Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Does external evaluation of laboratories improve patient safety?
-
Michael A. Noble
Published/Copyright:
June 19, 2007
Abstract
Laboratory accreditation and External Quality Assessment (also called proficiency testing) are mainstays of laboratory quality assessment and performance. Both practices are associated with examples of improved laboratory performance. The relationship between laboratory performance and improved patient safety is more difficult to assess because of the many variables that are involved with patient outcome. Despite this difficulty, the argument to continue external evaluation of laboratories is too compelling to consider the alternative.
Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:753–5.
Published Online: 2007-06-19
Published in Print: 2007-06-01
©2007 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Foreword
- Errors in laboratory medicine and patient safety: the road ahead
- How can we make laboratory testing safer?
- “Pre-pre” and “post-post” analytical error: high-incidence patient safety hazards involving the clinical laboratory
- Risk management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing
- Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories
- Effects of analytic variations in creatinine measurements on the classification of renal disease using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
- Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories
- Reduction of multi-dimensional laboratory data to a two-dimensional plot: a novel technique for the identification of laboratory error
- Does external evaluation of laboratories improve patient safety?
- Risk management in laboratory medicine: quality assurance programs and professional competence
- Point-of-care testing, medical error, and patient safety: a 2007 assessment
- Blood gas and patient safety: considerations based on experience developed in accordance with the Risk Management perspective
- The role of in vitro diagnostic companies in reducing laboratory error
- Application of the Six Sigma concept in clinical laboratories: a review
- One hundred years of laboratory testing and patient safety
Articles in the same Issue
- Foreword
- Errors in laboratory medicine and patient safety: the road ahead
- How can we make laboratory testing safer?
- “Pre-pre” and “post-post” analytical error: high-incidence patient safety hazards involving the clinical laboratory
- Risk management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing
- Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories
- Effects of analytic variations in creatinine measurements on the classification of renal disease using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
- Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories
- Reduction of multi-dimensional laboratory data to a two-dimensional plot: a novel technique for the identification of laboratory error
- Does external evaluation of laboratories improve patient safety?
- Risk management in laboratory medicine: quality assurance programs and professional competence
- Point-of-care testing, medical error, and patient safety: a 2007 assessment
- Blood gas and patient safety: considerations based on experience developed in accordance with the Risk Management perspective
- The role of in vitro diagnostic companies in reducing laboratory error
- Application of the Six Sigma concept in clinical laboratories: a review
- One hundred years of laboratory testing and patient safety
