Home Personal or Partisan Incumbency Advantage? Evidence from an Electoral Reform at the Local Level in Italy
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Personal or Partisan Incumbency Advantage? Evidence from an Electoral Reform at the Local Level in Italy

  • Marco Alberto De Benedetto ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 7, 2019

Abstract

We analyze the incumbency advantage using a large data set on Italian municipal elections held from 1993 to 2011. We first apply a non-parametric Sharp Regression Discontinuity Design comparing parties that barely win an election to those that barely lose, exploiting the fact that partisan incumbency status changes discontinuously at the threshold of margin of victory of zero. In order to disentangle the personal incumbency advantage from the partisan effect, we rely on a reform that introduced mayoral term limit, and exploit the exogenous change on the incumbency status of mayors keeping the partisan incumbency status constant. We find that the incumbency advantage is essentially driven by the personal effect. The results are robust to different specifications and estimation strategies with excellent balance in observable characteristics. Also, the effect of interest is larger in magnitude for municipalities located in the South of Italy compared to northern municipalities.

JEL Classification: D72; D78; J45

References

Alford, J., and D. W. Brady. 1988. Partisan and Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections, 1846–1986. Center for the Study of Institution and Values, Rice University.Search in Google Scholar

Alford, J. R., and J. R. Hibbing. 1981. “Increased Incumbency Advantage in the House.” Journal of Politics 43: 1042–61.10.2307/2130188Search in Google Scholar

Ashworth, S. 2006. “Reputational Dynamics and Political Careers.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 21 (2): 441–66.10.1093/jleo/ewi015Search in Google Scholar

Bellucci, P. 1991. “Italian Economic Voting.” In Economics and Politics, edited by H. Norpoth, M. Lewis-Beck, and L. Jean-Dominique, 63–81. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Besley, T. 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and M. H. Farrell. 2018. “On the Effect of Bias Estimation on Coverage Accuracy in Nonparametric Inference.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 113: 767–79.10.1080/01621459.2017.1285776Search in Google Scholar

Caughey, D., and J. S. Sekhon. 2011. “Elections and the Regression Discontinuity Design: Lessons from Close US House Races, 1942–2008.” Political Analysis 19 (4): 385–408.10.1093/pan/mpr032Search in Google Scholar

Chiaramonte, A., and A. Di Virgilio. 2000. “Le elezioni regionali del 2000.” Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 30 (3): 513–52.Search in Google Scholar

Cover, A. D., and D. Mayhew. 1977. “Congressional Dynamics and the Decline of Competitive Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered, edited by C. D. Lawrence and B. I. Oppenheimer. New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Cox, G. W., and S. Morgenstern. 1993. “The Increasing Advantage in the U.S. States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 18: 495–511.10.2307/439852Search in Google Scholar

Erikson, R. S. 1971. “The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections.” Polity 3: 395–405.10.2307/3234117Search in Google Scholar

Erikson, R. S., and R. Titiunik. 2015. “Using a Regression Discontinuity to Uncover the Personal Incumbency Advantage.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (1): 101–19.10.1561/100.00013137Search in Google Scholar

Fantozzi, P., and R. De Luca. 2010. “Ceto politico locale e regolazione sociale in Calabria.” Prisma 2 (1): 77–99.10.3280/PRI2010-001008Search in Google Scholar

Ferreira, F., and J. Gyourko. 2009. “Do Political Parties Matter? Evidence from US Cities.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124: 399–422.10.1162/qjec.2009.124.1.399Search in Google Scholar

Fowler, A., and A. H. Hall. 2014. “Disentangling the Personal and Partisan Incumbency Advantages: Evidence from Close Elections and Term Limits.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9: 501–31.10.1561/100.00014013Search in Google Scholar

Freier, R. 2015. “The Mayor’s Advantage: Causal Evidence on Incumbency Effects in German Mayoral Elections.” European Journal of Political Economy 40: 16–30.10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2015.07.005Search in Google Scholar

Garand, J. C. 1991. “Electoral Marginality in State Legislative Elections, 1968–1986.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 7–28.10.2307/439964Search in Google Scholar

Garand, J. C., and D. A. Gross. 1984. “Changes in the Vote Margins for Congressional Candidates: A Specification of Historical Trends.” The American Political Science Review 78: 17–30.10.2307/1961246Search in Google Scholar

Gelman, A., and G. King. 1990. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34: 1142–64.10.2307/2111475Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, S. C., and D. Landa. 2009. “Do the Advantages of Incumbency Advantage Incumbents?” Journal of Politics 71 (4): 1481–98.10.1017/S0022381609990223Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, J., P. Todd, and W. van der Klaauw. 2000. “Identification and Estimation of Treatment Effects with a Regression-discontinuity Design.” Econometrica 69: 201–20.10.1111/1468-0262.00183Search in Google Scholar

Hainmueller, J., and H. L. Kern. 2008. “Incumbency as a Source of Spillover Effects in Mixed Electoral Systems: Evidence from a Regression-Discontinuity Design.” Electoral Studies 27: 213–27.10.1016/j.electstud.2007.10.006Search in Google Scholar

Imbens, G., and T. Lemieux. 2008. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” Journal of Econometrics 142: 2.10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Jacobson, G. C. 1987. “The Marginals Never Vanished: Incumbency and Competition in Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 31: 126–41.10.2307/2111327Search in Google Scholar

King, G. 1986. “How Not to Lie with Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes in Quantitative Political Science.” American Journal of Political Science 30: 666–87.10.2307/2111095Search in Google Scholar

King, G. 1990. “Representation through Legislative Redistricting: A Stochastic Model.” American Journal of Political Science 33: 787–824.10.2307/2111110Search in Google Scholar

Knack, S. 2002. “Social Capital and the Quality of Government: Evidence from the States.” American Journal of Political Science 46: 772–85.10.2307/3088433Search in Google Scholar

Lee, D. 2008. “Randomized Experiments from Non-random Selection in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Econometrics 142: 675–97.10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.004Search in Google Scholar

Lee, D., and T. Lemieux. 2010. “Regression Discontinuity Designs in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 48: 281–355.10.1257/jel.48.2.281Search in Google Scholar

Lee, D., E. Moretti, and M. J. Butler. 2004. “Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the US House.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (3): 807–59.10.1162/0033553041502153Search in Google Scholar

Levitt, S. D. 1994. “Using Repeat Challengers to Estimate the Effect of Campaign Spending on Election Outcomes in the U.S. House.” Journal of Political Economy 102: 777–98.10.1086/261954Search in Google Scholar

Linden, L. L. 2004. “Are Incumbents Really Advantaged? the Preference for Non-Incumbents in Indian National Elections.” Unpublished paper. Departments of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Search in Google Scholar

Lopes da Fonseca, M. 2018. “Identifying the Source of Incumbency Advantage through a Constitutional Reform.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (3): 657–70.10.1111/ajps.12287Search in Google Scholar

Matsusaka, J. G., and F. Palda. 1999. “Voter Turnout: How Much Can We Explain?” Public Choice 98: 431–46.10.1023/A:1018328621580Search in Google Scholar

McCrary, J. 2008. “Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test.” Journal of Econometrics 142: 698–714.10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.005Search in Google Scholar

Miguel, E., and F. Zaidi. 2003. “Do Politicians Reward Their Supporters? Public Spending and Incumbency Advantage in Ghana.” Unpublished paper. Department of Economics, UC Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Molina, J. 2001. “The Electoral Effect of Underemployment: Government Turnover and Its Causes in Latin-American, Caribbean and Industrialised Countries.” Electoral Studies 20: 427–46.10.1016/S0261-3794(00)00030-5Search in Google Scholar

Payne, J. L. 1981. “The Personal Electoral Advantage of House Incumbents.” American Politics Quarterly 8: 375–98.Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, D. B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66: 688–70.10.1037/h0037350Search in Google Scholar

Serra, G., and D. Moon. 1994. “Casework, Issue Positions, and Voting in Congressional Elections: A District Analysis.” Journal of Politics 56 (1): 200–13.10.2307/2132353Search in Google Scholar

Stolfi, F., and M. Hallerberg. 2016. “Clientelistic Budget Cycles: Evidence from Health Policy in the Italian Regions.” Journal of European Public Policy 23: 833–50.10.1080/13501763.2015.1075577Search in Google Scholar

Titiunik, R. 2011. “Incumbency Advantage in Brazil: Evidence from Municipal Mayor Elections.” Unpublished paper. Department of Political Science, University of Michigan.Search in Google Scholar

Uppal, Y. 2009. “The Disadvantaged Incumbents: Estimating Incumbency Effects in Indian State Legislatures.” Public Choice 138: 9–27.10.1007/s11127-008-9336-4Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2019-11-07

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejeap-2018-0125/html
Scroll to top button