint L.E. 2002. Particle density, pp. 229–240. In: Dane J.H. & Topp G.C. (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4 – Physical Methods, Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, USA.10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c10Suche in Google Scholar

Gardner W. R. 1958. Some steady state solutions of unsaturated moisture flow equations with application to evaporation from a water table. Soil Sci. 85 228–232.10.1097/00010694-195804000-00006Suche in Google Scholar

Gee G.W. & Or D. 2002. Particle-size analysis, pp. 255–294. In: Dane J.H. & Topp G.C. (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4 – Physical Methods, Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, USA.Suche in Google Scholar

van Genuchten M.Th. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44 892–898.10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002xSuche in Google Scholar

Herbst M., Diekkrüger B. & Vereecken H. 2006. Geostatistical co– regionalization of soil hydraulic properties in a micro–scale catchment using terrain attributes. Geoderma 132 206–221.10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.05.008Suche in Google Scholar

Horel Á., Tóth E., Gelybó G., Kása I., Bakacsi Z. & Farkas C. 2015. Effects of land use and management on soil hydraulic properties. Open Geoscience 1 742–754.10.1515/geo-2015-0053Suche in Google Scholar

Huang M., Zettl J.D., Barbour S.L. & Pratt D. 2016. Characterizing the spatial variability of the hydraulic conductivity of reclamation soils using air permeability. Geoderma 262 285–293.10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.014Suche in Google Scholar

International Organization of Standardization, Standard of Soil quality – Determination of pH (ISO 10390:1994).Suche in Google Scholar

IUSS Working Group WRB. 2014. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources No. 106. FAI, Rome.Suche in Google Scholar

Jakšík O., Kodešová R., Kubiš A., Stehlíková I., Drábek O. & Kapička A. 2015. Soil aggregate stability within morphologically diverse areas. Catena 127: 287–299.10.1016/j.catena.2015.01.010Suche in Google Scholar

Jirků V., Kodešová R., Nikodem A., Mühlhanselová M. & Žigová A. 2013. Temporal variability of structure and hydraulic properties of topsoil of three soil types. Geoderma 204 – 205: 43–58.10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.03.024Suche in Google Scholar

Kelishadi H., Mosaddeghi M.R., Hajabassi M.A. & Ayoubi S. 2014. Near-saturated soil hydraulic properties as influenced by land use management systems in Koohrang region of central Zagros, Iran. Geoderma 213 426–434.10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.008Suche in Google Scholar

Kodešová R., Jirků V., Kodeš V., Mühlhanselová M., Nikodem A. & Žigová A. 2011. Soil structure and soil hydraulic properties of haplic Luvisol used as arable land and grassland. Soil Till. Res. 111: 154–161.10.1016/j.still.2010.09.007Suche in Google Scholar

Kodešová R., Kočárek M., Kodeš V., Šimůnek J. & Kozák J. 2008. Impact of soil micromorphology features on water flow and herbicide transport in soils. Vadose Zone J. 7 798–809.10.2136/vzj2007.0079Suche in Google Scholar

Kodešová R., Nēmeček K., Kodeš V. & Žigová A. 2012. Using dye tracer for visualization of preferential flow at macro- and microscales. Vadose Zone J. 11, vzj2011.0088.10.2136/vzj2011.0088Suche in Google Scholar

Kodešová R., Pavlů L., Kodeš V., Žigová A. & Nikodem A. 2007. Impact of spruce forest and grass vegetation cover on soil micromorphology and hydraulic properties of organic matter horizon. Biologia 62: 565–568.10.2478/s11756-007-0112-6Suche in Google Scholar

Kodešová R., Rohošková M. & Žigová A. 2009. Comparison of aggregate stability within six soil profiles under conventional tillage using various laboratory tests. Biologia 64 550–554.10.2478/s11756-009-0095-6Suche in Google Scholar

Kodešová R., Šimůnek J., Nikodem A. & Jirků V. 2010. Estimation of parameters of the radially-symmetric dualpermeability model using tension disc infiltrometer and Guelph permeameter experiments. Vadose Zone J. 9 213– 225.10.2136/vzj2009.0069Suche in Google Scholar

Lichner L., Eldridge D.J., Schacht K., Zhukova N., Holko L., Šír M. & Pecho J. 2011. Grass cover influences hydrophysical parameters and heterogeneity pf water flow in sandy soil. Pedosphere 21 719–729.10.1016/S1002-0160(11)60175-6Suche in Google Scholar

Lichner L., Hallett P.D. & Orfanus T. 2010. Vegetation impact on the hydrology of an aeolian sandy soil in a continental climate. Ecohydrology 3 413–420.10.1002/eco.153Suche in Google Scholar

Lipiec J., Kuś J., Słowińska-Jurkiewicz A. & Nosalewicz A. 2006. Soil porosity and water infiltration as influenced by tillage methods. Soil Till. Res. 89: 210–220.10.1016/j.still.2005.07.012Suche in Google Scholar

Lozano E., García-Orenes F., Bárcenas-Moreno G., Jiménez-Pinilla P., Mataix-Solera J., Arcenegui V., Morugán-Corona-do A. & Mataix-Beneyto J. 2014. Relationships between soil water repellency and microbial community composition under different plant species in a Mediterranean semiarid forest. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 62: 101–107.10.2478/johh-2014-0017Suche in Google Scholar

Noellemeyer E., Frank F., Alvarez C., Morazzo G. & Quiroga A. 2008. Carbon content and aggregation related to soil physical and biological properties under a landuse sequence in the semiarid region of central Argentina. Soil Till. Res. 99 179– 190.10.1016/j.still.2008.02.003Suche in Google Scholar

Nikodem A., Pavlů L., Kodešová R., Borůvka L. & Drábek O. 2013. Study of podzolization process under different vegetation cover in the Jizera Mountains region. Soil Water Res. 8: 1–13.10.17221/56/2012-SWRSuche in Google Scholar

Matocha C.J., Grove J.H., Karathanasis T.D. & Vandiviere M. 2016. Changes in soil mineralogy due to nitrogen fertilization in an agroecosystem. Geoderma 263: 176–184.10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.09.002Suche in Google Scholar

Nimmo J.R. & Perkins K.S. 2002. Aggregate stability and size distribution, pp. 317–328. In: Dane J.H. & Topp G.C. (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 4 – Physical Methods. SSSA, Madison.10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c14Suche in Google Scholar

Orfánus T., Stojkovová D., Rajkai K., Czachor H. & Sándor R. 2016. Spatial patterns of wetting characteristics in grassland sandy soil. J. Hydrol. Hydromech. 64: 167–175.10.1515/johh-2016-0010Suche in Google Scholar

Orfánus T., Bedrna Z., Lichner L., Hallet P.D., Kňava K. & Sebiň M. 2008. Spatial variability of water repellency in pine forest soil. Soil Water Res. 3: 123–129.10.17221/11/2008-SWRSuche in Google Scholar

Orfánus T., Dlapa P., Fodor N., Raikai K., Sandor R. & Novakova K. 2014. How severe and subcritical water repellency determines the seasonal infiltration in natural and cultivated sandy soils. Soil Till. Res. 125 49–59.10.1016/j.still.2013.09.005Suche in Google Scholar

Pagliai M. & Vignozzi N. 2002. The pore system as an indicator of soil quality. In: Pagliai M. & Jones R. (eds), Sustainable Land Management – Environmental Protection – A Soil Physical Approach. Advances in Geology 35 71–82.Suche in Google Scholar

Reynolds W.D. & Elrick D. E. 1991. Determination of hydraulic conductivity using a pension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55: 633–639.10.2136/sssaj1991.03615995005500030001xSuche in Google Scholar

Reynolds W.D., Elrick D.E., Youngs E.G., Amoozegar A., Booltink H.W.G. & Bouma J. 2002. Saturated and field-saturated water flow parameters, pp. 797–878. In: Dane J. & Topp C. (eds), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 4: Physical Methods. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, USA.Suche in Google Scholar

Sándor R., Lichner L., Filep T., Balog K., Lehoczky É. & Fodor N. 2015. Spatial variability of hydrophysical properties of fallow sandy soils. Biologia 70: 1468–1473.10.1515/biolog-2015-0182Suche in Google Scholar

Schwartz R.C., Steven R.E. & Unger P.W. 2003. Soil hydraulic properties of cropland compared with reestablished and native grassland. Geoderma 116: 47–60.10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00093-4Suche in Google Scholar

Schwen A., Bodner G., Scholl P., Buchan G.D. & Loiskandl W. 2011. Temporal dynamics of soil hydraulic properties and the water-conducting porosity under different tillage. Soil Till. Res. 113: 89–98.10.1016/j.still.2011.02.005Suche in Google Scholar

Skukla M.K., Lal R., Owens L.B. & Urikefer P. 2003. Land use and management impact on structure and infiltration characteristics of soils in the North Appalachian region of Ohio. Soil Sci. 168: 167–177.10.1097/01.ss.0000058889.60072.aaSuche in Google Scholar

Šimůnek, J. van Genuchten M. Th. & Šejna M. 2008. Development and applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD software packages, and related codes. Vadose Zone J. 7 (2): 587–600.10.2136/vzj2007.0077Suche in Google Scholar

Skjemstad J. & Baldock J.A. 2008. Total and organic carbon, pp. 225–238. In: Carter M. (ed.), Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis, (2nd Edition), Soil Science Society of Canada, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.10.1201/9781420005271.ch21Suche in Google Scholar

Soilmoisture Equipment Corp. 2008. Model 2800K1 Guelph Permeameter Operating Instructions. Soilmoisture Equipment Corp., Santa Barbara, CA.Suche in Google Scholar

Stoops G. 2003. Guidelines for Analysis and Desription of Soils and Regolith Thin Sections. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 184 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

Watson K.W. & Luxmoore R.J. 1986. Estimating macroporosity in a forest watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50: 578–582.10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007xSuche in Google Scholar

Wooding R.A. 1968. Steady infiltration from a shallow circular pond. Water Resour. Res. 4 1259–1273.10.1029/WR004i006p01259Suche in Google Scholar

Zádorová T., Jakšík O., Kodešová R. & Penížek V. 2011. Influence of terrain attributes and soil properties on soil aggregate stability. Soil Water Res. 6: 111–119.10.17221/15/2011-SWRSuche in Google Scholar

Zhang Z.F., Groenevelt P.H. & Parkin G.W. 1998. The well-shape factor for the measurement of soil hydraulic properties using the Guelph permeameter. Soil Till. Res. 49: 219–221.10.1016/S0167-1987(98)00174-3Suche in Google Scholar

Zhang R. 1997. Determination of soil sorptivity and hydraulic conductivity from the disk infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61: 1024–1030.10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040005xSuche in Google Scholar

Žigová A., Šťastný M. & Kodešová R. 2013. Development of soils on paragneis and granite in the southearn part of Bohemia. Acta Geodyn. Geomater. 10: 85–95.10.13168/AGG.2013.0008Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2016-6-6
Accepted: 2016-7-20
Published Online: 2016-11-23
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

© 2016 Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Section Cellular and Molecular Biology
  2. Pigments from fungi, an opportunity of production for diverse applications
  3. Section Zoology
  4. Morphological view on the evolution of the immunity and lymphoid organs of vertebrates, focused on thymus
  5. Section Cellular and Molecular Biology
  6. p53-Fibrinolytic system and acute lung injury
  7. Section Cellular and Molecular Biology
  8. The multipotent action of electromagnetic field
  9. Section Cellular and Molecular Biology
  10. Prescreening, identification and harvesting of microalgae with antibacterial activity
  11. Section Botany
  12. Cloning and molecular characterization of Myb transcription factors from Leymus (Poaceae: Trticeae)
  13. Section Botany
  14. Hydrological soil behavior in areas with semi-arid vegetation (Beni Chougrane Mountains, Algeria)
  15. Section Botany
  16. Extent and persistence of water repellency in two Iranian soils
  17. Section Botany
  18. The impact of the permanent grass cover or conventional tillage on hydraulic properties of Haplic Cambisol developed on paragneiss substrate
  19. Section Zoology
  20. Species composition of tetranychoid mites (Acari: Trombidiformes: Prostigmata: Tetranychoidea) in main landscapes of Tehran and modelling ecological niche of Tetranychoidea in main climates of Tehran Province, Iran
  21. Section Zoology
  22. Abiotic factors affect the occurrence of different morphological characteristics in Erebia medusa (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
  23. Section Zoology
  24. Comparison of molecular and morphometric analysis in species discrimination of larvae among five cyprinids from the subfamily Leuciscinae: A tool for sustainable conservation of riverine ichthyofauna
  25. Section Zoology
  26. Values of three branched plasma amino acids of farmed rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss
Heruntergeladen am 8.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/biolog-2016-0133/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen