Home Comment on Michael Schefczyk
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Comment on Michael Schefczyk

In Search of a Just Political Economy: Why We Should Go beyond Rawls’s POD and Schefczvk’s RUWS
  • Fabian Schuppert
Published/Copyright: February 11, 2016
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This commentary challenges Michael Scliefczyk’s proposal for a realistically utopian welfare state (RUWS). As it stands, RUWS says too little about the concrete measures it will offer to avoid political domination and harmful inequalities. Moreover, RUWS follows Rawlsian Property-Owning Democracy (POD) by being silent on crucial issues such as banking regulation, the governance of investments and the issue of actual control over capital. Ultimately, it therefore seems that RUWS does not present an attractive alternative to POD since it suffers from very similar problems and shortcomings as POD.

Published Online: 2016-02-11
Published in Print: 2013-05-01

© 2013 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

Downloaded on 22.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2013-0116/html
Scroll to top button