Home Phylogenetic aspects of the concept of intelligent life design
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Phylogenetic aspects of the concept of intelligent life design

  • Zbigniew Krajewski EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 21, 2015
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper presents a new treatment of molecular evolutionary model as a product of intelligent changes. The aim of this paper is to obtain a life design system, drawing on processes occurring in nature regardless of explanations of the origins of life. The idea of intelligent design and molecular relationship is considered as a basic concept of the intelligent life design system, using some analogies taken from molecular evolutionary models. Three steps of life design system are outlined; however, the main subject is an attempt to find certain similar effects of the design system processes and the processes simulated with basic evolutionary substitution models: Jukes-Cantor; Felsenstein; and Hasegawa, Kishino, and Yano (HKY). An idea of gene reduction has been applied, from more complex (taking into account information density) biological systems to less complex, specialised biological systems. Two steps have been taken into consideration: a test stage in the virtual world and an adaptation finishing process after running the systems in the real world. Two algorithms have been applied. The first one has applied similarity related to an accommodation process to required conditions in the virtual and the real world. The second algorithm has applied accommodation to required conditions separately (expressed as amino acid substitution) in the first step, using a convenient criterion, and further (similar to observable) accommodation in the real world. A phylogenetic tree, similar to a real one, has been calculated using the above method for mammals, for mtDNA, with the maximum likelihood method, and with the aid of PhyML for the HKY model. This paper is an introduction showing an aspect of the life design system, related to phylogenetic relationships.


Corresponding author: Zbigniew Krajewski, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Roosevelta 40, Zabrze 41-800, Poland, Phone: +48 32 2777463, E-mail:

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Polański A, Kimmel M. Bioinformatics. Berlin: Springer, 1998.Search in Google Scholar

2. Allman ES, Rhodes JA. Mathematical models in biology. An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004.10.1017/CBO9780511790911Search in Google Scholar

3. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 1985;22:160–74.10.1007/BF02101694Search in Google Scholar

4. King AC, Billingham J, Otto SR. Differential equations. Linear, nonlinear, ordinary, partial. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.10.1017/CBO9780511755293Search in Google Scholar

5. Mayer CD. Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2000.10.1137/1.9780898719512Search in Google Scholar

6. Jeffrey A. Advanced engineering mathematics. University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Harcourt/Academic Press, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

7. Zwillinger D. Handbook of differential equations, 3rd ed. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1997.Search in Google Scholar

8. Cai Y, Zhou G, Chou K. Support vector machines for predicting membrane protein types by using functional domain composition. Biophys J 2003;84:3257–63.10.1016/S0006-3495(03)70050-2Search in Google Scholar

9. Chou K, Cai Y. Prediction of protease types in a hybridization space. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006;339:1015–20.10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.10.196Search in Google Scholar

10. Zhang G, Li H, Gao J, Fang B. Predicting lipase types by improved Chou’s pseudo-amino acid composition. Protein Pept Lett 2008;15:1132–7.10.2174/092986608786071184Search in Google Scholar

11. Chou K, Cai Y. Predicting protein quaternary structure by pseudo amino acid composition. Proteins Struct Funct Genet 2003;53:282–9.10.1002/prot.10500Search in Google Scholar

12. Krajewski Z, Tkacz E. Feature selection of protein structural classification using SVM classifier. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2013;33:47–61.10.1016/S0208-5216(13)70055-XSearch in Google Scholar

13. Krajewski Z, Tkacz E. Protein structural classification based on pseudo amino acid composition using SVM classifier. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2013;33:77–87.10.1016/j.bbe.2013.03.002Search in Google Scholar

14. Chou K. Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo-amino acid composition. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinform 2001;43:246–55.10.1002/prot.1035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Chou K, Cai Y. Predicting subcellular localization of proteins by hybridizing functional domain composition and pseudo-amino acid composition. J Cell Biochem 2004;91:1197–1203.10.1002/jcb.10790Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Hall BG. Phylogenetic trees made easy. University of Rochester, Emeritus and Bellingham Research Institute. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates Inc., 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-6-14
Accepted: 2015-7-28
Published Online: 2015-8-21
Published in Print: 2015-9-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/bams-2015-0018/html
Scroll to top button