Home Endogenous Peer Group Effects on Adolescents’ Crime Reporting Intentions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Endogenous Peer Group Effects on Adolescents’ Crime Reporting Intentions

  • Mark D. Agee EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 7, 2020

Abstract

This paper provides an empirical analysis of the determinants of adolescents’ crime reporting intentions with particular emphasis on the role of social interactions. The empirical strategy extends the discrete choice random utility model to allow preferences to be defined over the expected actions of an individual’s peer group defined by his or her class at school. In this context, students choose whether to report instances of bullying, property theft, or academic cheating they may witness at or around school. Both endogenous and exogenous peer group effects on adolescents’ crime reporting intentions are identified and estimated using a 1620-student dataset. Results lend support to the hypothesis that social interactions play a significant role in shaping adolescents’ decisions to report wrongdoing they may witness. These group influences can strengthen, or temper school policies aimed at encouraging students to take a more active role in reducing school or community crime.

JEL Classification: C25; C92; D91; H41; K42

Corresponding author: Mark D. Agee, Department of Economics, Pennsylvania State University, Altoona, PA, 16601, USA, E-mail:
Helpful comments and suggestions from two anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.

References

Ajzen, I. 2002. “The Theory of Planned Behavior.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50: 179–211, https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2011.613995.Search in Google Scholar

Ammermueller, A., and J.-S. Pischke. 2009. “Peer Effects in European Primary Schools: Evidence from the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study.” Journal of Labor Economics 27 (3): 315–47, https://doi.org/10.1086/603650.Search in Google Scholar

Andrews, I., and J. H. Stock. 2018. “Weak Instruments and what to Do about Them.” In NBER Summer Institute Methods Lectures. Boston, MA: Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar

Barrera-Osorio, F., M. Bertrand, L. L Linden, and F. Perez-Calle. 2011. “Improving the Design of Conditional Transfer Programs: Evidence from a Randomized Education Experiment in Colombia.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3 (2): 167–95, https://doi.org/10.1257/app.3.2.167.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, G. S. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76 (2): 169–217, https://doi.org/10.1086/259394.Search in Google Scholar

Becker, G., and K. Murphy. 2000. Social Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674020641Search in Google Scholar

Bersani, B. E., and A. R. Piquero. 2017. “Examining Systematic Crime Reporting Bias across Three Immigrant Generations: Prevalence, Trends, and Divergence in Self-Reported and Official Reported Arrests.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 33: 835–57, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-016-9314-9.Search in Google Scholar

Blume, L. E., W. A. Brock, S. N. Durlauf, and R. Jayaraman. 2013. Linear Social Interactions Models. Working Paper no. w19212. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.10.3386/w19212Search in Google Scholar

Brank, E. M., J. L. Woolard, V. E. Brown, M. Fondacaro, J. L. Luescher, R. G. Chinn, and S. A. Miller. 2007. “Will They Tell? Weapons Reporting by Middle-School Youth.” Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 5: 125–46, https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006296171.Search in Google Scholar

Brock, W. A., and S. N. Durlauf. 2001a. “Interactions-Based Models,.” In Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5, edited by J. Heckman, and E. Leamer, 3463–568. Amsterdam: North Holland.10.3386/t0258Search in Google Scholar

Brock, W. A., and S. N. Durlauf. 2001b. “Discrete Choice with Social Interactions.” The Review of Economic Studies 68: 235–60, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00168.Search in Google Scholar

Boozer, M., and S. E. Cacciola. 2001. Inside the Black Box of Project STAR: Estimation of Peer Effects using Experimental Data. Discussion Paper no. 832. New Haven, CT: Economic Growth Center, Yale University.Search in Google Scholar

Bramoullé, T., H. Djebbari, and B. Fortin. 2009. “Identification of Peer Effects through Social Networks.” Journal of Econometrics 150 (1): 41–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2008.12.021.Search in Google Scholar

Card, D., and L. Giuliano. 2013. “Peer Effects and Multiple Equilibria in the Risky Behavior of Friends.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 95 (4): 1130–49, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_00340.Search in Google Scholar

Carrell, S. E., F. V. Malmstrom, and J. E. West. 2008. “Peer Effects in Academic Cheating.” Journal of Human Resources 43 (1): 173–207, https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2008.0013.Search in Google Scholar

Coleman, J. S. 1987. “Families and Schools.” Educational Researcher 16 (6): 32–8, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x016006032.Search in Google Scholar

Connell, N. M. 2018. “Fear of Crime at School: Understanding Student Perceptions of Safety as Function of Historical Context.” Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 16: 124–36, https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016680407.Search in Google Scholar

Currie, C. E., R. A. Elton, J. Todd, and S. Platt. 1997. “Indicators of Socioeconomic Status for Adolescents: The WHO Health Behavior in School-Aged Children Survey.” Health Education Research 12: 385–97, https://doi.org/10.1093/her/12.3.385.Search in Google Scholar

Dodge, K., T. Dishion, and J. Lansford. 2006. Deviant Peer Influences in Programs for Youth: Problems and Solutions. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Durlak, J., and R. Weissberg. 2007. The Impact of After-School Programs that Promote Personal and Social Skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social and Emotional Learning.Search in Google Scholar

Esbensen, F. A. 2009. Final Report: Evaluation of the Teens, Crime and the Community and Community Works Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.10.1037/e640792009-001Search in Google Scholar

Esbensen, F. A. 2011. Outcome Evaluation of the Teens, Crime, and the Community/ Community Works (TCC/CW) Training Program in Nine Cities across Four States, 2004–2005. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR25865.Search in Google Scholar

Fortin, B., and M. Yazbeck. 2015. “Peer Effects, Fast Food Consumption and Adolescent Weight Gain.” Journal of Health Economics 42: 125–38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2015.03.005.Search in Google Scholar

Foster, G. 2006. “It’s Not Your Peers, and It’s Not Your Friends: Some Progress towards Understanding Educational Peer Effects.” Journal of Public Economics 90 (8–9): 1455–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.12.001.Search in Google Scholar

Funk, P. 2006. “Governmental Action, Social Norms, and Criminal Behavior.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 161 (3): 522–35.10.1628/093245605774259363Search in Google Scholar

Galbiati, R., and G. Zanella. 2012. “The Tax Evasion Social Multiplier: Evidence from Italy.” Journal of Public Economics 96 (5): 485–94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

Gini, G., P. Albiero, B. Benelli, and G. Altoè. 2008. “Determinants of Adolescents’ Active Defending and Passive Bystanding Behavior in Bullying.” Journal of Adolescence 31: 93–105, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.05.002.Search in Google Scholar

Glaeser, E. L., B. I. Sacerdote, and J. A. Scheinkman. 2003. “The Social Multiplier.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 345–53, https://doi.org/10.1162/154247603322390982.Search in Google Scholar

Goudriaan, H., K. Wittebrood, and P. Nieuwbeerta. 2006. “Neighbourhood Characteristics and Reporting Crime.” British Journal of Criminology 46: 719–42, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azi096.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, B. S. 2008. “Identifying Social Interactions through Conditional Variance Restrictions.” Econometrica 76 (3): 643–60, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2008.00850.x.Search in Google Scholar

Hansen, L. P. 1982. “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators.” Econometrica 50 (4): 1029–54, https://doi.org/10.2307/1912775.Search in Google Scholar

Heilbrun, A., D. Cornell, and T. Konold. 2018. “Authoritative School Climate and Suspension Rates in Middle Schools: Implications for Reducing the Racial Disparity in School Discipline.” Journal of School Violence 17: 324–38, https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2017.1368395.Search in Google Scholar

Hirschi, T. 1971. Causes of Delinquency. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hymel, S., R. McClure, M. Miller, E. Shumka, and J. Trach. 2015. “Addressing School Bullying: Insights from Theories of Group Processes.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 37 (1): 16–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.008.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, L. M., R. L. Simons, and R. D. Conger. 2004. “Criminal Justice System Involvement and Continuity of Youth Crime: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Youth & Society 36: 3–29, https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x03260323.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, S. L., T. E. Waasdorp, K. Debnam, and C. P. Bradshaw. 2013. “The Role of Bystander Perceptions and School Climate in Influencing Victims’ Responses to Bullying: To Retaliate or Seek Support?” Journal of Criminology 2013: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/780460.Search in Google Scholar

Katz, L., J. Kling, and J. Leibman. 2001. “Moving to Opportunity in Boston: Early Results of a Randomized Mobility Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 607–54, https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144113.Search in Google Scholar

Kutsyuruba, B., D. A. Klinger, and A. Hussain. 2015. “Relationships Among School Climate, School Safety, and Student Achievement and Well‐Being: A Review of the Literature.” The Review of Education 3: 103–35, https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3043.Search in Google Scholar

Lamborn, S. D., and D. T. Nguyen. 2004. “African American Adolescents’ Perceptions of Family Interactions: Kinship Support, Parent-Child Relationships, and Teen Adjustment.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 33: 547–58, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:joyo.0000048068.55441.d6.10.1023/B:JOYO.0000048068.55441.d6Search in Google Scholar

Lee, L.-F., X. Liu, and X. Lin. 2010. “Specification and Estimation of Social Interaction Models with Network Structures.” The Econometrics Journal 13 (2): 145–76, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423x.2010.00310.x.Search in Google Scholar

Lin, X. 2010. “Identifying Peer Effects in Student Academic Achievement by Spatial Autoregressive Models with Group Unobservables.” Journal of Labor Economics 28 (4): 825–60, https://doi.org/10.1086/653506.Search in Google Scholar

Lessne, D., and C. Yanez. 2016. Student Reports of Bullying: Results from the 2015 School Crime Supplement to the National Crime Victimization Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Search in Google Scholar

Liu, X., E. Patacchini, and Y. Zenou. 2013. “Social Multiplier or Social Norms?” CEPR Discussion Paper no. DP9366, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2224291.Search in Google Scholar

Lucifora, C., and M. Tonello. 2012. Students’ Cheating as a Social Interaction: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in a National Evaluation Program. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 6967. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).10.2139/ssrn.2170655Search in Google Scholar

Ludwig, J., P. Hirschfeld, and G. Duncan. 2001. “Urban Poverty and Juvenile Crime: Evidence from a Randomized Housing-Mobility Experiment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 665–79, https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530151144122.Search in Google Scholar

Lyle, D. S. 2007. “Estimating and Interpreting Peer and Role Model Effects from Randomly Assigned Social Groups at West Point.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 89 (2): 289–99, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.2.289.Search in Google Scholar

Mahoney, J. L., A. L. Harris, and J. S. Eccles. 2006. “Organized Activity Participation, Positive Youth Development, and the Over‐Scheduling Hypothesis.” Social Policy Report 20 (4): 1–32, https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2379-3988.2006.tb00049.x.Search in Google Scholar

Manski, C. F. 1993. “Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem.” The Review of Economic Studies 60: 531–42, https://doi.org/10.2307/2298123.Search in Google Scholar

Menjívar, C., and C. L. Bejarano. 2004. “Latino Immigrants’ Perceptions of Crime and Police Autorities in the United States: A Case Study from the Phoenix Metropolitan Area.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 27: 120–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/0141987032000147968.Search in Google Scholar

Mulvey, E. P., and E. Cauffman. 2001. “The Inherent Limits of Predicting School Violence.” American Psychologist 56: 797–802, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.10.797.Search in Google Scholar

O’Brennan, L. M., T. E. Wassdorp, and C. P. Bradshaw. 2014. “Strengthening Bullying Prevention through School Staff Connectedness.” Journal of Educational Psychology 106: 870–80.10.1037/a0035957Search in Google Scholar

Olea, J. L. M., and C. Pflueger. 2013. “A Robust Test for Weak Instruments.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 31 (3): 358–69, https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2013.806694.Search in Google Scholar

Patacchini, E., and Y. Zenou. 2011. “Juvenile Delinquency and Conformism.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 28 (1): 1–31.10.1093/jleo/ewp038Search in Google Scholar

Pflueger, C. E., and S. Wang. 2015. “A Robust Test for Weak Instruments in Stata.” The Stata Journal 15 (1): 216–25, https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1501500113.Search in Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, R., B. A. Jacobs, and R. Wright. 2003. “Snitching and the Code of the Street.” British Journal of Criminology 43: 291–309, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/43.2.291.Search in Google Scholar

Saarento, S., C. F. Garandeau, and C. Salmivalli. 2015. “Classroom- and School-Level Contributions to Bullying and Victimization: A Review.” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 25 (3): 204–18, https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2207.Search in Google Scholar

Sacerdote, B. 2011. “Peer Effects in Education: How Might They Work, How Big are They and How Much Do we Know Thus Far?” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, Vol. 3, 249–77. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00004-1Search in Google Scholar

Schnebly, S. M. 2008. “The Influence of Community-Oriented Policing on Crime-Reporting Behavior.” Justice Quarterly 25: 223–50, https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802025009.Search in Google Scholar

Shang, Q. 2014. “Endogenous Neighborhood Effects on Welfare Participation.” Empirical Economics 47: 639–67, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-013-0754-x.Search in Google Scholar

Shang, Q., and L.-F. Lee. 2011. “Two-Step Estimation of Endogenous and Exogenous Group Effects.” Econometric Reviews 30: 173–207, https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2011.534039.Search in Google Scholar

Sharp, R., A. Green, and J. Lewis. 2017. Education and Social Control: A Study in Progressive Primary Education. London, UK: Routledge.10.4324/9781315210179Search in Google Scholar

Slocum, L. A., T. J. Taylor, B. T. Brick, and F.-A. Esbensen. 2010. “Neighborhood Structural Characteristics, Individual-Level Attitudes, and Youths’ Crime Reporting Intentions.” Criminology 48: 1063–100, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2010.00212.x.Search in Google Scholar

Soetevent, A. R., and P. Kooreman. 2007. “A Discrete-Choice Model with Social Interactions: With an Application to High School Teen Behavior.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 599–624, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.924.Search in Google Scholar

Solis, C., E. L. Portillos, and R. K. Brunson. 2009. “Latino Youth’s Experiences with and Perceptions of Involuntary Police Encounters.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 623: 39–51, https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208330487.Search in Google Scholar

Stueve, A., K. Dash, L. O’Donnell, P. Tehranifar, R. Wilson-Simmons, R. G. Slaby, and B. G. Link. 2006. “Rethinking the Bystander Role in School Violence Prevention.” Health Promotion Practice 7 (1): 117–24, https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839905278454.Search in Google Scholar

Traxler, C. 2010. “Social Norms and Conditional Cooperative Taxpayers.” European Journal of Political Economy 26: 89–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

Triplett, R. A., I. Y. Sun, and R. R. Gainey. 2005. “Social Disorganization and the Ability and Willingness to Enact Control: A Preliminary Test.” Western Criminology Review 6 (1): 89–103.Search in Google Scholar

Van der Weele, J. 2012. “Beyond the State of Nature: Introducing Social Interactions in the Economic Model of Crime.” Review of Law & Economics 8 (2): 401–31, https://doi.org/10.1515/1555-5879.1551.Search in Google Scholar

Verlinden, S., M. Hersen, and J. Thomas. 2000. “Risk Factors in School Shootings.” Clinical Psychology Review 20: 3–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-7358(99)00055-0.Search in Google Scholar

Warner, B. D. 2007. “Directly Intervene or Call the Authorities? A Study of Forms of Neighborhood Social Control within a Social Disorganization Framework.” Criminology 45: 99–129, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00073.x.Search in Google Scholar

Wells, W., J. A. Schafer, S. P. Varano, and T. Bynum. 2006. “Neighborhood Residents’ Production of Order: The Effects of Collective Efficacy on Responses to Neighborhood Problems.” Crime & Delinquency 52: 523–50, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128705284681.Search in Google Scholar

Wood, L., J. Smith, K. Varjas, and J. Meyers. 2016. “Engaging Upstanders: Class-wide Approach to Promoting Positive Bystander Behavior.” School Psychology Forum 10 (1): 66–77.Search in Google Scholar

Yarnell, L. M., K. E. Pasch, H. S. Brown, C. L. Perry, and K. A. Komro. 2014. “Cross-Gender Social Normative Effects for Violence in Middle School: Do Girls Carry a Social Multiplier Effect for At-Risk Boys?” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 43 (9): 1465–85, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-014-0104-0.Search in Google Scholar

Yeung, R., and P. Nguyen-Hoang. 2016. “Endogenous Peer Effects: Fact or Fiction?” Journal of Educational Research 109: 37–49, https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.918528.Search in Google Scholar

Zimmerman, D. J. 2003. “Peer Effects in Academic Outcomes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (1): 9–23, https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303762687677.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-01-11
Accepted: 2020-11-25
Published Online: 2020-12-07

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejeap-2020-0009/html
Scroll to top button