Home Animacy effects on differential Goal marking
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Animacy effects on differential Goal marking

  • Seppo Kittilä
Published/Copyright: October 27, 2008
Linguistic Typology
From the journal Volume 12 Issue 2

Abstract

This paper examines Differential R Marking (DRM) – i.e., the effects of animacy on the encoding of goals (R), as in ‘a linguist sent a book to the phonetician/to the town’ – from a crosslinguistic perspective. The phenomenon comprises three types, which are distinguished based on whether R can be marked in the same way as the transitive Patient or not (animate Rs usually allow this, while inanimate Rs usually surface as obliques). Even though DRM shares common features with Differential Object Marking (DOM), the two phenomena cannot be explained by the same functions. The findings of this article support the view that differences in object coding (comprising both DRM and DOM) are best explained by affectedness rather than ambiguity avoidance.


Correspondence address: Yleisen kielitieteen laitos, PL 9, 00014 Helsingin yliopisto, Finland; e-mail:

Received: 2005-11-28
Revised: 2007-11-05
Published Online: 2008-10-27
Published in Print: 2008-October

©Walter de Gruyter

Downloaded on 7.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/LITY.2008.038/html
Scroll to top button