Follow-up contributions for collaboratively accomplishing peer feedback in video-mediated L2 interactions

References

Ajjawi, Rola & David Boud. 2017. Researching feedback dialogue: An interactional analysis approach. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42(2). 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1102863.Search in Google Scholar

Ajjawi, Rola & David Boud. 2018. Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43(7). 1106–1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128.Search in Google Scholar

Al-Gahtani, Saad & Carsten Roever. 2014. Insert and post-expansion in L2 Arabic requests. System 42. 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.10.018.Search in Google Scholar

Alshuraidah, Ali & Neomy Storch. 2019. Investigating a collaborative approach to peer feedback. ELT Journal 73(2). 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy057.Search in Google Scholar

Badem-Korkmaz, Fatma, Semih Ekin & Ufuk Balaman. 2022. Pre-service language teachers’ resistance to teacher trainer advice on task design for video-mediated L2 interaction. Classroom Discourse 13(2). 212–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2021.2020144.Search in Google Scholar

Balaman, Ufuk. 2021. The interactional organization of video‐mediated collaborative writing: Focus on repair practices. Tesol Quarterly 55(3). 979–993. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3034.Search in Google Scholar

Balaman, Ufuk. 2023. Conversation analytic language teacher education in digital spaces. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-031-19127-5Search in Google Scholar

Balaman, Ufuk & Olcay Sert. 2017. The coordination of online L2 interaction and orientations to task interface for epistemic progression. Journal of Pragmatics 115. 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.015.Search in Google Scholar

Batlle, Jaume & Paul Seedhouse. 2022. Affiliation and negative assessments in peer observation feedback for foreign language teachers professional development. Applied Linguistics Review 13(6). 1077–1101. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Bozbıyık, Merve & Ufuk Balaman. 2023. The role of translingual peer involvement in resolving understanding troubles in the English medium of instruction classroom. System 113. 103003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103003.Search in Google Scholar

Carless, David, Diane Salter, Min Yang & Joy Lam. 2011. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education 36(4). 395–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449.Search in Google Scholar

Cekaite, Asta. 2007. A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal 91(1). 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2007.00509.x.Search in Google Scholar

Copland, Fiona. 2011. Legitimate talk in feedback conferences. Applied Linguistics 33(1). 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr040.Search in Google Scholar

Deppermann, Arnulf. 2011. The study of formulations as a key to an interactional semantics. Human Studies 34(2). 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-011-9187-8.Search in Google Scholar

Dings, Abby. 2014. Interactional competence and the development of alignment activity. The Modern Language Journal 98(3). 742–756. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12120.Search in Google Scholar

Dolce, Frank M. & Rémi A. Van Compernolle. 2020. Topic management and student initiation in an advanced Chinese-as-a-foreign-language classroom. Classroom Discourse 11(1). 80–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1563799.Search in Google Scholar

Ekin, Semih, Ufuk Balaman & Fatma Badem-Korkmaz. 2021. Tracking telecollaborative tasks through design, feedback, implementation, and reflection processes in pre-service language teacher education. Applied Linguistics Review 15(1). 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0147.Search in Google Scholar

Eskildsen, Søren Wind & Guðrún Theodórsdóttir. 2017. Constructing L2 learning spaces: Ways to achieve learning inside and outside the classroom. Applied Linguistics 38(2). 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv010.Search in Google Scholar

Galaczi, Evelina D. 2014. Interactional competence across proficiency levels: How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking tests? Applied Linguistics 35(5). 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt017.Search in Google Scholar

Greer, Tim. 2016. Learner initiative in action: Post-expansion sequences in a novice ESL survey interview task. Linguistics and Education 35. 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2016.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

Hall, Joan Kelly, John Hellermann & Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2011. L2 interactional competence and development. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847694072Search in Google Scholar

Heller, Vivien. 2017. Managing knowledge claims in classroom discourse: The public construction of a homogeneous epistemic status. Classroom Discourse 8(2). 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2017.1328699.Search in Google Scholar

Hellermann, John. 2008. Social actions for classroom language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847690272Search in Google Scholar

Jacknick, Christine M. 2011. ‘But this is writing’: Post-expansion in student-initiated sequences. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language) 5(1). 39–54.Search in Google Scholar

Jacknick, Christine M.. 2013. “Cause the textbook says…”: Laughter and student challenges in the ESL classroom. In Phillip Glenn & Elizabeth Holt (eds.), Studies of laughter in interaction, 185–200. London: Bloomsbury Academic.10.5040/9781472542069.ch-009Search in Google Scholar

Jefferson, Gail. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Gene H. Lerner (ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation, 13–31. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.125.02jefSearch in Google Scholar

Kääntä, Leila. 2014. From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 66. 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

Koole, Tom. 2010. Displays of epistemic access: Student responses to teacher explanations. Research on Language & Social Interaction 43(2). 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351811003737846.Search in Google Scholar

Lam, Daniel M. K. 2018. What counts as “responding”? Contingency on previous speaker contribution as a feature of interactional competence. Language Testing 35(3). 377–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218758126.Search in Google Scholar

Leyland, Christopher. 2018. Resistance as a resource for achieving consensus: Adjusting advice following competency-based resistance in L2 writing tutorials at a British University. Classroom Discourse 9(3). 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2018.1480966.Search in Google Scholar

Markee, Numa. 2008. Toward a learning behavior tracking methodology for CA-for-SLA. Applied Linguistics 29(3). 404–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm052.Search in Google Scholar

Matsumoto, Yumi. 2018. “Because we are peers, we actually understand”: Third‐party participant assistance in English as a lingua franca classroom interactions. Tesol Quarterly 52(4). 845–876. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.430.Search in Google Scholar

May, Lyn. 2011. Interactional competence in a paired speaking test: Features salient to raters. Language Assessment Quarterly 8(2). 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.565845.Search in Google Scholar

Merkel, Warren. 2018. Role reversals: A case study of dialogic interactions and feedback on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 39. 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.11.007.Search in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. 2018. Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(1). 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413878.Search in Google Scholar

Mondada, Lorenza. & Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2004. Second language acquisition as situated practice: Task accomplishment in the French second language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 88(4). 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-15-.x.Search in Google Scholar

Mutluoğlu, Arzu Kanat & Ufuk Balaman. 2023. The use of Video Enhanced Observation in video-mediated post-observation conversations on pre-service EFL teachers’ online practicum teaching. System 118. 103151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103151.Search in Google Scholar

Nanbu, Zachary & Tim Greer. 2022. Creating obstacles to progressivity: Task expansion in second language role-plays. Tesol Quarterly 57(4). 1364–1400. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3197.Search in Google Scholar

Pekarek-Doehler, Simona & Evelyne Berger. 2018. L2 interactional competence as increased ability for context-sensitive conduct: A longitudinal study of story-openings. Applied Linguistics 39(4). 555–578.Search in Google Scholar

Pekarek Doehler, Simona & Klara Skogmyr-Marian. 2022. Functional diversification and progressive routinization of a multiword expression in and for social interaction: A longitudinal L2 study. The Modern Language Journal 106. 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12758.Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of social action, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511665868.008Search in Google Scholar

Roever, Carsten & Naoki Ikeda. 2022. What scores from monologic speaking tests can(not) tell us about interactional competence. Language Testing 39(1). 7–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322211003332.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735. https://doi.org/10.2307/412243.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A Primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791208Search in Google Scholar

Seedhouse, Paul. 2005. Conversation Analysis and language learning. Language Teaching 38(4). 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444805003010.Search in Google Scholar

Seedhouse, Paul & Steve Walsh. 2010. Learning a second language through classroom interaction. In Paul Seedhouse, Steve Walsh & Chris Jenks (eds.), Conceptualising “learning” in applied linguistics, 127–146. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/9780230289772_8Search in Google Scholar

Sert, Olcay. 2019. The interplay between collaborative turn sequences and active listenership: Implications for the development of L2 interactional competence. In Rafael Salaberry & Silvia Kunitz (eds.), Teaching and testing L2 interactional competence: Bridging theory and practice, 142–166. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315177021-6Search in Google Scholar

Skovholt, Karianne. 2018. Anatomy of a teacher–student feedback encounter. Teaching and Teacher Education 69. 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.09.012.Search in Google Scholar

Ta, Binh Thanh. 2024. Collaboratively pursuing student uptake of feedback through storytelling: A conversation analytic study of interaction in team doctoral supervision. Applied Linguistics Review 15(6). 2857–2875. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0026.Search in Google Scholar

Ta, Binh Thanh & Anna Filipi. 2020. Storytelling as a resource for pursuing understanding and agreement in doctoral research supervision meetings. Journal of Pragmatics 165. 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.03.008.Search in Google Scholar

Ten Have, Paul. 2007. Doing conversation analysis, 2 edn. Los Angeles: SAGE.10.4135/9781849208895Search in Google Scholar

Tsai, Mei-Hsing & Celeste Kinginger. 2014. Giving and receiving advice in computer-mediated peer response activities. CALICO Journal 32(1). 82–112. https://doi.org/10.1558/calico.v32i1.25959.Search in Google Scholar

Vehviläinen, Sanna. 2009. Problems in the research problem: Critical feedback and resistance in academic supervision. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 53(2). 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830902757592.Search in Google Scholar

Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2002. Displaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussion. Research on Language & Social Interaction 35(4). 453–479. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3504_3.Search in Google Scholar

Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2005. Peer tutoring in a graduate writing centre: Identity, expertise, and advice resisting. Applied Linguistics 26(2). 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amh041.Search in Google Scholar

Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2007a. Complex advice acceptance as a resource for managing asymmetries. Text and Talk 27(1). 107–137. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2007.005.Search in Google Scholar

Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2007b. The multi‐functionality of accounts in advice giving. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(3). 367–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00328.x.Search in Google Scholar

Waring, Hansun Zhang. 2017. Going general as a resource for doing advising in post-observation conferences in teacher training. Journal of Pragmatics 110. 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.009.Search in Google Scholar

Waring, Hansun Zhang & Sarah Chepkirui Creider. 2021. Micro-reflection on classroom communication: A FAB-framework. Bristol: Equinox Publishing LTD.10.3138/9781781797372Search in Google Scholar

Watanabe, Aya. 2017. Developing L2 interactional competence: Increasing participation through self-selection in post-expansion sequences. Classroom Discourse 8(3). 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2017.1354310.Search in Google Scholar

Wotring, Anthony, Honglin Chen & Mark Fraser. 2023. They are talking, but is it productive? Exploring EFL students’ small group talk. Tesol Quarterly 58(1). 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3227.Search in Google Scholar

Young, Richard Frederick. 2011. Interactional competence in learning, teaching, and testing. In Eli Hinkel (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 426–443. NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Young, Richard Frederick & Elizabeth R. Miller. 2004. Learning as changing participation: Discourse roles in ESL writing conferences. The Modern Language Journal 88(4). 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.t01-16-.x.Search in Google Scholar