Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Reply
-
Geoffrey R Sampson
Published/Copyright:
August 20, 2007
Abstract
1. My thesis restated
The responses to my target article are thoughtful and interesting. It is a matter of regret to me, though, that some of them say little about the issue which I aimed to raise.
Published Online: 2007-08-20
Published in Print: 2007-04-19
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Grammar without grammaticality
- Ungrammaticality, rarity, and corpus use
- Advancing linguistics between the extremes: Some thoughts on Geoffrey R. Sampson's “Grammar without grammaticality”
- Linguistics beyond grammaticality
- Real bad grammar: Realistic grammatical description with grammaticality
- “Good is good and bad is bad”: but how do we know which one we had?
- Take empiricism seriously! In support of methodological diversity in linguistics
- Reply
Articles in the same Issue
- Grammar without grammaticality
- Ungrammaticality, rarity, and corpus use
- Advancing linguistics between the extremes: Some thoughts on Geoffrey R. Sampson's “Grammar without grammaticality”
- Linguistics beyond grammaticality
- Real bad grammar: Realistic grammatical description with grammaticality
- “Good is good and bad is bad”: but how do we know which one we had?
- Take empiricism seriously! In support of methodological diversity in linguistics
- Reply
