Home Rococo et fugacité du regard :émergence et modifications de la notion de ‹ papillotage ›
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Rococo et fugacité du regard :émergence et modifications de la notion de ‹ papillotage ›

  • Bérangère Poulain
Published/Copyright: December 30, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The word ‘papillotage’ was introduced into art discourse by Roger de Piles in the late seventeenth century. Then, and throughout the eighteenth century, the term referred to an unpleasant physiological effect on the eye (a flickering effect) created by a disordered pictorial composition or insufficient contrast between colors. From the mid-eighteenth century, however, the term acquired a second and vaguer meaning in the context of moralistic and critical discourses. Essentially, the term became synonymous with superficiality, instability, and frivolity. Used in diatribes against voluptuous paintings, ‘papillotage’ reflected an ideological posture. A similar use of the term is evident in historiographical discourses characterizing Rococo art.

  1. Crédits photographiques : 1 RMN-Grand Palais (Musée du Louvre, Paris) / Franck Raux. – 2 Stockholm, Nationalmuseum. – 3 Richmond, Virginia Museum of Fine Arts. – 4 Boston, Museum of Fine Arts. – 5 Moscou, Musée d’Etat des Beaux-Arts Pouchkine.

Published Online: 2017-12-30

© 2017 Bérangère Poulain, published by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 9.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ZKG-2017-0030/html
Scroll to top button