Home Expert consensus on narrative medicine in China (2023)
Article Open Access

Expert consensus on narrative medicine in China (2023)

  • Rong Huang , Hao Zhang , Xu Mao , Yuling Qiao , Yuanda Li , Jun Li , Fang Li , Fang Huang , Danjiang Sun , En-yu Wang , Lili Wu , Xinyan Yu , Liming Zhu EMAIL logo and Liping Guo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 22, 2024

The burgeoning field of Narrative Medicine (NM) in China has drawn the attention of scholars and medical practitioners nationwide, yet discrepancies in understanding its principles and methods remain. The absence of overarching guidance and detailed practice strategies has impeded the development of NM’s potential. To address this gap and to foster a unified approach to the history, practice, and research of NM, the Narrative Medicine Association of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association and the Narrative Medicine Association of the Beijing Integrative Medicine Association convened a panel of experts to draft the Expert Consensus on Narrative Medicine in China (ECNMC 2023) [1].

Medicine is fundamentally concerned with preventing and treating diseases as well as preserving or reinstating the physical, psychological, and social well-being of individuals. Humane care should be at the core of medicine. Nonetheless, the emphasis on medical technologism and the paucity of the humanistic aspects in clinical education and practices have led to potential discord between healthcare providers and patients. NM has been recognized as a pivotal tool in advancing health humanities, for it integrates insights from diverse fields such as literature, linguistics, anthropology, sociology, psychology, and communication studies to investigate and shape the dynamics, content, and methodologies of clinical interactions between healthcare providers and patients. Recent research indicates that NM has the potential to improve the empathy of healthcare providers, enhance patient satisfaction, foster collaborative doctor-patient relationships, and produce better clinical outcomes, patient outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes.

Since its introduction into China in 2011, NM has been instrumental in mediating medical disputes and cultivating harmonious doctor-patient relations in China [2]. The trajectory of NM in China has been marked by significant milestones, including the inauguration of the Chinese Journal of Narrative Medicine in 2018 and the publication of the Narrative Medicine textbook for hospital resident trainees in 2020. This textbook was commissioned by the National Health Commission of China. The establishment of national, provincial, and municipal narrative medicine associations underscores the growing recognition and support for this field. Drawing on a synthesis of scholarly literature, expert insights, and practical experiences in NM, the ECNMC 2023 working group meticulously designed a structured consultation questionnaire. Following the modified Delphi Method, experts were invited to iteratively review, refine, and rate each recommendation in the questionnaire. This process culminated in the consensus agreement on 21 recommendations for advancing NM practices in China. The ECNMC 2023 is envisioned to serve as a valuable resource for Chinese NM practitioners in the future.

Methodology

The ECNMC 2023 initiative was jointly spearheaded by the Narrative Medicine Association of the Chinese Preventive Medicine Association and the Narrative Medicine Association of the Beijing Integrative Medicine Association, and has been formally registered on the Practice Guideline Registration for Transparency (PREPARE) platform under the registration number PREPARE-2023CN553. The development process of the ECNMC 2023 applied a modified Delphi Method, leveraging a structured consultation questionnaire to solicit expert feedback during the initial round of inquiries. Experts were invited to offer recommendations and alternative perspectives. When the importance and feasibility scores of each recommendation were ≥0.8 points in the subsequent round, the inquiries were terminated.

The ECNMC 2023 was formed through two rounds of Delphi inquiry conducted by expert groups in July and September of 2023. Following the second round, data were meticulously collected, revealing importance scores ranging from 0.87 to 0.99 for each recommendation. These results have not only met the strict Delphi evaluation criteria but also signaled the conclusion of the inquiry process. Initially comprising 24 proposed recommendations, the ECNMC 2023 eventually settled on 21 recommendations deemed pivotal by the experts. During the first round, 29 inquiry forms were distributed, with 23 collected and 21 deemed valid, reflecting an effective recovery rate of 72.41 %. The subsequent round saw 21 inquiry forms issued, all of which were collected and validated, which results in a remarkable 100 % effective recovery rate. The experts exhibited a high level of positivity, with judgment basis for inquiry at 0.776, familiarity level at 0.840, and authority coefficient at 0.808. This underscores their profound expertise in the subject matter. Notably, the coefficient of variation (CV) in the first round ranged from 0.089 to 0.310 for each recommendation, with a Kendall coordination coefficient W value of 0.107. In the second round, CV values ranged from 0.045 to 0.111, with a corresponding Kendall coordination coefficient W value of 0.132, indicating a trend towards greater consensus among expert opinions.

Contents

The concept and values of NM

Recommendation 1: Rita Charon’s definition in The Principles and Practice of Narrative Medicine is recommended as the baseline definition: NM is “a rigorous intellectual and clinical discipline to fortify healthcare with the capacity to skillfully receive the accounts persons give of themselves – to recognize, absorb, interpret, and be moved to action by the stories of others” [3].

Recommendation 2: The “Basic Concepts of Narrative Medicine 22334 Red Flower Model” (China Copyright Registration Certificate-2023-F-00069644) should be used to explain and elucidate the fundamental tenets of NM. This model reflects the “two tools” of cultivating narrative competency – close reading and writing; the “two tools” of NM practice – the self and the presence of healthcare providers; the “three focuses” of NM – empathy, relationality, and emotion; the “three elements” – attention, representation, and affiliation, as well as the “four relationships” – the composite trust relationships of healthcare providers with patients, with themselves, with colleagues, and with society.

Recommendation 3: The concept of “developmental NM” should be adopted in both practice and research settings, which aims to broaden the horizons of NM by expanding its scope, beneficiaries, tools, and application areas.

Recommendation 4: NM has practical attributes as a comprehensive framework that encapsulates the clinical behaviors of exemplary medical practitioners with a blend of humanistic competency and medical expertise. Therefore, NM not only explains and elucidates clinical medical humanities, but also serves as a tool for humanistic care.

Recommendation 5: NM is of significance to patients. There is an interactive relationship between healthcare professionals and patients. On the one hand, healthcare professionals provide care and support for patients, address patients’ physical and psychological needs, and provide life and death education, so that patients may objectively and rationally face the limits of medicine, understand the meaning of human life, and obtain informed diagnosis and treatment through shared decision-making. On the other hand, the reciprocal nature of patient feedback serves as a testament to the quality of care provided, which greatly enhances the sense of professional achievement and motivate healthcare professionals to improve their services for patients.

Recommendation 6: NM is of significance to healthcare professionals. NM may improve the relationships of healthcare professionals with patients, with themselves, with colleagues, and with society by enhancing their narrative competency. NM not only promotes communication and mutual trust, but also allows healthcare professionals to acquire a sense of respect and achievement, thereby mitigating workplace burnout.

Recommendation 7: NM is of significance to hospitals. NM may enhance the health humanities competency of healthcare professionals, improve patient experience at healthcare institutions, increase their adherence to these institutions and reduce doctor-patient conflicts, as well as promote the development of medical humanities and hospital management.

Recommendation 8: NM is of significance to medicine and healthcare as a whole. The combination of NM with evidence-based medicine and precision medicine is beneficial for the practice of the bio-psycho-social model. On the one hand, NM can be used as a tool for the improvement of evidence-based medicine. On the other hand, precision medicine is the individualization of medical technology at the biomedical level, while NM is the individualization of health humanities at the psychological-social level. NM, evidence-based medicine, and precision medicine complement each other.

Recommendation 9: NM has significant social values. NM brings medicine back to its essence – medicine is not about “the disease” but “the person.” Meanwhile, the harmonious doctor-patient relationship fostered by NM contributes to the advancement of social harmony.

The practice of NM

Recommendation 10: Narrative nursing, rooted in NM and narrative therapy, represents a vital branch of NM and its practical application in the nursing domain.

Recommendation 11: Medical institutions at all levels should incorporate NM into clinic practice. Healthcare providers are encouraged to actively engage in listening to patients’ narratives in their encounter with patients. It is important for healthcare providers to cultivate professional habits of self-reflection, embrace empathy, and promote shared decision-making, in order to foster a collaborative partnership of mutual trust with patients.

Recommendation 12: Medical institutions at all levels should use NM as a foundation to establish humanistic departments, humanistic nursing units, and humanistic hospitals. The concept of NM should be integrated into various aspects of healthcare, including health promotion, hospital management, research and teaching, and doctor-patient dispute resolution.

Recommendation 13: Medical institutions at all levels should organize continuing medical education related to NM. Doctor-patient stories should be disseminated through various media platforms to inspire and motivate healthcare providers to practice NM consistently.

Recommendation 14: Medical schools should provide NM-related courses to medical students to fully demonstrate the educational value of NM. Medical schools are encouraged to explore the construction of a series of NM courses, including basic theories of NM, illness narratives, narrative texts, narrative and doctor-patient communication, and NM and traditional culture.

The research of NM

Recommendation 15: To promote the localization and development of NM in China, it is recommended that in-depth theoretical and practical research be carried out on NM, so as to establish NM with Chinese characteristics, and effectively articulate Chinese voices and tell Chinese stories to the international community.

Recommendation 16: Medical schools/colleges and medical institutions of all levels should conduct empirical research on the clinical application of NM, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method research. In addition to patients, the subjects of NM research should include family members, clinical doctors, and medical students, nurses, clinical pharmacists, and other healthcare providers who interact with patients. The establishment of doctor-patient communities, nurse-patient communities, and medical care communities should also be included in the research.

Recommendation 17: Research on NM education and teaching needs to be strengthened. Such research may include textbook development, curriculum design, teaching contents design, pedagogies, and evaluation models.

Recommendation 18: Research on NM practitioners needs to be strengthened. The research objectives include enhancing narrative competency, empathy, professional resilience, and professionalism of healthcare providers. The goals of such research include promoting self-reflection, reducing occupational burnout, and enhancing professional identity.

Recommendation 19: Research on the effect of NM practice on patients needs to be strengthened. The research objectives include improving patient experience and satisfaction, and improving clinical outcomes, patient outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and their overall health and well-being.

Recommendation 20: Standardization of intervention methods should be explored, including close reading, parallel chart writing, narrative nursing practice, Balint group activities, and artistic intervention in the empirical research of NM.

Recommendation 21: Quantitative empirical research on the effectiveness of NM should have a series of standardized measurement indicators. It is recommended that the following validated scales for measurement be used, including but not limited to: Patient Satisfaction Scale, Quality of Life Scale (QLS), Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), Narrative Competence Scale, Caring Ability Scale (CAS), Jefferson Scale of Empathy (JSE), Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), Personal Growth Initiative Scale (PGIS), and Career Resilience Scale.

Chief Reviewer of Consensus:
JIN Changxiao, Peking University Third Hospital
Consultation Experts (in alphabetical order of surnames in Chinese Pinyin):
CHENG Yu, School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University
JIA Junju, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
LI Bo, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University
LI Chun, Hebei Petro China Central Hospital
LI Fei, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Peking Union Medical College
LI Jing, Shanghai East Hospital
LI Xiaodan, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University
LIN Xiaoji, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
LIU Xiaohong, Hunan Cancer Hospital
LU Ming, Jiaozuo People’s Hospital
SHU Jing, Zhejiang Sian International Hospital
SU Jiachun, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University
WANG Lin, National Institute of Environmental Health, China CDC
WANG Ping, Suzhou Wuzhong People’s Hospital
WU Guo-an, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University
XIA Yuanyuan, School of Marxism, Nanjing Medical University School of Marxism, Nanjing Medical University
XIE Hong, West China Hospital, Sichuan University
ZHANG Yanhua, Jiading Central Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences
ZHAO Bin, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University
ZHAO Yuanyuan, The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University
ZHU Mei, The Sixth People’s Hospital of Zhengzhou
Secretaries:
MAO Xu, School of Health Humanities, Peking University
FANG Binru, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
WU Jin, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
Translators:
LIU Jingjing, School of Health Humanities, Peking University
Daniel Vuillerman, School of Health Humanities, Peking University


Corresponding authors: Liming Zhu, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Building 10, No.1 Banshan East Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, E-mail: ; and Liping Guo, School of Health Humanities, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, 100191 Beijing, China, E-mail:

Rong Huang and Hao Zhang contributed equally to this work and share first authorship. Liming Zhu and Liping Guo share correspondence authorship. The Chinese version of the ECNMC 2023 was published in the Chinese Journal of Narrative Medicine, see Liping Guo, Liming Zhu, Rong Huang, Yuling Qiao, Yuanda Li, Jun Li, Fang Li, Xu Mao, Fang Huang, Hao Zhang, Danjiang Sun, En-Yu Wang, Lili Wu, Xinyan Yu, “Expert Consensus on Narrative Medicine in China (2023),” Narrative Medicine 6, no. 6 (2023): 381–411. It contains a detailed analysis of each recommendation as well as a list of reference consisting of over 240 entries. This article was translated by Jingjing Liu and Daniel Vuillerman.


Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the People’s Medical Publishing House and the Chinese journal of Narrative Medicine for their permission to translating and reprinting this article.

  1. Research ethics: Not applicable.

  2. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  3. Author contributions: Rong Huang and Hao Zhang contributed equally to the overall process of this work and share first authorship. Liming Zhu and Liping Guo share correspondence authorship with their conceptualization and supervision of this project. Xu Mao, Yuling Qiao, Yuanda Li, Jun Li, Fang Li, Fang Huang, Danjiang Sun, En-yu Wang, Lili Wu, Xinyan Yu wrote the original draft.

  4. Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  5. Research funding: Key Special Program of the National Social Science Fund of China (22AZD077), Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Soft Scientific Research Special Cultivation Fund (NO. SSR2022A1, SSR2022B2), Zhejiang Provincial Medicine and Health Science Fund (NO. 2023KY604, 2021KY591), Zhejiang Association For Science and Technology Soft Scientific Research Project (NO. 2023KXCX-KT034), Education and Teaching Research Project of Peking University Health Science Center (2022YB36, 2023YB44), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

  6. Data availability: Not applicable.

References

1. Guo, LP, Zhu, LM, Huang, R, Qiao, YL, Li, YD, Li, J, et al.. Expert consensus on narrative medicine in China (2023). Narrat Med 2023;6:381–411.Search in Google Scholar

2. Guo, LP. An overview of narrative medicine in China. Chin Med Cult 2023;6:205–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/mc9.0000000000000064.Search in Google Scholar

3. Rita, C, DasGupta, S, Hermann, N, Irvine, C, Marcus, ER, Colsn, ER, et al.. The principles and practice of narrative medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-05-22

© 2024 the author(s), published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 25.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ajmedh-2024-0012/html
Scroll to top button