Startseite Bubbles and OB associations
Artikel Open Access

Bubbles and OB associations

  • Sergey A. Drozdov EMAIL logo , Evgenii O. Vasiliev , Marina V. Ryabova , Yuri A. Shchekinov und Biman B. Nath
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 13. April 2022

Abstract

Supernovae explosions (SNe) in a stratified interstellar disc can create large scale structures and outflows perpendicular to the disc. Their morphology and emission characteristics depend on interrelations between the number of exploded SNe, the ISM vertical scale height, the height above the ISM disc at which SNe are located, and the mid-plane density of ambient gas. When observed such out-of-plane gas structures do characterize properties of the driving SNe and reveal the presence of underlying stellar clusters. Even though the morphology and emission properties of such structures are sensitive to characteristics of ambient gas they might be used for rough estimates of the clusters’ mass.

1 Introduction

Stars are born in groups and clusters with a mass function d N / d M M α , α = 1.25 2.25 in mass limits 300 and 3 × 1 0 7 M (e.g. Krumholz et al. 2019). Clusters with moderate and large mass M 1 0 3 M are more or less easily identified, whereas the lower mass limit of M min 300 M is poorly-defined, especially in the inner part of the Galactic disc at the galactocentric distances r 3 5 kpc with a rather crowd stellar environment. The problem exacerbates when opaqueness due to dust extinction is accounted for – it prevents observations of OB-associations towards the Galactic centre beyond 3 kpc (Bronfman et al. 2000). However, the lower limit for stellar clusters is of great importance for understanding star formation process. In particular, it determines the smallest spatial scale at which an interrelation between the star formation rate and the gas mass does not operate (Kruijssen and Longmore 2014).

Wood and Churchwell (1989a,b) first suggested to associate bright far infrared point-like sources with ultracompact HII regions tracing sites of OB star formation. Later on, Wouterloot and Brand (1996, and references therein) and Bronfman et al. (2000) have used molecular (CO and CS) lines to measure the kinematic distances to respective star formation regimes. In both cases, these observations are biased towards dense ( 1 0 3 1 0 5 cm 3 ) and relatively young stellar clusters, and thus more diffuse ones are missed. From this point of view, complementary approaches to identify sites of star formation would be desirable. In this article, we present arguments in favour of SNe-driven superbubbles and supershells around compact stellar clusters with age t OB 10  Myr as signatures of an OB association.

A small fraction of stars in clusters are massive and end their life as supernovae (SNe) explosions. As a result, outflows of kpc-sizes are formed around massive stellar clusters (see, e.g. Bagetakos et al. 2011), while such explosions in less populated stellar clusters may form chimneys and worms (Heiles 1984, Heiles et al. 1996, Norman and Ikeuchi 1989, Normandeau et al. 1996). The Galactic interstellar disc can be broken out by even only a few SNe explosions if they are members of stellar clusters located higher than a half of the disc scale height (Bronfman et al. 2000, Zari et al. 2018, Damiani et al. 2019). The signatures of such breakouts can be found in H α surveys (see, e.g. Haffner et al. 2003). Such out-of-plane gas structures can serve to reveal underlying stellar clusters. It is reasonable to argue that their morphology and emission properties are sensitive to characteristics of ambient gas, and as such might be used for rough estimates of the clusters’ mass.

2 Model

We carry out 3D hydrodynamic simulations (Cartesian geometry) of SNe explosions inside a cluster located in the galactic disc. We set up a gaseous disc to be initially in the hydrostatic equilibrium in a gravitational potential (as in many previous papers, see, e.g. de Avillez 2000, Hill et al. 2012, Walch et al. 2015, Li et al. 2017), which consists of two components: a dark matter (DM) halo and a baryonic disc. In cylindrical coordinates with z -axis perpendicular to the disc, the z -component of the gravitational acceleration due to the DM halo is calculated from a Navarro–Frenk–White profile: g DM ( z ) = G M DM ( r ) z / r 3 , where M DM is the DM mass enclosed within radius r , and we adopt virial radius of the halo equal to 200 kpc and concentration parameter c = 12 as for the Milky Way case (Navarro et al. 1997).

The baryonic disc is assumed to be self-gravitating with an isothermal velocity dispersion. The acceleration perpendicular to the disc is g ( z ) = 2 π G Σ tanh ( z / z ) , where Σ and z are the stellar surface density and scale height of the stellar disc, respectively. Contribution from a gaseous disc is included following Li et al. (2017), by dividing g ( z ) by f = Σ / ( Σ + Σ gas ) , which implicitly suggests the gaseous disc to be non-self-gravitating. We assume the cylindrical radial distance R = 3  kpc, for which the value of z is assumed to be equal to 0.3 kpc as it has been estimated in the solar neighbourhood (Gilmore and Reid 1983), the stellar surface density equals to Σ = 180 M pc 2 , and gas surface density Σ g = 11.5 M pc 2 . The latter is very close to the observed density in the Milky Way disc at the Solar circle (Kalberla 2003, Kalberla and Kerp 2009), and the one considered in Section 4.3 of Li et al. (2017); the mid-plane density is n 0 = 3 cm 3 . Our model is consistent with that of gravitational potential built by Kalberla (2003) at the cylindrical radial distance 3 kpc from the Milky Way centre (Figure 7 in Kalberla 2003). Our choice is motivated by the following two reasons: (a) a sufficient number of unresolved stellar clusters are expected at this galactocentric radius (see, e.g. Bronfman et al. 2000), and (b) the relative scale heights of the gaseous and stellar discs are most favourable for SNe explosions in young stellar clusters to produce vertical gaseous structures extending above the disc.

The gas density profile is found from the hydrostatic equilibrium. At large heights, the number density is kept uniform at 1 0 2 cm 3 . Initially, the gas temperature is 9 × 1 0 3 K ; the gas metallicity is kept constant equal to the solar value within the entire computational domain. Standard simulations are performed with a physical cell size of 4 pc in the computational domain with 128 × 128 × 192 cells, which corresponds to 512 × 512 × 768 pc 3 . In several runs, the domain has been expanded to 768 × 768 × 1024 pc 3 and 102 4 3 pc 3 . This resolution is close to the spatial limit sufficient for the Sedov–Taylor phase to capture consistently (Kim and Ostriker 2015): the ratio of cooling radius to injection is equal to or greater than a factor of 3. In our simulations, the cooling radius for solar-metallicity gas behind shock waves with T 1 0 7 K is l c 12 / n 0 pc for cooling rate adopted following Vasiliev (2013). We have conducted simulations for one of the models presented in this article with twice better resolution, and we did not find any significant changes in physical quantities of interest.

SNe are distributed randomly in a cluster of radius 10 pc. For the spatial resolution adopted here, a cluster volume consists of around 100 cells. Within this volume, 10–20 SNe explode in 20 Myr with a rate of 0.5 1 SN per 1 Myr. A typical example of a sequence of SN positions is shown in Figure 1. Even though the position of subsequent SNe explosions is random the overall dynamics of a growing superbubble is stable against a particular realization. This circumstance can be readily understood because the radius of a single remnant from an SN can grow in 1–2 Myr up to R 30 50 pc , i.e. much larger than the cluster radius. From this point of view, the randomization is unnecessary. However, it provides a practical advantage for numerical procedure. Random distribution allows us to easily avoid the numerical strong-shock instability, also referred to as the odd-even instability described by Quirk (1994). We consider three models: in the first, the centre of the cluster is located at the midplane ( z = 0 ), and in the others, it is shifted to some height z : 20 and 60 pc. Both values of the shifted clusters are lower than 1/2 of the disc scale height for the galactocentric distance equal to 3 kpc. The mass and energy of each SN are injected in one cell for a standard spatial resolution of 4 pc or a region of radius 4 pc in case of a better resolution; SN energy is assumed to be 1 0 51 erg. Masses of massive stars – SNe progenitors – in a cluster are distributed randomly within 8–40 M according to the Salpeter initial mass function. We begin our run when the most massive SN explodes. The intervals between following SNe correspond on average to the lifetime of massive stars, which relates stellar mass to log ( t l , year ) = 10.04 3.8054 log M + 1.0646 log 2 M (Iben 2012). Because we consider a small number of massive members in a cluster (especially for a cluster of 10 SNe), the shape of a cumulative bubble slightly depends on the initial spatial SNe distribution; however, the cluster radius is quite small and the differences in SNe spatial positions within the cluster are not crucial for our purposes so that the global dynamics of the bubble is determined by the disc properties and the number of SNe only.

Figure 1 
               Projected positions of SNe explosions into 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 x
                                 ,
                                 y
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        \left(x,y)
                     
                  , 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              
                                 (
                              
                              
                                 y
                                 ,
                                 z
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        (y,z)
                     
                  , and 
                     
                        
                        
                           
                              (
                              
                                 x
                                 ,
                                 z
                              
                              )
                           
                        
                        \left(x,z)
                     
                   planes (left to right), dashed circles show the radius of a cluster, colour bar encodes the time when a next SN in the sequence explodes, and squares show projections of the numerical cells. The exact positions are generated randomly and do not coincide with the cell centre. However, the energy of an exploded SN is assumed to be injected into the entire cubic cell.
Figure 1

Projected positions of SNe explosions into ( x , y ) , ( y , z ) , and ( x , z ) planes (left to right), dashed circles show the radius of a cluster, colour bar encodes the time when a next SN in the sequence explodes, and squares show projections of the numerical cells. The exact positions are generated randomly and do not coincide with the cell centre. However, the energy of an exploded SN is assumed to be injected into the entire cubic cell.

The code is based on the unsplit total variation diminishing approach that provides high-resolution capturing of shocks and prevents unphysical oscillations. We have implemented the Monotonic Upstream-Centred Scheme for Conservation Laws (MUSCL-Hancock scheme) and the Harten–Lax–van Leer contact (HLLC) method (see, e.g. Toro 1999) as an approximate Riemann solver. This code has successfully passed the whole set of tests proposed in Klingenberg et al. (2007). For instance, the Sedov blast test for a single SN remnant is reproduced well (see Figure 1 in Vasiliev et al. 2017). Growth of an SN remnant radius at ejecta-dominated phase and its transition to adiabatic expansion afterwards (see Appendix A in Vasiliev et al. 2017) is in a good agreement with the well-known analytic and numerical solutions (e.g. Truelove and McKee 1999). The hydrodynamic driver of our code is identical to that described in Khoperskov et al. (2014), where the results of the other several tests can be found. The boundary conditions are periodic for the x - and y -directions, and outflowing for z . The time step is chosen as a minimum value from the Courant–Friedrichs–Lewy condition and cooling time over the whole grid.

Simulations are run with radiative cooling processes. A tabulated non-equilibrium cooling function is taken from Vasiliev (2011, 2013). The fitted function is obtained for gas cooling isochorically from 1 0 8 K down to 10 K. The non-equilibrium calculation (Vasiliev 2011, 2013) includes kinetics of all ionization states of H, He, C, N, O, Ne, Mg, Si, Fe, as well as kinetics of molecular hydrogen at T < 1 0 4 K . We apply a diffuse heating term representing the photoelectric heating of dust grains (Bakes and Tielens 1994), which is thought to be the dominant heating mechanism in the interstellar medium, namely in the warm neutral gas considered here (Wolfire et al. 1995). In our simulations, the heating rate is assumed to be time-independent and exponentially decreasing in the vertical direction with the scale height of the ISM disc. Such an assumption is sufficient to stabilize radiative cooling of ambient gas at T = 9 × 1 0 3 K . Any deviation of the heating rate in the unperturbed gas violates the balance between cooling and heating and stimulates thermal instability, resulting in redistribution of gas mass in the interstellar disc (see, e.g. in de Avillez 2000, Hill et al. 2012). In order to avoid contamination of such effects, we follow Li et al. (2017) to assume the heating rate exponentially decreasing upwards across the entire computational domain. Thus, in the absence of strong perturbations from SNe explosions the initial density and temperature distributions remain in the hydrostatic equilibrium within more than 30 Myr with a high accuracy – deviations do not grow above a few percents. Thus, the initial hydrostatic equilibrium of the interstellar gas layer under the external gravitational potential from stellar disc and DM is highly stable, and possible small deviations do not contaminate overall dynamical scenario.

3 Results

3.1 Dynamics of bubbles

Vertical slices in the ( x , z )-plane in Figures 2 and 3 present the density and temperature evolution for two clusters consisting of 20 and 10 SNe, respectively, with the centres located in the midplane ( z = 0 ).[1] Figure 4 presents an example of a 3D appearance of density and temperature structure in the bubble corresponding to the model in Figure 2. At the age of 10 Myr , the bubble around the cluster of 20 SNe expands to the radius comparable to the disc scale height. Afterwards, it continues expanding predominantly in the vertical direction. At the time t = 12 Myr , the bubble already shows evidence of forming an outflow, which occurs at t 14 Myr . Furthermore, the major part of the energy injected by next SNe is transferred directly into the halo (see plates for t = 16 and 18 Myr), because of a very low gas density in the hole created at previous stages. One expects that after t 24 Myr , when all SNe in the cluster are exhausted, the hole is filled by gas from the disc within the next 1 Myr , while hot gas above the disc keeps its high temperature during the next several Myr. The fragments from the destroyed shell will fall on to the disc within a much longer period (Fraternali 2017). Note that the gas unperturbed by SNe explosions keeps the initial hydrostatic distribution even at late times t = 18 Myr , as seen, e.g. in the distributions at all heights close to the vertical borders of the box in Figures 26.

Figure 2 
                  2D slices showing gas density (log(
                        
                           
                           
                              n
                           
                           n
                        
                     , cm
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    3
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-3}
                        
                     ), upper panels) and temperature (log(
                        
                           
                           
                              T
                           
                           T
                        
                     , 
                        
                           
                           
                              K
                           
                           K
                        
                     ), lower panels) for a cluster of 20 SNe located at the midplane (
                        
                           
                           
                              z
                              =
                              0
                           
                           z=0
                        
                     ) at 12, 14, 16, and 18 Myr (from left to right) since the first SN has exploded. The cluster centre is located at 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    x
                                    ,
                                    z
                                 
                                 )
                              
                              =
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    0
                                    ,
                                    0
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                           \left(x,z)=\left(0,0)
                        
                     , the coordinates are in kpc.
Figure 2

2D slices showing gas density (log( n , cm 3 ), upper panels) and temperature (log( T , K ), lower panels) for a cluster of 20 SNe located at the midplane ( z = 0 ) at 12, 14, 16, and 18 Myr (from left to right) since the first SN has exploded. The cluster centre is located at ( x , z ) = ( 0 , 0 ) , the coordinates are in kpc.

Figure 3 
                  The same as in Figure 2, but for a cluster consisting of 10 SNe. The cluster centre is located at 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    x
                                    ,
                                    z
                                 
                                 )
                              
                              =
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    0
                                    ,
                                    0
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                           \left(x,z)=\left(0,0)
                        
                     , the coordinates are in kpc.
Figure 3

The same as in Figure 2, but for a cluster consisting of 10 SNe. The cluster centre is located at ( x , z ) = ( 0 , 0 ) , the coordinates are in kpc.

Figure 4 
                  3D image of the growing bubble shown in Figure 2 at the age 18 Myr – left and right panels depict the density and the temperature structure, correspondingly; for the sake of clarity, the density is limited in a range 
                        
                           
                           
                              n
                              =
                              1
                              
                                 
                                    0
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    4
                                 
                              
                              −
                              1
                              
                              
                                 
                                    cm
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    3
                                 
                              
                           
                           n=1{0}^{-4}-1\hspace{0.33em}{{\rm{cm}}}^{-3}
                        
                     , the temperature is within 
                        
                           
                           
                              T
                              =
                              1
                              
                                 
                                    0
                                 
                                 
                                    3
                                 
                              
                              
                                 
                                 –
                                 
                              
                              1
                              
                                 
                                    0
                                 
                                 
                                    5
                                 
                              
                              
                              K
                           
                           T=1{0}^{3}\hspace{0.1em}\text{&#x2013;}\hspace{0.1em}1{0}^{5}\hspace{0.33em}{\rm{K}}
                        
                     . In order to eliminate rather strong contaminations from the gaseous disc its contribution has been subtracted in the left panel; the thin elliptically shaped artefact remained from the subtraction procedure. We use the YT package (Turk et al. 2011) to produce this figure.
Figure 4

3D image of the growing bubble shown in Figure 2 at the age 18 Myr – left and right panels depict the density and the temperature structure, correspondingly; for the sake of clarity, the density is limited in a range n = 1 0 4 1 cm 3 , the temperature is within T = 1 0 3 1 0 5 K . In order to eliminate rather strong contaminations from the gaseous disc its contribution has been subtracted in the left panel; the thin elliptically shaped artefact remained from the subtraction procedure. We use the YT package (Turk et al. 2011) to produce this figure.

For a less populated cluster, with 10 SNe, the time delay between subsequent explosions is close to merging between SN remnant and the ISM.[2] After each merging phase, a weak perturbation of density/temperature appears. For instance, such a relic from previous explosions is found in the left panel of Figure 3, the largest one located in the disc has a radius around 100 pc. The gas density inside this relic is close to the unperturbed value in the disc so that a subsequent SN forms a shell in a gas perturbed by previous SNe – the inner circle with an enhanced density shell. The bubble consists of several hot regions at t 12 Myr . Afterwards, these regions merge at t 14 Myr and form a narrow hot channel perpendicular to the disc. Subsequent SNe transfer their energy through this channel to higher heights. Although the hot gas reaches distances more than the scale height, the delay between SNe is longer than the time needed for filling this channel by gas from the disc ( t 16 Myr ), and next SN explodes in gas with a density close to typical in the galactic midplane ( t 18 Myr ). Two features distinguish this case from the one with higher SN rate: (i) even though the gas evacuated by the initial episode of SNe explosions falls back and fills the cavity the disc height does not relax to the initial height, but becomes thinner around the position of the SNe cluster, (ii) small hot regions located at 3 scale heights above and below the cluster in the disc. Both structures are short-lived and practically disappear in the next several Myr. Thus, low-populated clusters at radial distances of 3  kpc from the Galactic centre hardly leave observable relicts/remnants in the gas distribution.

As mentioned above, stellar clusters are spread in heights above/below the midplane. SNe in such clusters may explode at heights that are considerably greater than the cluster radius. Young ( 5 Myr) stellar clusters have been found up to 100 pc in the solar neighbourhood (Zari et al. 2018). Such height is roughly half of the gaseous scale height at the solar galactocentric distance. As the stellar disc becomes thicker closer to the Galactic centre, one can expect that young stellar clusters may be located at similar or even higher positions. Thus, it might be interesting to consider SNe explosions in stellar clusters located close to the midplane and slightly larger than a half of the scale height.

Figures 5 and 6 show the density evolution for two clusters consisting of 10 SNe located at 20 and 60 pc above the midplane, respectively. These are around 1/5 and 3/5 of the scale height at a radial distance of 3 kpc from the Galactic centre. One can see that bubbles formed by these SNe clusters are merged to the ISM at around t 16 18 Myr , similar to those in the midplane (Figure 3). However, for clusters located above/below the midplane new remarkable structures form above/below the disc at 1 3 scale heights: they contain warm diffuse gas with n 0.1 cm 3 and exist for a longer characteristic time ( t 18 Myr ) than those formed at similar heights for midplane clusters (see the right panel in Figure 3). Moreover, the asymmetry in the positioning of these structures – either above or below the midplane may provide additional information about the height at which the driving energy source – an SNe cluster – is located. One can note that for the cluster located at 60 pc the gas perturbed by SNe explosions extends close to the computational domain boundaries at t 18 Myr (see right panel in Figure 6). However, it is not important for further evolution as soon as the gas is subsonic, and its mass flux is negligible.

Figure 5 
                  The same as in Figure 2, but for a cluster consisting of 10 SNe located at height 
                        
                           
                           
                              z
                              =
                              20
                              
                              pc
                           
                           z=20\hspace{0.33em}{\rm{pc}}
                        
                      above the midplane, i.e. the cluster centre is located at 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    x
                                    ,
                                    z
                                 
                                 )
                              
                              =
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    0
                                    ,
                                    0.02
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                           \left(x,z)=\left(0,0.02)
                        
                     , the coordinates are in kpc.
Figure 5

The same as in Figure 2, but for a cluster consisting of 10 SNe located at height z = 20 pc above the midplane, i.e. the cluster centre is located at ( x , z ) = ( 0 , 0.02 ) , the coordinates are in kpc.

Figure 6 
                  The same as in Figure 2, but for a cluster consisting of 10 SNe located at height 
                        
                           
                           
                              z
                              =
                              60
                              
                              pc
                           
                           z=60\hspace{0.33em}{\rm{pc}}
                        
                      above the midplane, i.e. the cluster centre is at 
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    x
                                    ,
                                    z
                                 
                                 )
                              
                              =
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    0
                                    ,
                                    0.06
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                           \left(x,z)=\left(0,0.06)
                        
                     , the coordinates are in kpc.
Figure 6

The same as in Figure 2, but for a cluster consisting of 10 SNe located at height z = 60 pc above the midplane, i.e. the cluster centre is at ( x , z ) = ( 0 , 0.06 ) , the coordinates are in kpc.

3.2 Emission from gas

The structures described above may be detected in various lines and wavelength ranges. To calculate emission features the hydrogen radiative coefficients and Gaunt factors are taken from Draine (2011), we use the ionization gas composition corresponding to the cooling rate for a given temperature (Vasiliev 2013). With these assumptions we simulate emission and velocity distributions along each line-of-sight and obtain emission and velocity maps (see also Vasiliev and Nath 2015, Vasiliev and Moiseev 2015, Vasiliev et al. 2017). Figures 710 present the H α intensity, ionized gas velocity dispersion, X-ray intensity in the 0.7–1.2 keV band, and HI column density for the models shown in Figures 26 at time t = 16 Myr (right middle panel). Note that Figures 7 and 8 show the maps for the whole disc, whereas Figures 9 and 10 present the emission features only above the midplane. That is because the gas below the midplane is only slightly perturbed by SNe clusters located above the midplane. In each model, one can note the region close to the midplane with slightly enhanced emissivity. These features are produced by the density perturbations originated from the merging phases of early SN explosions (see the density slices in Figures 26).

Figure 7 
                  The H
                        
                           
                           
                              α
                           
                           {\rm{\alpha }}
                        
                      intensity lg(
                        
                           
                           
                              I
                              
                                 (
                                 
                                    H
                                    α
                                 
                                 )
                              
                           
                           I\left(H{\rm{\alpha }})
                        
                     , erg cm
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-2}
                        
                      s
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-1}
                        
                      arcsec
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-2}
                        
                     ), ionized gas velocity dispersion (
                        
                           
                           
                              σ
                           
                           \sigma 
                        
                     , km/s), X-ray intensity in the 0.7–1.2 keV band lg(I(0.7–1.2 keV), keV cm
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-2}
                        
                      s
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-1}
                        
                      str
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-1}
                        
                     ), and HI column density (lg(N(HI), cm
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    2
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-2}
                        
                     ), panels from left to right) for a cluster of 20 SNe located at the midplane (
                        
                           
                           
                              z
                              =
                              0
                           
                           z=0
                        
                     ) at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded.
Figure 7

The H α intensity lg( I ( H α ) , erg cm 2 s 1 arcsec 2 ), ionized gas velocity dispersion ( σ , km/s), X-ray intensity in the 0.7–1.2 keV band lg(I(0.7–1.2 keV), keV cm 2 s 1 str 1 ), and HI column density (lg(N(HI), cm 2 ), panels from left to right) for a cluster of 20 SNe located at the midplane ( z = 0 ) at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded.

Figure 8 
                  The same as in Figure 7, but for a cluster of 10 SNe located at the midplane (
                        
                           
                           
                              z
                              =
                              0
                           
                           z=0
                        
                     ) at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded.
Figure 8

The same as in Figure 7, but for a cluster of 10 SNe located at the midplane ( z = 0 ) at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded.

Figure 9 
                  The H
                        
                           
                           
                              α
                           
                           {\rm{\alpha }}
                        
                      intensity, ionized gas velocity dispersion, X-ray intensity in the 0.7–1.2 keV band and HI column density (from left to right) for a cluster of 10 SNe located at height 
                        
                           
                           
                              z
                              =
                              20
                              
                              pc
                           
                           z=20\hspace{0.33em}{\rm{pc}}
                        
                      above the midplane at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded. Only the maps above the midplane are shown.
Figure 9

The H α intensity, ionized gas velocity dispersion, X-ray intensity in the 0.7–1.2 keV band and HI column density (from left to right) for a cluster of 10 SNe located at height z = 20 pc above the midplane at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded. Only the maps above the midplane are shown.

Figure 10 
                  The same as in Figure 9, but for a cluster of 10 SNe located at height 
                        
                           
                           
                              z
                              =
                              60
                              
                              pc
                           
                           z=60\hspace{0.33em}{\rm{pc}}
                        
                      above the midplane at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded.
Figure 10

The same as in Figure 9, but for a cluster of 10 SNe located at height z = 60 pc above the midplane at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded.

For the cluster consisting of 20 SNe low-intensity H α structures can be found up to 3 scales of height, or z 0.3 kpc (left panel in Figure 7), and the velocity dispersion of these structures is higher than 50 km s 1 (left middle panel), then, such gas has a specific locus on the “H α intensity – velocity dispersion” diagram – an area that corresponds to both low H α intensities and high values of velocity dispersion (Martínez-Delgado et al. 2007, Moiseev and Lozinskaya 2012, Egorov et al. 2014, Vasiliev and Moiseev 2015, Egorov et al. 2017). Hot gas outflowing from the disc has sufficiently high temperature to emit in X-rays. The HI column density in the disc is significant for attenuating X-ray intensity below 0.3 keV, so that here we consider more energetic range, 0.7–1.2 keV (right middle panel). One can find X-ray spots located symmetrically above and below the midplane. Note that the X-ray spot in the midplane disappears within less than 1 Myr after exhaustion of SNe explosions, because of efficient gas merging in the midplane, whereas the X-ray spots above and below the disc remain for next several Myr. Their shapes are very similar to X-ray structures observed in the Galactic centre (see, e.g. Figures 6 and 1 in Extended data by Ponti et al. 2015, Ponti et al. 2019, respectively). The X-ray structures formed by less SNe number (Figures 810) look like narrow chimneys and similar to small filaments seen in Figure 6 by Ponti et al. (2015). The gas in these structures is highly ionized, such that only a few lumps of neutral gas can be found in HI maps (right panel).

There are no distinguishable emission structures after SNe explosions in a 10 SNe cluster located at the disc midplane (Figure 8). During the evolution, one may only find bubbles formed by individual SN explosions, because the time delay between subsequent explosions is longer than the duration of the merging phase. Figure 8 presents the distributions for time moment after 4 Myr when the last SN has exploded (for the evolution see Figure 3), so that these emission distributions present the latest period of the merging phase.

For a cluster displaced out of the midplane several remarkable gaseous structures are appeared (Figures 5 and 6), and they might be found in H α and HI emission (see left and right panels in Figures 9 and 10). They are found at 3 scale heights ( 0.3 kpc ), though even more remarkable for clusters at moderate heights 1 / 5 1 / 2 of scale height, or 20 60 pc . Clusters at smaller ( 20 pc) or larger ( 60 pc) heights do not give any structures, because at smaller heights SNe cannot form collective outflow (see the description above and Figure 3), whereas at larger ones the swept-up mass is too small. Note that for clusters at larger heights, the energy injected by SNe is easily channelled into the vertical direction, and the volume of high-velocity gas is greater than for clusters at lower heights. As a result, a high velocity dispersion region appears at larger heights (see left middle panel in Figure 10).

3.3 Dust emission in hot gas

Grains in hot gas are heated both by collisions behind shocks and by ultraviolet (UV) starlight produced by stellar population in the disc. To calculate the total infrared (IR) emission of dust grains we assume a steady-state heating by UV photons and collisions. We model the dust population consisting of graphites and silicates of five sizes: 30, 100, 300, 1,000, and 3,000 Å distributed according to Mathis et al. (1977). The dust-to-gas ratio is taken equal to 1/120. The local UV energy density within one scale height of the disc is set the value u = 1.5 × 1 0 13 erg cm 3 , it is three times higher than the field near the solar neighbourhood (Habing 1968), because the stellar surface density in our simulations is taken about three times higher than that near the Sun as well. The dust absorption and emission coefficients are taken from Draine (2011) and Laor and Draine (1993). The heating rate due to collisions with electrons is adopted from Dwek (1987). Small dust grains can be destructed in hot plasma, we take it into account in the manner described by Drozdov and Vasiliev (2021).

Figure 11 presents the total IR ( λ 3 –3,000 μ m ) surface brightness (left) and average temperature (right panel) of dust grains in hot gas of the bubble formed by a cluster of 20 SNe located at the midplane at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded. Note that here we do not depict the dust emission of the disc.

Figure 11 
                  Total IR surface brightness (log(
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    L
                                 
                                 
                                    d
                                 
                              
                           
                           {L}_{d}
                        
                     , erg s
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    1
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-1}
                        
                      cm
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                 
                                    −
                                    3
                                 
                              
                           
                           {}^{-3}
                        
                     ), left panel) and temperature (
                        
                           
                           
                              
                                 
                                    T
                                 
                                 
                                    d
                                 
                              
                              
                              K
                           
                           {T}_{d}\hspace{0.33em}{\rm{K}}
                        
                     , right panel) of dust grains in hot gas of a cluster of 20 SNe located at the midplane (
                        
                           
                           
                              z
                              =
                              0
                           
                           z=0
                        
                     ) at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded.
Figure 11

Total IR surface brightness (log( L d , erg s 1 cm 3 ), left panel) and temperature ( T d K , right panel) of dust grains in hot gas of a cluster of 20 SNe located at the midplane ( z = 0 ) at 16 Myr since the first SN has exploded.

Large ( a 300 Å) grains in the hot gas at low heights are predominantly heated by the UV starlight, whereas smaller ones ( a 100  Å) are kept hotter by collisions in high-temperature interior of the bubble. Because dust emissivity is mainly determined by smaller grains, the IR brightness and dust temperature in hot plasma of the bubble are significantly contributed by collisions. One can note that bright “caps” reach heights of z 0.4 kpc . They are more pronounced in comparison with the total H α emission (see left panel in Figure 7). The dust temperature is distributed similar to the X-ray emission in the range of 0.7–1.2 keV (see third panel in Figure 7). One can see that a significant volume filling factor of hot gas in bubbles can be found in the bubble formed by a cluster of 20 SNe. Therefore, dust emission can be used in identifying clusters consisting of more than 20 SNe or more massive than 3 × 1 0 3 M (assuming one SN per 150 M ).

One can note that the dust temperature at low and middle galactic latitudes is usually below 20 K (see middle panel of Figure 9 in Planck Collaboration et al. 2013). These temperature values are thought to be determined by a local UV background (e.g. Section 9 in Draine 2003). At the same time in the all-sky dust temperature map (see middle panel of Figure 9 in Planck Collaboration et al. 2013), there are many small patches with higher dust temperature values: 23–27 K. In Figure 11 one can see that the dust temperature in the “caps” reaches 25 K and even higher, that is close to the values in such observed patches with typical angular size about several degrees or physical size of 0.2–0.4 kpc at distance of several kpc. A detailed comparison of the simulated “caps” and observed patches will be done elsewhere. However, one can expect that the emission of dusty “caps” can be used in searching SNe explosions in low-mass OB clusters.

4 Discussion

Throughout the article we implicitly assumed that the radial density gradient has negligible effects on the dynamics of growing bubbles and their emission characteristics. Such an assumption is motivated by the fact that in all cases we considered the characteristic scales of SN remnants to merge and form a local vertical outflow are much shorter (from 1 pc within a cluster to 100 pc within the ISM disc) as compared to spatial scales in the radial direction (a few kpc for spiral galaxies). On the contrary, the effects of radial density gradient in the disc might have effects in dwarf galaxies where the ISM discs are amorphous and fluffy with the vertical to the radial scale ratios ( 0.1 ) being larger than in disc galaxies ( 0.03 ) (see, e.g. Puche et al. 1992). We also assumed the ISM disc implicitly to be in the hydrostatic equilibrium and neglected local turbulent motions. The presence of turbulence leads to a faster washing out of the density perturbations formed due to the merging phase (see density slices in Figures 26); however, it is unlikely to change the global dynamics of SN bubble (see Fielding et al. 2018, Vasiliev et al. 2019 for comparison).

5 Conclusion

We have studied the evolution of collective remnants formed by several (up to 20) SNe in the galactic disc. Such a number of SNe can be attributed to small OB clusters. The morphology of a remnant depends on both disc and cluster properties, e.g. disc thickness, midplane density, and height at which the cluster centre is located above the disc midplane, cluster radius and mass function of massive stars, and so on. We have found the following

  1. the energy injected by a cluster of 20 SNe at the midplane is sufficient to break the disc out at radial distance 3 kpc in the Galaxy; the outflow can reach 2–3 scale heights and emit in H α and X-ray (0.7–1.2 keV) during several Myr;

  2. a cluster of 10 SNe at the midplane is not able to drive gas outflow from the disc;

  3. 10 SNe clusters located at 0.2 0.5 scale heights above the midplane produce H α structures extending 0.5 2 scale heights, these structures can be identified by velocity dispersion of ionized gas;

  4. A cluster of 20 SNe at the midplane can produce the IR-bright dusty “caps” at heights 0.2 0.4 kpc , the dust temperature in the “caps” is 20 K , which is mainly controlled by small grains heated presumably by collisions in hot plasma of SNe bubble.

Thus, out-of-plane gaseous structures formed by several SNe explosions in low-mass OB clusters might be detected by using maps of ionized gas velocity dispersion, intensity maps in H α and HI 21 cm lines, X-ray bands, and IR emission of dust. Overall, these characteristics represent a set of observational manifestations of presence of underlying stellar clusters unobserved otherwise. The morphology and emission properties of such structures are sensitive to both properties of ambient gas and clusters’ characteristics, and as such might be used for rough estimates of the clusters’ mass.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Mikhail Shevchenko for helping with rendering.

  1. Funding information: Numerical simulations of the superbubble dynamics were supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 19-72-20089) using the equipment of the shared research facilities of the HPC computing resources at the Moscow State University (project no. RFMEFI62117X001). The work of SD and YS is done under the support of the project 01-2020 “New Scientific Groups LPI.” MR is grateful to the Ministry for Education and Science of the Russian Federation (grant 3.858.2017/4.6).

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

References

de Avillez MA. 2000. Disc-halo interaction - I. Three-dimensional evolution of the Galactic disc. MNRAS. 315(3):479–497. 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03464.xSuche in Google Scholar

Bagetakos I, Brinks E, Walter F, de Blok WJG, Usero A, Leroy AK, et al. 2011. The fine-scale structure of the neutral interstellar medium in nearby galaxies. AJ. 141(1):23. 10.1088/0004-6256/141/1/23Suche in Google Scholar

Bakes ELO, Tielens AGGM. 1994. The photoelectric heating mechanism for very small graphitic grains and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. ApJ. 427:822. 10.1086/174188Suche in Google Scholar

Bronfman L, Casassus S, May J, Nyman L-AAA. 2000. The radial distribution of OB star formation in the Galaxy. A&A. 358:521–534. Suche in Google Scholar

Damiani F, Prisinzano L, Pillitteri I, Micela G, Sciortino S. 2019. Stellar population of Sco OB2 revealed by Gaia DR2 data. A&A. 623:A112. 10.1051/0004-6361/201833994Suche in Google Scholar

Draine BT. 2003. Interstellar dust grains. ARA&A. 41:241–289. 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840Suche in Google Scholar

Draine BT. 2011. Physics of the interstellar and intergalactic medium. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. 10.1515/9781400839087Suche in Google Scholar

Drozdov SA, Vasiliev EO. 2021. Dust destruction in hot gas dynamic flows. Bull Lebedev Phys Inst. 48(10):327–331. 10.3103/S1068335621100043Suche in Google Scholar

Dwek E. 1987. The infrared diagnostic of a dusty plasma with applications to supernova remnants. ApJ. 322:812. 10.1086/165774Suche in Google Scholar

Egorov OV, Lozinskaya TA, Moiseev AV, Smirnov-Pinchukov GV. 2014. The supergiant shell with triggered star formation in the dwarf irregular galaxy IC 2574: neutral and ionized gas kinematics. MNRAS. 444(1):376–391. 10.1093/mnras/stu1369Suche in Google Scholar

Egorov OV, Lozinskaya TA, Moiseev AV, Shchekinov YuA. 2017. Complexes of triggered star formation in supergiant shell of Holmberg II. MNRAS. 464(2):1833–1854. 10.1093/mnras/stw2367Suche in Google Scholar

Fielding D, Quataert E, Martizzi D. 2018. Clustered supernovae drive powerful galactic winds after superbubble breakout. MNRAS. 481(3):3325–3347. 10.1093/mnras/sty2466Suche in Google Scholar

Fraternali F. 2017. Gas accretion via condensation and fountains. Astrophys and Space Sci Lib. 430:323. 10.1007/978-3-319-52512-9_14Suche in Google Scholar

Gilmore G, Reid N. 1983. New light on faint stars - III. Galactic structure towards the South Pole and the Galactic thick disc. MNRAS. 202:1025–1047. 10.1093/mnras/202.4.1025Suche in Google Scholar

Habing HJ. 1968. The interstellar radiation density between 912 Å and 2,400 Å. BAN. 19:421. Suche in Google Scholar

Haffner LM, Reynolds RJ, Tufte SL, Madsen GJ, Jaehnig KP, Percival JW. 2003. The Wisconsin Hα mapper northern sky survey. ApJS. 149(2):5–422. 10.1086/378850Suche in Google Scholar

Heiles C. 1984. HI shells, supershells, shell-like objects, and worms. ApJS. 55:585–595. 10.1086/190970Suche in Google Scholar

Heiles C, Reach WT, Koo B-C. 1996. Radio recombination lines from inner galaxy diffuse gas. II. The extended low-density warm ionized medium and the “Worm-ionized Medium. ApJ. 466:191. 10.1086/177503Suche in Google Scholar

Hill AS, Joung MR, MacLow M-M, Benjamin RA, Haffner LM, Klingenberg C, et al. 2012. Vertical structure of a supernova-driven turbulent, magnetized interstellar medium. ApJ. 750(2):104. 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/104Suche in Google Scholar

Iben I. 2012. Stellar Evolution Physics. Vol 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139061223Suche in Google Scholar

Kalberla PMW. 2003. Dark matter in the milky way. I. The isothermal disc approximation. ApJ. 588(2):805–823. 10.1086/374330Suche in Google Scholar

Kalberla PMW, Kerp J. 2009. The HI distribution of the milky way. ARA&A. 47(1):27–61. 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101823Suche in Google Scholar

Khoperskov SA, Vasiliev EO, Khoperskov AV, Lubimov VN. 2014. Numerical code for multi-component galaxies: from N-body to chemistry and magnetic fields. J Phys Conf Ser. 510(1):012011. 10.1088/1742-6596/510/1/012011Suche in Google Scholar

Kim C-G, Ostriker EC. 2015. Momentum injection by supernovae in the interstellar medium. ApJ. 802(2):99. 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/99Suche in Google Scholar

Klingenberg Ch, Schmidt W, Waagan K. 2007. Numerical comparison of Riemann solvers for astrophysical hydrodynamics. J Comp Phys. 227(1):12–35. 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.07.034Suche in Google Scholar

Kruijssen JMD, Longmore SN. 2014. An uncertainty principle for star formation - I. Why galactic star formation relations break down below a certain spatial scale. MNRAS. 439(4):3239–3252. 10.1093/mnras/stu098Suche in Google Scholar

Krumholz MR, McKee CF, Bland-Hawthorn J. 2019. Star clusters across cosmic time. ARA&A. 57:227–303. 10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104430Suche in Google Scholar

Laor A, Draine BT. 1993. Spectroscopic constraints on the properties of dust in active galactic nuclei. ApJ. 402:441. 10.1086/172149Suche in Google Scholar

Li M, Bryan GL, Ostriker JP. 2017. Quantifying supernovae-driven multiphase galactic outflows. ApJ. 841(2):101. 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7263Suche in Google Scholar

Martínez-Delgado I, Tenorio-Tagle G, Muñoz-Tuñón C, Moiseev AV, Caíros LM. 2007. Three-dimensional spectroscopy of blue compact galaxies: Diagnostic diagrams. AJ. 133(6):2892–2897. 10.1086/515438Suche in Google Scholar

Mathis JS, Rumpl W, Nordsieck KH. 1977. The size distribution of interstellar grains. ApJ. 217:425–433. 10.1086/155591Suche in Google Scholar

Micelotta ER, Matsuura M, Sarangi A. 2018. Dust in supernovae and supernova remnants II: Processing and survival. SSRv. 214(2):53. 10.1007/978-94-024-1581-0_14Suche in Google Scholar

Moiseev AV, Lozinskaya TA. 2012. Ionized gas velocity dispersion in nearby dwarf galaxies: looking at supersonic turbulent motions. MNRAS. 423(2):1831–1844. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21005.xSuche in Google Scholar

Navarro JF, Frenk CS, White SDM. 1997. A universal density profile from hierarchical clustering. ApJ. 490(2):493–508. 10.1086/304888Suche in Google Scholar

Norman CA, Ikeuchi S. 1989. The disc-halo interaction: Superbubbles and the structure of the interstellar medium. ApJ. 345:372. 10.1086/167912Suche in Google Scholar

Normandeau M, Taylor AR, Dewdney PE. 1996. A galactic chimney in the Perseus arm of the Milky Way. Natur. 380(6576):687–689. 10.1038/380687a0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Padmanabhan T. 2001. Theoretical Astrophysics. Vol. 2, Stars and Stellar Systems. Berlin: Springer. 10.1017/CBO9780511840159Suche in Google Scholar

Planck Collaboration, Abergel A, Ade PAR, Aghanim N, Alves MIR, Aniano G, Armitage-Caplan C, et al. 2014. Planck 2013 results. XI. All-sky model of thermal dust emission. A&A 571:A11. 10.1051/0004-6361/201323195Suche in Google Scholar

Ponti G, Morris MR, Terrier R, Haberl F, Sturm R, Clavel M, et al. 2015. The XMM-Newton view of the central degrees of the milky way. MNRAS. 453(1):172–213. 10.1093/mnras/stv1331Suche in Google Scholar

Ponti G, Hofmann F, Churazov E, Morris MR, Haberl F, Nandra K, et al. 2019. An X-ray chimney extending hundreds of parsecs above and below the galactic centre. Nature. 567(7748):347–350. 10.1038/s41586-019-1009-6Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Puche D, Westpfahl D, Brinks E, Roy J-R. 1992. Holmberg II: A laboratory for studying the violent interstellar medium. AJ. 103:1841. 10.1086/116199Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk JJ. 1994. A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate. Int J Numer Methods Fluids. 18(6):555–574. 10.1007/978-3-642-60543-7_22Suche in Google Scholar

Toro E. 1999. Riemann solvers and numerical methods for fluid dynamics. Second edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978-3-662-03915-1Suche in Google Scholar

Truelove JK, McKee CF. 1999. Evolution of nonradiative supernova remnants. ApJS. 120(2):299–326. 10.1086/313176Suche in Google Scholar

Turk MJ, Smith BD, Oishi JS, Skory S, Skillman SW, Abel T, et al. 2011. yt: A multi-code analysis toolkit for astrophysical simulation data. ApJS. 192(1):9. 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/9Suche in Google Scholar

Vasiliev EO. 2011. Non-equilibrium ionization states and cooling rates of photoionized enriched gas. MNRAS. 414(4):3145–3157. 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18623.xSuche in Google Scholar

Vasiliev EO. 2013. Non-equilibrium cooling rate for a collisionally cooled metal-enriched gas. MNRAS. 431(1):638–647. 10.1093/mnras/stt189Suche in Google Scholar

Vasiliev EO, Nath BB, Shchekinov YuA. 2015. Evolution of multiple supernova remnants. MNRAS. 446(2):1703–1715. 10.1093/mnras/stu2133Suche in Google Scholar

Vasiliev EO, Moiseev AV, Shchekinov YuA. 2015. Velocity dispersion of ionized gas and multiple supernova explosions. Balt Astron. 24:213–220. 10.1515/astro-2017-0222Suche in Google Scholar

Vasiliev EO, Nath BB, Shchekinov YuA. 2017. Evolution of clustered supernovae. MNRAS. 468(3):2757–2770. 10.1093/mnras/stx719Suche in Google Scholar

Vasiliev EO, Shchekinov YuA, Nath BB. 2019. Launching of hot gas outflow by disc-wide supernova explosions. MNRAS. 486(3):3685–3696. 10.1093/mnras/stz1099Suche in Google Scholar

Walch S, Girichidis P, Naab T, Gatto A, Glover SC, Wünsch R, et al. 2015. The SILCC (SImulating the LifeCycle of molecular Clouds) project - I. Chemical evolution of the supernova-driven ISM. MNRAS. 454(1):238–268. 10.1093/mnras/stv1975Suche in Google Scholar

Wolfire MG, Hollenbach D, McKee CF, Tielens AGGM, Bakes ELO. 1995. The neutral atomic phases of the interstellar medium. AJ. 443:152–168. 10.1086/175510Suche in Google Scholar

Wood DOS, Churchwell E. 1989a. The morphologies and physical properties of ultracompact H II regions. ApJS. 69:831. 10.1086/191329Suche in Google Scholar

Wood DOS, Churchwell E. 1989b. Massive stars embedded in molecular clouds: Their population and distribution in the galaxy. ApJ. 340:265. 10.1086/167390Suche in Google Scholar

Wouterloot JGA, Brand J. 1996. IRAS sources beyond the solar circle. VII. The 12C/13 C ratio in the far outer galaxy. A&AS. 119:439–467. 10.1051/aas:1996258Suche in Google Scholar

Zari E, Hashemi H, Brown AGA, Jardine K, de Zeeuw PT. 2018. 3D mapping of young stars in the solar neighbourhood with Gaia DR2. A&A. 620:A172. 10.1051/0004-6361/201834150Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-10-30
Revised: 2022-03-10
Accepted: 2022-03-24
Published Online: 2022-04-13

© 2022 Sergey A. Drozdov et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Research Articles
  2. Deep learning application for stellar parameters determination: I-constraining the hyperparameters
  3. Explaining the cuspy dark matter halos by the Landau–Ginzburg theory
  4. The evolution of time-dependent Λ and G in multi-fluid Bianchi type-I cosmological models
  5. Observational data and orbits of the comets discovered at the Vilnius Observatory in 1980–2006 and the case of the comet 322P
  6. Special Issue: Modern Stellar Astronomy
  7. Determination of the degree of star concentration in globular clusters based on space observation data
  8. Can local inhomogeneity of the Universe explain the accelerating expansion?
  9. Processing and visualisation of a series of monochromatic images of regions of the Sun
  10. 11-year dynamics of coronal hole and sunspot areas
  11. Investigation of the mechanism of a solar flare by means of MHD simulations above the active region in real scale of time: The choice of parameters and the appearance of a flare situation
  12. Comparing results of real-scale time MHD modeling with observational data for first flare M 1.9 in AR 10365
  13. Modeling of large-scale disk perturbation eclipses of UX Ori stars with the puffed-up inner disks
  14. A numerical approach to model chemistry of complex organic molecules in a protoplanetary disk
  15. Small-scale sectorial perturbation modes against the background of a pulsating model of disk-like self-gravitating systems
  16. Hα emission from gaseous structures above galactic discs
  17. Parameterization of long-period eclipsing binaries
  18. Chemical composition and ages of four globular clusters in M31 from the analysis of their integrated-light spectra
  19. Dynamics of magnetic flux tubes in accretion disks of Herbig Ae/Be stars
  20. Checking the possibility of determining the relative orbits of stars rotating around the center body of the Galaxy
  21. Photometry and kinematics of extragalactic star-forming complexes
  22. New triple-mode high-amplitude Delta Scuti variables
  23. Bubbles and OB associations
  24. Peculiarities of radio emission from new pulsars at 111 MHz
  25. Influence of the magnetic field on the formation of protostellar disks
  26. The specifics of pulsar radio emission
  27. Wide binary stars with non-coeval components
  28. Special Issue: The Global Space Exploration Conference (GLEX) 2021
  29. ANALOG-1 ISS – The first part of an analogue mission to guide ESA’s robotic moon exploration efforts
  30. Lunar PNT system concept and simulation results
  31. Special Issue: New Progress in Astrodynamics Applications - Part I
  32. Message from the Guest Editor of the Special Issue on New Progress in Astrodynamics Applications
  33. Research on real-time reachability evaluation for reentry vehicles based on fuzzy learning
  34. Application of cloud computing key technology in aerospace TT&C
  35. Improvement of orbit prediction accuracy using extreme gradient boosting and principal component analysis
  36. End-of-discharge prediction for satellite lithium-ion battery based on evidential reasoning rule
  37. High-altitude satellites range scheduling for urgent request utilizing reinforcement learning
  38. Performance of dual one-way measurements and precise orbit determination for BDS via inter-satellite link
  39. Angular acceleration compensation guidance law for passive homing missiles
  40. Research progress on the effects of microgravity and space radiation on astronauts’ health and nursing measures
  41. A micro/nano joint satellite design of high maneuverability for space debris removal
  42. Optimization of satellite resource scheduling under regional target coverage conditions
  43. Research on fault detection and principal component analysis for spacecraft feature extraction based on kernel methods
  44. On-board BDS dynamic filtering ballistic determination and precision evaluation
  45. High-speed inter-satellite link construction technology for navigation constellation oriented to engineering practice
  46. Integrated design of ranging and DOR signal for China's deep space navigation
  47. Close-range leader–follower flight control technology for near-circular low-orbit satellites
  48. Analysis of the equilibrium points and orbits stability for the asteroid 93 Minerva
  49. Access once encountered TT&C mode based on space–air–ground integration network
  50. Cooperative capture trajectory optimization of multi-space robots using an improved multi-objective fruit fly algorithm
Heruntergeladen am 2.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/astro-2022-0021/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen