Startseite On Subject-Auxiliary Inversion and the notion “purely formal generalization”
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

On Subject-Auxiliary Inversion and the notion “purely formal generalization”

  • Robert D. Borsley und Frederick J. Newmeyer
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 10. Februar 2009
Cognitive Linguistics
Aus der Zeitschrift Band 20 Heft 1

Abstract

English Subject-Auxiliary Inversion (SAI, hereafter) has been considered by many linguists to be a prime example of a formal generalization that does not allow a characterization in functional or semantic terms. However, Adele Goldberg's target article argues that the internal syntactic form of SAI can indeed by characterized in such terms. We provide a considerable amount of evidence that Goldberg is unsuccessful in her attempt to mount a counter-challenge to the idea that SAI represents a significant purely formal generalization in the grammar of English.


Authors' e-mail: 〈
1068 Seymour St., Vancouver, BC V6B 3M6, Canada. Authors' e-mail: 〈

Received: 2007-07-08
Revised: 2008-01-14
Published Online: 2009-02-10
Published in Print: 2009-February

© 2009 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co. KG, D-10785 Berlin

Heruntergeladen am 2.12.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/COGL.2009.007/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen