Startseite Lebenswissenschaften Somatic embryogenesis in Phlox paniculata – histological analysis
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Somatic embryogenesis in Phlox paniculata – histological analysis

  • Hana Vejsadová , Pavel Matiska , Bohuš Obert , Eva Ürgeová EMAIL logo und Anna PreŤová
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 11. August 2016
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill
Biologia
Aus der Zeitschrift Biologia Band 71 Heft 7

Abstract

In vitro regeneration and histological analysis of somatic embryogenesis derived from in vitro leaves were assessed in Phlox paniculata L. The explants were incubated on Murashige and Skoog medium containing 2.26–4.52 μM 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) with or without 0.89 μM benzyladenine supplemented with 3% or 9% sucrose and vitamins. The intact leaf blades were cultured in the dark at temperature 22 ± 2°C. Two Phlox cultivars showed significantly higher regeneration capacity in the in vitro conditions when the cultivation media have been supplemented with 2,4-D at concentrations of 4.52 μM and 3% sucrose. The effect of 2,4-D on somatic embryo induction has been enhanced in presence of cytokinin benzyladenine. In cultivars, the embryogenic structures have been created on calluses derived from leaf sections within 6–9 weeks in culture. Meristematic zones with forming embryogenic structures were mostly localized adjacent to de novo forming tracheal elements in calluses in our experiments. In the absence of tracheal elements, the embryogenic structures have been surrounded by several layers of isodiametric cells. The embryo proper and the suspensor part could be clearly distinguished on the embryogenic structures. The embryogenic potential of cultures has been very high, so that even secondary and tertiary somatic embryos were formed. Within 6–9 weeks in culture, well differentiated embryogenic structures up to torpedo stages were developed. Cultivar ‘Fuji’ exhibited slightly higher embryogenic response in culture than cultivar ‘Starfire’. The cultures maintained their embryogenic potential for about 18 months. Embryogenic structures have been able to convert to complete plants within 3 months.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the Ministry of the Environment of the Czech Republic (project MZP0002707 301), and has been elaborated within Czech-Slovak cooperation.

References

Chen S., Liang M., Li Q. & Xu M. 2008. Study of rapid propagation of Phlox paniculata. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 95: 245–250.10.1007/s11240-008-9431-8Suche in Google Scholar

Declerck V. & Korban S.S. 1995. Shoot regeneration from leaf tissues of Phlox paniculata L. J. Plant Physiol. 147: 441–446.10.1016/S0176-1617(11)82180-2Suche in Google Scholar

Dedičová B., Obert B., Hricová A., Šamaj J., Bobák M. & Pret’ová A. 2000. Shoot and embryo-like structures regenerated from from cultured flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) hypocotyl segments. J. Plant Physiol. 157: 327–334.10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80055-3Suche in Google Scholar

Fraga M., Alonso M. & Borja M. 2004. Shoot regeneration rates of perennial phlox are dependent on cultivar and explant type. Hort. Sci. 39: 1373–1377.10.21273/HORTSCI.39.6.1373Suche in Google Scholar

Jain A., Rout G.R. & Raina S.N. 2002. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from callus cultures of Phlox paniculata Linn. Sci. Hort. 94: 137–143.10.1016/S0304-4238(01)00369-7Suche in Google Scholar

Mackay W.A., Sankhla D. & Sankhla N. 1999. Micropropagation of superior selections of perennial phlox. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. – Plant 35: 49–53.Suche in Google Scholar

Matiska P. & Vejsadová H. 2010. Polyploidy induction in Phlox paniculata L. under in vitro conditions. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun. 58: 101–106.10.11118/actaun201058010101Suche in Google Scholar

Matiska P., Vejsadova H. & Pretova A. 2006. Induction of morphogenesis in Phlox paniculata L, p. 58. In: XXII EUCARPIA Symposium (Section Ornamentals) “Breeding for Beauty”, Book of Abstracts, 11-15 September 2006, Sanremo, Italy.Suche in Google Scholar

Murashige T. & Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497.10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xSuche in Google Scholar

Nau J. 1996. Ball Perennial Manual: Propagation and Production. Ball Publishing, Batavia, IL, USA, 487 pp.Suche in Google Scholar

Olensen M.N. & Fonnesbech M. 1975. Phlox plants from shoot tips. Acta Hort. 54: 95–99.10.17660/ActaHortic.1975.54.12Suche in Google Scholar

Pret’ová A. & Williams E.G. 1986a. Direct somatic embryogenesis from immature zygotic embryos of flax Linum usitatissimum L. J. Plant Physiol. 126: 155–161.10.1016/S0176-1617(86)80016-5Suche in Google Scholar

Pret’ov’ A. & Williams E.G. 1986b. Zygotic embryo cloning in oil seed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Sci. 47: 195–198.10.1016/0168-9452(86)90178-0Suche in Google Scholar

Raghavan V. 2004. Role of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in somatic embryogenesis on cultured zygotic embryos of Arabidopsis: cell expansion, cell cycling, and morphogenesis during continuous exposure of embryos to 2,4-D. Am. J. Bot. 91: 1743–1756.10.3732/ajb.91.11.1743Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Šamaj J., Baluška F., Bobak M. & Volkmann D. 1999. Extracellular matrix surface network of embryogenic units of friable maize callus contains arabinogalactan-proteins recognized by monoclonal antibody JIM 4. Plant Cell Rep. 18: 369–374.10.1007/s002990050588Suche in Google Scholar

Schnabelrauch L.S. & Sink K.C. 1979. In vitro propagation of Phlox subulata and Phlox paniculata. Hort. Sci. 14: 607–608.10.21273/HORTSCI.14.5.607Suche in Google Scholar

Vejsadová H. & Pret’ov’. 2000. Cytological and histological study of morphogenesis in Rhododendron L. Adv. Hort. Sci. 14: 87–91.Suche in Google Scholar

Vejsadová H. & Pret’ov’. 2003. Somatic embryogenesis in Rhododendron catawbiense ‘Grandiflorum’. Acta Hort. 616: 467–470.10.17660/ActaHortic.2003.616.73Suche in Google Scholar

Wherry E.T. 1955. The genus Phlox. Morris Arboretum Monographs III, Philadelphia, PA, USA.Suche in Google Scholar

Abbreviations
2,4-D

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

BA

benzyladenine.

Received: 2016-2-2
Accepted: 2016-6-15
Published Online: 2016-8-11
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

©2016 Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Zoology
  2. Climate warming and invasive fish species: Will they replace native fish species in waters of temperate zones?
  3. Cellular and Molecular Biology
  4. Production of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate from mixed culture
  5. Cellular and Molecular Biology
  6. Molecular and immunological characterization of Lp1, the 34 kDa outer membrane lipoprotein of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
  7. Cellular and Molecular Biology
  8. Antibacterial activity of a microemulsion loaded with cephalosporin
  9. Cellular and Molecular Biology
  10. Isolation and characterization of Vibrio alginolyticus from cultured amphioxus Branchiostoma belcheri tsingtauense
  11. Cellular and Molecular Biology
  12. Somatic embryogenesis in Phlox paniculata – histological analysis
  13. Botany
  14. Overexpression of the novel Zygophyllum xanthoxylum C2H2-type zinc finger gene ZxZF improves drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis and poplar
  15. Botany
  16. Vegetation diversity of the two Dinaric karstic rivers in Bosnia and Herzegovina
  17. Botany
  18. Diversity and spatial patterns of plant communities in volcanic temporary ponds of Sicily (Italy)
  19. Zoology
  20. Erythraeus (Erythraeus) pistacicus sp. n. (Trombidiformes: Erythraeidae) from southern Iran, and notes on other Erythraeus spp.
  21. Zoology
  22. Studies on eucrenal-hypocrenal zonation of springs along the river mainstream: A case study of a karst canyon in Bosnia and Herzegovina
  23. Zoology
  24. Different catching series from light and pheromone trapping of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
  25. Zoology
  26. Newts in the nature reserve Dönche: Evaluation of diversity, breeding behaviour and threats due to a decline in habitat suitability
  27. Zoology
  28. Antioxidant status of rabbits after treatment with epicatechin and patulin
Heruntergeladen am 7.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/biolog-2016-0100/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen