Home Medicine Jaya Spider Monkey Optimization-driven Deep Convolutional LSTM for the prediction of COVID’19
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Jaya Spider Monkey Optimization-driven Deep Convolutional LSTM for the prediction of COVID’19

  • Satish Chander EMAIL logo , Vijaya Padmanabha and Joseph Mani
Published/Copyright: November 13, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

COVID’19 is an emerging disease and the precise epidemiological profile does not exist in the world. Hence, the COVID’19 outbreak is treated as a Public Health Emergency of the International Concern by the World Health Organization (WHO). Hence, an effective and optimal prediction of COVID’19 mechanism, named Jaya Spider Monkey Optimization-based Deep Convolutional long short-term classifier (JayaSMO-based Deep ConvLSTM) is proposed in this research to predict the rate of confirmed, death, and recovered cases from the time series data. The proposed COVID’19 prediction method uses the COVID’19 data, which is the trending domain of research at the current era of fighting the COVID’19 attacks thereby, to reduce the death toll. However, the proposed JayaSMO algorithm is designed by integrating the Spider Monkey Optimization (SMO) with the Jaya algorithm, respectively. The Deep ConvLSTM classifier facilitates to predict the COVID’19 from the time series data based on the fitness function. Besides, the technical indicators, such as Relative Strength Index (RSI), Rate of Change (ROCR), Exponential Moving Average (EMA), Williams %R, Double Exponential Moving Average (DEMA), and Stochastic %K, are extracted effectively for further processing. Thus, the resulted output of the proposed JayaSMO-based Deep ConvLSTM is employed for COVID’19 prediction. Moreover, the developed model obtained the better performance using the metrics, like Mean Square Error (MSE), and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) by considering confirmed, death, and the recovered cases of COVID’19 for China and Oman. Thus, the proposed JayaSMO-based Deep ConvLSTM showed improved results with a minimal MSE of 1.791, and the minimal RMSE of 1.338 based on confirmed cases in Oman. In addition, the developed model achieved the death cases with the values of 1.609, and 1.268 for MSE and RMSE, whereas the MSE and the RMSE value of 1.945, and 1.394 is achieved by the developed model using recovered cases in China.


Corresponding author: Satish Chander, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra, Ranchi, India, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None.

  2. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  3. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

References

1. Za, ZhiZhonghua, Liu, Xing Bing, Xue. The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel Coronavirus diseases (COVID-19)—China. Epidemiology Working Group for NCIP Epidemic Response, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention 2020;41:145–51. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2020.02.003.Search in Google Scholar

2. Ahmadi, A, Shirani, M, Rahmani, F. Modeling and forecasting trend of COVID-19 epidemic in Iran. medRxiv 2020. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.17.20037671.Search in Google Scholar

3. Spicuzza, L, Parisi, GF, Tardino, L, Ciancio, N, Nenna, R, Midulla, F, et al. Exhaled markers of antioxidant activity and oxidative stress in stable cystic fibrosis patients with moderate lung disease. J Breath Res 2018;12:1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/aa9b39.Search in Google Scholar

4. Leonardi, S, Parisi, GF, Capizzi, A, Manti, S, Cuppari, C, Scuderi, MG, et al. YKL-40 as marker of severe lung disease in cystic fibrosis patients. J Cyst Fibros 2016;15:583–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcf.2015.12.020.Search in Google Scholar

5. Wu, Z, McGoogan, JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Jama 2020;323:1239–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.2648.Search in Google Scholar

6. Zu, ZY, Jiang, MD, Xu, PP, Chen, W, Ni, QQ, Lu, GM, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a perspective from China. Radiology 2020:200490. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2020200490.Search in Google Scholar

7. Yadav, DP. Medical image retrieval using structural similarity index with particle swarm optimization. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 2017;7:445–54.Search in Google Scholar

8. Zhong, L, Mu, L, Li, J, Wang, J, Yin, Z, Liu, D. Early prediction of the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in the mainland China based on simple mathematical model. IEEE Access 2020;8:51761–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2979599.Search in Google Scholar

9. Peeri, NC, Shrestha, N, Rahman, MS, Zaki, R, Tan, Z, Bibi, S, et al. The SARS, MERS and novel coronavirus (COVID-19) epidemics, the newest and biggest global health threats: what lessons have we learned? Int J Epidemiol 2020;49:717–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyaa033.Search in Google Scholar

10. Hsieh, YH, Lee, JY, Chang, HL. SARS epidemiology modeling. Emerg Infect Dis 2004;10:1165. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1006.031023.Search in Google Scholar

11. Zhou, G, Yan, G. Severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic in Asia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1608–10. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0912.030382.Search in Google Scholar

12. Mobaraki, K, Ahmadzadeh, J. Current epidemiological status of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus in the world from 1.1. 2017 to 17.1. 2018: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2019;19:351. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3987-2.Search in Google Scholar

13. Zhu, N, Zhang, D, Wang, W, Li, X, Yang, B, Song, J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382:727–33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.Search in Google Scholar

14. Charmaine, Butt, Jagpal, Gill, Chun, David, Benson, A. Babu. Deep learning system to screen coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia. Appl Intell 2020;1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-020-01714-3.Search in Google Scholar

15. Marsaline, BM, Valarmathi, IR, Swamy, SM, Rajakumar, BR. Threshold prediction for segmenting tumour from brain MRI scans. Int J Imag Syst Technol 2014;24:129–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ima.22087.Search in Google Scholar

16. Kumar, A C, Vimala, R. Load balancing in cloud environment exploiting hybridization of chicken swarm and enhanced Raven roosting optimization algorithm. Multimed Res 2020;3:45–55.10.46253/j.mr.v3i1.a5Search in Google Scholar

17. Liu, X, Guo, S, Yang, B, Ma, S, Zhang, H, Li, J, et al. Automatic organ segmentation for CT scans based on super-pixel and convolutional neural networks. J Digit Imag 2018;31:748–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-018-0052-4.Search in Google Scholar

18. Gharbi, M, Chen, J, Barron, JT, Hasinoff, SW, Durand, F. Deep bilateral learning for real-time image enhancement. ACM Trans Graph 2017;36:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3072959.3073592.Search in Google Scholar

19. Monkaresi, H, Calvo, RA, Yan, H. A machine learning approach to improve contactless heart rate monitoring using a webcam. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf 2013;18:1153–60. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2013.2291900.Search in Google Scholar

20. Chen, M, Hao, Y, Hwang, K, Wang, L, Wang, L. Disease prediction by machine learning over big data from healthcare communities. Ieee Access 2017;5:8869–79. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2694446.Search in Google Scholar

21. Malathi, D, Logesh, R, Subramaniyaswamy, V, Vijayakumar, V, Sangaiah, AK. Hybrid reasoning-based privacy-aware disease prediction support system. Comput Electr Eng 2019;73:114–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.11.009.Search in Google Scholar

22. Liu, J, Zhang, Z, Razavian, N. Deep ehr: chronic disease prediction using medical notes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.04928 2018.Search in Google Scholar

23. Fei, Y, Gao, K, Li, WQ. Prediction and evaluation of the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome following severe acute pancreatitis using an artificial neural network algorithm model. HPB 2019;21:891–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2018.11.009.Search in Google Scholar

24. Bachur, RG, Michelson, KA, Neuman, MI, Monuteaux, MC. Temperature-adjusted respiratory rate for the prediction of childhood pneumonia. Acad Pediatr 2019;19:542–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2018.11.015.Search in Google Scholar

25. Wu, F, Zhao, S, Yu, B, Chen, YM, Wang, W, Song, ZG, et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020;579:265–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3.Search in Google Scholar

26. Zheng, Y, Yu, S, Yang, J, Gan, T, Song, Q, Yang, J, et al. Intelligent optimization of diversified community prevention of COVID-19 using traditional Chinese medicine. IEEE Comput Intell Mag 2020;15:62–73.10.1109/MCI.2020.3019899Search in Google Scholar

27. Issa, M, Elaziz, MA. Analyzing COVID-19 virus based on enhanced fragmented biological Local Aligner using improved Ions Motion Optimization algorithm. Appl Soft Comput;96:2020:106683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106683.Search in Google Scholar

28. Xingjian, SHI, Chen, Z, Wang, H, Yeung, DY, Wong, WK, Woo, WC. Convolutional LSTM network: a machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. In: Advances in neural information processing systems; 2015;802–10 pp.Search in Google Scholar

29. Oriani, FB, Coelho, GP. Evaluating the impact of technical indicators on stock forecasting. IEEE symposium series on computational intelligence (SSCI). Piscataway, New Jersey, United States: IEEE; 2016:1–8 p.10.1109/SSCI.2016.7850017Search in Google Scholar

30. Rao, R. Jaya: a simple and new optimization algorithm for solving constrained and unconstrained optimization problems. Int J Ind Eng Comput 2016;7:19–34. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2015.8.004.Search in Google Scholar

31. Bansal, JC, Sharma, H, Jadon, SS, Clerc, M. Spider monkey optimization algorithm for numerical optimization. Memet Comput 2014;6:31–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12293-013-0128-0.Search in Google Scholar

32. Novel coronavirus (COVID-19) cases data. Available from: https://data.humdata.org/dataset/novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov-cases [Accessed Apr 2020].Search in Google Scholar

33. Efendi, R, Arbaiy, N, Deris, MM. A new procedure in stock market forecasting based on fuzzy random auto-regression time series model. Inf Sci 2018;441:113–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.02.016.Search in Google Scholar

34. Ercan, Harun. Baltic stock market prediction by using NARX. Proceedings on 12th international scientific and technical conference on computer sciences and information technologies (CSIT). Piscataway, New Jersey, United States: IEEE; 2017.10.1109/STC-CSIT.2017.8098829Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-05-30
Accepted: 2020-10-06
Published Online: 2020-11-13

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bams-2020-0030/html
Scroll to top button