Home Rational bubbles in a monetary economy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Rational bubbles in a monetary economy

  • Ge Zhou EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: September 4, 2017

Abstract

This study explores rational bubbles in a monetary economy using an endogenous growth model with status seeking. Rational bubbles may arise when the money growth rate is higher than some threshold level. In a bubbly economy, a higher money growth rate leads to a larger bubble size, while the monetary policy is super-neutral. However, in a bubbleless economy, the monetary policy is non-neutral. Based on a comparative analysis of the calibrated model, I argue that an optimal monetary policy that maximizes the social welfare of a bubbleless economy may trigger bubbles and hurt the economy.

JEL Classification: E52; G12; O11

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China for their financial support.

Appendix

A Proof of Proposition 1

In the bubbleless BGP, the value of q is equal to 0, and I suppose that c = θk, m = ϕk, and π is equal to some constant. This means that

c˙c=k˙k=m˙mgn.

From equation (7), we have that

(9)gn=ηθ1+ϕ+αAδρ.

From equation (6), we get that

(10)γθϕ=αAδ+π.

From equation (4) and equation (5), we know that

(11)gn=gMπ,
(12)gn=Aδθ.

From equation (10), equation (11), and equation (12), we have that

γθgM(1α)A+θ=ϕ.

Using this result to replace ϕ in equation (10), we can find that

(1α)Aθ=ηθ[gM+θ(1α)A]gM+θ(1α)A+γθρ.

Simplifying the above equation, we have that

0=[η+(1+γ)]θ2+[(η+1)κ(1+γ)Θ]θκΘ,

where κgM − (1 − α)A, Θ ≡ ρ + (1 − α)A > 0. The solutions for this equation are given by

θ1=(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ+[(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ]2+4(η+1+γ)κΘ2(η+1+γ),
θ2=(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ[(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ]2+4(η+1+γ)κΘ2(η+1+γ).

When gM ≥ (1 − α)A, then κ ≥ 0. Thus, to guarantee that the value of θ is nonnegative, θ should be equal to (1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ+[(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ]2+4(η+1+γ)κΘ2(η+1+γ).

When gM < (1 − α)A, then κ < 0. Suppose that

θ2=(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ[(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ]2+4(η+1+γ)κΘ2(η+1+γ)>0.

It is also easy to find that

θ2+κ<(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ[(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ]2+4(η+1+γ)κΘ2(η+1+γ)+κ=(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ[(1+γ)Θ+(η+1)κ]24ηγΘκ2(η+1+γ)+κ<(1+γ)Θ(η+1)κ[(1+γ)Θ+(η+1)κ]22(η+1+γ)+κ.

If (1 + γ)Θ + (η + 1)κ > 0, then θ2 + κ < γκ/(1 + γ + η) < 0. If (1 + γ)Θ + (η + 1)κ ≤ 0, then θ2+κ<(1+γ)Θ+(η+1)κ+γκη+1+γ<0. Thus, the value of m is negative, which has no economic meaning.

Therefore, we should rule out the solution of θ2. ■

B Proof of Proposition 2

At the bubbly BGP, I guess that c = θk, m = ϕk, q = vk, and π is equal to some constant. Thus:

c˙c=k˙k=m˙m=q˙qg=αAδ.

From equation (4), we obtain that

π=gM(αAδ).

While from equation (5), we can solve

θ=(1α)A.

Together with equation (6), we have that

ϕ=γ(1α)AgM.

Substituting the above results into equation (7), we have that

v=(ηργgM)(1α)A1.

Given the parameter restriction

η(1α)A>ρ,

to guarantee that bubbles exist (v > 0), the restriction on the growth rate of money is given by

gM<0,

or,

gM>γρ(1α)Aη(1α)Aρg¯M.

References

Christiano, Lawrence, Cosmin Ilut, Roberto Motto, and Massimo Rostagno. 2010. Monetary Policy and Stock Market Booms.NBER Working Paper 16402.10.3386/w16402Search in Google Scholar

Dong, F., J. Miao, and P. Wang. 2017. “Asset Bubbles and Monetary Policy.” Manuscript10.1016/j.red.2020.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Gali, Jordi. 2014. “Monetary Policy and Rational Asset Price Bubbles.” American Economic Review 104 (3): 721–752.10.3386/w18806Search in Google Scholar

Grossman, G. M., and N. Yanagawa. 1993. “Asset Bubbles and Endogenous Growth.” Journal of Monetary Economics 31 (1): 3–19.10.1016/0304-3932(93)90014-7Search in Google Scholar

He, Z., and Arvind Krishnamurthy. 2017. “A Macroeconomic Framework for Quantifying Systemic Risk.” American Economic Review.10.3386/w19885Search in Google Scholar

Miao, J. 2014. “Introduction to Economic Theory of Bubbles.” Journal of Mathematical Economics 53: 130–136.10.1016/j.jmateco.2014.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Miao, J., and P. Wang. 2012. “Bubbles and Total Factor Productivity.” American Economic Review 102 (3): 82–87.10.1257/aer.102.3.82Search in Google Scholar

Walsh, Carl. 2010. Monetary Theory and Policy., 3rd ed. Cambridge, London: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Zhou, Ge. 2016. “The Spirit of Capitalism and Rational Bubbles.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 20 (6): 1432–1457.10.1017/S1365100514000972Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-9-4

©2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejm-2016-0242/html
Scroll to top button