Home A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Relative Payouts to Operational Creditors and Financial Creditors from Bankruptcy Resolution in India
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Relative Payouts to Operational Creditors and Financial Creditors from Bankruptcy Resolution in India

  • Rohit Prasad EMAIL logo , Gaurav Gupta and Yogesh B. Mathur
Published/Copyright: June 25, 2020
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper analyses the outcomes of the cases resolved under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code of India to examine the treatment of admitted claims for the two main classes of creditors i.e. operational and financial creditors. It shows that, at an aggregate level, operational creditors and financial creditors realize an equal percentage of their claims. However, at an individual level, there is wide heterogeneity in the treatment of the two classes of creditors. Three benchmark division rules – Proportional division, Constrained Equal Losses and Constrained Equal Awards, are used to characterize the actual divisions in each case. This analysis allows us to hypothesize that when aggregate claims of operational creditors are tiny, the Constrained Equal Awards (that is extremely generous to small creditors), does well. When aggregate claims of operational creditors are large, the Proportional rule does well. But when the claims of operational creditors fall in an intermediate range, the Constrained Equal Losses rule which is most unfavourable to the operational creditor comes to the fore. Hence, some broad guidelines that can be applied on a case by case basis appear to be desirable.


Corresponding author: Rohit Prasad, Management Development Institute, Economics, Gurgaon, 122001, India, E-mail:

References

Aumann, R., and M. Maschler. 1985. “Game Theoretic Analysis of a Bankruptcy Problem from the Talmud.” Journal of Economic Theory 36 (2): 195–213, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(85)90102-4.Search in Google Scholar

Bebchuk, L. A., and H. F. Chang. 1992. “Bargaining and the Division of Value in Corporate Reorganization.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 8: 253–79, Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 80, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.471820.Search in Google Scholar

Branch, B., and A. Khizer. 2016 October. “Bankruptcy Practice in India.” International Review of Financial Analysis 47: 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2016.06.004.Search in Google Scholar

Bhushan Steel Limited. 2018. Bhushan Steel List of Creditors as on 20 March, 2018. Also Available at http://www.bhushan-group.org/Investor%20Relations%20pdf/Notice/BSL_List%20of%20creditors_20%20March%2018%20-%20vF.pdf (accessed March 23, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. Klapper. 2003 February. “Resolution of corporate distress in East Asia.” Journal of Empirical Finance 10 (1–2): 199–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-5398(02)00023-3.Search in Google Scholar

Davydenko, S. A., and J. R. Franks. 2008. “Do Bankruptcy Codes Matter? A Study of Defaults in France, Germany, and the U.K.” The Journal of Finance 63: 565–608, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01325.x.Search in Google Scholar

Electrosteel Steels. 2018. Electrosteel Steels List of Creditors as on 02 April 2018. Also Available at http://www.electrosteelsteels.com/investor-relations/pdf/list-of-creditors.pdf (accessed March 23, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Essar Steel. 2019a. Essar Steel Case: NCLT Order on Essar Steel Dated 08 March 2019. Also Available at http://www.essarsteel.com/upload/pdf/NCLT_order_dated_8_March_2019.pdf (accessed March 20, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Essar Steel. 2019b. Essar Steel List of Creditors as on 05 March, 2019. Also Available at http://www.essarsteel.com/upload/pdf/list_of_creditors17.pdf (accessed March 23, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Herrero, C., and A. Villar. 2001. “The Three Musketeers: Four Classical Solutions to Bankruptcy Problems.” Mathematical Social Sciences 42. (3): 307–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4896(01)00075-0.Search in Google Scholar

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India. 2018. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India- Notification dated 05 October, 2018 (Amendment). Also Available at https://ibbi.gov.in/webadmin/pdf/whatsnew/2018/Oct/CIRP%20Amendment-5.10.2018_2018-10-05%2023:21:24.pdf (accessed March 28, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Lowenthal, D. A. 2014. United States: Tough Choices Confront Trade Creditors When A Retailer Faces Bankruptcy. Also Available at https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/InsolvencyBankruptcyRe-structuring/345390/Tough-Choices-Confront-Trade-Creditors-When-A-Retailer-Faces-Bankruptcy (accessed April 17, 2020).Search in Google Scholar

Phadnis, M., and N. Prabhala. 2015 March. Debt Recovery Tribunals in India: A Short Note. CAFRAL working paper. Also Available at http://www.cafral.org.in/sfControl/content/Speech/462016115856AM-Phadnis_Prabhala_Paper_Mar_2015.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Saari, D. G. 1999. “Explaining All Three-Alternative Voting Outcomes.” Journal of Economic Theory 87: 313–55, https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1999.2541.Search in Google Scholar

Safavian, M., and S. Sharma. 2007 September. “When Do Creditor Rights Work?” Journal of Comparative Economics 35 (3): 484–508, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2007.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

Sengupta, R., A. Sharma, and S. Thomas. 2016. Evolution of the Insolvency Framework for Non-financial Firms in India, 2016–8. Mumbai, India: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research.Search in Google Scholar

Swiss Ribbons. 2019. Swiss Ribbons Case: Supreme Court of India Judgement in the Case of Swiss Ribbons Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Union of India & Ors delivered on 25 January 2019. Also Available at https://www.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2018/4653/4653_2018_Judgement_25-Jan-2019.pdf (accessed March 28, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

United Nations. 2005. “United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.” In Legislative Guide on Insolvency Law. Herndon, Virginia: United Nations Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2020-06-25

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 20.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ajle-2020-0017/html
Scroll to top button