Home Decision criteria for rational selection of homogeneous genotyping platforms for pharmacogenomics testing in clinical diagnostics
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Decision criteria for rational selection of homogeneous genotyping platforms for pharmacogenomics testing in clinical diagnostics

  • Raffaele Di Francia , Ferdinando Frigeri , Massimiliano Berretta , Erika Cecchin , Claudio Orlando , Antonio Pinto and Pamela Pinzani
Published/Copyright: March 2, 2010

Abstract

Background: Genotyping is crucial for the identification of genetic markers underlying the development of neoplastic diseases and for determining individual variations in response to specific drugs. Technologies which can accurately identify genetic polymorphisms will dramatically affect routine diagnostic processes and future therapeutic developments in personalized medicine. However, such methods need to fulfill the principles of analytical validation to determine their suitability to assess nucleotide polymorphisms in target genes.

Approach: This article reviews recent developments in homogeneous technologies for the genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms. Here, homogeneous methods essentially refer to “single-tube” assays performed in a liquid phase. For the appropriate choice of any method, several criteria must be considered: 1) detection of known genetic variations; 2) analytical performance including specificity, sensitivity and robustness of the method; 3) availability of large platforms and required equipment; 4) suitability of platforms and tests for routine diagnostics; 5) suitability for high throughput implementation.

Content: This review is intended to provide the reader with an understanding of these various technologies for pharmacogenomic testing in the routine clinical laboratory. A brief overview is provided on the available technologies for the detection of known mutations, a specific description of the homogeneous platforms currently employed in genotyping analysis, and considerations regarding the proper assessment of the analytical performance of these methods. Based on the criteria proposed here, potential users may evaluate advantages and limitations of the various analytical platforms and identify the most appropriate platform according to their specific setting and diagnostic needs.

Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:447–59.


Corresponding authors: Antonio Pinto and Raffaele Di Francia, Hematology-Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione “G. Pascale”, IRCCS, Via Mariano Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy Phone: +39 81 5903 382/+39 81 5903 635, Fax: +39 81 5903 833, ;

Received: 2009-10-5
Accepted: 2009-12-11
Published Online: 2010-03-2
Published in Print: 2010-04-01

©2010 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorials
  2. Molecular biology and genetics in clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
  3. Improving the post-analytical phase
  4. Reviews
  5. State of the art in therapeutic drug monitoring
  6. Decision criteria for rational selection of homogeneous genotyping platforms for pharmacogenomics testing in clinical diagnostics
  7. Reference Values and Biological Variations
  8. Assessment of critical values policies in Italian institutions: comparison with the US situation
  9. Genetics and Molecular Diagnostics
  10. Performance evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV Genotype II for hepatitis C virus genotyping
  11. Genotyping mitochondrial DNA single nucleotide polymorphisms by PCR ligase detection reactions
  12. FOXL2 mutations in Taiwanese patients with blepharophimosis, ptosis, epicanthus inversus syndrome
  13. Low expression of human β-defensin 1 in duodenum of celiac patients is partially restored by a gluten-free diet
  14. General Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
  15. Evaluation of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A in the detection of inflammatory and infectious diseases in children
  16. Procalcitonin measurement in routine emergency medicine practice: comparison between two immunoassays
  17. Clinical application of a lectin-antibody ELISA to measure fucosylated haptoglobin in sera of patients with pancreatic cancer
  18. Simultaneous determination of serum tryptophan metabolites in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus by high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection
  19. Beware of carryover in modern chemistry analyzers
  20. Correlation between glucose and bupivacaine levels in cerebrospinal fluid after spinal anesthesia: glycorrhachia as predictor for duration of sensory block
  21. Comparison of different depletion strategies for improving resolution of the human urine proteome
  22. Cardiovascular Diseases
  23. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A as a marker for long-term mortality in patients with peripheral atherosclerosis: inconclusive findings from the Linz Peripheral Arterial Disease (LIPAD) study
  24. Association of matrix metalloproteinase 9 genotypes and cardiovascular disease risk factors with serum matrix metalloproteinase 9 concentrations in Taiwanese individuals
  25. C-reactive protein variants are not associated with susceptibility to stroke and stroke recurrence
  26. Association of hyperhomocysteinemia with left ventricular dilatation and mass in human heart
  27. A methodological reappraisal of total and high molecular weight adiponectin determination in human peripheral circulation: comparison of four immunometric assays
  28. Letters to the Editor
  29. High specificity but low sensitivity of the cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) test in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis
  30. Disparity in estimated average glucose due to different hemoglobin A1c methods and hemoglobin S trait
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2010.112/pdf?lang=en
Scroll to top button