Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Constructions on holiday
-
Jeffrey Lidz
Published/Copyright:
February 10, 2009
Abstract
Constructions at Work provides many new empirical observations and sound criticisms of other work. These fail, however, to support Goldberg's two main arguments. They do not undermine the need for innate linguistic structure; nor do they decide for Construction Grammar in particular.
Received: 2007-11-09
Revised: 2008-01-30
Published Online: 2009-02-10
Published in Print: 2009-February
© 2009 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D-10785 Berlin
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Cognitive Linguistics comes of age
- ‘Caused motion’? The semantics of the English to-dative and the Dutch aan-dative
- Fictive dynamicity, nominal aspect, and the Finnish copulative construction
- The role of gesture in crossmodal typological studies
- The nature of generalization in language
- Constructions at work or at rest?
- On Subject-Auxiliary Inversion and the notion “purely formal generalization”
- The case of the missing generalizations
- Constructions and generalizations
- Cognitive (Construction) Grammar
- Constructions on holiday
- Developing constructions
- Constructions work
Articles in the same Issue
- Cognitive Linguistics comes of age
- ‘Caused motion’? The semantics of the English to-dative and the Dutch aan-dative
- Fictive dynamicity, nominal aspect, and the Finnish copulative construction
- The role of gesture in crossmodal typological studies
- The nature of generalization in language
- Constructions at work or at rest?
- On Subject-Auxiliary Inversion and the notion “purely formal generalization”
- The case of the missing generalizations
- Constructions and generalizations
- Cognitive (Construction) Grammar
- Constructions on holiday
- Developing constructions
- Constructions work
