Home Deforming a Convex Hypersurface by Anisotropic Curvature Flows
Article Open Access

Deforming a Convex Hypersurface by Anisotropic Curvature Flows

  • HongJie Ju , BoYa Li and YanNan Liu EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 2, 2020

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a fully nonlinear curvature flow of a convex hypersurface in the Euclidean 𝑛-space. This flow involves 𝑘-th elementary symmetric function for principal curvature radii and a function of support function. Under some appropriate assumptions, we prove the long-time existence and convergence of this flow. As an application, we give the existence of smooth solutions to the Orlicz–Christoffel–Minkowski problem.

MSC 2010: 35J96; 35J75; 53A15; 53A07

1 Introduction

Let M0 be a smooth, closed, strictly convex hypersurface in the Euclidean space Rn, which encloses the origin and is given by a smooth embedding X0:Sn-1→Rn. Consider a family of closed hypersurfaces {Mt} with Mt=Xⁱ(Sn-1,t), where X:Sn-1×[0,T)→Rn is a smooth map satisfying the initial value problem(1.1)

∂⁡X∂⁡t⁹(x,t)=1f⁹(Μ)âąÏƒk⁹(x,t)âąÏ†âą(⟹X,Μ⟩)ⁱ⟹X,ÎœâŸ©âąÎ·âą(t)âąÎœ-X,
X⁹(x,0)=X0⁹(x).
Here 𝑓 is a given positive and smooth function on the unit sphere Sn-1, 𝜈 is the unit outer normal vector of Mt at the point X⁹(x,t). Further, ⟹⋅,⋅⟩ is the standard inner product in Rn, 𝜑 is a positive smooth function defined in (0,+∞), 𝜂 is a scalar function to be specified later, and 𝑇 is the maximal time for which the solution exists. We use {ei⁹j}, 1≀i,j≀n-1, and ∇ for the standard metric and the Levi–Civita connection of Sn-1 respectively. Principal radii of curvature are the eigenvalues of the matrix bi⁹j:=∇i⁡∇j⁥h+ei⁹j⁹h with respect to {ei⁹j}. Moreover, σk⁹(x,t) is the 𝑘-th elementary symmetric function for principal curvature radii of Mt at X⁹(x,t) and 𝑘 is an integer with 1≀k≀n-1. In this paper, σk is normalized so that σk⁹(1,
,1)=1.

Geometric flows with speed of symmetric polynomial of the principal curvature radii of the hypersurface have been extensively studied; see e.g. [34, 8, 11, 36].

On the other hand, anisotropic curvature flows provide alternative methods to prove the existences of elliptic PDEs arising from convex geometry; see e.g. [3, 4, 5, 6, 21, 26, 27, 28, 33].

A positive homothetic self-similar solution of (1.1), if it exists, is a solution to the fully nonlinear equation

(1.2)câąÏ†âą(h)âąÏƒk⁹(x)=f⁹(x)⁹on⁹Sn-1

for some positive constant 𝑐. Here ℎ is the support function defined on Sn-1. We are concerned with the existence of smooth solutions for equation (1.2).

When k=n-1, equation (1.2) is just the smooth case of the Orlicz–Minkowski problem. The Orlicz–Minkowski problem is a basic problem in the Orlicz–Brunn–Minkowski theory in convex geometry. It is a generalization of the classical Minkowski problem which asks what are the necessary and sufficient conditions for a Borel measure on the unit sphere Sn-1 to be a multiple of the Orlicz surface area measure of a convex body in Rn. In [14], Haberl, Lutwak, Yang and Zhang studied the even case of the Orlicz–Minkowski problem. After that, the Orlicz–Minkowski problem attracted great attention from many scholars; see for example [9, 10, 19, 22, 37, 35, 39].

When Ï†âą(s)=s1-p, k=n-1, equation (1.2) reduces to the Lp-Minkowski problem, which has been extensively studied; see e.g. [2, 7, 16, 18, 20, 23, 24, 29, 30, 31, 38].

When 1≀k<n-1, equation (1.2) is the so-called Orlicz–Christoffel–Minkowski problem. For Ï†âą(s)=s1-p, 1≀k<n-1, (1.2) is known as the Lp-Christoffel–Minkowski problem and is the classical Christoffel–Minkowski problem for p=1. Under a sufficient condition on the prescribed function, existence of the solution for the classical Christoffel–Minkowski problem was given in [12].

The Lp-Christoffel–Minkowski problem is related to the problem of prescribing the 𝑘-th 𝑝-area measures. Hu, Ma and Shen [17] proved the existence of convex solutions to the Lp-Christoffel–Minkowski problem for p≄k+1 under appropriate conditions. Using the methods of geometric flows, Ivaki [21] and then Sheng and Yi [33] also gave the existence of smooth convex solutions to the Lp-Christoffel–Minkowski problem for p≄k+1. In case 1<p<k+1, Guan and Xia [13] established the existence of convex body with the prescribed 𝑘-th even 𝑝-area measures.

In this paper, we study the long-time existence and convergence of flow (1.1) for strictly convex hypersurfaces and the existence of smooth solutions to the Orlicz–Christoffel–Minkowski problem (1.2).

The scalar function η⁹(t) in (1.1) is usually used to keep Mt normalized in a certain sense; see for example [4, 21, 33]. In this paper, 𝜂 is given by

η⁹(t)=∫Sn-1h⁹f⁹(x)Ï†âą(h)⁹dx∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx,

where h⁹(⋅,t) is the support function of the convex hypersurface Mt. It will be proved in Section 2 that ∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx is non-decreasing along the flow under this choice of 𝜂.

To obtain the long-time existence of flow (1.1), we need some constraints on 𝜑.

  1. Ï†âą(s) is a positive and continuous function defined in (0,+∞) such that φ>α⁹s-k-Δ for some positive constants 𝜀 and đ›Œ for 𝑠 near 0 and Ï•âą(s)=∫0s1Ï†âą(τ)⁹dτ is unbounded as s→+∞. Here 𝑘 is the order of σk.

The main results of this paper are stated as follows.

Theorem 1

Assume M0 is a smooth, closed and strictly convex hypersurface in Rn. Suppose 𝑘 is an integer with 1≀k<n-1 and φ∈C∞ⁱ(0,+∞) satisfying (A). Moreover, for any s>0,

∂∂⁡s⁹(sⁱ∂∂⁡s⁹(logâĄÏ†âą(s)))≄0 and -a≀sⁱ∂∂⁡s⁹(logâĄÏ†âą(s))≀-1,

where 𝑎 is a positive constant. Suppose 𝑓 is a smooth function on Sn-1 such that

(k+1)ⁱf-1k+aⁱeiⁱj+(k+a)ⁱ∇i⁡∇j⁡(f-1k+a)

is positive definite. Then flow (1.1) has a unique smooth solution Mt for all times t>0. Moreover, when t→∞, a subsequence of Mt converges in C∞ to a smooth, closed, strictly convex hypersurface, whose support function is a smooth solution to equation (1.2) for some positive constant 𝑐.

When f≡1, we have the following result.

Theorem 2

Assume M0 is a smooth, closed and strictly convex hypersurface in Rn. If f≡1, φ∈C∞ⁱ(0,+∞) satisfying (A), and 𝑘 is an integer with 1≀k<n-1. Moreover, for any s>0,

∂∂⁡s⁹(sⁱ∂∂⁡s⁹(logâĄÏ†âą(s)))≄0 and sⁱ∂∂⁡s⁹(logâĄÏ†âą(s))≀-1.

Then flow (1.1) has a unique smooth solution Mt for all times t>0. Moreover, when t→∞, a subsequence of Mt converges in C∞ to a smooth, closed, strictly convex hypersurface, whose support function is a smooth solution to equation (1.2) for some positive constant 𝑐.

As an application, we have the following corollary.

Corollary 1

Under the assumptions of Theorem 1 or Theorem 2, there exists a smooth solution to equation (1.2) for some positive constant 𝑐.

From the proof of Lemma 7 in Section 3, we will see if φâ€Č⁹(s)⁹sÏ†âą(s)=a0 for some negative constant a0, then the convexity condition on 𝑓 reduces to f-1k-a0⁹ei⁹j+∇j⁡∇j⁥(f-1k-a0) being positive definite. Hence, when Ï†âą(s)=s1-p for p≄k+1 with the above condition on 𝑓, our conclusion recovers the existence results to the Lp-Christoffel–Minkowski problem which have been obtained in [17, 21, 33].

This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give some basic knowledge about flow (1.1) and evolution equations of some geometric quantities. In Section 3, the long-time existence of flow (1.1) will be obtained. First, under assumption (A), uniform positive upper and lower bounds for support functions of {Mt} are derived. Based on the bounds of support functions, we obtain the uniform bounds of principal curvatures by constructing proper auxiliary functions. The long-time existence of flow (1.1) then follows by standard arguments. In Section 4, by considering a related geometric functional, we prove that a subsequence of {Mt} converges to a smooth solution to equation (1.2), completing the proofs of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2.

2 Preliminaries

Let Rn be the 𝑛-dimensional Euclidean space, and let Sn-1 be the unit sphere in Rn. Assume 𝑀 is a smooth closed strictly convex hypersurface in Rn. Without loss of generality, we may assume that 𝑀 encloses the origin. The support function ℎ of 𝑀 is defined as h⁹(x):=maxy∈M⁡⟹y,x⟩ for all x∈Sn-1, where ⟹⋅,⋅⟩ is the standard inner product in Rn.

Denote the Gauss map of 𝑀 by ΜM. Then 𝑀 can be parametrized by the inverse Gauss map X:Sn-1→M with X⁹(x)=ΜM-1⁹(x). The support function ℎ of 𝑀 can be computed by

(2.1)h⁹(x)=⟹x,X⁹(x)⟩,x∈Sn-1.

Note that đ‘„ is just the unit outer normal of 𝑀 at X⁹(x). Differentiating (2.1), we have

∇i⁥h=⟹∇i⁥x,X⁹(x)⟩+⟹x,∇i⁥X⁹(x)⟩.

Since ∇i⁥X⁹(x) is tangent to 𝑀 at X⁹(x), we have ∇i⁥h=⟹∇i⁥x,X⁹(x)⟩. It follows that

(2.2)Xⁱ(x)=∇⁡h+hⁱx.

By differentiating (2.1) twice, the second fundamental form Aiⁱj of 𝑀 can be computed in terms of the support function (see for example [34]),

(2.3)Aiⁱj=∇iⁱj⁡h+hⁱeiⁱj,

where ∇iⁱj=∇i⁡∇j denotes the second-order covariant derivative with respect to eiⁱj. The induced metric matrix giⁱj of 𝑀 can be derived by Weingarten’s formula,

(2.4)ei⁹j=⟹∇i⁥x,∇j⁥x⟩=Ai⁹m⁹Al⁹j⁹gm⁹l.

The principal radii of curvature are the eigenvalues of the matrix bi⁹j=Ai⁹k⁹gj⁹k. When considering a smooth local orthonormal frame on Sn-1, by virtue of (2.3) and (2.4), we have

(2.5)biⁱj=Aiⁱj=∇iⁱj⁡h+hⁱήiⁱj.

We will use bi⁹j to denote the inverse matrix of bi⁹j.

From the evolution equation of X⁹(x,t) in flow (1.1), we derive the evolution equation of the corresponding support function h⁹(x,t),

(2.6)∂⁡h⁹(x,t)∂⁡t=1f⁹(x)âąÏƒk⁹(x,t)âąÏ†âą(h)⁹h⁹(x,t)⁹η⁹(t)-h⁹(x,t).

The radial function 𝜌 of 𝑀 is given by Ïâą(u):=max⁥{λ>0:λ⁹u∈M} for all u∈Sn-1. Note that Ïâą(u)⁹u∈M. From (2.2), 𝑱 and đ‘„ are related by Ïâą(u)⁹u=∇⁡h⁹(x)+h⁹(x)⁹x and ρ2=|∇⁡h|2+h2.

In the rest of the paper, we take a local orthonormal frame {e1,
,en-1} on Sn-1 such that the standard metric on Sn-1 is {ÎŽi⁹j}. Double indices always mean to sum from 1 to n-1. We denote partial derivatives âˆ‚âĄÏƒk∂⁡bi⁹j and ∂2âĄÏƒk∂⁡bp⁹qⁱ∂⁡bm⁹n by σki⁹j and σkp⁹q,m⁹n respectively. For convenience, we also write N=1f⁹(x)âąÏ†âą(h)⁹h, F=NâąÏƒk⁹η⁹(t).

Now, we can prove that the mixed volume ∫Sn-1h⁹(x,t)âąÏƒk⁹(x,t)⁹dx is non-decreasing along flow (1.1).

Lemma 1

∫ S n - 1 h ⁹ ( x , t ) ⁹ σ k ⁹ ( x , t ) ⁹ d x is non-decreasing along flow (1.1).

Proof

According to the evolution equation of ℎ in (2.6), we get

∂tâĄÏƒk=σki⁹jⁱ∂t⁥(∇i⁹j⁥h+ÎŽi⁹j⁹h)=σki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥(∂t⁥h)+σki⁹j⁹Ύi⁹jⁱ∂t⁥h=σki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥F-σki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥h+σki⁹j⁹Ύi⁹j⁹F-σki⁹j⁹Ύi⁹j⁹h=σki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥F+σki⁹j⁹Ύi⁹j⁹F-kâąÏƒk;

the last equality holds because σk is homogeneous of degree 𝑘 and σki⁹j⁹bi⁹j=kâąÏƒk. Hence

∂t⁹∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx=∫Sn-1(∂tâĄÏƒk)⁹h⁹dx+∫Sn-1σkⁱ∂t⁥h⁹d⁹x=∫Sn-1(hâąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥F+hâąÏƒki⁹j⁹Ύi⁹j⁹F-k⁹hâąÏƒk)⁹dx+∫Sn-1FâąÏƒk⁹dx-∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx=(k+1)⁹∫Sn-1FâąÏƒk⁹dx-(k+1)⁹∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx+∫Sn-1(hâąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥F-FâąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥h)⁹dx=(k+1)⁹∫Sn-1FâąÏƒk⁹dx-(k+1)⁹∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx,

where, in the last equality, we use the fact ∑i∇i⁥(σki⁹j)=0.

By Hölder’s inequality, we have

1k+1ⁱ∂t⁹∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx=∫Sn-11f⁹(x)âąÏƒk2âąÏ†âą(h)⁹h⁹η⁹dx-∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx=1∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx⁹[∫Sn-11f⁹(x)âąÏƒk2âąÏ†âą(h)⁹h⁹dx⁹∫Sn-1hÏ†âą(h)⁹f⁹(x)⁹dx-(∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx)2]≄0,

and the equality holds if and only if câąÏ†âą(h)âąÏƒk⁹(x)=f⁹(x) for some positive constant 𝑐. ∎

By flow equation (1.1), we can derive evolution equations of some geometric quantities.

Lemma 2

The following evolution equations hold along flow (1.1):

∂t⁥bi⁹j-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹qⁱ∇p⁹q⁥bi⁹j=(k+1)⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk⁹Ύi⁹j-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹q⁹Ύp⁹q⁹bi⁹j+N⁹η⁹(t)⁹(σki⁹p⁹bj⁹p-σkj⁹p⁹bi⁹p)
+N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹q,m⁹nⁱ∇j⁥bp⁹qⁱ∇i⁥bm⁹n+η⁹(t)⁹(σkⁱ∇i⁹j⁥N+∇jâĄÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥N+∇iâĄÏƒkⁱ∇j⁥N)-bi⁹j,
∂t⁥bi⁹j-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹qⁱ∇p⁹q⁥bi⁹j=-(k+1)⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk⁹bi⁹p⁹bj⁹p+N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹q⁹Ύp⁹q⁹bi⁹j-N⁹η⁹(t)⁹bi⁹p⁹bj⁹q⁹(σkr⁹p⁹br⁹q-σkr⁹q⁹br⁹p)
-N⁹η⁹(t)⁹bi⁹l⁹bj⁹s⁹(σkp⁹q,m⁹n+2âąÏƒkp⁹m⁹bn⁹q)ⁱ∇l⁥bp⁹qⁱ∇s⁥bm⁹n
-η⁹(t)⁹bi⁹p⁹bj⁹q⁹(σkⁱ∇i⁹j⁥N+∇jâĄÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥N+∇iâĄÏƒkⁱ∇j⁥N)+bi⁹j,
∂t⁥(ρ22)-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥(ρ22)=(k+1)⁹h⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk-ρ2+η⁹(t)âąÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥hⁱ∇i⁥N-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹bm⁹i⁹bm⁹j.

Proof

From (1.1),

∂t⁡∇i⁹j⁥h=∇i⁹j⁥(∂t⁥h)=η⁹(t)⁹(σkⁱ∇i⁹j⁥N+∇jâĄÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥N+∇iâĄÏƒkⁱ∇j⁥N)+N⁹η⁹(t)ⁱ∇i⁹jâĄÏƒk-hi⁹j,

where ∇i⁹jâĄÏƒk=σkp⁹q,m⁹nⁱ∇j⁥bp⁹qⁱ∇i⁥bm⁹n+σkp⁹qⁱ∇i⁹j⁥bp⁹q. By the Gauss equation,

∇iⁱj⁡bpⁱq=∇pⁱq⁡biⁱj+ήiⁱjⁱ∇pⁱq⁡h-ήpⁱqⁱ∇iⁱj⁡h+ήiⁱqⁱ∇pⁱj⁡h-ήpⁱjⁱ∇iⁱq⁡h.

Hence

∂t⁥hi⁹j=N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹qⁱ∇p⁹q⁥bi⁹j+k⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk⁹Ύi⁹j-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹q⁹Ύp⁹q⁹bi⁹j+N⁹η⁹(t)⁹(σki⁹p⁹bj⁹p-σkj⁹p⁹bi⁹p)+N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹q,m⁹nⁱ∇j⁥bp⁹qⁱ∇i⁥bm⁹n+η⁹(t)⁹(σkⁱ∇i⁹j⁥N+∇jâĄÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥N+∇iâĄÏƒkⁱ∇j⁥N)-hi⁹j.

This together with (2.5) gives the evolution equation of biⁱj. The evolution equation of biⁱj then follows from ∂t⁡biⁱj=-biⁱmⁱblⁱjⁱ∂t⁡bmⁱl. For more details of computations about the evolution equations of biⁱj and biⁱj, one can refer to [8, 34].

Recalling that ρ2=h2+|∇⁡h|2, we have

∂t⁥(ρ22)-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥(ρ22)=hⁱ∂t⁥h+∇i⁥hⁱ∇i⁡∂t⁥h-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹(hⁱ∇i⁹j⁥h+∇i⁥hⁱ∇j⁥h+∇m⁥hⁱ∇j⁡∇m⁹i⁥h+∇m⁹i⁥hⁱ∇m⁹j⁥h)=hⁱ∂t⁥h+∇i⁥hⁱ∇i⁥(N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk-h)-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹[∇i⁥hⁱ∇j⁥h+∇m⁥hⁱ∇j⁥(bm⁹i-h⁹Ύm⁹i)]-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹h⁹(bi⁹j-h⁹Ύi⁹j)-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹(bm⁹i-h⁹Ύm⁹i)⁹(bm⁹j-h⁹Ύm⁹j)=(k+1)⁹h⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk-ρ2+η⁹(t)âąÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥hⁱ∇i⁥N-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹bm⁹i⁹bm⁹j.∎

3 The Long-Time Existence of the Flow

In this section, we will give a priori estimates about support functions and curvatures to obtain the long-time existence of flow (1.1) under assumptions of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2.

In the rest of this paper, we assume that M0 is a smooth, closed, strictly convex hypersurface in Rn and h:Sn-1×[0,T)→R is a smooth solution to the evolution equation (2.6) with the initial h⁹(⋅,0) the support function of M0. Here 𝑇 is the maximal time for which the solution exists. Let Mt be the convex hypersurface determined by h⁹(⋅,t), and let Ïâą(⋅,t) be the corresponding radial function.

We first give the uniform positive upper and lower bounds of h⁹(⋅,t) and Ïâą(u,t) for t∈[0,T).

Lemma 3

Let ℎ be a smooth solution of (2.6) on Sn-1×[0,T), 𝑓 a positive, smooth function on Sn-1 and φ∈C∞ⁱ(0,+∞) a decreasing function satisfying (A). Then

1C≀h⁹(x,t)≀C,1Câ‰€Ïâą(u,t)≀C,

where đ¶ is a positive constant independent of 𝑡.

Proof

Let J⁹(t)=∫Sn-1Ï•âą(h⁹(x,t))⁹f⁹(x)⁹dx. We claim that J⁹(t) is unchanged along flow (1.1). It is because

Jâ€Č⁹(t)=∫Sn-1ϕâ€Č⁹(h)ⁱ∂t⁥h⁹f⁹(x)⁹dx=∫Sn-1f⁹(x)Ï†âą(h)ⁱ∂t⁥h⁹d⁹x=∫Sn-1f⁹(x)Ï†âą(h)⁹(1f⁹(x)âąÏƒk⁹(x)âąÏ†âą(h)⁹h⁹η⁹(t)-h)⁹dx=∫Sn-1σk⁹(x)⁹h⁹η⁹(t)⁹dx-∫Sn-1hÏ†âą(h)⁹f⁹(x)⁹dx=0.

For each t∈[0,T), suppose that the maximum of radial function Ïâą(⋅,t) is attained at some ut∈Sn-1. Let

Rt=maxu∈Sn-1âĄÏâą(u,t)=Ïâą(ut,t)

for some ut∈Sn-1. By the definition of support function, we have h⁹(x,t)≄Rtⁱ⟹x,ut⟩ for all x∈Sn-1. Denote the hemisphere containing ut by Sut+={x∈Sn-1:⟹x,ut⟩>0}. Since ϕâ€Č⁹(h)=1Ï†âą(h)>0 implies that Ï•âą(h) is strictly increasing about ℎ, we have

J⁹(0)=J⁹(t)≄∫Sut+Ï•âą(h⁹(x,t))⁹f⁹(x)⁹dx≄∫Sut+Ï•âą(Rtⁱ⟹x,ut⟩)⁹f⁹(x)⁹dx≄fmin⁹∫Sut+Ï•âą(Rtⁱ⟹x,ut⟩)⁹dx=fmin⁹∫S+Ï•âą(Rt⁹x1)⁹dx,

where S+={x∈Sn-1:x1>0}.

Denote S1={x∈Sn-1:x1≄12}. Then

J⁹(0)≄fmin⁹∫S1Ï•âą(Rt2)⁹dx=fminâąÏ•âą(Rt2)⁹|S1|,

which implies that Ï•âą(Rt2) is uniformly bounded from above. By assumption (A), Ï•âą(s) is strictly increasing and tends to +∞ as s→+∞. Thus Rt is uniformly bounded from above.

Now we can prove that η⁹(t) has a positive lower bound. Since mixed volumes are monotonic increasing (see [32, page 282]), we have, for each t∈[0,T),

hmink+1⁹(t)≀∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dxωn-1≀hmaxk+1⁹(t),

here hmin⁹(t)=minx∈Sn-1⁥h⁹(x,t), and hmax⁹(t)=maxx∈Sn-1⁥h⁹(x,t).

This together with Lemma 1 and the upper bound of ℎ implies that there exist positive constants c1 and c2 such that

∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx≀c1 and hmax⁹(t)≄c2.

Recalling the definition of η⁹(t) and noticing that 1Ï†âą(s) is an increasing function, we have

η⁹(t)=∫Sn-1h⁹f⁹(x)Ï†âą(h)⁹dx∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx≄1c1⁹∫Sut+h⁹f⁹(x)Ï†âą(h)⁹dx≄1c1⁹∫Sut+Rtⁱ⟹x,utâŸ©âąfmin⁹1Ï†âą(Rtⁱ⟹x,ut⟩)⁹dx=1c1⁹fmin⁹∫S+Rt⁹x1⁹1Ï†âą(Rt⁹x1)⁹dx≄1c1⁹fmin⁹|S1|⁹12⁹Rt⁹1Ï†âą(12⁹Rt)≄c3,

where c3 is a positive constant independent of 𝑡.

Suppose the minimum of h⁹(x,t) is attained at a point (xt,t). At (xt,t), ∇i⁹j⁥h is non-negative. It follows that σk⁹(xt,t)≄hmink⁹(t). Then, in the sense of the lim inf of a difference quotient (see [15]), we have

∂⁡hmin⁹(t)∂⁡t≄1fmax⁹hmin⁹(t)⁹[η⁹(t)⁹hmink⁹(t)âąÏ†âą(hmin⁹(t))-f⁹(x)]≄1fmax⁹hmin⁹(t)⁹[c3⁹hmink⁹(t)âąÏ†âą(hmin⁹(t))-fmax].

If Ï†âą(s)>α⁹s-k-Δ for some positive constant 𝜀 for 𝑠 near 0, then

∂⁡hmin⁹(t)∂⁡t≄1fmax⁹hmin⁹(t)⁹(hmin-Δ⁹(t)⁹α⁹c3-fmax).

The right hand of the above inequality is positive for hminⁱ(t) small enough, and the lower bound of hminⁱ(t) follows from the maximum principle in [15]. ∎

By the equality ρ2=h2+|∇⁡h|2, we can obtain the gradient estimate of the support function from Lemma 3.

Corollary 2

Under the assumptions of Lemma 3, we have

|∇⁡h⁹(x,t)|≀C for all⁹(x,t)∈Sn-1×[0,T),

where đ¶ is a positive constant depending only on constants in Lemma 3.

The uniform bounds of η⁹(t) can be derived from Lemmas 1 and 3.

Lemma 4

Under the assumptions of Lemma 3, η⁹(t) is uniformly bounded above and below from zero.

Proof

In term of the proof of Lemma 3, η⁹(t) has uniform positive lower bound. From Lemma 1, we know that ∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx is monotonic decreasing about 𝑡, which gives a positive lower bound on ∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx. This together with the uniform bounds of h⁹(x,t) implies that η⁹(t) is bounded from above. ∎

To obtain the long-time existence of flow (1.1), we need to establish the uniform bounds on principal curvatures. By Lemma 3, for any t∈[0,T), h⁹(⋅,t) always ranges within a bounded interval Iâ€Č=[1C,C], where đ¶ is the constant in Lemma 3. First, we give the estimates of σk.

Lemma 5

Under the assumptions of Lemma 3, σk⁹(x,t)≄C for all (x,t)∈Sn-1×[0,T), where đ¶ is a positive constant independent of 𝑡.

Proof

Consider the auxiliary function Q=log⁥M-AâąÏ22, where M=NâąÏƒk=1f⁹(x)âąÏ†âą(h)⁹hâąÏƒk and 𝐮 is a positive constant to be determined later. The evolution equation of 𝑀 is given by

∂t⁥M=Nⁱ∂tâĄÏƒk+σkⁱ∂t⁥N=N⁹(σki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥F+σki⁹j⁹Ύi⁹j⁹F-kâąÏƒk)+Mh⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)⁹(F-h)=NâąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥F+NâąÏƒki⁹j⁹Ύi⁹j⁹F-k⁹M+M2h⁹η⁹(t)⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)-M⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)=N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥M+M⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹Ύi⁹j-M⁹(k+1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+M2h⁹η⁹(t)⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ).

It is easy to compute

∇i⁥Q=∇i⁥MM-Aⁱ∇i⁥(ρ22),∇i⁹j⁥Q=∇i⁹j⁥MM-1M2ⁱ∇i⁥Mⁱ∇j⁥M-Aⁱ∇i⁹j⁥(ρ22).

Due to the evolution equation of ρ22 in Lemma 2, the evolution equation of 𝑄 is

∂t⁥Q-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥Q=1M2⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁥Mⁱ∇j⁥M+N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹Ύi⁹j-(k+1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+Mh⁹η⁹(t)⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)-(k+1)⁹A⁹h⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk+AâąÏ2-A⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥hⁱ∇i⁥N+A⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹bm⁹i⁹bm⁹j.

For fixed 𝑡, at a point where 𝑄 attains its spatial minimum, we have

∂t⁥Q≄AâąÏ2-(k+1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+Mh⁹η⁹(t)⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)-(k+1)⁹A⁹h⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk-A⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥hⁱ∇i⁥N=12⁹AâąÏ2-(k+1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+1h⁹eQ+AâąÏ22⁹η⁹(t)⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+A⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk⁹(ρ22⁹eQ+AâąÏ22⁹η⁹(t)-h⁹(k+1)-1Nⁱ∇i⁥hⁱ∇i⁥N).

Now we choose A>2ρ2⁹(k+1). Notice that 𝜑 is a monotonic decreasing, positive function and we have obtained uniform bounds of ℎ, 𝜌, |∇⁡h| and η⁹(t). If 𝑄 is negatively large enough, the right-hand side is positive, and the lower bound of 𝑄 follows. ∎

Lemma 6

Under the assumptions of Lemma 3, σk≀C for all (x,t)∈Sn-1×[0,T), where đ¶ is a positive constant independent of 𝑡.

Proof

By Lemma 3, there exists a positive constant đ” such that B<ρ2<1B for all t>0. Define

P⁹(x,t)=Ï†âąÏƒkf⁹(1-BâąÏ22)=Mh⁹11-BâąÏ22.

By the evolution equation of 𝑀 in Lemma 5, we have

∂t⁥Mh-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥Mh=-Mh⁹(k+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+M2h2⁹η⁹(t)⁹(k+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+2⁹Nh⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁥hⁱ∇j⁥Mh.

Hence

∂t⁥P-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁹j⁥P=11-BâąÏ22⁹[-Mh⁹(k+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+M2h2⁹η⁹(t)⁹(k+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+2⁹Nh⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇i⁥hⁱ∇j⁥Mh]+M⁹Bh⁹(1-BâąÏ22)2⁹[(k+1)⁹N⁹h⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk-ρ2+η⁹(t)âąÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥hⁱ∇i⁥N-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹j⁹bm⁹i⁹bm⁹j]-2⁹B1-BâąÏ22⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒki⁹jⁱ∇iâĄÏ22ⁱ∇j⁥P.

At a point where Pⁱ(⋅,t) attains its maximum, we have

∇j⁥Mh=-Mh⁹Bⁱ∇jâĄÏ221-BâąÏ22=-Mh⁹B⁹bj⁹m⁹hm1-BâąÏ22.

Due to the inverse concavity of (σk)1k, we have from [1, Lemma 5], ((σk)1k)i⁹j⁹bi⁹m⁹bj⁹m≄(σk)2k, which means σki⁹j⁹bi⁹m⁹bj⁹m≄k⁹(σk)1+1k. Then, at the point where P⁹(⋅,t) attains its maximum, we have

∂t⁥P≀11-BâąÏ22⁹[-Mh⁹(k+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+M2h2⁹η⁹(t)⁹(k+φâ€Č⁹hφ)]+Mh⁹B(1-BâąÏ22)2⁹[(k+1)⁹N⁹h⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk-ρ2+η⁹(t)âąÏƒkⁱ∇i⁥hⁱ∇i⁥N-k⁹N⁹η⁹(t)⁹(σk)1+1k].

From Lemmas 3 and 4, we have ∂t⁥P≀c1⁹P+c2⁹P2-c3⁹P2+1k. By the maximum principle, we see that P⁹(x,t) is uniformly bounded from above. The upper bound of σk follows from the uniform bounds on ℎ and 𝜌. ∎

Now we can derive the upper bounds of principal curvatures Își⁹(x,t) of Mt for i=1,
,n-1.

Lemma 7

Under the assumptions of Theorem 1, we have Își≀C for all (x,t)∈Sn-1×[0,T), where đ¶ is a positive constant independent of 𝑡.

Proof

By rotation, we assume that the maximal eigenvalue of biⁱj at 𝑡 is attained at point xt in the direction of the unit vector e1∈TxtⁱSn-1. We also choose the orthonormal vector field such that biⁱj is diagonal. By the evolution equation of biⁱj in Lemma 2, we get

∂t⁥b11h-N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹qⁱ∇p⁹q⁥b11h=2h⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹qⁱ∇p⁥b11hⁱ∇q⁥h+Nh2⁹η⁹(t)⁹b11âąÏƒkp⁹qⁱ∇p⁹q⁥h-(k+1)⁹Nh⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk⁹(b11)2+Nh⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹q⁹Ύp⁹q⁹b11-Nh⁹η⁹(t)⁹(b11)2⁹(σkp⁹q,m⁹n+2âąÏƒkp⁹m⁹bn⁹q)ⁱ∇1⁥bp⁹qⁱ∇1⁥bm⁹n-η⁹(t)h⁹(b11)2⁹(∇11⁥NâąÏƒk+2ⁱ∇1âĄÏƒkⁱ∇1⁥N)-b11h2⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk+2⁹b11h=2h⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒkp⁹qⁱ∇p⁥b11hⁱ∇q⁥h-(k+1)⁹Nh⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk⁹(b11)2-Nh⁹η⁹(t)⁹(b11)2⁹(σkp⁹q,m⁹n+2âąÏƒkp⁹m⁹bn⁹q)ⁱ∇1⁥bp⁹qⁱ∇1⁥bm⁹n-η⁹(t)h⁹(b11)2⁹(∇11⁥NâąÏƒk+2ⁱ∇1âĄÏƒkⁱ∇1⁥N)+(k-1)⁹b11h2⁹N⁹η⁹(t)âąÏƒk+2⁹b11h.

According to inverse concavity of (σk)1k, we obtain, by [34] or [1],

(σkp⁹q,m⁹n+2âąÏƒkp⁹m⁹bn⁹q)ⁱ∇1⁥bp⁹qⁱ∇1⁥bm⁹n≄k+1k⁹(∇1âĄÏƒk)2σk.

On the other hand, by the Schwartz inequality, the following inequality holds:

2⁹|∇1âĄÏƒkⁱ∇1⁥N|≀k+1k⁹N⁹(∇1âĄÏƒk)2σk+kk+1âąÏƒk⁹(∇1⁥N)2N.

Hence we have, at (xt,t),

∂t⁥b11h≀-(b11)2hâąÏƒk⁹η⁹(t)⁹[∇11⁥N-kk+1⁹(∇1⁥N)2N+(k+1)⁹N+(1-k)⁹N⁹b11h]+2⁹b11h.

Let 𝜏 be the arc-length of the great circle passing through xt with the unit tangent vector e1. Notice that

∇11⁥N-kk+1⁹(∇1⁥N)2N+(k+1)⁹N=(k+1)⁹Nkk+1⁹(N1k+1+(N1k+1)Ï„âąÏ„).

Since

Nτ=(f-1)Ï„âąÏ†âąh+f-1âąÏ†âąhÏ„âą(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ),
NÏ„âąÏ„=(f-1)Ï„âąÏ„âąÏ†âąh+2⁹(f-1)Ï„âąÏ†âąhÏ„âą(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+f-1âąÏ†â€Č⁹hτ2⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+f-1âąÏ†âąhÏ„âąÏ„âą(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+f-1âąÏ†âąhτ2⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)â€Č;
here f-1 is 1f.

We have by direct computations

1+N-1k+1⁹(N1k+1)Ï„âąÏ„=1+1k+1⁹N-1⁹NÏ„âąÏ„-k(k+1)2⁹N-2⁹Nτ2=1+1k+1⁹f⁹(f-1)Ï„âąÏ„+2⁹f(k+1)⁹h⁹(f-1)Ï„âąhÏ„âą(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+φâ€Č(k+1)âąÏ†âąh⁹hτ2⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+hÏ„âąÏ„(k+1)⁹h⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+hτ2(k+1)⁹h⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)â€Č-k(k+1)2⁹f2⁹(f-1)τ2-2⁹k⁹f(k+1)2⁹h⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)⁹(f-1)Ï„âąhτ-k⁹hτ2(k+1)2⁹h2⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)2=1+1k+1⁹f⁹(f-1)Ï„âąÏ„+2⁹f(k+1)2⁹h⁹(f-1)Ï„âąhÏ„âą(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+hÏ„âąÏ„(k+1)⁹h⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)+hτ2(k+1)⁹h⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)â€Č-k(k+1)2⁹f2⁹(f-1)τ2+hτ2(k+1)2⁹h2⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)⁹(φâ€Č⁹hφ-k)=1+φâ€Č⁹hφk+1⁹hÏ„âąÏ„+hh+hτ2(k+1)⁹h⁹(1+φâ€Č⁹hφ)â€Č-1+φâ€Č⁹hφh⁹(k+1)2⁹f⁹[hÏ„âą(k-φâ€Č⁹hφf⁹h)12-(f-1)Ï„âą(h⁹fk-φâ€Č⁹hφ)12]2+1k+1⁹[(k-φâ€Č⁹hφ)-(f-1)τ2⁹f2⁹(kk+1+1k+1⁹1+φâ€Č⁹hφφâ€Č⁹hφ-k)+(f-1)Ï„âąÏ„âąf]≄1+φâ€Č⁹hφk+1⁹hÏ„âąÏ„+hh+1k+1⁹[(k-φâ€Č⁹hφ)-(f-1)τ2⁹f2⁹(kk+1+1k+1⁹1+φâ€Č⁹hφφâ€Č⁹hφ-k)+(f-1)Ï„âąÏ„âąf],

where, in the last inequality, we use the conditions φâ€Č⁹hφ≀-1 and (φâ€Č⁹hφ)â€Č≄0. Since

(k+1)⁹f-1k+a⁹ei⁹j+(k+a)⁹(f-1k+a)i⁹j

is positive definite and -a≀φâ€Č⁹hφ≀-1, thus we can estimate

(k-φâ€Č⁹hφ)-(f-1)τ2⁹f2⁹k-φâ€Č⁹hφ-1k-φâ€Č⁹hφ+(f-1)Ï„âąÏ„âąf≄k+1-(f-1)τ2⁹f2⁹k+a-1k+a+(f-1)Ï„âąÏ„âąf=k+1+(k+a)⁹f1k+a⁹(f-1k+a)Ï„âąÏ„=f1k+a⁹[(k+1)⁹f-1k+a+(k+a)⁹(f-1k+a)Ï„âąÏ„]≄cf,

where cf is a positive constant depending on 𝑓 and the minimal eigenvalue of (k+1)ⁱf-1k+aⁱeiⁱj+(k+a)ⁱ(f-1k+a)iⁱj.

Now we can derive

∂t⁥b11h≀-(b11h)2⁹NâąÏƒk⁹η⁹(t)⁹(cf⁹h+(2-a-k)⁹b11)+2⁹b11h.

By the uniform bounds on ℎ, 𝑓, 𝜂 and σk, we conclude

∂t⁥b11h≀-c1⁹(b11h)2+c2⁹b11h.

Here c1 and c2 are positive constants independent of 𝑡. The maximum principle then gives the upper bound of b11, and the result follows. ∎

When f≡1, it can be seen from the proof of Lemma 7 that the conditions on 𝑓 and the lower bound of φâ€Č⁹hφ can be removed.

Corollary 3

Under the assumptions of Theorem 2, we have Își≀C for all (x,t)∈Sn-1×[0,T), where đ¶ is a positive constant independent of 𝑡.

Combining Lemma 5, Lemma 6 and Lemma 7, we see that the principal curvatures of Mt have uniform positive upper and lower bounds. This together with Lemma 3 and Corollary 2 implies that the evolution equation (2.6) is uniformly parabolic on any finite time interval. Thus the result of [25] and the standard parabolic theory show that the smooth solution of (2.6) exists for all time. And by these estimates again, a subsequence of Mt converges in C∞ to a positive, smooth, strictly convex hypersurface M∞ in Rn. To complete the proofs of Theorem 1 and Theorem 2, it only needs to be checked that the support function of M∞ satisfies equation (1.2).

4 Convergence of the Flow

By Lemma 1, Lemma 3 and Lemma 6, the functional

V⁹(t)=∫Sn-1h⁹(x,t)âąÏƒk⁹(x,t)⁹dx

is non-decreasing along the flow, and V⁹(t)≀C for all t≄0. This tells that

∫0tVâ€Č⁹(t)⁹dt=V⁹(t)-V⁹(0)≀V⁹(t)≀C,

which leads to ∫0∞Vâ€Č⁹(t)⁹dt≀C. This implies that there exists a subsequence of times tj→∞ such that Vâ€Č⁹(tj)→0 as tj→∞.

By Lemma 1, we have

(k+1)⁹Vâ€Č⁹(tj)⁹V⁹(tj)=∫Sn-11f⁹(x)âąÏƒk2⁹(x)⁹hâąÏ†âą(h)⁹dx⁹∫Sn-1hÏ†âą(h)⁹f⁹(x)⁹dx-(∫Sn-1hâąÏƒk⁹dx)2.

Since ℎ and σk have uniform positive upper and lower bounds, by passing to the limit, we obtain

∫Sn-11f⁹(x)âąÏƒk~2⁹(x)âąÏ†âą(h~)⁹h~⁹dx⁹∫Sn-1h~Ï†âą(h~)⁹f⁹(x)⁹dx=(∫Sn-1h~âąÏƒk~⁹dx)2,

where σk~ and h~ are the 𝑘-th elementary symmetric function for principal curvature radii and the support function of M∞. According to the equality condition for the Hölder inequality, there exists a constant c≄0 such that câąÏ†âą(h~)âąÏƒk~⁹(x)=f on Sn-1. Noticing that h~ and σk~ have positive upper and lower bounds, 𝑐 should be positive. The proofs of Theorems 1 and 2 are finished.

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11871432

Award Identifier / Grant number: 11871102

Award Identifier / Grant number: 12071017

Award Identifier / Grant number: 1172005

Funding statement: This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (11871432, 11871102 and 12071017) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (1172005).

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for helpful suggestions.

  1. Communicated by: Guozhen Lu

References

[1] B. Andrews, J. McCoy and Y. Zheng, Contracting convex hypersurfaces by curvature, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 47 (2013), no. 3–4, 611–665. 10.1007/s00526-012-0530-3Search in Google Scholar

[2] K. J. Böröczky, E. Lutwak, D. Yang and G. Zhang, The logarithmic Minkowski problem, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 26 (2013), no. 3, 831–852. 10.1090/S0894-0347-2012-00741-3Search in Google Scholar

[3] P. Bryan, M. N. Ivaki and J. Scheuer, A unified flow approach to smooth, even Lp-Minkowski problems, Anal. PDE 12 (2019), no. 2, 259–280. 10.2140/apde.2019.12.259Search in Google Scholar

[4] C.-Q. Chen, Y. Huang and Y.-M. Zhao, Smooth solutions to the Lp dual Minkowski problem, Math. Ann. 373 (2019), no. 3–4, 953–976. 10.1007/s00208-018-1727-3Search in Google Scholar

[5] H. Chen and Q.-R. Li, The Lp dual Minkowski problem and related parabolic flows, preprint. Search in Google Scholar

[6] K.-S. Chou and X.-J. Wang, A logarithmic Gauss curvature flow and the Minkowski problem, Ann. Inst. H. PoincarĂ© Anal. Non LinĂ©aire 17 (2000), no. 6, 733–751. 10.1016/s0294-1449(00)00053-6Search in Google Scholar

[7] K.-S. Chou and X.-J. Wang, The Lp-Minkowski problem and the Minkowski problem in centroaffine geometry, Adv. Math. 205 (2006), no. 1, 33–83. 10.1016/j.aim.2005.07.004Search in Google Scholar

[8] B. Chow and D.-H. Tsai, Expansion of convex hypersurfaces by nonhomogeneous functions of curvature, Asian J. Math. 1 (1997), no. 4, 769–784. 10.4310/AJM.1997.v1.n4.a7Search in Google Scholar

[9] R. J. Gardner, D. Hug, W. Weil, S. Xing and D. Ye, General volumes in the Orlicz–Brunn–Minkowski theory and a related Minkowski problem I, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58 (2019), no. 1, Paper No. 12. 10.1007/s00526-018-1449-0Search in Google Scholar

[10] R. J. Gardner, D. Hug, S. Xing and D. Ye, General volumes in the Orlicz–Brunn–Minkowski theory and a related Minkowski problem II, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59 (2020), no. 1, Paper No. 15. 10.1007/s00526-019-1657-2Search in Google Scholar

[11] C. Gerhardt, Non-scale-invariant inverse curvature flows in Euclidean space, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 49 (2014), no. 1–2, 471–489. 10.1007/s00526-012-0589-xSearch in Google Scholar

[12] P.-F. Guan and X.-N. Ma, The Christoffel–Minkowski problem. I. Convexity of solutions of a Hessian equation, Invent. Math. 151 (2003), no. 3, 553–577. 10.1007/s00222-002-0259-2Search in Google Scholar

[13] P.-F. Guan and C. Xia, Lp Christoffel–Minkowski problem: The case 1<p<k+1, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 57 (2018), no. 2, Paper No. 69. 10.1007/s00526-018-1341-ySearch in Google Scholar

[14] C. Haberl, E. Lutwak, D. Yang and G. Zhang, The even Orlicz Minkowski problem, Adv. Math. 224 (2010), no. 6, 2485–2510. 10.1016/j.aim.2010.02.006Search in Google Scholar

[15] R. S. Hamilton, Four-manifolds with positive curvature operator, J. Differential Geom. 24 (1986), no. 2, 153–179. 10.4310/jdg/1214440433Search in Google Scholar

[16] Y. He, Q.-R. Li and X.-J. Wang, Multiple solutions of the Lp-Minkowski problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 55 (2016), no. 5, Article ID 117. 10.1007/s00526-016-1063-ySearch in Google Scholar

[17] C. Hu, X.-N. Ma and C. Shen, On the Christoffel–Minkowski problem of Firey’s 𝑝-sum, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 21 (2004), no. 2, 137–155. 10.1007/s00526-003-0250-9Search in Google Scholar

[18] Y. Huang, J. Liu and L. Xu, On the uniqueness of Lp-Minkowski problems: The constant 𝑝-curvature case in R3, Adv. Math. 281 (2015), 906–927. 10.1016/j.aim.2015.02.021Search in Google Scholar

[19] Y. Huang, E. Lutwak, D. Yang and G. Zhang, Geometric measures in the dual Brunn–Minkowski theory and their associated Minkowski problems, Acta Math. 216 (2016), no. 2, 325–388. 10.1007/s11511-016-0140-6Search in Google Scholar

[20] D. Hug, E. Lutwak, D. Yang and G. Zhang, On the Lp Minkowski problem for polytopes, Discrete Comput. Geom. 33 (2005), no. 4, 699–715. 10.1007/s00454-004-1149-8Search in Google Scholar

[21] M. N. Ivaki, Deforming a hypersurface by principal radii of curvature and support function, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 58 (2019), no. 1, 2133–2165. 10.1007/s00526-018-1462-3Search in Google Scholar

[22] H.-Y. Jian and J. Lu, Existence of solutions to the Orlicz–Minkowski problem, Adv. Math. 344 (2019), 262–288. 10.1016/j.aim.2019.01.004Search in Google Scholar

[23] H.-Y. Jian, J. Lu and X.-J. Wang, Nonuniqueness of solutions to the Lp-Minkowski problem, Adv. Math. 281 (2015), 845–856. 10.1016/j.aim.2015.05.010Search in Google Scholar

[24] H.-Y. Jian, J. Lu and G. Zhu, Mirror symmetric solutions to the centro-affine Minkowski problem, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 55 (2016), no. 2, Article ID 41. 10.1007/s00526-016-0976-9Search in Google Scholar

[25] N. V. Krylov and M. V. Safonov, A property of the solutions of parabolic equations with measurable coefficients, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 44 (1980), no. 1, 161–175, 239. 10.1070/IM1981v016n01ABEH001283Search in Google Scholar

[26] Q.-R. Li, W. Sheng and X.-J. Wang, Flow by Gauss curvature to the Aleksandrov and dual Minkowski problems, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 22 (2020), no. 3, 893–923. 10.4171/JEMS/936Search in Google Scholar

[27] Y.-N. Liu and J. Lu, A flow method for the dual Orlicz–Minkowski problem, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 373 (2020), no. 8, 5833–5853. 10.1090/tran/8130Search in Google Scholar

[28] Y.-N. Liu and J. Lu, A generalized Gauss curvature flow related to the Orlicz–Minkowski problem, preprint (2020), https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.02376. 10.29007/qwpkSearch in Google Scholar

[29] J. Lu, Nonexistence of maximizers for the functional of the centroaffine Minkowski problem, Sci. China Math. 61 (2018), no. 3, 511–516. 10.1007/s11425-016-0539-xSearch in Google Scholar

[30] J. Lu and X.-J. Wang, Rotationally symmetric solutions to the Lp-Minkowski problem, J. Differential Equations 254 (2013), no. 3, 983–1005. 10.1016/j.jde.2012.10.008Search in Google Scholar

[31] E. Lutwak, The Brunn–Minkowski–Firey theory. I. Mixed volumes and the Minkowski problem, J. Differential Geom. 38 (1993), no. 1, 131–150. 10.4310/jdg/1214454097Search in Google Scholar

[32] R. Schneider, Convex Bodies: the Brunn–Minkowski Theory, Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications 151, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[33] W.-M. Sheng and C.-H. Yi, A class of anisotropic expanding curvature flow, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A 40 (2020), 2017–2035. 10.3934/dcds.2020104Search in Google Scholar

[34] J. I. E. Urbas, An expansion of convex hypersurfaces, J. Differential Geom. 33 (1991), no. 1, 91–125. 10.4310/jdg/1214446031Search in Google Scholar

[35] D. Xi, H. Jin and G. Leng, The Orlicz Brunn–Minkowski inequality, Adv. Math. 260 (2014), 350–374. 10.1016/j.aim.2014.02.036Search in Google Scholar

[36] C. Xia, Inverse anisotropic curvature flow from convex hypersurfaces, J. Geom. Anal. 27 (2017), no. 3, 2131–2154. 10.1007/s12220-016-9755-2Search in Google Scholar

[37] Y.-J. Sun and Y.-M. Long, The planar Orlicz Minkowski problem in the L1-sense, Adv. Math. 281 (2015), 1364–1383. 10.1016/j.aim.2015.03.032Search in Google Scholar

[38] G. Zhu, The logarithmic Minkowski problem for polytopes, Adv. Math. 262 (2014), 909–931. 10.1016/j.aim.2014.06.004Search in Google Scholar

[39] D. Zou and G. Xiong, Orlicz–John ellipsoids, Adv. Math. 265 (2014), 132–168. 10.1016/j.aim.2014.07.034Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-08-07
Revised: 2020-09-13
Accepted: 2020-09-14
Published Online: 2020-10-02
Published in Print: 2021-02-01

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 29.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ans-2020-2108/html
Scroll to top button