‚Armenhilfe‘ ins Ausland
Abstract
We citizens of the affluent countries tend to discuss our obligations toward the distant needy in terms of donations and transfers, assistance and redistribution. This way of conceiving the problem is a serious moral error, and a very costly one for the global poor. It depends on the false belief that the causes of the persistence of severe povery are indigenous to the countries in which it occurs. There are indeed national and local factors that contribute to persistent poverty in developing countries. But global institutional rules also play an important role in its reproduction, in part by sustaining the national and local factors that affluent Westerners most like to blame for the problem. Since these rules are shaped by our governments, in our name, we bear moral responsibility not merely by assisting the distant poor too little, but also, and more significantly, by harming them too much.
© 2003 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Globalisierung ohne Weltregierung
- Legitimationsfragen der Globalisierung – eine vertragstheoretische Sicht
- Heimliche Komplizenschaft?
- Why Deliberation Cannot Tame Globalization
- Poverty and Responsibility in a Globalized World
- ‚Armenhilfe‘ ins Ausland
- Die moralische Bedeutung politischer Grenzen
- Utilitarismus, Menschenrechte und Nichtregierungs-Organisationen
- Four Charges Against the WTO
- One World
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Globalisierung ohne Weltregierung
- Legitimationsfragen der Globalisierung – eine vertragstheoretische Sicht
- Heimliche Komplizenschaft?
- Why Deliberation Cannot Tame Globalization
- Poverty and Responsibility in a Globalized World
- ‚Armenhilfe‘ ins Ausland
- Die moralische Bedeutung politischer Grenzen
- Utilitarismus, Menschenrechte und Nichtregierungs-Organisationen
- Four Charges Against the WTO
- One World
