Science Studies and Literature

Works Cited

Biagioli, Mario. 1999. “Introduction: Science Studies and Its Disciplinary Predicament”. In: Mario Biagioli (ed.). The Science Studies Reader. New York: Routledge. xi-xviii.Search in Google Scholar

Chatman, Seymour. 1980. “What Novels Can Do That Films Can’t (and Vice Versa)”. Critical Inquiry 7.1: 121–40.10.1086/448091Search in Google Scholar

Collins, Harry, and Robert Evans. 2007. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226113623.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dickhaut, Kirsten. 2005. “Intermedialität und Gedächtnis”. In: Astrid Erll and Ansgar Nünning (eds.). Gedächtniskonzepte der Literaturwissenschaft: Theoretische Grundlegung und Anwendungsperspektiven. Berlin: De Gruyter. 203–26.10.1515/9783110908435.203Search in Google Scholar

Dimock, Wai Chee, and Priscilla Wald (eds.). 2002. Literature and Science: Cultural Forms, Conceptual Exchanges. Spec. issue of American Literature 74.4.10.1215/00029831-74-4-705Search in Google Scholar

Emmeche, Claus. 1991. “Simulating Life: Postmodern Science”. The Garden in the Machine: The Emerging Science of Artificial Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 156–66.Search in Google Scholar

Foucault, Michel. 1980. “Truth and Power”. In: Colin Gordon (ed.). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books. 109–33.Search in Google Scholar

Gross, Alan G. 1990. The Rhetoric of Science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Haraway, Donna J. 1991. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective”. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge. 183–201. Originally published in Feminist Studies 14.3 (1988): 575–99.10.2307/3178066Search in Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra. 2003. “A World of Sciences”. In: Robert Figueroa and Sandra Harding (eds.). Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophy of Science and Technology. New York: Routledge. 49–69.Search in Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harding, Sandra, and Robert Figueroa. 2003. “Introduction”. In: Robert Figueroa and Sandra Harding (eds.). Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophy of Science and Technology. New York: Routledge. 1–11.Search in Google Scholar

Ickstadt, Heinz. 2012. “‘Asynchronous Messaging’: The Multiple Functions of Richard Powers’ Fiction”. In: Antje Kley and Jan D. Kucharzewski (eds.). Ideas of Order: Narrative Patterns in the Novels of Richard Powers. Heidelberg: Winter. 23–44.Search in Google Scholar

Kay, Lily. 2000. Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Stanford: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9781503617575Search in Google Scholar

Keller, Evelyn Fox. 1985. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 1988. “Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-Closer”. Social Problems 35.3: 298–310.10.1525/sp.1988.35.3.03a00070Search in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno. 2008. “Powers of the Facsimile: A Turing Test on Science and Literature”. In: Stephen J. Burn and Peter Dempsey (eds.). Intersections: Essays on Richard Powers. Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press. 263–91.Search in Google Scholar

Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Lepenies, Wolf. 1988. Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Levine, George. 1987. “Introduction”. In: George Levine (ed.). One Culture: Essays in Science and Literature. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 3–32.Search in Google Scholar

Lewontin, Richard C. 2000. The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism, and Environment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Machlup, Fritz. 1962. The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Milich, Klaus. 1998. Die frühe Postmoderne: Geschichte eines europäisch-amerikanischen Kulturkonflikts. Frankfurt: Campus.Search in Google Scholar

Newfield, Christopher. 2003. Ivy and Industry: Business and the Making of the American University, 1880–1980. Durham: Duke University Press.10.1515/9780822385202Search in Google Scholar

Otis, Laura (ed.). 2002. Literature and Science in the Nineteenth Century: An Anthology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pickering, Andrew (ed.). 1992. Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Powers, Richard. 2000b. “Being and Seeming: The Technology of Representation”. wildethics.org. Alliance for Wild Ethics, n. d. Web. 31 July 2014. Originally published in Context: A Forum for Literary Arts and Culture 3.Search in Google Scholar

Powers, Richard. 1995. Galatea 2.2. New York: Picador.Search in Google Scholar

Powers, Richard. 2009. Generosity. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Powers, Richard. 2007. Interview by Alex Michod. The Believer 5.1: n. pag. Web. [accessed 31 July 2014].Search in Google Scholar

Powers, Richard. 2008. “Making the Rounds”. In: Stephen J. Burn and Peter Dempsey (eds.). Intersections: Essays on Richard Powers. Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press. 305–10.Search in Google Scholar

Powers, Richard. 2000a. Plowing the Dark. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Search in Google Scholar

Powers, Richard. 2006. The Echo Maker. London: Heinemann.Search in Google Scholar

Powers, Richard. 1991. The Gold Bug Variations. New York: Morrow.Search in Google Scholar

Powers, Richard. 2003. The Time of Our Singing. London: Random House.Search in Google Scholar

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2008. “Changing Fates of Virus: Medical History, Agriculture, Molecular Biology”. In: Sabine Sielke and Elisabeth Schäfer-Wünsche (eds.). The Body as Interface: Dialogues between the Disciplines. Heidelberg: Winter. 203–18.Search in Google Scholar

Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 2001. Experimentalsysteme und Epistemische Dinge: eine Geschichte der Proteinsynthese im Reagenzglas. Göttingen: Wallstein.Search in Google Scholar

Sielke, Sabine. 2010. “Biology”. In: Bruce Clarke and Manuela Rossini (eds.). The Routledge Companion to Literature and Science. London: Routledge. 29–40.Search in Google Scholar

Sielke, Sabine. 2013. “Natural Sciences”. In: Eliza Richards (ed.). Emily Dickinson in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 236–45.Search in Google Scholar

Sielke, Sabine. 2014. “Network and Seriality: Conceptualizing (Their) Connection”. In: Ulfried Reichardt, Heike Schäfer, and Regina Schober (eds.). Networks in American Culture / Network Theories and American Studies. Spec. issue of Amerikastudien/American Studies. Forthcoming.Search in Google Scholar

Sielke, Sabine. 2008. “Science into Narrative, or: Novelties of a Cultural Nature”. In: Thomas Klinkert und Monika Neuhofer (eds.). Literatur, Wissenschaft, Wissen seit der Epochenschwelle 1800. Berlin: de Gruyter. 432–58.Search in Google Scholar

Sielke, Sabine. 2012. “The Subject of Literature, or (Re-)Cognition in Richard Powers’ (Science) Fiction”. In: Antje Kley and Jan D. Kucharzewski (eds.). Ideas of Order: Narrative Patterns in the Novels of Richard Powers. Heidelberg: Winter. 241–61.Search in Google Scholar

Snow, Charles Percy. 1963. The Two Cultures: and a Second Look. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sontag, Susan. 1990. “One Culture and the New Sensibility”. 1965. Against Interpretation and Other Essays. New York: Picador. 292–304.Search in Google Scholar

Tabbi, Joseph. 2008. “Afterthoughts on The Echo Maker”. In: Stephen J. Burn and Peter Dempsey (eds.). Intersections: Essays on Richard Powers. Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press. 219–29.Search in Google Scholar

Wald, Priscilla. 2008. Contagious: Cultures, Carriers, and the Outbreak Narrative. Durham: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv11sms36Search in Google Scholar

Wyer, Mary, et al. (eds.). 2001. Women, Science and Technology: A Reader in Feminist Science Studies. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar