Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony: A comment
-
Anatol Stefanowitsch
Published/Copyright:
January 3, 2007
Abstract
In his discussion note, Hilpert outlines an intriguing and very promising application of distinctive collexeme analysis to diachronic data. He tracks lexical associations of the English shall-future from Early Modern English to Present-Day English, showing how shifts in these associations can be related to the semantic development of the construction from ‘obligation’ to ‘intention’.
Published Online: 2007-01-03
Published in Print: 2006-December-01
© Walter de Gruyter
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Gapped coordinations in English: Form, usage, and implications for linguistic theory
- Corpora and introspection as corroborating evidence: The case of preposition placement in English relative clauses
- The internal structure of four-noun compounds in English and German
- A note on quantifying ‘good’ and ‘bad’ prosodies
- Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony
- Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony: A comment
- Contents Volume 2 (2006)
Articles in the same Issue
- Gapped coordinations in English: Form, usage, and implications for linguistic theory
- Corpora and introspection as corroborating evidence: The case of preposition placement in English relative clauses
- The internal structure of four-noun compounds in English and German
- A note on quantifying ‘good’ and ‘bad’ prosodies
- Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony
- Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony: A comment
- Contents Volume 2 (2006)
