Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Testing the hypothesis that priming is a motivation for change
-
Elizabeth Closs Traugott
Published/Copyright:
September 1, 2008
Abstract
Some questions are posed concerning issues to investigate when testing the hypothesis that semantic priming contributes to change, especially unidirectionality in change. They include extent of prior context, similarity of semantic primes, and univerbation effects. Ways in which priming could be used to test hypotheses about grammaticalization are suggested in connection with the development of auxiliaries, and the obligatorification of subject markers. Finally, the necessity of distinguishing motivations and mechanisms is outlined.
Published Online: 2008-09-01
Published in Print: 2008-08-01
© 2008 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D-10785 Berlin
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Priming and unidirectional language change
- Implicit learning as a mechanism of language change
- Concept Priming in Language Change
- Testing the hypothesis that priming is a motivation for change
- Priming as a testing ground for historical linguists? – A reply to Chang, Eckardt and Traugott
Articles in the same Issue
- Priming and unidirectional language change
- Implicit learning as a mechanism of language change
- Concept Priming in Language Change
- Testing the hypothesis that priming is a motivation for change
- Priming as a testing ground for historical linguists? – A reply to Chang, Eckardt and Traugott