Point-of-care testing, medical error, and patient safety: a 2007 assessment
-
Sharon S. Ehrmeyer
Abstract
Point-of-care testing (POCT) is the fastest growing segment of a US$30 billion worldwide market. “Errors” in the testing process, as well as medical data interpretation and treatment associated with POCT, are recognized as leading to major compromises of patient safety. In today's environment, most testing errors (pre-analytical, analytical and post-analytical) can be virtually eliminated by proper design of testing systems. We cite examples of two systems that have made exceptional progress in this respect. It has been recently suggested that the basic errors associated with the testing process are amplified in the POC setting. Two of the amplifiers – incoherent regulations and failure of clinician/caregivers to respond appropriately to POCT results – lead us to recognize additional changes in today's POCT environment. The first is a willingness of manufacturers, not laboratories, to take responsibility for the quality of test results – an outgrowth of an industrial philosophy called autonomation. The second is a need to substantially modify the clinician/caregiver test utilization paradigm to take full advantage of POCT results, available on site in real time. Both have already begun to take place.
Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:766–73.
©2007 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin New York
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Foreword
- Errors in laboratory medicine and patient safety: the road ahead
- How can we make laboratory testing safer?
- “Pre-pre” and “post-post” analytical error: high-incidence patient safety hazards involving the clinical laboratory
- Risk management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing
- Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories
- Effects of analytic variations in creatinine measurements on the classification of renal disease using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
- Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories
- Reduction of multi-dimensional laboratory data to a two-dimensional plot: a novel technique for the identification of laboratory error
- Does external evaluation of laboratories improve patient safety?
- Risk management in laboratory medicine: quality assurance programs and professional competence
- Point-of-care testing, medical error, and patient safety: a 2007 assessment
- Blood gas and patient safety: considerations based on experience developed in accordance with the Risk Management perspective
- The role of in vitro diagnostic companies in reducing laboratory error
- Application of the Six Sigma concept in clinical laboratories: a review
- One hundred years of laboratory testing and patient safety
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Foreword
- Errors in laboratory medicine and patient safety: the road ahead
- How can we make laboratory testing safer?
- “Pre-pre” and “post-post” analytical error: high-incidence patient safety hazards involving the clinical laboratory
- Risk management in the preanalytical phase of laboratory testing
- Recommendations for detection and management of unsuitable samples in clinical laboratories
- Effects of analytic variations in creatinine measurements on the classification of renal disease using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)
- Process and risk analysis to reduce errors in clinical laboratories
- Reduction of multi-dimensional laboratory data to a two-dimensional plot: a novel technique for the identification of laboratory error
- Does external evaluation of laboratories improve patient safety?
- Risk management in laboratory medicine: quality assurance programs and professional competence
- Point-of-care testing, medical error, and patient safety: a 2007 assessment
- Blood gas and patient safety: considerations based on experience developed in accordance with the Risk Management perspective
- The role of in vitro diagnostic companies in reducing laboratory error
- Application of the Six Sigma concept in clinical laboratories: a review
- One hundred years of laboratory testing and patient safety
