International Experience of Applying Transparency Rules in Arbitration Processes Between Investors and States

References

Ajibo, K. I (2015). Confidentiality in international commercial arbitration: Assumptions of implied duty and a proposed solution. Latin American Journal of International Trade Law, 3(2), 332–337.Search in Google Scholar

Al-Louzi, R. M. (2013). A coherence perspective of bilateral investment treaties. Thesis. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester.Search in Google Scholar

Bagner, H. (2001). Confidentiality—A fundamental principle in international commercial arbitration? Journal of International Arbitration, 18(2), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1010957025365.10.54648/338334Search in Google Scholar

Baizeau, D., & Richard, J. (2016). Addressing the issue of confidentiality in arbitration proceedings: How is this done in practice? ASA Special Series, 43, 53–78.Search in Google Scholar

Bernet, M., & Gottlieb, B. (2016). Confidential and restricted data in the award: How do arbitrators draft awards without breaching confidentiality or restrictions? ASA Special Series, 43, 79–94.Search in Google Scholar

Borek, J., & Aust, A. (2001). Modern treaty law and practice. American Journal of International Law, 95(2), 468–470. https://doi.org/10.2307/2661430.10.2307/2661430Search in Google Scholar

Born, G. (2009). International commercial arbitration, Vol. 1. Kluwer Law International.Search in Google Scholar

Bravo, N. (2018). The Mauritius convention on transparency and the multilateral tax instrument: Models for the modification of treaties?. Transnational Corporations, Special Issue on Investment and International Taxation (Part 2), 25(3), 85–109.10.18356/4efe6452-enSearch in Google Scholar

Brown, A. C. (2000). Presumption meets reality: An exploration of the confidentiality obligation in international commercial arbitration. American University International Law Review, 16, 969.Search in Google Scholar

Buys, C. G. (2003). The tensions between confidentiality and transparency in international arbitration. American Review of International Arbitration, 14(121), 13–18.Search in Google Scholar

Dorskii, A. Y., Pavlenko, E. M., Shutikova, N. S., Zubanova, S. G., & Pashentsev, D. A. (2017). Advertisement in the EAEU countries: Law harmonization issues. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 8(7(29)), 2112–2120. https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v8.7(29).07.Search in Google Scholar

Euler, D., & Gehring, M. (2018). Transparency in international investment arbitration. Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Franck, S. D. (2005). The legitimacy crisis in investment arbitration: Privatizing public international law through in-consistent decisions. Fordham Law Review, 73, 980–981.Search in Google Scholar

Friedland, P. D. (2007). Arbitration clauses for international contracts. Juris Publishing, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Garimella, S. R. (2017). Revisiting arbitration’s confidentiality feature. Harmoning Trade Law, 5, 97–126.Search in Google Scholar

Gu, W. (2012). Confidentiality revisited: Blessing or curse in international commercial arbitration? American Review of International Arbitration, 15, 1–29.Search in Google Scholar

HoudeM. F. (2006). Novel features in recent OECD bilateral investment treaties. International Investment Perspectives, 1–35.Search in Google Scholar

ICSID case load – statistics issue 2019-2 (2019). Retrieved from https://icsid.worldbank.org/en/Documents/ICSID_Web_Stats_2019-2_(English).pdf [Accessed 23 June 2019].Search in Google Scholar

Ishikawa, T. (2014). Collective action clauses in sovereign bond contracts and investment treaty arbitration—An approach to reconcile the irreconcilable. Accounting, Economics, and Law: Convivium, 4(2), 63–98. https://doi.org/10.1515/ael-2013-0056.Search in Google Scholar

Issawi, M. (2015). The limits of the stability of the principle of confidentiality in investment arbitration in the face of transparency claims. Ma’araf Magazine: Legal Science Department, 18, 15–18.Search in Google Scholar

Kaufmann-KohlerG., & Potestà, M. (2016). Can the Mauritius Convention serve as a model for the reform of investor-State arbitration in connection with the introduction of a permanent investment tribunal or an appeal mechanism. Analysis and Roadmap, 3, 1–115.Search in Google Scholar

Khalifa, T. M. (2014). International arbitration between confidentiality and transparency. Journal of Law, Faculty of Law, Tanta University, 3, 9–11.Search in Google Scholar

Laverde, S. D. (2011). Analysis of the principle of transparency with special reference to its implications for the procedure of international investment arbitration. Criterio Jurídico, 11(1), 108–109.Search in Google Scholar

Mohan, M., Aziz, S. S., & Singh, K. (2019). Transparency in investment treaty arbitration & Asia’s mixed reception. Indian Journal of International Economic Law, 10, 104.Search in Google Scholar

Newcombe, A. P., & Paradell, L. (2009). Law and practice of investment treaties: Standards of treatment. Kluwer Law International BV.Search in Google Scholar

Nkongho, A. M., & Nyitioseh, N. A. (2018). Confidentiality and transparency: Balancing competing claims under OHADA law on arbitration proceedings. Journal of Taxation and Regulatory Framework, 1(1), 17–39.Search in Google Scholar

Perumal, A. P. S., & Ramamurthy, S. S. (2018). Transparency and confidentiality requirements in investment treaty arbitration. BRICS Law Journal, 5(4), 114–138. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-4-114-138.Search in Google Scholar

Pislevik, S. (2018). Precedent and development of law: Is it time for greater transparency in International Commercial Arbitration?. Arbitration International, 34(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiy008.Search in Google Scholar

Reinisch, A., & Knahr, C. (2007). Transparency versus confidentiality in international investment arbitration—The Biwater Gauff compromise. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 6(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1163/156918507x193131.10.1163/156918507X193131Search in Google Scholar

Reuben, R. C. (2005). Confidentiality in arbitration: beyond the myth. University of Kansas Law Review, 54, 1255.Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, C. A. (2006). Transparency in international commercial arbitration. University of Kansas Law Review, 54, 1301.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitz, A. J. (2005). Untangling the privacy paradox in arbitration. University of Kansas Law Review, 54, 1211.Search in Google Scholar

Shestak, V. A., Volevodz, A. G., & Alizade, V. A. (2019). On the possibility of doctrinal perception of artificial intelligence as the subject of crime in the system of common law: using the example of the U.S. criminal legislation. Russian Journal of Criminology, 13(4), 547–554. In Russian. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(4).547-554.10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(4).547-554Search in Google Scholar

Shirlow, E. (2016). Dawn of a new era? The UNCITRAL rules and UN convention on transparency in treaty-based investor-state arbitration. ICSID Review: Foreign Investment Law Journal, 31(3), 622–654. https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/siw022.10.1093/icsidreview/siw022Search in Google Scholar

Shirlow, E., & Caron, D. D. (2020). The multiple forms of transparency in international investment arbitration: Their implications, and their limits. Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration. Oxford University Press.10.1093/law/9780198796190.003.0019Search in Google Scholar

Stanivukovic, M. D. (2018). Confidentiality and transparency in international arbitration. Zbornik Radova, 52, 449. https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfns52-18945.Search in Google Scholar

Tsindeliani, I. A. (2015). The Russian system of financial law. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2S4), 47.Search in Google Scholar

Veresha, R. (2018). Preventive measures against computer related crimes: Approaching an individual. Informatologia, 51(3–4), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.32914/i.51.3-4.7.10.32914/i.51.3-4.7Search in Google Scholar

Yu, H. L. (2012). Duty of confidentiality: Myth or reality?. Civil Justice Quarterly, 31(1), 68–88.Search in Google Scholar