Home The Philosophy of History: A Value-pluralist Response
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The Philosophy of History: A Value-pluralist Response

  • George Crowder EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: November 1, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Vittorio Hösle’s evaluation of the Soviet Revolution on the ground of the philosophy of history can be usefully examined from the value-pluralist perspective of Isaiah Berlin. Although Berlinwould agree with most ofHösle’s judgements on the Revolution, he would do so for very different reasons. Most importantly, Berlin would not accept the teleology that lies at the heart of the philosophy of history. For Berlin, the notion of a human telos to be realized at the end of history is a species of moral monism, and so falsified, indeed rendered incoherent, by the deeply pluralist reality of human values. However, Berlin’s pluralism also seems to present a problem for the justification of liberalism, and I consider a range of responses to this difficulty.

Published Online: 2017-11-01
Published in Print: 2017-11-01

© 2017 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 21.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2017-0014/html
Scroll to top button