Naming the Principles in Democritus: An Epistemological Problem
-
Enrico Piergiacomi
Abstract
It is well known that Democritus posited two principles of reality, i. e. atoms and void, and that he gave them many names. Synonyms of atom include the terms “body”, “form” and “thing” or δέν, while void was also called “space”, “infinite” and “no-thing” or μηδέν. What usually escapes the attention of scholars is the problematic outcome that this apparently plain mode of expression raises at the epistemological level. Indeed, according to Proclus (In Plat. Crat. 16=fr. 68 B 26 DK), Democritus believed that names are not established by nature, but by convention, which may imply that they do not express the true nature of the object named. Proclus gives four proofs on his behalf, among which we find the ἰσορροπία argument. Names do not have a natural link with the objects they refer to and, therefore, do not express their inner essence, since the same thing will receive different designations and meanings, none of which fully expresses its real φύσις. Now, I will argue that, if we apply this idea to the principles, it follows that Democritus may have acknowledged that they are not fully comprehensible to human beings. The fact that both the atom and the void are assigned different names/meanings shows that their nature escapes human understanding. At the same time, I will also briefly suggest that the “ἰσορροπία argument” does not lead to skepticism. Instead, it leads to a rational dogmatism, which recognizes that atoms and void exist, are known and can be expressed through language, although no mind can fully comprehend their essence.
References
Ademollo, Francesco. 2003. “Democritus B26, on Names.” In Etymologia: Studies in Ancient Etymology, edited by Christos Nifadopoulos, 33–42. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.Suche in Google Scholar
Alfieri, Vittorio E. 1953. Atomos Idea. L‘origine del concetto dell’atomo nel pensiero greco. Firenze: Le Monnier.Suche in Google Scholar
Algra, Keimpe. 1995. Concepts of Space in GreekThought. Leiden et alii: Brill.10.1163/9789004320871Suche in Google Scholar
Andolfo, Matteo. 2001. Atomisti antichi. Testimonianze e frammenti. Milano: Bompiani.Suche in Google Scholar
Asmis, Elizabeth. 1984. Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Bailey, Cyril. 1928. The Greek Atomists and Epicurus. A Study. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1984. “Reason and Necessity in Leucippus”. In Benakis 1984, 141–158.Suche in Google Scholar
Barnes, Jonathan. 1986. The Presocratic Philosophers. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Suche in Google Scholar
Benakis, Linos G. 1984. Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Democritus, Vol. I Xanthi: International Democritean Foundation.Suche in Google Scholar
Bernabé, Alberto. 1998. “Lingüística antes de la lingüística. La génesis de la indagación sobre el lenguaje en la Grecia Antigua.” Revista Española de Lingüística 28:307–31.Suche in Google Scholar
Bertagna, Maria I. 2007. “ Democrito: la lingua e il mondo.” Elenchos 28:389–401.10.1515/elen-2007-280206Suche in Google Scholar
Bertelli, Lucio. 1980. “Per le fonti dell’antropologia di Democrito”. In Romano 1980, 527–532.Suche in Google Scholar
Bicknell, Peter J. 1967. “Parmenides’ Refutation of Motion and an Implication.” Phronesis 12:1–5.10.1163/156852867X00011Suche in Google Scholar
Brancacci, Aldo. 1986. “Les mots et les choses: la philosophie du langage chez Démocrite”. In AA.VV., Philosophie du langage et grammaire dans l’antiquité, Bruxelles: Ousia, 9–28.Suche in Google Scholar
Brancacci, Aldo. 2007. “Democritus’ Mousika.” In Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul, edited by Aldo Brancacci and Pierre-Marie Morel, 181–205. Leiden-Boston: Brill.10.1163/ej.9789004151604.i-352.41Suche in Google Scholar
Brunschwig, Jacques. 1984. “Démocrite et Xéniade”. In Benakis 1984, 109–123.Suche in Google Scholar
Calogero, Guido. 1967. Storia della logica antica. Vol. 1: l’età arcaica Roma, Bari: Laterza.Suche in Google Scholar
Cole, Thomas. 1967. Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. Cleveland: Western Reserve University.Suche in Google Scholar
Curd, Patricia. 2001. “Why Democritus Was Not a Sceptic.” In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy. 6, Before Plato, edited by John P. Anton and Anthony Preus. Albany: State University of New York Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Curd, Patricia. 2004. The Legacy of Parmenides. Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. Las Vegas: Parmenides Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Antonietta. 1976–1977. “La genesi dell’ipotesi atomistica nel pensiero di Democrito di Abdera.” Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia 19–20:377–92.Suche in Google Scholar
de Lacy, Phillip. 1958. “Οὐ Μᾶλλον and the Antecedents of Ancient Scepticism.” Phronesis 3:59–71.10.1163/156852858X00057Suche in Google Scholar
Denyer, Nicholas. 1993. Language, Thought and Falsehood in Ancient Greek Philosophy. London, New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Diano, Carlo. 1964. “Mallon Hetton e Isonomia.” In Isonomia. Studien zur Gleichheitsvorstellung im griechischen Denken, edited by Jürgen Mau, and Ernst G. Schmidt, 55–66. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.10.1515/9783112562420-004Suche in Google Scholar
Frank, Erich. 1923. Plato und die sogenannten Pythagoreer. Ein Kapitel aus der Geschichte des griechischen Geistes. Halle: Niemeyer.Suche in Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, Laura. 2007. Democrito e l’accademia. Studi sulla trasmissione dell’atomismo antico da Aristotele a Simplicio. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110912722Suche in Google Scholar
Gigon, Olof. 1987. Aristoteles. Vol. 3. Librorum deperditorum fragmenta. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110826661Suche in Google Scholar
Givone, Sergio. 1995. Storia del nulla. Roma, Bari: Laterza.Suche in Google Scholar
Graeser, Andreas. 1970. “Demokrit und die Skeptisch Formel.” Hermes 98:300–17.Suche in Google Scholar
Graeser, Andreas. 1972. The Argument of Melissus. Athens: Meletai kai Ereunai.Suche in Google Scholar
Gregory, Andrew. 2013. “Leucippus and Democritus on Like to Like and Ou Mallon.” Apeiron 46:446–68.10.1515/apeiron-2013-0021Suche in Google Scholar
Hasper, Pieter S. 1999. “The Foundations of Presocratic Atomism.” Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 17:1–14.Suche in Google Scholar
Hermann Diels, Walter Kranz. 1956. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlin: Weidmannsche.Suche in Google Scholar
Hirschle, Mauris. 1979. Sprachphilosophie und Namenmagie im Neuplatonismus: mit einem Exkurs zu Demokrit B 142. Meisenheim am Glan: Hain.Suche in Google Scholar
Joly, Henri. 1984. “Sur quelques significations “ontologiques” et “épistémologiques” de l’εἴδωλον démocritéen”. In Benakis 1984, 247–265.Suche in Google Scholar
Kirk, Geoffrey S., and Michael C. Stokes. 1960. “Parmenides’ Refutation of Motion.” Phronesis 5:1–4.10.1163/156852860X00081Suche in Google Scholar
Klowski, Joachim. 1971. “Antwortete Leukipp Melissos Oder Melissos Leukipp?”. Museum Helveticum 28:65–71.Suche in Google Scholar
Langerbeck, Hermann. 1935. Doxis Epirhysmie. Studien zu Demokrits Ethik und Erkenntnislehre. Berlin: Weidmann.Suche in Google Scholar
Leszl, Walter. 2009. I primi atomisti. Raccolta dei testi che riguardano Leucippo e Democrito. Firenze: Olschki.Suche in Google Scholar
Löbl, Rudolf. 1987. Demokrits Atomphysik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Suche in Google Scholar
Luce, John V. 1969. “An Argument of Democritus about Language.” The Classical Review 19:3–4.10.1017/S0009840X00328268Suche in Google Scholar
Luria, Salomon. 1970. Demokrit. Teksty, Perevod, Issledovanija. Leningrad: Nauka.Suche in Google Scholar
Makin, Stephen. 1993. Indifference Arguments. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Martano, Giuseppe. 1984. “La question de l’ὀρθότης τῶν ὀνομάτων dans la pensée archaïque et la solution de Démocrite: Ὀνόματα θέσει”. In Benakis 1984, 269–280.Suche in Google Scholar
Matson, Wallace. 1963. “Democritus, Fragment 156.” The Classical Quarterly 13:26–9.10.1017/S0009838800001567Suche in Google Scholar
McGibbon, Donal. 1964. “The Atomists and Melissus.” Mnemosyne 17:248–55.10.1163/156852564X00170Suche in Google Scholar
Montano, Aniello. 2014. Methodos. Aspetti dei metodi e dei processi cognitivi nella Grecia Antica. Napoli: Loffredo.Suche in Google Scholar
Morel, Pierre-Marie. 1996. Démocrite et la recherche des causes. Paris: Klincksieck.Suche in Google Scholar
Mourelatos, Alexander P.D. 2008. The Route of Parmenides. Las Vegas, Zurich, Athens: Parmenides Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
Mugler, Charles. 1956. “L’isonomie des atomistes.” Revue de philologie, de littérature et d’histoire anciennes 30:230–50.Suche in Google Scholar
Pagliaro, Antonino. 1956. “Struttura e pensiero del «Cratilo» di Platone.” In Nuovi saggi di critica semantica, edited by Antonino Pagliaro, 49–76. Firenze: D’Anna.Suche in Google Scholar
Paneris, Johannes. 1985. Demokritos: Sprachtheorie und Logos. In: AA.VV., Language and reality in Greek philosophy. Athens: Greek Philosophical Society.Suche in Google Scholar
Perilli, Lorenzo. 1997–2000. “Democr. Fr. 156 D.-K. (Δέν Vs. ἕν).” Museum Criticum 23–25:95–102.Suche in Google Scholar
Philippson, Robert. 1929. “Platons Kratylos und Demokrit.” Philologische Wochenschrift 47:923–7.Suche in Google Scholar
Pulpito, Massimo. 2014. “I tre livelli dell’ontologia parmenidea.” In Ontologie. Storie e prospettive della domanda sull’ente, a cura di Fausto Fraisopi, 19–67. Milano, Udine: Mimesis.Suche in Google Scholar
Reichenberger, Andrea. 2002. “Zum Begriff des Leeren in der Philosophie der frühen Atomisten.” Göttinger Forum für Altertumswissenschaft 5:105–22.Suche in Google Scholar
Romano, Francesco. 1989. Lezioni sul “Cratilo” di Platone. Catania: Università di Catania.Suche in Google Scholar
Rossitto, Cristina. 1980. “Perché Aristotele considera Democrito un negatore del principio di non contraddizione?” In Democrito e l’atomismo antico, a cura di Francesco Romano, 181–205. Catania: Università di Catania.Suche in Google Scholar
Salem, Jean. 1996. Démocrite. Grains de poussière dans un rayon de soleil. Paris: Vrin.Suche in Google Scholar
Sassi, Maria M. 1978. Le teorie della percezione in Democrito. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Suche in Google Scholar
Sedley, David N. 2003. Plato’s Cratylus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511482649Suche in Google Scholar
Spinelli, Emidio. 1991. “Ploutos e penie. Il pensiero economico di Democrito.” Philologus 135:290–319.10.1524/phil.1991.135.2.290Suche in Google Scholar
Spinelli, Emidio. 2010. “Presocratici scettici? Assunti genealogici nel Varro di Cicerone.” In Il quinto secolo. Studi di filosofia antica in onore di Livio Rossetti, a cura di Stefania Giombini e Flavia Marcacci, 235–45. Passignano: Aguaplano.Suche in Google Scholar
Taylor, Cristopher C.W. 1999. The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.10.1017/CCOL0521441226.009Suche in Google Scholar
Verde, Francesco. 2013. “Tuche e logismos nell’Epicureismo.” In Fate, Chance and Fortune in Ancient Thought, a cura di Francesca G. Masi e Stefano Maso, 177–97. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Suche in Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. 1991. Socrates, Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518508Suche in Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. 1993. “On the Pre-History in Diodorus.” In Studies in Greek Philosophy. Volume I: The Presocratics, edited by Gregory Vlastos and Daniel W. Graham, 351–8. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. 1994. “Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge.” In Socratic Studies, edited by Gregory Vlastos and Myles Burnyeat, 39–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511518515.003Suche in Google Scholar
Vlastos, Gregory. 2008. ““Names” of Being in Parmenides”. In Mourelatos 2008, 367–390.Suche in Google Scholar
Voelke, André-Jean. 1990. “Vide et non-être chez Leucippe et Démocrite.” Revue de théologie et de philosophie 122:341–52.Suche in Google Scholar
von Fritz, Kurt. 1963. Philosophie und sprachlicher Ausdruck bei Demokrit, Plato und Aristoteles. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Suche in Google Scholar
Wardy, Robert B. B. 1988. “Eleatic Pluralism.” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 70:126–46.10.1515/agph.1988.70.2.125Suche in Google Scholar
Warren, James. 2009. I Presocratici. Torino: Einaudi.Suche in Google Scholar
Westerink, Leendert. 1959. Damascius. Lectures on the Philebus (Wrongly Attributed to Olympiodorus). Amsterdam: Hakkert.Suche in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter Inc., Boston/Berlin
