Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Austronesian Nominalism and the Thinginess Illusion
-
David Gil
Published/Copyright:
July 15, 2009
Published Online: 2009-07-15
Published in Print: 2009-07-01
© 2009 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D-10785 Berlin
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Austronesian Nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study
- Minimalist Questions for the Nominalist Analysis of Tagalog Syntax
- On some ways to test Tagalog nominalism from a crosslinguistic perspective
- Comments on Austronesian nominalism: A Mayan perspective
- Austronesian Nominalism and the Thinginess Illusion
- Notes on Tagalog nominalism
- The lexical category debate in Salish and its relevance for Tagalog
- Nouns, verbs, and hidden structure in Tagalog
- The Category of Predicates and Predicate Phrases in Tagalog: Commentary on Kaufman's article
- Nominalism in Austronesian: A historical typological perspective. Comments on Daniel Kaufman's “Austronesian Nominalism and its consequences”
Articles in the same Issue
- Austronesian Nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study
- Minimalist Questions for the Nominalist Analysis of Tagalog Syntax
- On some ways to test Tagalog nominalism from a crosslinguistic perspective
- Comments on Austronesian nominalism: A Mayan perspective
- Austronesian Nominalism and the Thinginess Illusion
- Notes on Tagalog nominalism
- The lexical category debate in Salish and its relevance for Tagalog
- Nouns, verbs, and hidden structure in Tagalog
- The Category of Predicates and Predicate Phrases in Tagalog: Commentary on Kaufman's article
- Nominalism in Austronesian: A historical typological perspective. Comments on Daniel Kaufman's “Austronesian Nominalism and its consequences”