Home Relative Nielsen Numbers, Braids and Periodic Segments
Article Open Access

Relative Nielsen Numbers, Braids and Periodic Segments

  • Klaudiusz Wójcik EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: January 27, 2017

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to establish a connection between the method of period segments and the relative Nielsen fixed point theory. We prove that if W is a periodic segment over [0,T] for the T-periodic semi-process Φ, then the Poincaré map P has at least N(mW,W0W0--¯) fixed points with trajectories contained in W, where N(mW,W0W0--¯) is the relative Nielsen number defined by Zhao. It is also shown that if the sequence N(m¯n) is bounded and N(m)>1, then the Poincaré map has infinitely many periodic points. We prove that there exists a compact set IW0, invariant for the Poincaré map, such that the topological entropy h(P|I) is bounded from below by logN(m)-h(m¯). In particular, if h(m¯)=0, then h(P|I)logN(m). We adapt the result obtained by Jiang to get a concrete example of a braid-like periodic segment with N(m)>1.

MSC 2010: 54H20; 37B40; 20F36

1 Introduction

The notion of periodic segments introduced by Srzednicki proved to be a very useful tool for detecting periodic solutions and chaotic dynamics generated by periodic in time non-autonomous ODEs [23, 24]. If v:×nn is a smooth time-dependent vector field on n, then the ordinary differential equation

t ˙ = 1 , x ˙ = v ( t , x ) ,

generates a local flow on the extended phase space ×n. If f is T-periodic with respect to time, then the Poincaré map P associated to the vector field v (defined on some open subset of n) is given as follows: P(x0) is the value of the solution of the problem

x ˙ = v ( t , x ) , x ( 0 ) = x 0 ,

at time T. The k-periodic points of the Poincaré map P correspond to the kT-periodic solutions of x˙=v(t,x).

The periodic segment W is a compact subset of [0,T]×n with some special behavior of the vector field (1,v) on the boundary of W. Namely, the set of points (called the exit set W-) on the boundary of W at which the vector field (1,v) is pointing out with respect to the segment is closed. Periodicity of the segment means that the time 0 and time T sections of W are equal, W0=WT. Moreover, there exists a compact set W--W- (called the essential exit set) such that W0--=WT--, and (W,W--) is a pair of trivial bundles over [0,T] with the fiber (W0,W0--). Intuitively, W consists of the left-hand side {0}×W0, the right-hand side {T}×WT={T}×W0, and the main part located over the open interval (0,T). Because of the specific behavior of the flow (it moves along the time-axis with speed 1), it is clear that the right-hand side of W must belong to the exit set (see Figure 1).

There exists a relative homeomorphism mW:(W0,W0--)(W0,W0--) associated to the periodic segment W, called the monodromy map. It was proved by Srzednicki [24] that there exists an isolated set of fixed points Fk of Pk contained in W0W0-- such that

ind ( P k , F k ) = L ( m W k ) = L ( m k ) - L ( m ¯ k ) ,

where m:=W0xmW(x)W0, m¯=m|W0--. In particular, if L(mW)0, then the Poincaré map has a fixed point x whose trajectory (with respect to the local flow on the extended phase space) is contained in the segment W. The proof of Srzednicki’s fixed point index formula is based on the Lefschetz fixed point theorem and the properties of the fixed point index.

Figure 1 
          The periodic segment W over [0,T]{[0,T]} with the essential exit set W--{W^{--}}.
Figure 1

The periodic segment W over [0,T] with the essential exit set W--.

The problem of using other topological invariants to get more information on the structure of periodic solutions inside the segment was proposed in [22]. In addition to the existence of fixed points of the Poincaré map P, we are interested in finding a lower bound of the cardinality of the set of fixed points Fix(P). From that point of view, it seems to be very natural to try to find a connection between the method of periodic segments and the theory of Nielsen numbers (see [26]). The Nielsen fixed point theory is concerned with the determination of the minimal number of fixed points for all maps in the homotopy class of a given self map f:XX (X is a compact ENR). The Nielsen number N(f) provides a homotopy invariant lower bound for the number of fixed points of f.

The classical Nielsen number N(f) is rather poor lower bound for the number of fixed point of f if f:(X,A)(X,A) is a relative map. For example, let X be a 2-dimensional disk and let A be the circle bounding it. If f:(X,A)(X,A) is a continuous map such that f¯:=f|A has degree d, then f has at least |d-1| fixed points in A. On the other hand, N(f)=1. In 1980, Jiang observed the following phenomena in the problem concerning fixed point sets on the pants. Let P be the pants, i.e., the disk with two holes removed, and let f be the homeomorphism obtained by reflection on an axis of symmetry which interchanges the boundaries of the two holes. Then N(f)=1, but any homeomorphism isotopic to f will map the outer boundary of P onto itself in an orientation-reversing manner, and hence have at least two fixed point on this boundary circle. Thus, N(f) cannot be realized by a homeomorphism in the isotopy class.

In 1986, an extension of Nielsen theory to the relative setting was introduced by Schirmer in [19] and has developed rapidly since then ([31] is a very interesting survey on the subject). In this paper we will use the relative Nielsen number of f:(X,A)(X,A) on the closure of the complement N(f;XA¯), defined by Zhao [31, 30, 29].

We show (Theorem 4.4) that if W is a periodic segment over [0,T], then the Poincaré map P has at least N(m,W0W0--¯) fixed points with trajectories contained in the segment W. We give an example showing that N(m,W0W0--¯) cannot be replaced by the relative Nielsen number N(m;W0,W0--), defined by Schirmer. We will also study the relation between the number of periodic points of the Poincaré map P and the asymptotic Nielsen number N(m) defined and developed by Jiang (see [14, 11, 12]). We prove (Theorem 5.2) that if the sequence N(m¯n) is bounded and N(m)>1, then the Poincaré map has infinitely many periodic points. We also show (Theorem 5.3) that there exists a compact set IW0, invariant for the Poincaré map, such that the topological entropy h(P|I) is bounded from below by logN(m)-h(m¯). In particular, if h(m¯)=0, then

h ( P | I ) log N ( m ) .

The usefulness of our main results (Theorems 5.2 and 5.3) depends on the possibility of computation of N(m). The setting in which a great work has been carried out is that of homeomorphisms of compact surfaces. The central area in the topological dynamics of surface homeomorphism is their classification up to isotopy, due to Nielsen and Thurston (see [13, 17, 25]). Given a homeomorphism f (relative to some given finite f-invariant subset A) of a compact surface X, perhaps with boundary X, there exists a canonical Thurston representative g in the isotopy class of f that is one of the following three types: finite order (so gn=id for some n1), pseudo-Anosov, or reducible. In the third case, the surface may be cut up into subsurfaces along a tubular neighborhood of a finite g-invariant set of mutually-disjoint curves, and the restriction of an appropriate iterate of g to each subsurfaces is either finite order or pseudo-Anosov. Given the action of f on the fundamental group π1(XA), one can effectively decide its Thurston type using an algorithm due to Bestvina and Handel [2]. If W0 is a compact surface with boundary, then the Thurston–Nielsen canonical form decomposes m into periodic and pseudo-Anosov pieces where there is a stretching factor λ which describes each pseudo-Anosov piece. It was proved by Jiang (see [14, 11, 12]) that if the Euler–Poincaré characteristic W0 is negative, then N(m) equals the largest such stretching factor λ>1 (λ:=1 if there is no pseudo-Anosov piece). In particular, if there is at least one pseudo-Anosov piece, then N(m)>1.

As a natural possible area of applications, we will study braid-like periodic segments for periodic in time ODEs on the plane 2. Using the technique developed in [13, 14], we give an example of a periodic braid-like segment with N(m)>1. It is based on result of Fadell and Husseini (see [6]), using the Fox’s free differential calculus.

The study of geometric braids in the context of the existence of periodic solutions of periodic system of differential equations on the plane was started by Matsuoka in [15, 16, 18, 17] (see also [1, 13]). Based on the braiding information of known solutions, he obtained lower bounds for the number of extra periodic solutions.

This approach has one failing from the point of view of the applications to dynamics generated by ordinary differential equations. It is assumed that every solution of the equation x˙=v(t,x) extends forever in both directions of time. In particular, the Poincaré map P has to be defined globally as a diffeomorphism P:22. Matsuoka’s method applies also to the case of dissipative systems, when the Poincaré map P has a closed disk D such that P(D)D. It is rather a rare phenomenon in the concrete examples of ODEs. The advantage of our approach lies in the fact that we consider the local flows, so the solutions can blow up to infinity in finite time and the Poincaré map does not have to be globally defined. Moreover, we allowed the periodic segments with the non-empty essential exit sets. It should be stressed that Matsuoka’s approach and the method described in [14, 11, 12] cannot be directly applied to study the number of periodic points of the Poincaré map restricted to W0 if W0--. Our viewpoint sheds some new light on the structure of periodic orbits in that more general case.

We emphasize that if W0 is contractible, then the Nielsen numbers N(mn,W0W0--¯) do not give more information on the number of periodic points than the Lefschetz numbers L(mWn). We show that in some examples of chaotic planar periodic ODEs, the number of k-periodic points of the Poincaré map is bounded from below by |L((I-μW)k)|, where μW is induced by mW in homologies.

The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we have compiled some basic facts concerning Nielsen fixed point theory. In Section 3 we introduce the notion of a periodic segment. Section 4 establishes the relation between the method of periodic segments and Nielsen theory. In Section 5 will be concerned with the topological entropy of the Poincaré map. Section 6 is devoted to studying braid-like periodic segments. In Section 7 we give an example of a braid-like periodic segment that forces complicated dynamics. Section 8 deals with the case of contractible W0. For the convenience of the reader, in Appendix A we give a brief survey of the used results in the Nielsen theory based on [13].

2 Relative Nielsen Numbers

In this section we summarize without proofs the relevant material on the Nielsen theory. Let X be a compact ENR and let f:XX be a continuous map. The fixed point set of f,

Fix ( f ) := { x X : f ( x ) = x } ,

splits into a disjoint union of fixed point classes – two fixed points are in the same class F if and only if they can be joined by a path which is homotopic (rel end-points) to its own f-image. More precisely, x0,x1Fix(f) are in the Nielsen relation if there exists a continuous map α:[0,1]X such that α(i)=xi for i=0,1 and

α f α , rel { 0 , 1 } .

Then

Fix ( f ) = F 1 F k ,

where Fi are Nielsen fixed point classes. Each Nielsen class is an isolated set of fixed points of f, so the fixed point index ind(f,Fi) is defined. A fixed point class F is called essential if ind(f,F)0. The Nielsen numberN(f) of f is defined as the number of essential fixed point classes. Every map homotopic to f has at least N(f) fixed points.

Let f:(X,A)(X,A) be a continuous map of the pair (X,A) of compact ENRs. The restriction of f to A is written as f¯:=f|A:AA.

Definition 2.1 (Common Fixed Point Class).

A fixed point class F of f is said to be a common fixed point class if it contains an essential fixed point class of f¯.

Example 2.2 (Non-Common Fixed Point Class).

Let f:(𝔻,𝕊1)(𝔻,𝕊1) be the identity map on the 2-disk 𝔻. Then f has one fixed point class F=𝔹2. It is an essential fixed point class because ind(f,F)=L(f)=1. The restricted map f¯=id𝕊1 has one fixed point class 𝕊1, and it is not essential because ind(f¯,𝕊1)=L(id𝕊1)=0. It follows that F does not contain the essential class of f¯, so F is not common.

Example 2.3 (Common Fixed Point Class Does Not Have to Be Essential).

Let f:𝕊1𝕊1 be the identity and let A={1}. Then f has one fixed point class F=𝕊1 which is inessential because ind(id𝕊1,𝕊1)=L(id𝕊1)=0. Since A={1} is an essential fixed point class of f¯, we have that F is a common fixed point class.

By N(f,f¯) we denote the number of common and essential fixed point classes of f. It follows that

N ( f , f ¯ ) N ( f ) , N ( f , f ¯ ) N ( f ¯ ) .

Definition 2.4 (Relative Nielsen Number).

Let f:(X,A)(X,A) be a relative map. The relative Nielsen number of f is defined by

N ( f ; X , A ) := N ( f ) + N ( f ¯ ) - N ( f , f ¯ ) .

Theorem 2.5 (Lower Bound).

Any relative map f:(X,A)(X,A) has at least N(f;X,A) fixed points.

Definition 2.6.

We say that a fixed point class F of f:XXassumes its index in A if

ind ( f , F ) = ind ( f ¯ , F A ) .

The number of fixed point classes of f which do not assume their indices in A is denoted by N(f;XA¯) and is called the relative Nielsen number of f on the closure of the complement.

Proposition 2.7 ([31]).

Let f:(X,A)(X,A) be a relative map. If there exists a neighborhood V of A in X such that f(V)A, then for any fixed point class F of f, the set F(XA) is an isolated fixed point set of f with

ind ( f , F ( X A ) ) = ind ( f , F ) - ind ( f ¯ , F A ) .

Corollary 2.8.

Let f:(X,A)(X,A) be a relative map and assume that there exists a neighborhood V of A in X such that f(V)A. Then any fixed point class which does not assume its index in A contains a fixed point in XA. In particular, f has at least N(f,XA¯) fixed points in XA.

Theorem 2.9 ([31]).

Any relative map f:(X,A)(X,A) has at least N(f,XA¯) fixed points on the closure cl(XA).

Let f:(X,A)(X,A) be a relative map. Assume that A1,,Ak are all components of A such that f(Ai)Ai (i=1,,k). Then another relative number N(f,XA¯) is defined (see [31]) as the sum of the number of essential fixed point classes of all fAi:AiAi with int(Ai)= and the number of the fixed point classes which do not assume their indices in A and do not contain any essential fixed point classes of fAi:AiAi with int(Ai)=. One can prove (see [31]) that N(f,XA¯)N(f,XA¯).

We define the following auxiliary numbers:

  1. N ( f , A ) is the number of essential fixed point classes of f which assume their index in A. Obviously, 0N(f,A)N(f,f¯).

  2. n ( f ; X , A ) is the number of fixed point classes of f which do not assume their index in A and are a common point class of f and f¯. Obviously, n(f;X,A)N(f,XA¯).

It follows that

N ( f , X A ¯ ) N ( f ) - N ( f , A ) N ( f ) - N ( f , f ¯ ) = N ( f , X , A ) - N ( f ¯ ) .

By [21, Theorem 3.4], we have

N ( f , X A ¯ ) = n ( f ; X , A ) + N ( f ) - N ( f , f ¯ ) , N ( f , X A ¯ ) = N ( f ; X , A ) + n ( f ; X , A ) - N ( f ¯ ) .

3 Blocks and Periodic Segments

In this section we recall the notion of a Ważewski set and a periodic segment. We begin with the definitions of the basic concepts of the theory of continuous-time dynamical systems.

Let X be a topological space. A local semiflow on X is a continuous map ϕ:DX, where D is an open subset of X×[0,), such that for every xX, the set {t[0,):(x,t)D} is equal to an interval [0,ωx) for some 0<ωx. If t[0,ωx), then ωϕt(x)=ωx-t and the following equations hold:

ϕ ( x , 0 ) = x , ϕ ( x , s + t ) = ϕ ( ϕ ( x , s ) , t ) .

Let ϕ be a local semiflow on X. For BX we define its exit set by

B - = { x B : ϕ ( x , [ 0 , t ] ) B  for all  t ( 0 , ω x ) } .

Let another subset of B be defined as

B * = { x B : there exists  t ( 0 , ω x )  such that  ϕ t ( x ) B } .

We call B a Ważewski set for ϕ if B and B- are closed. A compact Ważewski set B is called a block.

Lemma 3.1.

If B is a Ważewski set, then the mapping

σ : B * x sup { t [ 0 , ω x ) : ϕ ( x , [ 0 , t ] ) B } [ 0 , + )

is continuous.

We will use the following notation: π2:×XX and π1:×X are projections. For Z×X and t, we define the t-section of Z by

Z t = { x X : ( t , x ) Z } .

By a local semi-process on a topological space X we mean a continuous map Φ:DX, where D is open subset of ×X×[0,) such that the map

ϕ : D ( ( σ , x ) , t ) ( σ + t , Φ ( σ , x , t ) ) × X

is a local semiflow on ×X. In the sequel, we write Φ(σ,t)(x) instead of Φ(σ,x,t). We say that Φ is T-periodic if Φ(σ,t)=Φ(σ+T,t) for each σ and t.

Figure 2 
          The periodic segment W and the homeomorphism h preserving t-sections.
Figure 2

The periodic segment W and the homeomorphism h preserving t-sections.

Figure 3 
          The monodromy map m:W0→W0{m\colon W_{0}\to W_{0}} for some periodic segment Wover [0,T]{[0,T]} induced by some homeomorphism h:[0,T]×W0→W{h\colon[0,T]\times W_{0}\to W}.
Figure 3

The monodromy map m:W0W0 for some periodic segment Wover [0,T] induced by some homeomorphism h:[0,T]×W0W.

Let Φ be a local T-periodic semi-process on X and let ϕ be the corresponding local semiflow on ×X. A set W[0,T]×X is called a periodic segment over [0,T] if it is a block with respect to ϕ such that the following conditions hold:

  1. There exists a compact subset W-- of W- (called the essential exit set) such that

    W - = W - - ( { T } × W T ) , W - ( [ 0 , T ) × X ) W - - .

  2. W 0 = W T , W0--=WT--, where W0 and W0-- are compact ENRs.

  3. There exists a homeomorphism h:[0,T]×W0W such that π1h=π1 and

    h ( [ 0 , T ] × W 0 - - ) = W - - .

For the periodic segment W over [0,T] one can define the corresponding monodromy map (see Figures 2 and 3)

m W : ( W 0 , W 0 - - ) ( W T , W T - - ) = ( W 0 , W 0 - - ) , m W ( x ) = π 2 h ( T , π 2 h - 1 ( 0 , x ) ) .

The monodromy map is actually a homeomorphism. We will use the following notation:

m : W 0 x m W ( x ) W 0 , m ¯ = m | W 0 - - : W 0 - - W 0 - - .

For s[0,T], we define two auxiliary functions by

m s : ( W 0 , W 0 - - ) ( W s , W s - - ) , m s ( x ) = π 2 h ( s , π 2 h - 1 ( 0 , x ) ) ,
m s : ( W s , W s - - ) ( W T , W T - - ) = ( W 0 , W 0 - - ) , m s ( x ) = π 2 h ( T , π 2 h - 1 ( s , x ) ) .

It follows that

m T = m W , m 0 = id ( W 0 , W 0 - - ) , m T = id ( W 0 , W 0 - - ) , m 0 = m W .

Figure 4 
          The periodic segment over [0,2⁢π]{[0,2\pi]} for the 2⁢π{2\pi}-periodic equation z˙=z¯⁢ei⁢t{\dot{z}=\overline{z}e^{it}}, z∈ℂ{z\in\mathbb{C}}.The essential exit set W--{W^{--}} is shaded. The monodromy map is a rotation by π.
Figure 4

The periodic segment over [0,2π] for the 2π-periodic equation z˙=z¯eit, z.The essential exit set W-- is shaded. The monodromy map is a rotation by π.

Lemma 3.2.

A different choice of the homeomorphism h in the definition of periodic segment provides the monodromy map homotopic to mW.

Proof.

If h~ is the another choice, then the map H:[0,1]×(W0,W0--)(W0,W0--), defined by

H t ( x ) = m t T m ~ t T ,

is a homotopy between mW and m~W. ∎

Example 3.3.

The periodic segment W over [0,2π] for the equation

z ˙ = z ¯ e i t , z ,

is presented in Figure 4. The monodromy map mW:(W0,W0--)(W0,W0--) is the rotation by π.

4 Periodic Segments and Relative Nielsen Numbers

Let W be a periodic segment over [0,T] for the T-periodic local semi-process Φ on X and let P=Φ(0,T) be a Poincaré map. Assume that σ:W*[0,+) is the exit time map. Since W*=W, σ is defined and continuous on the whole segment W.

We define a map w:W0W0 by

w ( x ) = m σ ( 0 , x ) ( Φ ( 0 , σ ( 0 , x ) ) ( x ) ) , x W 0 .

Observe that

w ¯ = w | W 0 - - = m | W 0 - - = m ¯ : W 0 - - W 0 - - ,

so we can treat w as a relative map, w:(W0,W0--)(W0,W0--).

Lemma 4.1.

The maps w,mW:(W0,W0--)(W0,W0--) are homotopic. In particular,

N ( m W , W 0 W 0 - - ¯ ) = N ( w , W 0 W 0 - - ¯ ) .

Proof.

Consider a homotopy H:[0,1]×W0W0 defined by

H t ( x ) := { m σ ( 0 , x ) ( Φ ( 0 , σ ( 0 , x ) ) ( x ) ) if  σ ( 0 , x ) ( 1 - t ) T , m ( 1 - t ) T ( Φ ( 0 , ( 1 - t ) T ) ( x ) ) if  σ ( 0 , x ) ( 1 - t ) T .

In particular, H1=mW and H0=w. Moreover,

H t ( x ) = m ( x ) , x W 0 - - , t [ 0 , 1 ] ,

hence Ht(W0--)=W0-- for t[0,1], so H:[0,1]×(W0,W0--)(W0,W0--) is a homotopy of relative maps. This completes the proof. ∎

Lemma 4.2.

Let

U = { x W 0 : Φ ( 0 , t ) ( x ) W t W t - - for  t [ 0 , T ] } .

Then the following hold:

  1. U is open in W 0 .

  2. w | U = P | U .

  3. Fix ( w | W 0 W 0 - - ) = Fix ( P | U ) U is compact.

  4. Fix ( w ) = Fix ( P | U ) Fix ( m ¯ ) .

  5. There exists V open neighborhood of A such that w ( V ) = W 0 - - .

Proof.

Let us observe that w(x)=Φ(0,T)(x)=P(x) if σ(0,x)=T, hence w|U=P|U. One can check that

U = { x W 0 : σ ( 0 , x ) = T , P ( x ) W 0 W 0 - - } ,

so U=w-1(W0W0--), and hence U is open in W0.

If xFix(w|W0W0--), then σ(0,x)=T, because otherwise w(x)W0--. Hence, xU and thus

Fix ( P | U ) = Fix ( w ) { x W 0 : σ ( 0 , x ) = T } .

In particular, Fix(P|U) is compact.

Put V={xW0:σ(0,x)<T}. It follows that V is open in W0, W0--V and w(V)=W0-- (see Figure 5). One can easily check that

Fix ( w ) = Fix ( P | U ) Fix ( m ¯ ) .

Figure 5 
          The set W0{W_{0}} is a square with three holes. The open set V={x∈W0:σ⁢(0,x)<T}⊂W0--{V=\{x\in W_{0}:\sigma(0,x)<T\}\subset W_{0}^{--}}is shaded in grey. On the complement W0∖V{W_{0}\setminus V} the map w coincides with the Poincaré map P.
Figure 5

The set W0 is a square with three holes. The open set V={xW0:σ(0,x)<T}W0--is shaded in grey. On the complement W0V the map w coincides with the Poincaré map P.

Lemma 4.3.

Assume that F is a Nielsen class of w. Then F does not assume its index in W0-- if and only if FU is an isolated set of fixed points of P|U and ind(P|U,FU)0.

Proof.

Let F be a Nielsen class of w. By Proposition 2.7, F(W0W0--) is an isolated set of fixed points of w and

ind ( w , F ( W 0 W 0 - - ) ) = ind ( w , F ) - ind ( w ¯ , F W 0 - - ) .

It follows, by Lemma 4.2, that

ind ( w , F ( W 0 W 0 - - ) ) = ind ( w , F U ) = ind ( P | U , F U ) ,

hence

ind ( P | U , F U ) = ind ( w , F ) - ind ( w ¯ , F W 0 - - ) ,

so the result follows. ∎

Theorem 4.4.

Let W be a periodic segment over [0,T]. Then P|U has at least N(mW,W0W0--¯) fixed points. Moreover, if L(m)L(m¯), then k:=N(mW,W0W0--¯)1. If F1,,Fk are the Nielsen classes of w that do not assume their indices in W0--, then

ind ( P | U , Fix ( P | U ) ) = i = 1 k ind ( P | U , F i U ) = L ( m ) - L ( m ¯ ) = L ( m W ) .

Figure 6 
          The T-periodic segment for z˙=z¯{\dot{z}=\overline{z}}, z∈ℂ{z\in\mathbb{C}}. The essential exit set W--{W^{--}} is shaded. The monodromymap mW{m_{W}} is the identity, so N⁢(mW;W0,W0--)=2{N(m_{W};W_{0},W_{0}^{--})=2}, and the Poincaré map P has exactly one fixed point.
Figure 6

The T-periodic segment for z˙=z¯, z. The essential exit set W-- is shaded. The monodromymap mW is the identity, so N(mW;W0,W0--)=2, and the Poincaré map P has exactly one fixed point.

Proof.

Since w and mW are homotopic as relative maps, w has at least N(mW,W0W0--¯) fixed points. It follows, by Lemma 4.3, that P|U has at least N(mW,W0W0--¯) fixed points.

By [24], we have that

ind ( P | U , Fix ( P | U ) ) = L ( m ) - L ( m ¯ ) .

Let F1,,Fn be Nielsen classes of w (nk) and F1,,Fk the Nielsen classes that do not assume their indices in W0--. By the additivity property of the fixed point index, Lemmas 4.2 and 4.3, we get that

ind ( P | U , Fix ( P | U ) ) = i = 1 n ind ( P | U , F i U ) = i = 1 k ind ( P | U , F i U ) ,

so

L ( m ) - L ( m ¯ ) = i = 1 k ind ( P | U , F i U ) .

In particular, if L(mW)=L(m)-L(m¯)0, then k1. ∎

Example 4.5.

If N(m¯)=0, then N(mW,W0W0--¯)=N(m). Indeed, if F is an essential fixed point class of m, then F does not assume its index in W0--. Otherwise, ind(m¯,FW0--)=ind(m,F)0, and FW0-- has to contain an essential fixed point class of m¯, a contradiction. Obviously, if F is an inessential fixed point class of m, then it has to assume its index in W0--, because N(m¯)=0. Let us mention that the condition N(m¯)=0 holds, for example, if m¯ is a fixed point free.

Example 4.6.

If W0 is simply connected or m is homotopic to id(W0,W0--), then

N ( m W , W 0 W 0 - - ¯ ) = { 1 if  L ( m ) L ( m ¯ ) , 0 if  L ( m ) = L ( m ¯ ) .

Indeed, m has exactly one fixed point class F=Fix(m) and ind(m,F)=L(m). Then

L ( m ¯ ) = ind ( m ¯ , Fix ( m ¯ ) ) = ind ( m ¯ , F W 0 - - ) .

In particular, in that case the relative Nielsen number N(mW,W0W0--¯) does not give more information about the fixed points of the Poincaré map than the relative Lefschetz number L(mW)=L(m)-L(m¯).

Example 4.7.

The Nielsen number N(mW,W0W0--¯) in Theorem 4.4 cannot be replaced by the Nielsen number N(m;W0,W0--). Consider a local flow defined by the planar ordinary differential equation

z ˙ = z ¯ n , z , n 1 .

One can check (see [24]) that for fixed T>0, in the extended phase space, there exists a T-periodic segment over [0,T] such that W0=Wt (t[0,T]) is a regular 2(n+1)-gon and W0-- consists of n+1 disjoint contractible parts (see Figure 6). Obviously, m=id(W0,W0--) and Φ(0,T) has exactly one fixed point. It follows, by the previous example, that N(m,W0W0--¯)=1, because L(m)=1 and L(m¯)=n+1. On the other hand, N(m)=1, N(m¯)=n+1, N(m,m¯)=1, hence

N ( m W ; W 0 , W 0 - - ) = n + 1 ,

and so N(mW;W0,W0--) is not a lower bound for the number of fixed points of the Poincaré map P.

Example 4.8.

Since N(mW,W0W0--¯)N(mW,W0W0--¯), one can try to replace N(mW,W0W0--¯) in Theorem 4.4 by N(mW,W0W0--¯). Unfortunately, N(mW,W0W0--¯) is not a lower bound of the fixed points of P|U inside the segment. For the segment W, in the previous example we have N(mW,W0W0--¯)=n+1.

5 Periodic Points by Periodic Segments

Let Φ be a T-periodic (T>0) semi-process on X. We define an operation of gluing periodic segments. If W and Z are periodic segments over [0,T] having the same cross-section at 0, i.e.,

( W 0 , W 0 - - ) = ( Z 0 , Z 0 - - ) ,

then we put

W Z := { ( t , x ) [ 0 , 2 π ] × X : x W t  if  t [ 0 , T ] , x Z t - T  if  t [ T , 2 T ] } .

This is a periodic segment over [0,2T].

If Z1,,Zr are periodic segments over [0,T] having the same cross-sections at 0, then we define recurrently another periodic segment over [0,rT] by

Z 1 Z r := ( Z 1 Z r - 1 ) Z r .

If Zi=W for each i=1,,r, then we put Wn=Z1Zr. It follows that if mW is a monodromy map for W, then mWn is a monodromy map for Wn. Obviously, W0n=W0 and (Wn)0--=W0--. Moreover, if P=Φ(0,T) is the Poincaré map, then Pn=Φ(0,nT).

Corollary 5.1.

Let W be a periodic segment over [0,T] for the T-periodic semi-process Φ. The set

U W n = { x W 0 : Φ ( 0 , t ) ( x ) ( W n ) t ( W n ) t - - for all  t [ 0 , n T ] }

is open in W0, and Pn has at least N(mWn,W0W0--¯) fixed points in UWn.

The growth rate of a sequence of complex numbers (an) is defined by

Growth a n = max { 1 , lim sup n | a n | 1 / n } .

We say that the sequence grows exponentially if Growthan>1.

Let f:XX be a continuous map of compact ENR. We define the asymptotic Nielsen number of f to be the growth rate of the Nielsen numbers

N ( f ) := Growth N ( f n ) .

For a relative map f:(X,A)(X,A), we put

N ( f , X A ¯ ) := Growth N ( f n , X A ¯ ) .

Theorem 5.2.

If N(m¯n) is bounded and N(m)>1, then the Poincaré map P has infinitely many periodic points whose trajectories are contained in the segment W.

Proof.

By Theorem 4.4, it is sufficient to show that N(mW,W0W0--¯)>1. It follows, by the properties of the relative Nielsen numbers, that

N ( m W n , W 0 W 0 - - ¯ ) N ( m n ) - N ( m n , m ¯ n ) , N ( m n , m ¯ n ) N ( m ¯ n ) .

Since N(m¯n) is bounded, for some M>0, we have

N ( m W n , W 0 W 0 - - ¯ ) N ( m n ) - M ,

so the result follows because N(m)>1. ∎

By h(f) we denote the topological entropy of the self map f:XX of the compact metric space. We refer the reader to [9] for the definition and basic properties of the topological entropy.

Theorem 5.3.

Let W0 be a compact polyhedron. Then there exists a compact set IW0W0--, invariant for the Poincaré map, such that

max { h ( P | I ) , h ( m ¯ ) } log N ( m ) .

Proof.

Let w:W0W0 be defined by

w ( x ) = m σ ( 0 , x ) ( Φ ( 0 , σ ( 0 , x ) ) ) , x W 0 ,

where σ:W[0,+) is the exit time function associated to the segment W. It follows, by [11, Theorem 2.7] and Lemma 4.1, that

h ( w ) log N ( w ) = log N ( m ) .

We define

I = { x W 0 : Φ ( 0 , t + k T ) ( x ) W t W t - -  for  t [ 0 , T ) , k 0 } .

Geometrically, I is the set of points in W0 whose trajectories are contained in the translated copies of the segment W for t0. One can check that I is compact and invariant for the Poincaré map P (compare [23, 24]).

Let xW0I. Then there exists t[0,T) and k0 such that Φ(0,t+kT)(x)Wt--. It follows that

σ ( 0 , P i ( x ) ) = T , i = 1 , , k - 1 , σ ( 0 , P k ( x ) ) = t ,

so

w i ( x ) = P i ( x ) , i = 1 , , k , w k + 1 ( x ) = m t ( Φ ( 0 , t ) ( P k ( x ) ) ) W 0 - - .

The map w:W0W0 has the following properties:

  1. I and W0-- are disjoint, compact and invariant for w.

  2. w | W 0 - - = m ¯ .

  3. For each xW0I, there exists n0 such that wn(x)W0--.

  4. w | I = P | I .

Let Ω be a set of non-wandering points of w, i.e., the set of points xW0 such that for any open neighborhood of x there exists N>0 such that wN(U)U. It follows that ΩIW0--. By the properties of the topological entropy, we have

h ( w ) = h ( w | Ω ) h ( w | I W 0 - - ) = max { h ( w | I ) , h ( w | W 0 - - ) } = max { h ( P | I ) , h ( m ¯ ) } ,

hence the result follows. ∎

Corollary 5.4.

If h(m¯)=0, then h(P|I)logN(m). In particular, the conclusion holds if m¯:W0--W0-- is a periodic homeomorphism, i.e., m¯n=idW0-- for some n1.

6 Braid-Like Periodic Segment

Definition 6.1 (The Algebraic Braid Group).

For a given integer n>0, the Artin braid groupBn is the group defined by the generators σ1,,σn-1 and the relations

  1. σ i σ i + 1 σ i = σ i + 1 σ i σ i + 1 for 1in-2,

  2. σ i σ j = σ j σ i for 1i,jn-1 such that |i-j|2.

An element in this group is called a braid.

Example 6.2.

The 1-braid group B1={1} is a trivial group. The 2-braid group is a free group with one generator isomorphic to . The 3-braid group B3 has the representation (see Figures 7 and 8)

B 3 = σ 1 , σ 2 σ 1 σ 2 σ 1 = σ 2 σ 1 σ 2 ,

and B4 has the representation

σ 1 , σ 2 , σ 3 σ 1 σ 2 σ 1 = σ 2 σ 1 σ 2 , σ 2 σ 3 σ 2 = σ 3 σ 2 σ 3 , σ 1 σ 3 = σ 3 σ 1 .

Figure 7 
          The generators σ1{\sigma_{1}} and σ2{\sigma_{2}} of B3{B_{3}}.
Figure 7

The generators σ1 and σ2 of B3.

Figure 8 
          The braids σ1{\sigma_{1}}, σ2-1{\sigma_{2}^{-1}} and σ1⁢σ2-1{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}^{-1}} in B3{B_{3}}.
Figure 8

The braids σ1, σ2-1 and σ1σ2-1 in B3.

A geometrical representation of the Artin braid group is given by the following construction (see Figure 9). Let S be the set of n distinct points in the interior of a 2-dimensional disk 𝔻. We call a subset G of [0,1]×𝔻 a geometric n-braid (compare [3, 15]) if the following conditions hold:

  1. G is the union of mutually disjoint n arcs.

  2. Each arc joins a point (0,x){0}×S to (1,τ(x)){1}×S, where τ is a permutation defined on S.

  3. Each arc intersects every {t}×𝔻 (t[0,1]) exactly once.

Two geometric braids are equivalent if there exists a continuous deformation from one to the other through geometric braids. The set of equivalence classes of geometric braids is the Artin braid group Bn, where n=cardS. The composition law is given by concatenation of geometric braids.

The following theorem, due to Birman, shows the relation between braids and dynamics.

Theorem 6.3 ([3]).

Let M be the group of authomorphisms of the fundamental group π1(DS), which are induced by homeomorphisms of DS, which in turn keep the boundary of D fixed pointwise. Then M is precisely the group Bn.

Remark 6.4 ([3]).

Let f:𝔻S𝔻S be an a homeomorphism which keeps the boundary of 𝔻 fixed pointwise. Thus, f represents an element of M. Then f has a unique extension m𝔻 to 𝔻 which permutes the points of S. The map m𝔻 is isotopic to the identity in 𝔻. This isotopy may be used to define a homeomorphism h~:[0,T]×𝔻[0,T]×𝔻 such that

h ~ | { 0 } × 𝔻 = id { 0 } × 𝔻 , π 1 = π 1 h ~ .

The associated monodromy mapping is equal to the homeomorphism

m 𝔻 ( x ) = π 2 h ~ ( T , π 2 h ~ - 1 ( 0 , x ) ) , x 𝔻 .

The image h~(I×S) is a geometric braid.

Let Dk denote a k-punctured disk, i.e., Dk is the 2-dimensional disk 𝔻 with k disjoint open disks removed. More precisely, 𝔻Dk is the union of k-disjoint open disks D(1),,D(k), and D(1)¯,,D(k)¯ are disjoint such that D(i)¯𝔻𝔻 for i=1,,k. For k=0, we put D0=𝔻.

Let W[0,T]×𝔻 be a periodic segment over [0,T] for a T-periodic local semi-process on 2. We say that W is a k-braid-like periodic segment if the following conditions hold (see Figure 10):

  1. W 0 = D k .

  2. The homeomorphism h:[0,T]×(W0,W0--)(W,W--) in the definition of a periodic segment W has an extension h~:[0,T]×𝔻[0,T]×𝔻 such that

    h ~ | { 0 } × 𝔻 = id { 0 } × 𝔻 , π 1 = π 1 h ~ .

Figure 9 
          The geometric 3-braid.
Figure 9

The geometric 3-braid.

Figure 10 
          The braid-like periodic segment W. The essential exit set W--{W^{--}} has two components shaded in grey.
Figure 10

The braid-like periodic segment W. The essential exit set W-- has two components shaded in grey.

Since W0-- is a compact ENR contained in the boundary of Dk, it is a finite union of the circles and the sets homeomorphic to closed intervals in . The associated monodromy map of h~

m 𝔻 ( x ) = π 2 h ~ ( T , π 2 h ~ - 1 ( 0 , x ) ) , x 𝔻 ,

is a relative homeomorphism m𝔻:(𝔻,𝔻)(𝔻,𝔻), where 𝔻 is the boundary 𝔻. Moreover, m𝔻 is isotopic to the identity by the homotopy H:𝔻×[0,1]𝔻, given by

H t ( x ) = π 2 h ~ ( t T , π 2 h ~ - 1 ( 0 , x ) ) , x 𝔻 , t [ 0 , 1 ] .

The monodromy map mW:(Dk,W0--)(Dk,W0--) associated to the k-braid-like periodic segment W is the orientation-preserving homeomorphism and mW(𝔻)=𝔻. The isotopy H:𝔻×[0,1]𝔻, defined above, has the following properties:

H 0 | D k = id D k , H 1 | D k = m : D k x m W ( x ) D k ,

and

H t ( 𝔻 ) = 𝔻 , H t ( W 0 - - ) = W 0 - - .

Lemma 6.5.

Let (L(mn))n0 be the sequence of Lefschetz numbers of the iterations of the monodromy map m:DkxmW(x)Dk associated to the k-braid-like periodic segment W. Then (L(mn))n0 is periodic with period less than or equal to k.

Proof.

The result is trivial if k=0, because then L(mn)=1 for n0. Assume that k1. Since m|D(i)=m|D(i) restricted to each D(i) (i=1,,k) is an orientation preserving homeomorphism of the circle, it is isotopic to the identity map on D(i), so without lost of generality we can assume that m𝔻:𝔻𝔻 is a periodic point free on D(i). By the Lefschetz fixed point theorem (applied to m𝔻n:𝔻𝔻), we get that

1 = L ( m 𝔻 n ) = ind ( m 𝔻 n , 𝔻 ) .

Let C=D(1)¯D(k)¯. Since m𝔻 is a periodic point free on D(i), by the additivity of the fixed point index, we get that

1 = ind ( m 𝔻 n , 𝔻 ) = ind ( m 𝔻 n , D k ) + ind ( m 𝔻 n , C ) .

Since mWn(Dk)=Dk and mWn(C)=(C), we have

ind ( m D n , D k ) = L ( m W n ) , ind ( m 𝔻 n , C ) = L ( m 𝔻 n | C ) ,

hence

1 = L ( m W n ) + L ( m 𝔻 n | C ) .

It is sufficient to show that the sequence L(m𝔻n|C) is periodic. Since each component of C is contractible, the Lefschetz number L(m𝔻n|C) is the Lefschetz number of the iteration of the associated permutation τ:{1,,k}{1,,k}. Obviously, L(m𝔻n|C)=L(τn) is periodic with period less than or equal to k. ∎

Lemma 6.6.

The sequence of Lefschetz numbers L(mWn|W0--) is periodic.

Proof.

Indeed, if C is a component of W0-- homeomorphic to a circle, then L(mWn|C)=0 since mW|C is orientation preserving, hence it is homotopic to the identity on C. It follows that L(mWn|W0--) is the sequence of Lefschetz numbers of mWn restricted to the components of W0-- homeomorphic to closed intervals, so it is a sequence of Lefschetz numbers of the permutation of a finite set, hence it is a periodic sequence. ∎

Corollary 6.7.

Assume that W is a braid-like periodic segment over [0,T] for some T-periodic (local) semi-process Φ on R2. If mW:(W0,W0--)(W0,W0--) is a monodromy map associated to W, then the sequence of relative Lefschetz numbers (L(mWn))n0 is periodic.

Proposition 6.8.

Assume that W is a periodic segment over [0,T] for some T-periodic local semi-process Φ on X.

  1. If χ ( W 0 , W 0 - - ) = χ ( W 0 ) - χ ( W 0 - - ) 0 then there exists n > 0 such that L ( m W n ) 0 , so the Poincaré map P has an n -periodic point whose trajectory is contained in W n .

  2. If X = 2 , W is a braid-like periodic segment and H(W0,W0--)0, then the Poincaré map P has a periodic point (not necessarily contained in W).

Proof.

For the periodic segment W over [0,T], one can define the Lefschetz zeta function of W by

ζ W ( t ) = exp ( L ( m W n ) t n n ) .

It follows that

ζ W ( t ) = k = 0 det ( I - H k ( m W ) t ) ( - 1 ) k + 1 ,

where Hk(mW):Hk(W0,W0--)Hk(W0,W0--) is the isomorphism induced in the singular homology with -coefficients. It is easy to check that χ(W0,W0--)0 implies ζW(t)1, hence there exists n>0 such that L(mWn)0.

Assume that W is a k-braid-like periodic segment for the local semi-process on 2. Let m0 be the number of components of W0-- homeomorphic to a closed interval in . It follows that

χ ( W 0 ) = 1 - k , χ ( W 0 - - ) = m .

If χ(W0)<0, then χ(W0,W0--)<0, so the result follows. If χ(W0)=0 and m1, then again χ(W0,W0--)0. Assume that χ(W0)=0 and m=0. Then, obviously, χ(W0,W0--)=0. Since m=0, we have that W0--𝔻 is either the circle 𝔻 or the empty set. It follows, by the definition of braid-like segments, that U=[0,T]×𝔻 is a periodic segment over [0,T] with the essential exit set U-- being [0,T]×𝔻 or the empty set. In both cases, χ(U0,U0--)=1, so the result follows. If χ(W0)=1, then m1, because otherwise H(W0,W0--)=0. In particular, χ(W0,W0--)0 and the proof is finished. ∎

Proposition 6.9.

Assume that W is a braid-like periodic segment over [0,T] for some T-periodic semi process Φ on R2. If N(m)>1, then the Poincaré map P has infinitely many periodic points. Moreover, there exists a compact set I, invariant for the Poincaré map, such that

h ( P | I ) log N ( m ) > 0 .

Proof.

Since every component of W0-- is homeomorphic to either a circle or a closed interval, it is easy to check that N(m¯n) is periodic, hence it is bounded and the result follows by Theorem 5.2 and Corollary 5.4. ∎

7 Example of Braid-Like Periodic Segment with N(m)>1

Assume that W is a k-braid-like periodic segment such that k>1 and χ(Dk)<0. Let m:DkxmW(x)Dk be the associated monodromy map. Following [13, 14], we recall a recipe on how to estimate N(m).

Since m:DkDk is a homeomorphism and χ(Dk)<0, by [13, 14], it follows that

N ( m ) = L ( m ) = λ ,

where λ is the largest stretching factor of the pseudo-Anosov pieces in the Thurston canonical form of m (λ:=1 if there is no pseudo-Anosov piece).

Let a1,,ak be generators of G=π1(Dk) and G=a1,,ak a free group. Let Γ=π1(Tm). Then Γ is described by the generators

Γ = a 1 , , a r , z a i z = z a i , i = 1 , , r ,

where ai=m*(ai) and m*:GG is induced by m.

Fadell and Husseini [6] devised a method of computing LΓ(mn). Let

D = ( a i a j )

be the Jacobian in Fox calculus, an n×n matrix in Γ. We recall that if G is a free group with an identity element e and generators gi, then the Fox derivative with respect to gi is a function from G into the integral group ring G, which is denoted gi, and obeys the following axioms:

g j g i = δ i j , e g i = 0 , ( u v ) g i = u g i + u v g i , u , v G ,

where δij is the Kronecker delta. It follows that

u - 1 g i = - u - 1 u g i .

It was proved in [6] that the matrices of the lifted chain map m~ (compare Appendix A) are given by

F ~ 0 = ( 1 ) , F ~ 1 = D ,

and consequently,

L Γ ( m ) = [ z ] - i = 1 n [ z ( a i ) a i ] Γ , L Γ ( m n ) = [ z n ] - i = 1 n [ tr ( z D ) n ] Γ .

If ρ:ΓGLl() is a group representation, then the ρ-twisted zeta function of m is given by

ζ ρ ( m ) = det ( I - t ( z D ) ρ ) det ( I - t z ρ ) ( t ) ,

where (zD)ρ is the block matrix obtained from the matrix zD by replacing each entry (in Γ) with its ρ-image (an l×l-matrix), and I is a suitable identity matrix. Note that ρ extends to a ring representation ρ:ΓMl(), so the formula for ζρ(m) is well defined. Moreover, if ρ:ΓUl() is a unitary representation and r is the minimum modulus of the zeros and poles of the rational function ζρ(m), then (compare [13, 14])

L ( m ) = Growth L Γ ( m n ) 1 r .

Following [13, 14], we show an example of a braid-like periodic segment W such that N(m)>1. In particular, in that case P has infinitely many periodic points and h(P|I)logN(m)>0 for some invariant set I (compare Corollary 6.9).

Example 7.1 ([13]).

Assume that m is a homeomorphism corresponding to a braid σ=σ1σ2-1B3. Then G=a1,a2,a3 is a free group of rank 3. Let m*:GG be induced by m and ai=m*(ai). Then

a 1 = a 1 a 3 a 1 - 1 , a 2 = a 3 , a 3 = a 3 - 1 a 2 a 3 ,

hence

Γ = a 1 , a 2 , a 3 , z a i z = z a i , i = 1 , 2 , 3 .

The matrix D in Fox calculus is given by

D = [ 1 - a 1 a 3 a 1 - 1 0 a 1 1 0 0 0 a 3 - 1 - a 3 - 1 + a 3 - 1 a 2 ] .

A representation ρ:ΓU(1) is given in the following way:

  1. The first step is to abelianize Γ and let z1.

  2. Then we get a projection ΓH=a for aia.

  3. We take a𝕊1.

Thus,

( z D ) ρ = [ 1 - a 0 a 1 0 0 0 a - 1 1 - a - 1 ] ,

so

ζ ρ ( m ) = det ( I - t ( z D ) ρ ) det ( I - t z ρ ) = 1 - ( 1 - a - a - 1 ) t + t 2 .

Take a=-1. Then ζρ(m)=1-3t+t2, and its smallest root is r=3-52<25.

It follows that N(m)>52.

8 The Number of Periodic Points of the Poincaré Map by Lefschetz Numbers

Let W be a periodic segment over [0,T]. If W0 is simply connected, then

N ( m W , W 0 W 0 - - ¯ ) = { 1 if  L ( m W ) 0 , 0 if  L ( m W ) = 0 ,

so the relative Nielsen number N(mW,W0W0--¯) does not give more information about the fixed points of the Poincaré map than the relative Lefschetz number L(mW)=L(m)-L(m¯). One need some additional information concerning the behavior of the system inside the segment to prove the existence of more periodic solutions.

In this section we assume that there exists another periodic segment ZW over [0,T]. Let us observe that if L(mW)L(mZ), then by Theorem 4.4 there exists a fixed point xW0 for the Poincaré map P with trajectory contained in W but not contained in Z. If additionally L(mZ)0, then P has at least two fixed points in W0. Their trajectories are contained in W, but one of them is contained in Z and the other one leaves Z in time less than T. Usually, one cannot get more than two fixed points in W0.

We will say that (Φ;Z,W) is a chaotic triple if Φ is T-periodic (local) semi-process on X, and Z and W are periodic segments over [0,T] such that

Z W , Z 0 = W 0 , Z 0 - - = W 0 - -

and

m Z = id ( W 0 , W 0 - - ) , L ( μ W ) χ ( W 0 , W 0 - - ) = L ( μ Z ) ,

where μW:H(W0,W0--)H(W0,W0--) is the authomorphism induced by mW:(W0,W0--)(W0,W0--), a homeomorphism in singular homologies (with rational coefficients).

Assume that (Φ;Z,W) is a chaotic triple with the Poincaré map P=PΦ=Φ(0,T). Let ϕ be a semiflow associated to Φ. We define

I := I ( Φ ) = { x W 0 : Φ ( 0 , t + k T ) ( x ) W t W t - -  for  t [ 0 , T ) , k 0 } ,

so I is the set of points x in W0 such that positive trajectories (with respect to ϕ) of (0,x) are contained in the bigger segment W.

Let Σ2={0,1}. We define g:=gΦ:IΣ2 by the following rule:

  1. If on the time interval [iT,(i+1)T] the trajectory of (0,x) is contained in Z, then g(x)i=0.

  2. If (0,Pi(x)) leaves Z in time less than T, then g(x)i=1.

It follows (see [24]) that g:IΣ2 is continuous and σg=gP, where σ:Σ2Σ2 is the shift map.

Let c=(c0,,cn-1)Σ2 be n-periodic sequence. We define the set (W0W0--)c(Φ) as a set of points x satisfying the following conditions:

  1. P l ( x ) W 0 W 0 - - for l{0,,n}.

  2. Φ ( 0 , t + l T ) ( x ) W t W t - - for t[0,T] and l{0,,n-1}.

  3. For each i{0,,n-1}, if ci=0, then Φ(0,iT+t)(x)ZtZt-- for t(0,T).

  4. For each i{0,,n-1}, if ci=1, then (0,Pi(x)) leaves Z in time less than T.

It follows that (W0W0--)c(Φ) is open in W0W0-- and

K c ( Φ ) = Fix ( P n ) ( W 0 W 0 - - ) c ( Φ )

is compact. In particular, the fixed point index ind(Pn|(W0W0--)c,Kc) is well defined and one can prove (see [26, 24]) that

ind ( P n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) c ( Φ ) , K c ( Φ ) ) = L ( ( μ W - I ) k ) ,

where the symbol 1 appears in c exactly k-times.

Remark 8.1.

It follows that if (Φ;Z,W) is a chaotic triple, then ind(Pn|(W0W0--)c(Φ),Kc(Φ)) is independent of Φ, i.e., if (Ψ;Z,W) is another chaotic triple, then

ind ( P n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) c ( Φ ) , K c ( Φ ) ) = ind ( P Ψ n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) c ( Ψ ) , K c ( Ψ ) ) .

Corollary 8.2.

If (Φ;Z,W) is a chaotic triple, then the Poincaré map P has infinitely many periodic points.

Proof.

It is sufficient to consider the n-periodic sequences with k=1. ∎

Let K be a positive integer and let E(1),,E(K) be disjoint closed subsets of the essential exit set Z-- which are T-periodic, i.e., E(l)0=E(l)T, and such that Z--=l=1KE(l).

For pΣK+1={0,1,,K}, we define the set (W0W0--)(p,relΦ) by the following rules:

  1. P l ( x ) W 0 W 0 - - for l{0,,n}.

  2. Φ ( 0 , t + l T ) ( x ) W t W t - - for t[0,T] and l{0,,n-1}.

  3. For each i{0,,n-1}, if pi=0, then Φ(0,iT+t)(x)ZtZt-- for t(0,T).

  4. For each i{0,,n-1}, if pi>0, then (0,Pi(x)) leaves Z in time less than T through E(pi).

The set (W0W0--)(p,relΦ) is open in W0 and the set

K ( p , rel Φ ) = ( W 0 W 0 - - ) ( p , rel Φ ) Fix ( P n )

is compact for every n-periodic sequence pΣK+1. In particular, the fixed point index

ind ( P n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) ( p , rel Φ ) , K ( p , rel Φ ) )

is well defined for every chaotic triple (Φ;Z,W) and each n-periodic sequence cΣK+1.

Problem 8.3.

Is the fixed point index ind(Pn|(W0W0--)(p,relΦ),K(p,relΦ)) independent of the semi-process Φ in the chaotic triple (Φ;Z,W)?

Figure 11 
          The periodic segment Z⁢(2){Z(2)} over [0,T]{[0,T]}. The monodromy map is the identity. The essential exit set Z⁢(2)--{Z(2)^{--}} has three components. One can choose the identity as the monodromy map mZ⁢(2){m_{Z(2)}}, so L⁢(mZ⁢(2))=-2{L(m_{Z(2)})=-2}.
Figure 11

The periodic segment Z(2) over [0,T]. The monodromy map is the identity. The essential exit set Z(2)-- has three components. One can choose the identity as the monodromy map mZ(2), so L(mZ(2))=-2.

Figure 12 
          The periodic segment W⁢(2){W(2)} over [0,T]{[0,T]}. One can choose the rotation by 2⁢π3{\frac{2\pi}{3}} as the monodromy map mW⁢(2){m_{W(2)}}, so L⁢(mW⁢(2))=L⁢(m)=1{L(m_{W(2)})=L(m)=1}, because m¯{\overline{m}} has no fixed points in W0--{W_{0}^{--}} and W0{W_{0}} is contractible.
Figure 12

The periodic segment W(2) over [0,T]. One can choose the rotation by 2π3 as the monodromy map mW(2), so L(mW(2))=L(m)=1, because m¯ has no fixed points in W0-- and W0 is contractible.

Remark 8.4.

Let us mention that it was proved in [27, 24] that if (Φλ,Z,W) (λ[0,1]) is an admissible continuous family of chaotic triples, then

ind ( ( P 0 ) n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) ( p , rel Φ 0 ) , K ( p , rel Φ 0 ) ) = ind ( ( P 1 ) n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) ( p , rel Φ 1 ) , K ( p , rel Φ 1 ) ) .

This result works in metric spaces X, and the admissibility of the family (Φλ;Z,W) means that there exists η>0 such that for every wW-- and zZ--, there exists t>0 such that for 0<τ<t and λ[0,1], we have

ϕ τ λ ( w ) W , d ( ϕ t λ ( w ) , W ) > η , ϕ τ λ ( z ) Z , d ( ϕ t λ ( z ) , Z ) > η ,

where d is a corresponding metric on ×X.

For the n-periodic sequence c=(c0,,cn-1)Σ2, by Πc we denote the set of all n-periodic sequences p=(p0,,pn-1)ΣK+1 such that ci=0 implies pi=0.

Corollary 8.5.

Let (Φ;Z,W) be a chaotic triple such that ind(Pn|(W0W0--)(p,relΦ),K(p,relΦ)){0,±1} for every pΠc. Then

card K c ( Φ ) | L ( ( μ W - I ) k ) | .

Proof.

The set Kc(Φ) splits into a finite, disjoint union of sets K(p,relΦ) (pΠc), so by the additivity property of the fixed point index we get that

L ( ( μ W - I ) k ) = ind ( P n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) c ( Φ ) , K c ( Φ ) ) = p Π c ind ( P n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) ( p , rel Φ ) , K ( p , rel Φ ) ) ,

hence the result follows. ∎

We will say that a chaotic triple (ΦM;Z,W) is a regular model (resp. weak regular model) for a chaotic triple (Φ;Z,W) if for every n-periodic sequence pΣK+1,

ind ( P n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) ( p , rel Φ ) , K ( p , rel Φ ) ) = ind ( ( P M ) n | ( W 0 W 0 - - ) ( p , rel Φ M ) , K ( p , rel Φ M ) ) { ± 1 } ( resp.  { 0 , ± 1 } ) .

In particular, if a chaotic triple (Φ;Z,W) has a weak regular model, then

card K c ( Φ ) | L ( ( μ W - I ) k ) |

for every n-periodic sequence cΣ2.

As an application we consider the local process Φm generated by the T=2πκ-periodic planar equation

z ˙ = z ¯ m ( 1 + e i κ t | z | 2 ) , z , m 1 ,

where κ>0 is a real parameter.

It was proved in [26] that for sufficiently small κ>0 (depending on m), there exists a chaotic triple (Φm;Z(m),W(m)) associated to Φm. The time t-section of the segment Z(m) is a regular 2(m+1)-gon based prism centered at the origin. The essential exit set Z(m)-- consists of n+1 disjoint parts. The segment W(m) is a twisted prism with a 2(m+1)-gon base also centered at the origin. Its time sections, are obtained by rotating the base with angular velocity κm+1 over the time interval [0,2πκ]. The essential exit set W(m)-- consists of m+1 disjoint ribbons winding around the prism (see Figures 11 and 12).

Corollary 8.6.

Let cΣ2 be an n-periodic sequence such that the symbol 1 appears k-times (0kn) in c. Then

card ( K c ( Φ m ) ) | tr ( I - A m ) k | ,

where

A m = [ 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 ] M m + 1 ( ) .

Proof.

We first explain that

| L ( ( μ W ( m ) - I ) k ) | = | tr ( I - A m ) k | .

Since the monodromy map mW(m):(W(m)0,W(m)0--)(W(m)0,W(m)0--) is a rotation by 2πm+1, we have

L ( μ W ( m ) ) = = L ( μ W ( m ) m ) = 1 , L ( μ W ( m ) m + 1 ) = χ ( W 0 ) - χ ( W 0 - - ) = 1 - ( m + 1 ) = - m .

It follows that

L ( ( I - μ W ( m ) ) k ) ) = i = 0 k ( - 1 ) i ( k i ) L ( μ W ( m ) i )
= ( m + 1 | s ( - 1 ) s ( k s ) ) ( L ( μ W ( m ) m + 1 ) - L ( μ W ( m ) ) )
= ( m + 1 | s ( - 1 ) s ( k s ) ) ( - m - 1 )
= - t = 0 m ( 1 - ω t ) k
= - tr ( I - A m ) k ,

where ω=e2πim+1 is the m+1-primitive root of unity. The last equation holds because 1,ω,,ωm are the eigenvalues of Am.

By Corollary 8.5, it is sufficient to show that a chaotic triple (Φm;Z(m),W(m)) has a weak regular model (ΦmM;Z(m),W(m)), and this is the case by results in [28], where the appropriate model semi-processes were constructed for every m1. For the convenience of the reader we very briefly describe below this construction for m=1 and m=2. ∎

Assume that m=1. We write Z=Z(1) and W=W(1), Φ=Φ1. Then

L ( μ W ) = 1 , L ( μ W 2 ) = - 1 , | L ( ( μ W - I ) k ) | = 2 k .

Let W0=[-R,R]×[-R,R]. For 0<c<a<b<R, we put J-1=[-b,-a], J0=[-c,c], J1=[a,b]. Consider the function f:J-1J0J1[-R,R] having the graph in Figure 13.

Let Z+1, Z-1 be two connected components of Z-- (right and left, respectively). The chaotic triple (Φ;Z,W) has a regular model (ΦM;Z,W) (see [28]) such that the following hold:

  1. { J - 1 J 0 J 1 } × [ - R , R ] = { z W 0 : Φ ( 0 , t ) M ( z ) W t  for all  t [ 0 , T ] } .

  2. J 0 × [ - R , R ] = { z W 0 : Φ ( 0 , t ) M ( z ) Z t  for all  t [ 0 , T ] } .

  3. For l=+1,-1,

    J 0 × [ - R , R ] = { z W 0 : z  leaves  Z  through  Z l  in time  T } .

  4. For z=(x,y){J-1J0J1}×[-R,R], the Poincaré map PM is given by

    P M ( x , y ) = ( f ( x ) , 0 ) .

Figure 13 
          The graph of function f:J-1∪J0∪J1→[-R,R]{f\colon J_{-1}\cup J_{0}\cup J_{1}\to[-R,R]} being a one-dimensional topological horseshoe.
Figure 13

The graph of function f:J-1J0J1[-R,R] being a one-dimensional topological horseshoe.

Figure 14 
          The graph of function f:J0∪J1∪J2∪J3→S{f\colon J_{0}\cup J_{1}\cup J_{2}\cup J_{3}\to S}.
Figure 14

The graph of function f:J0J1J2J3S.

Let m=2 and Z=Z(2), W=W(2), Φ=Φ2. It follows that Z0=W0 is a hexagon centered at the origin, and the exit set Z-- has three components E1, E2 and E3. Let R be equal to the radius of the inscribed circle Z0 and let h:zze2πi3 be the rotation. We define

S = [ 0 , R ] h ( [ 0 , R ] ) h 2 ( [ 0 , R ] ) , J k = h k - 1 ( [ b , c ] ) , k { 1 , 2 , 3 } .

Let f:JJ1J2J3S be a continuous map, symmetric with respect to h, with its graph shown in Figure 14.

Let r:W0S be the retraction shown in Figure 15. We put

K = r - 1 ( J J 1 J 2 J 3 ) .

The chaotic triple (Φ;Z,W) has a weak regular model (ΦM;Z,W) (see [28]) such that the following hold:

  1. K = { z W 0 : Φ ( 0 , t ) M ( z ) W t  for all  t [ 0 , T ] } .

  2. r - 1 ( J ) = { z W 0 : Φ ( 0 , t ) M ( z ) Z t  for all  t [ 0 , T ] } .

  3. For k{1,2,3},

    r - 1 ( J k ) = { z K : z  leaves  Z  through  Z l  in time  T } .

  4. The Poincaré map PM for ΦM satisfies

    P M ( z ) = f ( r ( z ) ) , z K .

Remark 8.7.

According to Corollary 8.5, it is interesting to study the behavior of the sequence L((I-μW)k). Let us first focus on the sequence ak=tr(I-Am)k, where Am is defined in Corollary 8.6. Let ρ>1 be the spectral radius of I-Am. Then there exists a sequence nk and q>0 such that

lim k a n k ρ n k = q .

In particular, ak has exponential growth so it is unbounded. In general, one can prove that the same conclusion holds if the sequence (L(μWk))k0 is l-periodic with period l6.

Problem 8.8.

Does every chaotic triple (Φ;Z,W) have a weak regular model? If the answer is not, characterize the chaotic triples that have weak regular models. What one can say about chaotic triples having regular models?

Figure 15 
          The deformation retraction r:W0→S{r\colon W_{0}\to S}.
Figure 15

The deformation retraction r:W0S.


Communicated by Fabio Zanolin


A Nielsen Numbers Theory: The Mapping Torus Approach

A.1 Generalized Lefschetz Number

The mapping torusTf of f:XX is the space obtained from X×+ by identifying (x,s+1) with (f(x),s) for all xX, s+. On Tf there exists a natural suspension semiflow

ϕ : T f × + T f , ϕ t ( [ x , s ] ) = [ x , s + t ] , t 0 .

We may identify X with X×{0}Tf. Then the map f:XX is the return map of the semiflow ϕ. A point xX and a positive number τ>0 determine the time-τ orbit curve

orb x τ := { ϕ t ( x ) = ϕ t ( [ x , 0 ] ) : t [ 0 , τ ] } T f .

It follows that xFix(f) if and only if orbx1 is a closed curve.

Lemma A.1.

Two fixed points x0,x1Fix(f) belong to the same fixed point class (Nielsen class) if and only if the closed curves orbx01 and orbx11 are freely homotopic in Tf. (The term freely homotopic means homotopic as maps from S1 into Tf.)

In the mapping torus Tf take the base point vXTf. Let w:[0,1]X be a fixed path from v to f(v). Let Γ=π1(Tf,v) be a fundamental group and let π=π1(X,v). By the Seifert–van Kampen theorem,

Γ = π , z α z = z f π ( α )  for all  α π ,

where z is represented by the loop (orbv1)w-1.

Two elements in g,gΓ are conjugated if there exists aΓ such that g=aga-1. Let Γc denote the set of conjugacy classes in Γ and Γγ[γ]Γc.

Suppose xFix(f). Pick any path c from v to x, and let α=[w(fc)c-1]π. Then cx:=[c(orbx1)c-1]Γ. One can check that cx=zαΓ. The Γ-coordinate cdΓ(x,f) of x is defined to be the conjugacy class [cx]=[zα]Γc. It is equal to the free homotopy class of the closed curve orbx1. It follows that the two fixed points are in the same fixed point (Nielsen) class if and only if they have the same Γ-coordinate.

The Γ-coordinatecdΓ(F,f) of a non-empty Nielsen class F is defined to be the common Γ-coordinate of its members

cd Γ ( F , f ) = cd Γ ( x , f ) , x F .

Let Γ be the integral ring of group Γ, and let Γc be a free abelian group with basis Γc. The norm in Γc is defined by

i k i γ i = i | k i | ,

when γiΓc are all different.

We define the generalized Γ-Lefschetz number by

L Γ ( f ) := F ind ( f , F ) cd Γ ( F , f ) Γ c ,

the summation being over all Nielsen classes F of f.

The Nielsen number of f is nothing but the number of non-zero terms in LΓ(f). LΓ(f) is a homotopy invariant of f.

A.2 Reidemeister Trace Formula

Assume that X is a finite cell complex and f:XX is a cellular map. Pick a cellular decomposition {ejd} of X, the base point v being a 0-cell. This lifts to a π-invariant cellular structure on the universal covering X~. Choose an arbitrary lift e~jd for each ejd. These lifts form a free π-basis for the cellular chain complex of X~. The lift f~ of f is also a cellular map. In every dimension d, the cellular chain map f~ gives rise to a π-matrix F~d with respect to the above basis, i.e., F~d=(aij) if

f ~ ( e ~ j d ) = i a i j e ~ j d , a i j π .

Theorem A.2 (Reidemeister Trace Formula).

The generalized Lefschetz number is given by

L Γ ( f ) = d ( - 1 ) d [ tr ( z F ~ d ) ] Γ c ,

where zF~d is regarded in ZΓ, and the brackets denote the linear map ZΓZΓc.

A.3 Periodic Orbit Classes

Let f:XX. Observe that xFix(fn) if and only if on the mapping torus Tf the time n-orbit curve orbxn is a closed curve. We define x,yFix(fn) to be in the same n-orbit class if and only if orbxn and orbyn are in the same free homotopy class of closed curves in Tf. The set Fix(fn) splits into a disjoint union of n-orbit classes.

Let On be an n-orbit class. If xOn, then its n-orbit is {x,f(x),,fn-1(x)}On, because the closed orbit curves of these points are the same curve with different base points.

Remark A.3.

If xOn and Fn is a Nielsen class containing x, then

O n = F n f ( F n ) f n - 1 ( F n ) .

Since for all xOn, the closed curves orbxn are freely homotopic in Tf, they represent a well-defined conjugacy class [orbxn] in Γ. It will be called the coordinate of On in Γ, and it is written as

cd Γ ( O n ) = [ orb x n ] Γ c .

Every n-orbit class On is an isolated subset of Fix(fn). Its index is defined by ind(fn,On). An n-orbit class On is called essential if its index is non-zero.

We define the (generalized) Lefschetz number (with respect to Γ) by

L Γ ( f n ) := O n ind ( f n , O n ) cd Γ ( O n ) Γ c ,

the summation being over all n-orbit classes On of fn. The asymptotic absolute Lefschetz number is defined by

L ( f ) := Growth L Γ ( f n ) .

The number NΓ(fn) of non-zero terms in LΓ(fn) is called the n-orbit Nielsen number of f. It follows that

N Γ ( f n ) N ( f n ) L Γ ( f n ) .

Moreover,

L Γ ( f n ) = d ( - 1 ) d [ tr ( z F ~ ) n ] Γ c .

A.4 Twisted Zeta Function

Suppose a group representation ρ:ΓGLl(R) (i.e., ρ(γ1γ2)=ρ(γ1)ρ(γ2) for γ1,γ2Γ) is given, where R is a commutative ring with unity. Then ρ extends to a ring representation ρ:ΓMl(R). Define the ρ-twisted Lefschetz number

L ρ ( f n ) := tr ( L Γ ( f n ) ) ρ = O n ind ( f n , O n ) tr ( cd Γ ( O n ) ) ρ R .

The ρ-twisted Lefschetz zeta function of f is the formal power series

ζ ρ ( f ) := exp ( n = 1 L ρ ( f n ) t n n ) .

It follows that it is a rational function

ζ ρ ( f ) = d det ( I - t ( z F ~ d ) ρ ) ( - 1 ) d + 1 R ( t ) ,

where (zF~d)ρ is the block matrix obtained from the matrix zF~d by replacing each entry (in Γ) with its ρ-image (an l×l-matrix), and I is a suitable identity matrix.

Example A.4.

If R= and ρ:ΓGL1()= is trivial (sending everything to 1), then Lρ(f) is the ordinary Lefschetz number, and ζρ(f) is the classical Lefschetz zeta function.

References

[1] G. Band and P. L. Boyland, Burau estimates for the entropy of a braid, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 7 (2007), 1345–1378. 10.2140/agt.2007.7.1345Search in Google Scholar

[2] M. Bestvina and M. Handel, Train tracks for surface homeomorphisms, Topology 34 (1995), 109–140. 10.1016/0040-9383(94)E0009-9Search in Google Scholar

[3] J. Birman, Braids, Links and Mapping Class Groups, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975. 10.1515/9781400881420Search in Google Scholar

[4] P. L. Boyland, Topological methods in surface dynamics, Topology Appl. 58 (1994), 223–298. 10.1016/0166-8641(94)00147-2Search in Google Scholar

[5] R. F. Brown, R. Greene and H. Schirmer, Fixed points of map extensions, Topological Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Lectures Notes in Math. 1411, Springer, Berlin (1989), 24–45. 10.1007/BFb0086438Search in Google Scholar

[6] E. Fadell and S. Husseini, The Nielsen number on surfaces, Topological Methods in Nonlinear Functional Analysis (Toronto 1982), Contemp. Math. 21, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1983), 59–98. 10.1090/conm/021/729505Search in Google Scholar

[7] J. Franks and M. Misiurewicz, Cycles for disk homeomorphisms and thick trees, Nielsen Theory and Dynamical Systems, Contemp. Math. 152, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1993), 261–293. 10.1090/conm/152/01319Search in Google Scholar

[8] J. Guaschi, Nielsen theory, braids and fixed points of surfaces homeomorphisms, Topology Appl. 117 (2002), 199–230. 10.1016/S0166-8641(01)00019-0Search in Google Scholar

[9] B. Hasselblat and A. Katok, Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. 10.1017/CBO9780511809187Search in Google Scholar

[10] H. Huang and B. Jiang, Braids and periodic solutions, Topological Fixed Point Theory and Applications (Tianjin 1988), Lectures Notes in Math. 1411, Springer, Berlin (1989), 107–123. 10.1007/BFb0086445Search in Google Scholar

[11] B. Jiang, Fixed points and braids I, Invent. Math. 75 (1984), 69–74. 10.1007/BF01403090Search in Google Scholar

[12] B. Jiang, Fixed points and braids II, Invent. Math. 272 (1985), 249–256. 10.1007/BF01450569Search in Google Scholar

[13] B. Jiang, Nielsen theory for periodic orbits and applications to dynamical systems, Nielsen Theory and Dynamical Systems, Contemp. Math. 152, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1993), 183–202. 10.1090/conm/152/01323Search in Google Scholar

[14] B. Jiang, Estimation of the number of periodic orbits, Pacific J. Math. 172 (1996), 151–185. 10.2140/pjm.1996.172.151Search in Google Scholar

[15] T. Matsuoka, The number and linking of periodic solutions of periodic systems, Invent. Math. 70 (1983), 319–340. 10.1007/BF01391795Search in Google Scholar

[16] T. Matsuoka, The Burau representation of the braid group and the Nielsen–Thurston classification, Nielsen Theory and Dynamical Systems, Contemp. Math. 152, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1993), 229–248. 10.1090/conm/152/01326Search in Google Scholar

[17] T. Matsuoka, Braid invariants and instability of periodic solutions of time-periodic 2-dimensional ODE’s, Topol. Methods Nonlinear Anal. 14 (1999), 261–274. 10.12775/TMNA.1999.033Search in Google Scholar

[18] T. Matsuoka, Periodic points and braids theory, Handbook of Topological Fixed Point Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004), 171–216. 10.1007/1-4020-3222-6_5Search in Google Scholar

[19] H. Schirmer, A relative Nielsen number, Pacific J. Math. 122 (1986), 459–473. 10.2140/pjm.1986.122.459Search in Google Scholar

[20] H. Schirmer, Fixed points sets on pairs of spaces, Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Its Applications, D. Reidel, Dordrecht (1986), 375–386. 10.1007/978-94-009-4632-3_30Search in Google Scholar

[21] H. Schirmer, On the location of fixed points on pairs of spaces, Topology Appl. 30 (1988), 253–266. 10.1016/0166-8641(88)90065-XSearch in Google Scholar

[22] R. Srzednicki, Periodic and bounded solutions in block for time-periodic nonautonomous ordinary differential equations, Nonlinear Anal. 22 (1994), 707–737. 10.1016/0362-546X(94)90223-2Search in Google Scholar

[23] R. Srzednicki and K. Wójcik, A geometric method for detecting chaotic dynamics, J. Differential Equations 135 (1997), 66–82. 10.1006/jdeq.1996.3222Search in Google Scholar

[24] R. Srzednicki, K. Wójcik and P. Zgliczyński, Fixed point results based on Ważewski method, Handbook of Topological Fixed Point Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004), 903–941. 10.1007/1-4020-3222-6_23Search in Google Scholar

[25] W. Thurston, On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphism of surfaces, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 19 (1998), 417–431. 10.1090/S0273-0979-1988-15685-6Search in Google Scholar

[26] K. Wójcik, Periodic segments and Nielsen numbers, Conley Index Theory, Banach Center Publ. 47, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa (1999), 247–252. 10.4064/-47-1-247-252Search in Google Scholar

[27] K. Wójcik and P. Zgliczyński, Isolating segments, fixed point index and symbolic dynamics, J. Differential Equations 161 (2000), 245–288. 10.1006/jdeq.1999.3696Search in Google Scholar

[28] K. Wójcik and P. Zgliczyński, Isolating segments, fixed point index and symbolic dynamics: III. Applications, J. Differential Equations 183 (2002), 262–278. 10.1006/jdeq.2001.4099Search in Google Scholar

[29] X. Zhao, Estimation of the number of fixed points on the complement, Topological Fixed Point Theory and Applications, Lectures Notes in Math. 1411, Springer, Berlin (1989), 257–265. 10.1016/0166-8641(90)90024-VSearch in Google Scholar

[30] X. Zhao, Estimation of the number of fixed points of map extension, Acta Math. Sinica (N. S.) 8 (1992), 357–361. 10.1007/BF02583262Search in Google Scholar

[31] X. Zhao, Relative Nielsen theory, Handbook of Topological Fixed Point Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004), 659–684. 10.1007/1-4020-3222-6_18Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-02-05
Revised: 2017-01-06
Accepted: 2017-01-06
Published Online: 2017-01-27
Published in Print: 2017-07-01

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 24.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ans-2016-6021/html
Scroll to top button